In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Happy Asian Lunar New Year!

My Barack Obama Special Edition Wall Calendar tells me that today is the Asian Lunar New Year, and the Times confirms that it’s the Year of the Ox. The Earth Ox.

I’m a water pig, which means I’m honest, straightforward and patient (honest and straightforward? Sure. Patient? Not in a million years). I’m apparently also shy (ha), modest (haha), self-indulgent (true), and too sensitive (really true).

What are you?

Here’s hoping it’s a good year.

Shameless Self-Promotion Sunday

Post a short summary of something you’ve written this week, along with a link. Don’t just link to your whole blog — make it specific.

So I know we’re all tired of talking about Rick Warren…

But it’s probably worth mentioning that his church promotes a view that domestic violence isn’t grounds for divorce. It’s a more “liberal” view than some other churches — Saddleback basically says that if you’re being beaten “regularly,” you may have grounds for separation (but not divorce), where as other churches assert that you either bring beatings on yourself or they’re part of wifely submission — but as Kathryn Joyce explains in her article, the entire submissive wife framework enables abuse, and makes it much more difficult for women in those churches to get out of abusive situations.

The good news is that Christian women are forming and disseminating Biblical justifications for leaving abusive relationships. The bad news is that influential mega-churches like Saddleback seem not to have taken notice.

Natalie Dylan Speaks Out

Yesterday, an article from Natalie Dylan — the pseudonym of the women’s study student who is auctioning off her virginity — appeared in The Daily Beast.  She now claims that the auction is more than a way to pay for grad school, as previously reported, but also a sociological experiment.  The article makes for an interesting read.  I recommend checking out the whole thing (it’s not very long), but these two paragraphs struck me as most relevant for discussion:

When I learned this, it became apparent to me that idealized virginity is just a tool to keep women in their place. But then I realized something else: if virginity is considered that valuable, what’s to stop me from benefiting from that? It is mine, after all. And the value of my chastity is one level on which men cannot compete with me. I decided to flip the equation, and turn my virginity into something that allows me to gain power and opportunity from men. I took the ancient notion that a woman’s virginity is priceless and used it as a vehicle for capitalism.

Are you rolling your eyes? I knew this experiment would bring me condemnation. But I’m not saying every forward-thinking person has to agree with what I’m doing. You should develop your own personal belief system—that’s exactly my point! For me, valuing virginity as sacred is simply not a concept I could embrace. But valuing virginity monetarily—now that’s a concept I could definitely get behind. I no longer view the selling of sex as wrong or immoral—my time at college showed me that I had too blindly accepted such arbitrary norms. And for what it’s worth, the winning bid won’t necessarily be the highest—I get to choose.

I hesitate to ask this question, feeling like the results are likely to divide along the common “anti-prostitution” and “sex-positive” feminist lines, but I’m also hoping that we might be able to have the conversation respectfully.  So, what do you think?

For my part, I’m personally uncomfortable with the concept of selling sex, especially within the context of a patriarchy, but also believes that one has a right to do with their body what they will.  I further think that Dylan is likely telling the truth about her intentions, and have thought the same things about this being an interesting example of how our society values virginity while watching this play out.  As someone who is rather resentful of the social construct of virginity and how it is used against women, I really do like that aspect and think it’s quite subversive, at the same time as I have the conflicting thought that it’s not so subversive (if again, still not morally objectionable in my view) to partake in “the world’s oldest profession.”

For what it’s worth, I think that Renee’s essay on this subject over at Global Comment is also quite good.

Discuss.

Thanks to Anna for the link.

Complicated and Conflicting Thoughts on Bill Baird

The other night, for the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, I attended an event in Rochester, NY with reproductive rights activist Bill Baird.  Until this event, I had never really heard of Bill Baird. I had heard of his famous Supreme Court case, Baird v. Eisenstadt, though I couldn’t cite it by name.  But upon learning who Baird was, I was immediately intrigued.

Who is Bill Baird?  Well, as stated, he was the defendant in Baird v. Eisenstadt, a very important case that not many people know.  Baird v. Eisenstadt built off of the famous Griswold v. Connecticut case, which said that the right to privacy means it is unconstitutional to outlaw contraception for married people, to rule that the same was true for unmarried people.  The case came up after Baird was arrested for giving contraceptive foam to a single 19-year-old woman (who was, at the time, considered a minor).  The decision contains the famous and significant line “If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child.”  Importantly, its conclusions regarding privacy are the basis for the Roe v. Wade decision, where it is quoted several times, as well as the gay rights ruling Lawrence v. Texas.

Baird has been arrested 8 times in 5 different states for lecturing on birth control, including once where he was accused of endangering a minor because there was a 14-month-old infant in the audience.  He claims both to have introduced the first gay rights bill in 1969, and to have set up the nation’s first abortion clinic, illegally.  He is on anti-choice hit lists, has had a bullet come through his living room window, and had his health clinic firebombed by an anti-choice zealot.  He was also the defendant in the important Belotti v. Baird Supreme Court decision, which struck down a strict Massachusetts parental consent laws for minors seeking abortions.  Throughout all of it, he was refused the help of reproductive rights organizations, and publicly mocked and condemned not only by them but by prominent feminists such as Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem.

I learned all of this during his talk, and much, much more, which I am still turning over in my head.

Baird is, in a word, eccentric.  Of course, there’s a lot more to say about him than that.  After all, if the only thing you can say about a person is “he’s eccentric,” you’re almost certainly using the word wrong.

Read More…Read More…

Your tax dollars at work

Hat tip to Joe at Advocates for Youth

The good folks at the AIDS Taskforce of Greater Cleveland were kind enough to send this info to me touting the work of one Derek Dye, the latest in the long, funny and sad line of abstinence-only sex education heroes. Dye uses his juggling clown schtick to draw the middle school kids’ attention, and then… Wham!

“Having sex before you are married is just like juggling machetes!”

“Sex before marriage will destroy all of your life’s dreams!”

As clownish as Dye’s words may sound to you, they are unfortunately not rare ones for young people to hear in classrooms all over the country. Thanks to George W. Bush and a complicit Congress, we have spent $1.5 billion to fund abstinence-only until marriage sex education in our public schools. And yes, that money goes to people like Derek Dye, as he is employed by the Elizabeth New Life Center that received a $800,000 CBAE grant in 2007 to promote abstinence until marriage. His qualifications? A “Bachelor of Fun Arts” from Barnum Bailey Clown College, and an abstinence educator certification that can be purchased for $50.

The video’s been pulled from YouTube and so isn’t on Joe’s post anymore, but if you’re really curious, there’s a clip on the clown’s website. I’m trying to imagine how seriously I’d have taken this guy when I was… how old are you in 7th grade, 12 or 13?

I especially appreciate his “dreams are delicate and easily destroyed” message. Actually, I want my kid to know that if he messes up, it doesn’t at all mean he can’t still achieve his dreams. No, I don’t particularly want him drinking, smoking, having sex, or smoking pot – you know, ever – but if he does I wouldn’t want him thinking it’s the end of the world. We will deal with it. I don’t know about you, but I was so dramatic at that age and the last thing I’d need is this clown adding fuel to the fire.

The Obamas do WHAT now?

This Fox News “sex expert” really must be an expert on the Obamas’ sex life to know how much fisting they do!  Enough to emphasize it, apparently!

I’m, uh, guessing that she meant fist bump. Oops. Guess we know what’s on someone’s mind.

I’m just saying.

h/t List of Now

Breaking: Obama Reverses the Global Gag Rule

It’s official. The gag rule is no more.  (At least until our next anti-choice president, if legislative action isn’t also taken.)

International funding can now go to organizations that provide abortions with other funding, or simply offer counseling about abortion as an option from a different provider.  Desperately poor women with high risk pregnancies won’t have to die because their doctor can’t tell them about termination options.  Many will have more access to safe abortion care, and won’t die or face permanent injury due to risky do-it-yourself procedures.  Women won’t have to get pregnant because their local birth control clinic had to choose between no funding or substandard, dishonest care, and subsequently closed down.

Yes, he’s a day late.  And no, I haven’t quite forgiven him yet for his supposed reasoning on that.  But mainly, I’m just letting out one of the biggest sighs of reliefs I’ve ever sighed.

This is what change can mean. Thousands of women’s lives saved.  And after the past 8 years of this deadly policy, it’s about time.

For an objective look at what the Global Gag Rule entailed, check out this fact sheet from Reuters.  For the pro-choice version, see Planned Parenthood.

Thanks to Colleen for the link to the confirmation I’ve been waiting for all day!