In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Links: In, around, and about Baltimore (Updated 5/1)

In the wake of Freddie Gray’s death from injuries mysteriously sustained while in police custody two weeks ago, and following his funeral yesterday, people in Baltimore have protested — some of it peaceful, much of it, as of Monday afternoon, violent, and with staggering consequence. Now, as the community comes back out into their neighborhoods, peaceful protesters continue to gather to voice their frustrations, and a lot of other people have things to say, too.

You’re a lesbian? Prove it.

TRIGGER WARNING: VIOLENT HOMOPHOBIA, XENOPHOBIA, PROBABLY RACISM

That’s what you have to do if you’re seeking asylum in the UK. Perhaps your family and your partner of 20 years have been killed. Perhaps you’re sentenced to stoning in your country of origin. Perhaps you jump through the necessary hoops and produce private, personal photographs and even a video of your sexual activities.

Is that good enough? Have you proven you’re a lesbian yet?

Apparently not to the government prosecutors of the UK.

Maybe you foolishly took measures to try and save your own life in Nigeria–tried to live undercover, married a man, even had kids (I mean, everybody knows lesbians can’t have kids, right? And real lesbians have never dated a man ever in their lives. Hey, maybe if you just explained you were bisexual, that sentence of stoning would be commuted!). Maybe you made the, um, “mistake” of “looking feminine” in Nigeria, either because you were femme or because you didn’t want to be killed. (Everybody knows lesbians never look feminine, right?)

A judge is ruling on Aderonke Apata’s case in weeks.

In my opinion, this is about the intersection of misogyny, homophobia, heterosexism (ever had a penis in your vagina? that penis is so powerful that it makes you straight no matter what else you’ve experienced.), anti-immigration sentiment, and yes, racism. It’s about the devaluing of a woman’s life, the dismissal of her trauma and of her identity because her lesbian experience doesn’t conform to some prosecutorial ideal, because she’s black, and because she’s an immigrant. Apata’s lesbianism is on trial, and 10 bucks says it’s not other lesbians who are ruling on it. (That wouldn’t make it OK, but there’s something particularly grotesque about a bunch of straight people sitting around passing judgment on whether or not somebody is a “real” lesbian and deciding that she doesn’t measure up to their bigoted white-centered stereotypes.)

Asylum for Aderonke Facebook page.

UK taxes are paying for these insults, just as my taxes go to the right-wing’s faith-based initiatives here in the US and the racist war on drugs and suchlike. And yet forced-birthers whine that they shouldn’t have to fund abortion because they “morally object” to it. Well, I morally object to any number of things in my own country, and what the UK is doing to Apata.

Philosophy, liberalism, and race: Falguni A. Sheth in the NYT

I found this interview in the NYT the other day about the philosophy of liberalism and its dependence on racism to be fascinating (let me hasten to say that nobody who has read Engels on the Irish, for example, could possibly say that radical leftism is not similarly based on racism). I do think it’s more important in the context of the US to understand the relationship between liberalism and racism because the US is a nation-state that is more or less based on liberal philosophies that largely can’t bear to hear any indication that such philosophies might be fallible (What did the founding fathers intend? Well, who gives a fuck what a bunch of rich slave-owning gentile white men intended? I’m not convinced they were bearing my best interests in mind.).

The Oscars: A Twitter-Eye View

I didn’t watch the Oscars because nobody was paying me to, but I did follow my friends watching them on Twitter, and here is what I gather:

1) Patricia Arquette made the stupidest white mainstream feminist plea for equal pay ever, claiming that “gays” and people of color need now to step up and fight for equal pay for women. Things she failed to mention: lots of gay people and people of color are women. Pretty much half of them, I’d say. More things she failed to mention: the pay gap between white men and white women is bad, but nowhere near as bad as that between white men and black women, or white men and Native American women, or white men and…you get the picture. Also, the implication that gay people and people of color owe [white] women something because “we’ve” been “fighting for them” and they’ve had enough time in the spotlight? Straight out untrue and obnoxious. Arquette, no doubt your intentions are good, but try to think next time.

2) The same crowd that apparently went wild over Arquette’s speech was silent and uncomfortable when Common and John Legend spoke about the mass incarceration of black men in the US. Fantastic.

3) Lest you think that Hollywood even gives two shits about white women–even famous white women in their clubhouse–they once again invited wife-beater and rapist extraordinaire Sean Penn to the stage, this time to give the Oscar for Best Picture. When the winner turned out to be Birdman, he reminded everyone how revolting he was by making a racist joke about the film’s director, Alejandro González Iñárritu. Apparently Iñárritu handled the situation with grace and dignity, calling on Mexicans in the US to fight for the respect that is their due, and Penn’s defenders immediately took to the internets to say it was totes OK because Penn was only joking, and anyway, Penn and Iñárritu are friends. Which is weird, because maybe I have this “friendship” thing completely backwards, but I always thought that part of being someone’s friend is not making racist jokes about them.

I’ve seen a lot of tweets about how Hollywood’s liberalism is a façade, and I’m going to say something controversial here: no, it’s not. This is liberalism. Liberalism is very good at handling the rights of the individual; liberalism posits that the structures of power as we know them are fine, it’s just that everybody should have access; liberalism wants us to all be friends. It’s not terribly good at power dynamics based on group membership and intersecting identity categories and axes of oppression and exploitation; it’s deeply uncomfortable with calls to dismantle institutions and power structures as they stand; it has a really hard time admitting that sometimes you have to take sides and fight. And that’s why the Hollywood audience went wild for Arquette, didn’t want to deal with what Legend and Common were saying, and keeps pretending Sean Penn is a fine human being. And it’s why traditional liberalism on its own, without the threat of the radical left lurking in the wings, is terribly weak sauce. Let me quote Barbara Ehrenreich, from one of my favorite of her essays:

“I can’t wait for the liberals to make a comeback, and not because I am one of them. When the liberals went underground, it was left to the rejects of the Democratic party–the feminists, peace activists, rainbow coalitionists, socialists, union militants–to hold up the liberal banner. We were left to defend social programs, like welfare and Medicaid, that were never halfway adequate in the first place, and to argue–a little wearily–for the mild reforms that might make life marginally more secure for the average person. What else was there to do in such a desolate political landscape, with no one…occupying the long expanse between us, on the left, and the likes of Jimmy Swaggart on the far, far right? But if the Democrats find the courage to get back to their business–working for the slow and piecemeal reform of our far-from-perfect society–maybe we’ll be able to get back to ours. And that is, as it has always been, to insist that slow and piecemeal reform is just not good enough.” (The Worst Years of Our Lives. HarperCollinsPublishers: New York, 1990. 81.)

What did I miss by watching the Oscars only via Twitter? Let me know in the comments section.

Seasalt & Co. advertises Photoshop tools using lynching imagery and only gets more offensive from there

[Content note for lynching imagery]

Now, some might see an eerie, atmospheric black-and-white shot of a tree with a noose hanging from it, titled, “The Hanging Tree,” and think, “Oh, God, lynching.” Accompany that image with an all-caps, italic COMING SOON, and some might think, “Wow, that’s verging on threatening.” But if you look at those things and think, “I bet there’s a new Photoshop action pack coming out, and I for one can. Not. Wait,” then either you work for Florida creative tool company Seasalt & Co. or are a friend of theirs and need to step in and tell them to get a grip.

Three young Muslim students murdered

I’ve been trying to find a good link for this story on and off all morning, but I can’t. I’m pulling together what I’m reading off my Twitter feed. If anybody has a good link, please leave it in comments and I’ll add it to the post.

Update: here’s a link, with thanks to Pseudonym.

So apparently an aggressive white atheist by the name of Craig Stephen Hicks murdered three Muslim students at Chapel Hill yesterday, newlyweds Deah Barakat, 23, a second-year student in UNC’s School of Dentistry, and Yusor Mohammad, 21, who was going to enter dental school in the fall. Mohammad’s sister, Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19, a sophomore in college, was visiting them and also murdered.

I’m not getting a whole lot of information here, but I think it’s quite telling that despite Facebook posts denouncing both radical Muslims and radical Christians, Hicks chose to go after young Muslim students who seem to have been devoted to good works, traveling to provide free dental care to those in need, etc. That’s what it means to live in an atmosphere of Islamophobia, aided and abetted by those in US government.

Marissa Alexander: Out of prison, still being punished

As noted yesterday, Marissa Alexander was released from prison yesterday. She has been, however, sentenced to two years’ of house arrest (after having spent three years in prison already), all for the crime of, nine days after having given birth, firing a warning shot at her estranged abusive ex-husband who was threatening to kill her (you can find this info, and the citations, on Wikipedia–I know we’re all pissed at Wikipedia right now, and for good reason, but I don’t see a reason not to trust the article). She had tried to escape through the garage, but the garage door wouldn’t open, at which point she got her gun out of her car and returned to the house, which is when her ex threatened to kill her. Her ex, Rico Gray and his son, who was present, corroborate every bit of this, and other women who have been involved with Gray confirm that he’s an abusive asshole.

Angela Corey’s vendetta, and decision to attempt to go for a sixty year sentence, has been documented already here. Angela Corey feels that Alexander fired the gun “in anger, not fear.” Apparently, if you’re a black woman in Florida, you are not allowed to let anger at being abused and threatened taint your fear of your abuser. Do we need to talk about how this plays into racist tropes of the Angry Black Woman? That what Corey is saying here is that as an Angry Black Woman, Alexander did not have properly ladylike emotions, and therefore should be punished?

Anger is a legitimate response to abuse. This is something I had to reiterate in very different circumstances, when I was running a petition regarding a friend who had been sexually harassed and her attempts at redress. Women are allowed to be angry. Black women are allowed to be angry. A woman can be angry and still need to defend herself.

Under you learn something new every day, I did not know that Alexander is required to pay for the ankle bracelet monitoring her movements and keeping her under house arrest. As the email that was sent to me by Free Marissa Now notes, this bracelet extends state surveillance and control into Alexander’s very home, and forcing her to pay for it is part of the privatization of the prison industry (please see Maya Schwerner’s article for more on the former, and Professor Beth Richie’s piece for more on the latter).

As far as I’m concerned, no matter what pieties the courts may mouth about this, they have no credibility. They have no place sitting in judgment on a woman trying to defend herself in her own home. That’s all I have to say right now. I’d like to find the text of Judge Daniel’s ruling/statement, but no luck so far.

Marissa Alexander released from prison

I have every intention of writing a longer post about this, but today got away from me. I just want to note that Marissa Alexander was released from prison today, and is now under house arrest for two years. More tomorrow, I promise.

Holocaust Remembrance Day

So, today, 1/27, is Holocaust Remembrance Day, and this is the Primo Levi quotation making the rounds on my Twitter feed:

It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.

The Drowned and the Saved

Nowhere is so “civilized” that its people can’t descend into rabid genocide; Until the Holocaust, Germany had won renown for the “German-Jewish symbiosis,” the way Germany and its Jews had created culture and lived together.

I want to take this opportunity to talk about group membership and intergenerational trauma. My family has been in the US for over 100 years; I’m the…fifth fourth generation born in the US on my mother’s side, and the fourth third on my father’s. Here are some quotations from my family:

My grandmother, to my mother when she was a little girl: “Remember, if you ever have to flee, Ireland has never persecuted its Jews.” (What they didn’t know at the time was that Eamon de Valera saw the Nazis as kindred spirits, nationalists trying to claim Germany for Germans, and refused to take in any Jewish refugees post-war, even while granting asylum to highly placed Nazis. This came out a few years back.)

My mother, to me, when I was a little girl. We were getting our passports renewed, and I had asked if we were going somewhere. When my mother said no, I asked why we were bothering, then: “We’re Jews, so we always have to be ready to flee.” To this day, I keep my passport in my purse at all times.

My mother, to me, more recently. We had been discussing Israel. I had been raised as anti-Zionist as it is possible to me and my mother was now expressing some ambivalence over that: “The Holocaust ended five years before I was born. Am I just supposed to take on faith that it can’t happen again?”

My therapist, a Jewish woman of my mother’s generation. I had been talking about this statement of my mother’s, and mentioned that even if I ever had to flee to Israel, I doubted they would take me, because I don’t have any paperwork proving I’m Jewish. I would have to get my great-grandmother’s burial records, my grandmother’s birth and marriage certificate, my mother’s birth and marriage certificate, and my birth certificate, and what were the odds that I was going to be able to pull all those together as I was fleeing?: “You should start getting them together now, so you have them ready. Just in case.”

My father: “Never miss the opportunity to kill a (neo-)Nazi. Because they’d do the same to you.”

Not one of these people was joking, even half-way.

I can’t speak about my therapist’s family, but I know for a fact that nobody in my family has suffered significant trauma due to anti-Semitism since my great-grandparents’ generation. Sure, individual incidents here and there–my first significant boyfriend lied to his grandfather about my being Jewish and during the ensuing fight, compared my being Jewish to his cousin’s cocaine problem and said his grandfather was an old man who “shouldn’t have to worry” about the possibility of his great-grandchildren being Jewish–but nothing on a life-choices-abridging institutional level, as far as I know, since leaving Eastern Europe (good call, (great-)great-grandparents, and I’m very grateful). These comments are all about group membership, group trauma, and intergenerational memory.

What I’m saying is that I’ve long suspected that the effects of group trauma last a long time. It’s well established that trauma can be conveyed unto a second generation (the best analogy I ever heard was that it’s like growing up in a house where for years before you were born, there was a giant hole in the porch that nobody had money to fix. Then they finally fix it, but everyone is so used to walking around the space where the hole was that they keep on doing it, and you do it too, because that’s how everyone walks, and you never even know the reason why. I think about this a lot when I have reactions that seem more appropriate to my mother given her childhood experiences than me.). But I was fascinated by this article outlining work being done on the cumulative effects of generation upon generation of trauma. I was less convinced by its use of African-Americans and Native Americans as examples, because those groups are still living in an ongoing traumatic situation–it’s less convincing to me. But when it comes to Jews in the US…I can’t help but wonder if this is why we’re all so fantastically neurotic. I’m a little facetious here, but only a little. My family, my friends–we’re all a bunch of anxious, depressive neurotics. Is this the after-effects of generation upon generation of violent trauma, of not being able to feel or be safe anywhere? I don’t know. But I found the article really suggestive.

And yet…as the article itself says, there’s a very bad history to locating the cause of injuries in the injured person rather than in the experience of injury. The idea that some people are just more predisposed to misery and that’s that, rather than spurring medical interventions, has all too often been used as an excuse for luckier people to shrug their shoulders and reassure themselves that they deserve their place at the top of the heap. Or sometimes it’s spurred horrific medical interventions. I don’t want to open the door to that sort of thing. On the other hand, I think it speaks to the power of repeated group trauma that it may be able to imprint itself on the biology of those three or four generations later, and give us all the more reason to fight against such horrors. I don’t know.

Thoughts?