In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

This Will Get You Banned

zuzu

Quoth Mark, who was stamping his little feetsies because I refused to a) buy into his framing of certain questions and b) do his Googling for him:

You say you’re a lawyer, huh? No doubt, one of the shittiest ones there is.

So much for ‘lawyer’ zuzu. She’s just another stupid-ass feminist skank.

Ilyka then pointed out the obvious:

Zuzu does not have to answer your questions, which many commenters have previously pointed out to you were irrelevant, argument-by-distraction, shifting-goalposts, Trolly-Trollerson questions in the first place. But let’s say Zuzu had wanted to answer your questions. Let’s say she’d felt charitable today. I’m betting you blew any chance of that with “stupid-ass feminist skank.”

To which Mark responded:

Ah, another shit skank who thinks she’s a badcunt behind a computer screen tries to suggest violence against men. I’ve got a better idea, douche-ditz. Take one of those metal coat hangers you femiskanks are always rhapsodizing about, dip it in the sewer, stick it up your smelly snatch, and abort yourself? How’s that, sistah?

In case you were wondering, that’s one way to get yourself banned around here. Bye, troll!

36 thoughts on This Will Get You Banned

  1. Where do these … entities (“people” somehow seems too generous, as does “sentient being”) come from? I see the attraction in some types of trolling, but this is just weird.

  2. I know I can make people mad with my viewpoints.

    But why would anyone try to post on a feminist board and insult feminists in an ignorant, vulgur, and adolescent manner and expect anything other than to be banned. I say good riddance. BTW many of these types are rather thin skinned.

    As for Lawyers they can be heartlesss soul sucking opportunists… but this is only a part of the legal community. Unfortunatly they are the ones who get all the press.

    The better a hired gun is the more the opposition will try to emphsize their negative qualities to sooth their bruised egos.

  6. Wow. Sick.

    Way to handle him though, everyone. Never stooping to his level. That’s why you all rock and keep me coming back.

    (Sorry to be all cheesy. I just felt like spreading some love after that ugliness.)

  7. Take one of those metal coat hangers you femiskanks are always rhapsodizing about,

    rhap·so·dize ( P ) Pronunciation Key (rps-dz)
    v. rhap·so·dized, rhap·so·diz·ing, rhap·so·diz·es
    v. intr.
    To express oneself in an immoderately enthusiastic manner

    Because feminists are always immoderately enthusiastic about metal coathangers. Sure.

    Dictionary.com. Yet another thing this troll has never encountered.

  8. OT: Seven women Senators have endorsed Joe Lieberman in the primary, despite his contention that hospitals have no requirement to provide emergency contraception to rape victims and that a rape victim in Connecticut probably would not have far to drive to find a hospital that would actually provide her with medical assistance.

    The seven are:
    Barbara Boxer
    Maria Cantwell
    Hillary Clinton
    Dianne Feinstein
    Mary Landrieu
    Blanche Lincoln
    Barbara Mikulski
    Patty Murray
    Deborah Stabenow

    I raise this because Lieberman’s position on emergency contraception makes clear the need to take the reproductive rights discussion beyond abortion rights. Lieberman and his colleagues endorsing him here – along with Planned Parenthood and NARAL’s national organizations – have prioritized incomplete scorecards and limited rubrics to judge his position. This is not to say that Lieberman has been bad for reproductive rights, but that his positions must be looked at in total. These senators and those organizations seem to have no desire to do that.

  9. There seems to be a huge number of them around these days. I got a guy on my blog the other day where he argued that all embryos started out as male—not to claim that women were second-best or anything!—-and then he claimed he ‘lived’ in the world of medicine. Probably as an inpatient.

  10. But why would anyone try to post on a feminist board and insult feminists in an ignorant, vulgur, and adolescent manner and expect anything other than to be banned.

    Honestly, I think they know they’ll be banned. That’s part of the fun. They can vent their pathetic spleens, and then for extra bonus points they can go back to their sad little MRA boards and talk about how they got banned and how that proves the evil feminazis can’t handle the truth and hate freedom.

  11. ginmar: did you tell him he was very close….all human embryos start off basically female? In mammals the ‘default’ sex is female, whereas in birds (they have the opposite sex chromosome setup going on) the default sex is male. Funny how that would ever be used to justify second-best status for anything, given that organisms don’t stay as embryos for very long.

  12. Jesus H. Christ on a crutch. I can’t possibly figure out what posts like that are trying to accomplish. Is he trying to scare you all? Is he trying to show you up with his intellectual prowess? Did he have a shitty day at work? I don’t get it, and I certainly don’t understand it in any sort of discourse where you are trying to change a person’s mind. All this sort of stuff does is make me feel bad for the person posting it. How sad to be so emotionally and intellectually constipated that you consider wishing we’d all abort ourselves with wire hangers to be high comedy.

  14. Why would he think Zuzu would want to waste any time answering his questions when he said this at the end of his very first comment?

    I know analytical reasoning is hard, but this is a fairly straightforward issue, so with some practice, I’m confident you can do it.

    Starts off as a condescending asshole and quickly devolves into a frothing lunatic. Was it performance art meant to demonstrate the horrors of mental illness as commentary on the Andrea Yates case?

  16. (and he got all his spelling and grammer right)

    But you, dear boy, still need to work on yours. As evidenced by the above.

  17. LOL! The pool of mentally and emotionally stunted men that women should avoid at all costs is expanding.

    It is a shame that it would be immoral to indulge in my desire to tatoo their foreheads with this warning to all women. “Beware. I am too stupid to even f*ck.”

  19. How unfair to poor Mark. You ban him just because he’s an arrogant idiot who results to vulgar misogynist insults at the drop of a hat? What do you think this is? Some sort of feminist blog?

    But seriously, I’m surprised you let him post after the “stupid-ass feminist skank” line. But I’m sure he came up with that line after much analytical thinking.

  20. Wow. This guy is a real American hero. Did you log his IP? A shiny 25 cent piece says he was posting from the FDA women’s health office!

  21. Good grief. How’m I supposed to abort myself when I didn’t even know I was pregnant with me?

  22. Actually, Raznor, he posted those in the middle of the night, when I was in bed, piny was stressing about his surgery, Jill was gallivanting around Europe and Lauren was meeting the fabulous Chris Clarke.

    Sure was entertaining finding those this morning.

  24. Wow, someone’s a resentful reject. Mark is probably one of those guys who wants to go to Ukraine and have sex with fourteen-year old sex-slaves, because economically empowered American women won’t give him the time of day.

  27. Um, I am the funny Mark with a k here…

    FUNNY I TELL YA!

    Laugh with me please???

    Anyway, guy was a jagoff. Gives us Marks a bad name.

  28. Heh. Micheyd, we told him repeatedly over and over again, and I finally had to ban him. He started out insulting, and proceeded to patronizing, and wanted to know what I was doing in the military, because of course only guys like him are fit for the military. All the things Mark said are probably what he says when he gets drunk after another girl turns him down. Sure explains Abu Ghraib, Haditha, and the rape and murder of Abeer Qasim Hassan al-Janabi.

  30. Good grief. How’m I supposed to abort myself when I didn’t even know I was pregnant with me?

    Oooh, I can answer that one – I’ve put waaaayyyyyy to much thought into this. You simply travel backwards in time, have sex with your father then become pregnant with yourself. Then you can have an abortion – which means either you’ll pop out of existence or your head will explode trying to answer the question “is it incest?”

    By the way, on that comment – does he even have a comprehension that the whole coathanger thing is something feminists find undesirable? My head wants to explode.

  31. Raznor, that’s going to be really difficult to pull off. Even if you take the personal identity condition to be identical genetic microstructure (which gives you a big problem with twins…), she’s going to have to have sex with and be impregnated by her father billions of times before the allelles just happen to split so that she is pregnant with a child whose genetic microstructure is identical to her own.

    Add in random mutation, and it becomes even more improbable.

    But still, it looks like even after accomplishing this, she’d merely be aborting her twin, not herself. In order to abort herself, she’d have to have been originally birthed and raised by herself, and then go back in time to repeat the cycle, but get an abortion instead. Needless to say, on standard views of time, this is going to be a big-time paradox and simply is not causally possible. You need a really eccentric (non-dimensional) view of time for this to be possible, and even then you’d need to tread very carefully with your concepts.

    Aborting oneself probably isn’t worth the trouble, anyway.

  32. Was it performance art meant to demonstrate the horrors of mental illness as commentary on the Andrea Yates case?

    LOL.. although the mentally ill may well protest that being mentally ill does not necessarily require or cause stupidity. I find these behaviors here to be great theatre in irony. That these men come to this Feminist blog time and again and attempt to prove that us women are all dumb bitches while proving themselves the ones lacking in cerebral prowess.

    Like June Bugs attracted to a light behind a screen window on a hot summer night. They just seem to keep coming out of nowhere.

    You need a really eccentric (non-dimensional) view of time for this to be possible, and even then you’d need to tread very carefully with your concepts.

    The first feat is easily accomplished while in a state of intoxication, but said state rather annhilates the last requirement.


  33. Raznor, that’s going to be really difficult to pull off. Even if you take the personal identity condition to be identical genetic microstructure (which gives you a big problem with twins…), she’s going to have to have sex with and be impregnated by her father billions of times before the allelles just happen to split so that she is pregnant with a child whose genetic microstructure is identical to her own.

    That’s a relief. I wouldn’t trust Ilyka with herself as a fetus.

  34. I have to say, I kind of like the ring of “badcunt.” Sometimes I find myself needing an alternate term for “badass.” This might be it.

Comments are currently closed.