Background on Feministe’s Next Top Troll is here. This round, we bring you the dudes who, despite multiple deletions and being routinely blocked, cannot stop leaving comments. They put in a good effort! Vote for your favorite below (posted below the fold because some of these comments may be triggering, particularly with regard to sexual assault).
1. PatRiarchy:
Hey cat = have you ever thought of DOING anything about it? You know – like taking control of your own life. Your freedom of movement is guaranteed under the law so you could MOVE. Go somewhere where being queer is normal maybe. Or create your own queer paradise. Lease an island and invite all the queers to live there. Then you could have as many babies as you wanted without any fear or retribution.
Look at the lot of you. All whinging and whining and none of you prepared to do anything about it except blame others for your own choices. Then you wonder why there are few females at the top.
Soon we men will no longer have any need of you at all and females will die out. By 2020 there will be the first full functioning android released onto the market. To be politically correct it will be a female. But economically it will be female becasue men would be prepared to pay a once off cost for never having to compromise and she would never take his kids. She can look like any female he wants and to his exact specifications. She will have great physical strength. Every piece of information ever recorded in human history at her fingertips. Including the Karma Sutra. She will be better than any natural Western female on Earth. She will be supportive of everything he does. And the cost to keep her is significantly less than any Western female. So as time goes on the investment becomes amortised. You’ve seen the latest public release a few weeks ago in Japan. This project is about 2 yrs behind the true pace.
Soon we will be able to create and grow perfect male humans in vitro without ever having to worry about what harmful things a mother may ingest.
The world will change for females and, by the very nature of this planet, evolution will drive you out. The weak perish and you have allowed yourselves to become weak by claiming to be victims and thus claiming privileges whilst never having to be reponsible for your actions. The time will fall upon you too fast for you to comprehend what is happening. When there’s no more mooching off men your fortunes will rapidly change and you will disappear. We’ve carried you for 3.5 MILLION years. Image what we can achieve with all the resouces that are saved from not having to support females. It’s a BRAVE new world dawning girlies and unless you grow up fast and stop whining and get doing you will fail. That means you are gonna be forced to work as hard as men or you will fail. There is competition coming that will run the lesser over in a generation.
Prey tell. What are the privileged Dudes privileged with? Is it a man is 400% more likely to commit suicide than a female? That’s quite a privilege I assume. Is it that men’s health is vastly inferior to females’ since wherever medicare is free females use it (in $ terms) 60,000% more than men yet they pay no extra which means men are being forced to support inferior females because females can’t look after themselves. That’s quite a privilege I assume. Is it that men are 1,500% more likely to be homeless than a female? Sounds quite privileged in a psychotic sort of way. Would it be that females demand to be paid for sex and so much so it is law. The privilege to pay a female for sex. Inspiring. Would it be that females have a choice to be a parent or not but not only do men get no choice but they are forced to abide by a woman’s choice. Clearly men and females are being treated differently. Why aren’t females in the streets demanding to be treated the same as men? What was that about psychosis again? Would it be the lower academic achievemants of men be a privilege? Of course it beggars the imagination that there could be any disparity at all since females have been screaming to be treated equally for 50 years. Clearly females are not treated equally but you seem not to notice these things. Hmmm. Psychosis. What is the exact definition again? Could it be the privilege of being killed at work since, like in Australia 500 men never come home every year. How many females are killed at work. You can guess. The hint is it’s a very round number. That’s quite a privilege isn’t it? Hmmm. Seems to fit the definition admirably.
But that is the whole notion of feminism. Females other than feminists are completely stupid. Feminists claim men oppress females. In a Federal election there were 132 female candidates out of a total of 155 seats. ALL would have won a seat if ALL females voted for them. Only 42 were elected. So a significant number of females are too stupid to realise that men oppress them and so vote for men and more oppression. Feminists know how stupid females are and it’s just lucky that feminists are around to save them.
But feminism is only about denigrating men to create fear and hatred of men and thence destroying our societies. Feminists claim that not only does a child not need a father but it is better off without one. Now we have a disintegrating society filled with violence both physical and psychological. Females have no sense of “honour” or “duty” to society and are only interested in “me”. Hence the feminist notion that bugger the kids if you’re not happy then rather than have an introspective look it’s best to kick him to the kerb and not allow the kids to have a relationship with him so that it hurts him. Doesn’t matter that it hurts the kids as every non-feminist child-developmental specialist says. After all it’s about what makes a femle happy isn’t it.
The over-riding FACT is that not one single negative claim about men ever made by any feminist anywhere at any time is actually true.
When a female agrees to have sex she has enterd into a contract. It takes BOTH parties to negate a contract. So if a female withdraws her consent she hasn’t a leg to stand on with regard to rape. This has now taken over from the “withdrawl of consent” since a famous case where a female said she withdrew consent and he took 30 seconds to stop so she was raped. He went to jail. Subsequently, the complainant admitted she lied and the whole thing was cooked up by his ex and the “victim”. A judge sentenced both to 2 years in prison and it took him 14 years and over $1m to have his name cleared.
2. Courage the Cowardly Dog:
Once again my sound reasoning is silenced. God help us all if you people ever gain power, there will go our first amendment rights. You will pull a Dan Snyder and bar people from carrying signs on government property. I know you don’t who Dan Snyder is or what he has to do with the 1st amendment, but that is just another illustration of your profound ignorance, which if you had your way would rule.
Of course, my thoughtful analysis of these comments will not get posted, because they require you to face a reality you choose to ignore and so long as you do that the world will be well populated with anti-feminists.
3. Ryan:
Dear lord ladies do I have to route through one of the IP addresses from your own users to post here now?
Good thing women know nothing about how computers work… How’s the Affirmative Action working in the sciences by the way? Your Council on Women and Girls is working hard to route boys out just like you did in
sports programs…
Anyway, this protest is laughable, women don’t care about men in working industry, they care about the dead providers who were blown to smithereens… This is what they mean when they speak of the “victims”
in this disaster..
Come on now get serious, women don’t provide for the welfare of men you silly women, men have to provide to you….. You women sure are silly.
Oops I forgot all comments must go through the feminist censor….lol.. Women and their belief in free speech….I swear….
I remember when you fired the President of Harvard University for speaking about gender dimorphic differences and replaced him with Drew Faust your former women’s studies department head…… I swear you women can’t compete against men for sh*t but it still doesn’t make it right that you outright pass “women first” laws like Affirmative Action and Title IX….
I can’t wait until you matriarchs allow men equal rights in college admissions… We almost got rid of your “women first” law in my state by a 1% margin… Oh well maybe next year….
By the way I saw your “End of Men” article in The Atlantic… You cunts will surely pay for celebrating the devotion of the Stimulus Package to yourselves.. and the globalization of male jobs..
I liked the reference to matriarchy though because it sure is true, the black community is a full fledge matriarchy. I CAN’T WAIT until your actions catch up to you…
Reminds me of the last article you cunts put out on “The End of Men”
Take a look at this femicunt. She’s laughing now but when the system breaks down she’s gonna get her asshole raped out so she can obtain food.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IU3iQnIt6Nc/TA_zgUV45aI/AAAAAAAAAbg/SYY6X93x-wE/s1600/ScreenShot037.jpg
Wow, I know it’s very late, you cunts must have your femicunt censor
soldiers on station around the clock!!!
4. Rice:
I don’t think everyone would agree that critical thinking is a sign of privilege.
@prettyamiable
I’m not sure how constructive calling someone a pompous prick is, especially when their point is essentially “it’s human nature to exaggerate, and consequently also to suspect people of exaggeration. Not that that’s always right or appropriate, but hey, it’s another explanation for why it happens.” Also, “here’s what I think” reads to me more as a way of prefacing something as just an opinion rather than Truth From on High, which seems the inverse of a pompous prick behavior.
@EAMD
I never made any such claims that a total intellectual vacuum existed here. That’s simply an easy way to paint a very unfair picture of me and tie in all sorts of nice, discrediting generalizations in lieu of engaging me in an honest discussion. I was merely pointing out that responding with an opinion to someone else’s opinion isn’t an inherent sign of privilege.
There’s a very big difference between sharing a story with a friend in the expectation of them giving you empathy/support, and presenting a personal experience as anecdotal evidence to a point you’re trying to make about broader social issues.
@Jesurgislac
I’m glad you feel comfortable making such broad, sweeping assumptions about me, my life, and my experiences.
I found your evaluation of my perspective very inaccurate, and to be honest, I find your perspective to be part of the problem, albeit in a more passive way than you find mine. I think discussions like this lose credibility with privileged people who would otherwise be more sympathetic see their perspectives as being inappropriate, or that their input is unwelcome. That brings about a lot of disregard and cynicism about attempts to help marginalized groups. I really don’t want to try to derail, but I felt I should make my position clear. And for what it’s worth, I suspect you and I want two very similar omelets, but disagree on which eggs need to be cracked.
And just to clarify, I want and expect that sort of treatment you frame as “stomping all over” from people who have privilege over me, as well as people I have privilege over. As I said before, if I share a story with a confidant with the caveat “this isn’t about politics or society, this is about how I feel,” I expect a much more empathetic, listening-based response. And I will give one when someone shares something like that with me. However, the second I share a personal story as a way of making an argument about the bigger world outside, I anticipate people to call my interpretation into question. I think that’s very constructive, and hearing a marginalized person defend why they felt something was bigoted might do an awful lot more to broaden a privileged persons understanding of that very marginalization.
And I find it patronizing when someone disagrees with me but just spares my feelings and nods their head empathetically.
And if I don’t think I’m emotionally ready to defend my reasons for feeling a way, then I take that as a sign that I need to deal with that experience more before I put it up for debate. I believe in respect and restraint, but more I believe in everyone’s entitlement to respond when spoken to. To voice their opinions and ask questions, and offer whatever reasonable perspective they might, which itself is and should be open to criticism and counter-argument. My right to speak is more important than your feelings, and your right to speak is more important than my feelings. I don’t have an absolute right to not be offended.
And I say all that with the addition that when you approach the extremes, a fair amount of leeway on the above statement exists. The privileging of speech I mention above quickly erodes when we switch from honest, dissenting questioning to attacks. And I think maybe that’s part of what we don’t reconcile: where the line between attack and debate lies, and why it lies there?