In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Seasalt & Co. advertises Photoshop tools using lynching imagery and only gets more offensive from there

[Content note for lynching imagery]

Now, some might see an eerie, atmospheric black-and-white shot of a tree with a noose hanging from it, titled, “The Hanging Tree,” and think, “Oh, God, lynching.” Accompany that image with an all-caps, italic COMING SOON, and some might think, “Wow, that’s verging on threatening.” But if you look at those things and think, “I bet there’s a new Photoshop action pack coming out, and I for one can. Not. Wait,” then either you work for Florida creative tool company Seasalt & Co. or are a friend of theirs and need to step in and tell them to get a grip.

That was the image (briefly) on Seasalt’s Facebook page to tease the upcoming release of the action suite, and no sooner was it up than people were seeing it and blanching at the imagery that, intentional or not, can’t be separated from a time when “lynch mob” wasn’t just a hyperbolic euphemism for an Internet pile-on.

Comments and shares started pouring in — including those from people who were offended at the imagery of a noose hanging from a tree, which has become synonymous with racial terror and the lynching of black people in U.S. history. Many user comments had been removed from the Facebook post; the first that appeared from the company itself was a reply thanking a supporter “for thinking outside the box on this. Being hung wasn’t designed just for one race of people. There is a long standing history and more to what is being seen in this advertising image. It represents so much more.”

The image — and all associated comments — was quickly removed and replaced with a nonpology that has also been removed.

Those with concerns about a product of ours, should take proper measures to support their claims. This certain product is not meant to offend anyone nor directed toward any persons, nor has anything to do any certain race. Coming to this page or going to other outlets to express your emotions will not remedy a cure, but spread hate. We have no broken any rights any American has. If you feel your rights are being violated, please contact the civil rights department with your concerns. With or without ones support, we will continue to design our product as it was intended to be made. We are sorry for all those that feel offended, you’re not required to agree with or purchase any of our products. There has been a huge misunderstanding what this product represents. We have given several attempts to explain what it is about and it has been apparent our efforts do not matter to those unwilling to make reason and listen. Our product is about having “freedom” not the act of causing anymore harm. We as a company are using our artistic freedom and expression to take a stand and will continue to do so.

To be perfectly clear: The stand they’re taking in the name of freedom and artistic freedom and expression is hawking a set of soon-to-be-released Photoshop actions.

To be even clearer: People who find this offensive should direct themselves to the civil rights department.

Because this collection of Photoshop actions is about taking back freedom and refusing to be hated against by the industry mobs joining to bully and ridicule artist[s] and hang them up and ruin their lively hoods. The noose just represents being hung, y’all. And Seasalt & Co. refuses to be hung anymore. People where hung for nothing other than hate, and Seasalt is tired of hate. They’re moving on.

As you might expect, people objected, including people on social media, including one Rachel Stewart, a jewelry designer and artist who engaged them in a dialogue and, in so doing, gave them a whole lot more time, patience, and respect to these assbags than any saint should be expected to give.

And Seasalt doubled down.

And then…

To be perfectly crystal clear: Stewart offered to further share their openly posted social media content on social media, and Seasalt threatened legal action.

Their current Facebook nonpology further doubles down (triples down?), talking about a collection that “is about rising above and refusing to let the world run us and hang us by any mistakes we have made or didn’t make.” Seasalt creates art by “emotion and things that hit home for us.” “Not everyone understands as art it’s [sic] subjective.” They can’t help that people “haven’t been able to see past that.” They meant no harm. “Some choose to see only what they want to see.” Seasalt will be donating proceeds from their collection to charities that “support equality and artist” — “maybe even a scholarship fund” — because they want to fight for justice and equality and make it known that they’re no longer following “the leaders of hate or bulling/attacking of others.”

It’s because you don’t understand art. You don’t understand that the fear and violence experienced by people of color, and the threatening nature of just a loop of rope, is basically the same as the hatred experienced by graphic artists because of a reason. Being literally hanged for simply existing in society while being black is clearly parallel to being figuratively hanged as an artist in some way for something possibly having to do with mistakes, which you would understand if you were an artist. And most important, they meant no harm by it, which automatically means that no harm was done, because that’s the way intent works.

So stop bullying them, people! You don’t understand art! And the world will continue to stay ugly if we don’t stop the hate. It’s up to us.

N.B. Blah blah blah First Amendment blah blah freedom of expression blah blah ART blah. No one’s denying these turdbuckets’ rights to produce and use that image. People are just calling them turdbuckets for doing it.


15 thoughts on Seasalt & Co. advertises Photoshop tools using lynching imagery and only gets <em>more</em> offensive from there

  1. One of their few defenders on their Facebook page appeared to be a young black woman. Someone then pointed out that it was a fake profile, and as proof, observed the woman’s profile picture had been stolen from the national registry of missing persons. Since then the whole comment page seems to have been removed.

  2. Somebody is remarkably obtuse. And good luck with that lawsuit! It’s rather obvious that English isn’t the first language of whoever it is who’s defending this garbage, but that’s no excuse. Figure it out.

      1. My apologies to people (including my mother) for whom English wasn’t their first language!

        I’m tempted to make some kind of joke about people from Texas and whether English is their first language, but will refrain.

      2. Yes, it is the same Brittany Davis that I sued for copyright infringement. She’s been trying to deny it but, there is so much proof I’m not sure why she is even trying to (and thinking people will believe her).

  3. I actually believe it didn’t occur to them for a second that their hanging tree depicted lynching. Lynching isn’t a part of their cultural background right.

    It’s just something that mean people did to those others that the school covers during black history month. You know when you learn about those others. Why would they ever consider the concerns and experiences of minorities?

    1. I actually believe it didn’t occur to them for a second that their hanging tree depicted lynching. Lynching isn’t a part of their cultural background right.

      It’s just something that mean people did to those others that the school covers during black history month. You know when you learn about those others. Why would they ever consider the concerns and experiences of minorities?

      I agree. It’s the old, ‘but we’re not in white supremacist group, hell, some of us even voted for Obama! How can we be racist?’ way of thinking.

      Next they will point out something which ‘proves’ they’re not racist, like a Chinese woman designed the graphic, or that two of their employees are Jewish, who were also the victims of lynchings down South, (those are examples I made up, I wouldn’t be surprised in the slightest, if all the employees are white.) I assume if they had a single African American working there, they’d have a big picture of him hugging the CEO on their splash page.

  4. I clicked over to that image and then headtilted off my chair and onto the floor trying to figure out what an American Horror Story: Coven promo pic has to do with Photoshop.

    protip: There is no head angle at which these design choices are not completely inexplicable.

  5. Why… was that even considered a selling point that could draw people to their product?

    If I see a creepy image of a noose and a tree and it’s labeled “The Hanging Tree, coming soon”, I think horror movie. Not creative Photoshop pack. Like, if their “action pack” was in fact a horror pack, and what they’re selling is artwork that can be used for backdrops in horror images? Then it’s appropriate because they’re showing you something that evokes the same emotions as what they’re selling does, but then don’t be vague about it, explain that this imagery is intended to assist artists in creating horrifying images and so that’s the point.

    But… I can’t see any relationship at all between an “action pack” and a creepy image of a hanging tree. What’s an action pack, anyway? Why use a horrifying image to sell something that’s unrelated to that image? Even if it had been a guillotine or stones piled on a board to represent the pressing of “witches” in Salem… what has it got to do with a Photoshop action pack?

    1. The point is…it’s how you react when people express disapprobation. My wife was designing a logo for her company and she showed me the prototype. I pointed out that it looked like a ‘woman’s part,’ and once I pointed it out, she totally saw it, and made sure she changed it to look less pornographic. It wasn’t her intention to make a vulva-esque logo, and she was mature enough to understand that not EVERYONE would get her intention. This company should have just accepted the criticism with a ‘whoa, we didn’t realize. Sorry.’

    2. I wonder whether they were going the Hunger Games route. If you haven’t read them, there’s a song in the final book that factors into the plot called “The Hanging Tree.” Maybe they thought they could capitalize on being between the two movies?

      But also, I don’t know. I don’t have a personal racial history with that image and it’s terrifying.

    3. The filters and such are horroresque, I would imagine. Darkens the images, allows you to add shadows etc…
      Still could have used a different picture and name for it.

  6. This is one of those “Swistakas in Asia and most of recorded human history are lucky. Except in Western Europe because; Nazis” type of affairs.

    Like, anywhere with a marginally less awful history “The Hanging Tree” tends to be a sort of local folk mythology thing…”where the pregnant maid servant took her own life, under the very tree the Master’s son…(ha) seduced her. Never again shall her poor dead soul be taken against her will…”

    Because romanticising suicide, rape, subjugation and a real nasty past is apparently just great.

    Although if you are the kind of pessimist, predisposed to reckoning all the ways things could theoretically be any worse in order to stay sane, it does kind of work. (Ahem..Blues musicians…)

Comments are currently closed.