In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Women’s Health: More Than Our Uteruses, Breastmilk, or Offspring

An interesting conversation is brewing among New York Times readers about a recent post in the paper’s “Well” blog about prescription drug sharing among women. Blogger Tara Parker-Pope wrote, “…drug-sharing rates were highest among younger women ages 18 to 44, raising special concerns about side effects and health risks of unchecked prescription drug use among women who might become pregnant,” prompting comments by many women “of child-bearing age” who expressed frustration over being considered “pre-pregnant,” and often nothing more, by the medical community. Particular sobering was comment #172, which drew a line between this type of attitude and the Bush administration’s proposal requiring health organizations receiving federal aid to hire health care providers regardless of whether they refuse to prescribe birthcontrol, emergency contraception, or perform abortions.

Although she responded defensively to women’s comments at first, Tara Parker-Pope has followed up with a podcast of an interview with Cindy Pearson from the National Women’s Health Network, in which they discuss in greater depth the implications of the medical community’s difficulty in seeing “women of childbearing age” as valuable patients in their own right. I recommend checking out the conversation if you have time.

Coincidentally, I read the “Well” column about five minutes after getting somewhat worked up about this article, titled “Vitamin D Deficiency May Lurk in Babies.” The article explores some recent findings that babies who are exclusively breastfed may be at higher risk for vitamin D deficiency and related conditions such as rickets. I’ll be honest and say that I was nervous while reading the article, afraid that it would draw the conclusion that formula is healthier than breastmilk and was relieved when they reported that vitamin D deficiency in babies can be prevented with a few vitamin drops.

“I completely support breast-feeding, and I think breast milk is the perfect food, and the healthiest way to nourish an infant,” said Dr. Catherine M. Gordon, director of the bone health program at Children’s Hospital Boston and an author of several studies on vitamin D deficiency, including Aleanie’s case.

“However,” Dr. Gordon continued, “we’re finding so many mothers are vitamin D deficient themselves that the milk is therefore deficient, so many babies can’t keep their levels up. They may start their lives vitamin D deficient, and then all they’re getting is vitamin D deficient breast milk.”

Wait a minute, mothers are vitamin D deficient themselves? That seems important, especially because, according to this very article, vitamin D deficiency can cause osteopenia (low bone mineral density), osteoporosis, diabetes, autoimmune diorders, and cancer. Surely the article addresses ways women themselves can end their vitamin D deficiencies, even if only as a means of being better breastmilk providers for their children!?!?

Sorry, no dice. As far as this article is concerned, the only thing newsworthy about women’s vitamin D deficiencies is that they are crummy vitamin D delivery systems for their children.

This article’s failure to address adult women’s health concerns reminded me of an experience I had last summer when my friend Rebecca called me in a panic one morning, asking for me to drive her to the hospital after she had unexpectedly broken her foot while walking across a parking lot. When the doctor heard that the brake hadn’t occurred during a fall or other serious impact, she recommended getting a test for vitamin D deficiency and made several suggestions about tips for building healthy bones as an adult woman.

Because osteoporosis is a potential side effect of vitamin D deficiency, here are some tips for women at different ages in their life interested in preventing the disease:

  • Up through your twenties, you build bone density; after that, you maintain what bone density you have. Keep this in mind when considering your diet, at any age. If yours is low in calcium or vitamin D, consider changing it or taking supplements.
  • Get some sun! Even though it is wise to be cautious about skin cancer, ten to thirty minutes of sunlight (depending on your skin tone and personal needs) helps decrease vitamin D deficiency.
  • If you have risk factors such as a family history of osteoporosis, consider getting a bone density test at menopause. Otherwise, consider getting one at the age of 65. Transwomen should consult with their endocrinologist about how hormone levels have affected their bone density and when to have bone density tests.
  • Do weight bearing exercise if you are able (such as dancing, jogging, or other movement where you hold your weight up), which builds bone matrix.

This is nowhere near a complete list, but is perhaps slightly more helpful than the generic “take more calcium” advice that seems to be the party line re: osteoporosis. I’m about the farthest thing from a doctor and this list is a compilation of tips I’ve heard from doctor friends of mine, internet resources, and conversations I’ve had with my own doctor. For a much more exhaustive collection of health resources for women, Our Bodies, Ourselves has gathered many women-oriented web-resources.

Regardless of the specific health issue, we all (regardless of gender) hope for access to quality medical care with providers we trust, who take our concerns seriously, and who put our needs and desires as patients first. Unfortunately, the idea that women’s health concerns are obscured when they are of “child bearing age” by the health of their children and (more insultingly) the children their doctor believes they might conceive, is another obstacle to quality medical care.

How do your experiences compare to those of the women responding to Parker-Pope’s column?

New Comment Policy

Safe, pro-feminist discussion is important to us. We will delete comments that are abusive, off-topic, or include ad hominem attacks. Foul language is not offensive to us unless it is used as a weapon against a writer or commenter. Because we value our community and will work to protect that community, sometimes we will delete comments that we believe to be harmful or trolling.

Each blogger retains control over the comments on their own posts, particularly negative and incendiary comments.

WE RETAIN THE RIGHT TO:
1. Control content and comments.
2. Edit comments.
Please use HTML to post links that are relevant to conversation. Posting a long link breaks the template and is irritating to the webmistresses.
3. Delete comments.
If they meet the criteria for deletion, we will not hesitate to delete such comments.
4. Prevent comments by specific persons or groups.
We will do what is possible to prevent publishing comments that are racist, sexist, ableist, homophobic, or transphobic. Controversy is not scary to us, but we do aim to create a space that is safe for the expression of pro-feminist ideas.
5. Make some posts feminist-only, or exclude certain types of comments.

GUEST BLOGGERS
Feministe, as part of a site tradition that aims to share the public platform and give readers a taste of our favorite writers and issues, frequently hands the keys to the site over to guest bloggers, often during the summer months. Our guest bloggers are chosen by the Feministe crew and approved by all of the regular writers. We expect all commenters to respect our guests as they would the house writers.

Moreover, we invite all the folks to come along with us because we are their fans and supporters, and because we’re interested in the kind of discussion that their ideas will inspire. While we are very much their fans, that does not mean that we endorse every minute detail of their opinions, much like Jill can disagree with Cara, Holly can disagree with Lauren, and Piny can disagree with Jack. This kind of ideological diversity is a feature of having a group blog, not a bug. Moreover, this kind of diversity is more representative of our feminisms than vetting one another’s writing for cohesion. Our guest bloggers write and publish posts without any kind of editorial review, but with our express support.

As writers, we don’t expect to please everyone, but we do expect that criticism will be hewn to the opinion being criticized and not veer into the likeability of the person expressing it. We will attempt to warn those who are getting into this territory before moderating their comments.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
I posted a comment. Why can’t I see it on the site?
As the site has grown, so has the volume of comments. We have difficulty approving the comments fast enough (we also work day jobs), so provided your comment is not abusive or off-topic, it will appear as soon as one of us gets to it.

Why am I blocked from commenting on Feministe?
There are a few reasons a comment might be blocked.

1. If a comment is abusive, off-topic, includes an ad hominem attack, or is otherwise argued in bad faith.

2. If a commenter has previously posted comments that are abusive, off-topic, or include ad hominem attacks, the Feministe moderators may decide to ban the commenter’s IP address. The abusive commenter is banned from commenting on the site in the future without moderation, even if the later comments are not abusive. We ban or moderate IPs because it is too time consuming to pick out comments written by someone with a pattern of abuse.

3. If you share a computer or IP address with someone who has written abusive comments, your comment may be blocked even if you have never written anything abusive.

4. If your comment has inadvertently been caught in the spam filter, which may occur if you use a term that is commonly associated with spam.

5. We believe you may be sock-puppeting.

WE VALUE diversity of opinions and we welcome dissent, but our primary goal is to foster a dynamic feminist community. In that spirit, we ask that all commenters post in good faith, and that conservative or non-feminist commenters keep in mind that they are in our house and should behave accordingly. We will use our discretion in determining which comments are posted.

Xenophobia Rears its Ugly Head in All Sorts of Places

Golf is not something that is usually on my radar screen (unless I’m getting worked up about how golf courses buy water rights to maintain their unsustainable lushness in draught-affected areas or about how the Bush administration claims to have increased the amount of wetlands in the U.S. by counting golf courses as wetlands), but this article about the LPGA’s new policy really caught my attention.

Apparently, the Ladies Professional Golf Association has decided that its members “must be conversant in English by 2009 or face suspension.”

“We live in a sports-entertainment environment,” said Libba Galloway, the deputy commissioner of the tour, the Ladies Professional Golf Association. “For an athlete to be successful today in the sports entertainment world we live in, they need to be great performers on and off the course, and being able to communicate effectively with sponsors and fans is a big part of this.

“Being a U.S.-based tour, and with the majority of our fan base, pro-am contestants, sponsors and participants being English speaking, we think it is important for our players to effectively communicate in English.”

The LPGA and the other professional golf tours, unlike professional team sports, are dependent on their relationships with corporate sponsors for their financial survival.

Although Galloway insisted that “the vast majority” of the 120 international players on the LPGA circuit already spoke enough English to get by, she declined to say how many did not. There are 26 countries represented on the LPGA Tour. South Korea, with 45 golfers, has the largest contingent.

For me, this is sad for two reasons.

The first obviously, is the LPGA’s decision to cater to the xenophobia, perceived or accurate, of the ladies golf-watching community. I mean, it’s golf. You don’t need to speak English to play it extremely well. You don’t need to communicate with any team mates. I’ll be honest, I don’t know the first thing about golf, but my guess is that the qualities that make someone an awesome golfer, that make them exciting to watch (I mean, as exciting as golf can be…), don’t have a lot to do with their ability to say, “I’m so happy I won, I dedicate this tournament to my family” (or whatever golfers say when they are interviewed by the press after tournaments). The idea is that American viewers (and, by extension, American sponsors) just don’t relate to foreign athletes, especially when they look “foreign” (read: Korean), especially when they augment their foreigness by having the audacity to speak in their native tongue. “Don’t they know they’re in America? We speak ENGLISH here! I mean, I think it’s funny when Margaret Cho makes fun of her parents’ accents, but I’m not about to buy golf balls recommended by someone who doesn’t even speak clearly!”

The second thing this got me thinking about was the second-class status of women’s athletics in all areas. Nothing new, I know, but still depressing. I mean, the MPGA isn’t so skiddish about their sponsorship that they have to impliment an idiotic policy like this. Oh wait, their not even called the MGPA, are they? They’re just the PGA (and the PGA TOUR, which I just learned is a different entity). Because anything called the Professional Golfers’ Assosiation is obviously for men, just like the NBA. I forgot.

Today We Mourn the Passing of Del Martin

This is some sad news.

Call me sappy (and putting aside my complicated feelings about marriage), but it makes me happy that she got to marry her long term partner before she passed.

Del Martin is best known for co-founding the Daughters of Bilitis, which was the first national lesbian organization in the United States, but was also involved in the National Organization for Women (where she helped combat homophobia within the organization), the Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club, and, later in her life, in Old Lesbians Organizing for Change.

She also co-authored several books, one of which, Lesbian/Woman, was read outloud to me by my best friend in her bedroom when I was 13 and was trying to figure out what being queer was all about.

According to a statement by Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, “gifts in lieu of flowers can be made to honor Del’s life and commitment and to defeat the California marriage ban through the National Center for Lesbian Rights NO on 8 committee at www.nclrights.org/NoOn8.”

Swapping Knowledge Across Generations

Every now and again, I’ll hear someone make a remark that goes something like this:

“Racism in the movement is just hold over bitterness from the second wave. We third wavers know better than that.”

Upon hearing/reading this statement, I find myself clutching my stomach from laughing so hard.

Now second wave feminists (and the movement they lead) had their share of problems, no doubt. But some of the things I hear coming out of the third wave aren’t much better. (Hint: Writing about an issue that impacts women of color once every six months does *not* make you immune from spouting racist or xenophobic bullshit the rest of the time. Just a statement for the record.)

In DaisyDeadhead’s first post, she wrote something that stuck with me:

I realized, while observing the talking head, that he was too young to have any first-hand knowledge of what he was talking about. This was his Received Wisdom, the ‘official’ version that has Been Decided Upon by the Powers that Be. And as progressives, we should worry. History is written by the victors, and consequently, a lot of ours has been erased.

A history book can tell us a lot. Talking to the actual humans involved can tell us a whole lot more.

I have also been thinking about this ever since Carmen and I were accepted into the Progressive Women’s Voices program, and subsequently had the time to hang out with a lot of older women who are feminists. Now, I generally tend to hang out with folks a bit older than I, especially after I started working in my local library system. The average librarian is about 55-65 where I live, and they are the people that give me the most hope about living a full active life all the way to the end.

I spoke with one gentleman for whom the library system was his third career – after 25 years in the military and 25 years in private sector.

He often joked that he goes skydiving every year just to prove to his kids he doesn’t belong in a nursing home.

There was a wonderful woman who was retiring when I started, who told me about the history of where I lived, and how all the areas that I lived in/grew up in were strictly segregated.

Another older sub saw me reading Jabari Asim’s the N-Word and told me stories about how that was the absolute worst, most gut wrenching thing you could call someone when he was growing up – and how he used it once in the earshot of his mother and received the beating of his life.

“My mom never touched me before then, and she never touched me after,” he said, wincing at the memory, “but she made sure I remembered that word would earn me a whipping!”

Another fabulous woman I know had devoted her remaining time in the library to providing teens with accurate information about sex and sexuality.

And *every* librarian I’ve met has been an avid defender of free speech and the right to information.

I hang with the grown folks often. However, I still wasn’t prepared to meet older feminists who were (really, still are) trail blazers and luminaries.

So meeting Alida Brill and Gloria Feldt was a bit of a mind blower, to say the least.

Read More…Read More…

“One-Legged Hooker Slain”

That is the New York Post* title on the death of Elizabeth Acevedo.  Who is now dead.  A 38 year old woman who was disabled, and happened to be a prostitute.   Oh, yeah, and police are still looking for a suspect.  Or something.  Kinda.  Worth mentioning down there at the bottom of the short screed on this woman’s death. 

Renee at Womanist Musings has more on how some folk are just funny funny har-haring over the whole deal.

Am I surprised?  Surprised that people can turn this woman’s death into comedy, or rail on about how she happened to be a prostitute, a disabled one at that, and spend as much time talking about her record for non-violent crimes and criminal lifestyle as they do, oh, about the fact that she was murdered?  Nope, not at all.  If she were a white man, or a non-fallen women (a white one, especially) do you think there’d be some outrage there?  A demand for, oh, actual respect for the dead and justice?  I bet there would be.

There is a reason I don’t like people as a general rule…

 

*fixed!

Michelle and Hillary Open Thread

I just want to say that both Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton brought down the house with their DNC speeches.  (Clinton speech video and text here; Obama speech video here; text here)  Clinton’s speech last night, especially, really wowed me.  It was worth staying up and watching all of the other bullshit run over.

Go ahead and discuss — civilly, please.

Before I discovered feminism…

… I was already neck-deep in hip-hop culture.

The facts are simple: I was raised with hip-hop. That was the emerging culture my parents were immersed in as teenagers in the early 80s*, and even to this day there are older songs I hear that sound like lullabies to me. Old tracks by LL Cool J, the Sugarhill Gang, Kool Moe Dee, even old Common (back when he was Common Sense) fill me with a strange sense of familiarity and peace. My earliest memories are filled with the sweet mana of hip-hop.

So, it should come as no surprise that my earliest encounters with sexism also had a hip-hop chaser.

When I was about ten years old, I remember being at one of my mother’s friends house. They were doing hair in the kitchen, so they expected me to go and amuse myself by playing with the woman’s eleven year old son, Bryan. I was rapidly approaching the age when I could make my own music choices, so I was often getting in trouble for raiding my parent’s CD collections. That day, a lot like any other, I had grabbed a handful of CDs when my mom wasn’t looking, a copy of Word Up magazine, a few books (I always had a book or two on hand) and headed to the basement to try to find music videos on TV.

Bryan was also bored, alternately ignoring me and fighting with me, generally over whose turn it was to play their CD on the one stereo in the basement with a temperamental attitude. We both knew that at any moment, the CD player could decide to stop reading CDs so the battle quickly took on epic proportions.

After I lost the most recent round of slapboxing over the stereo, I settled onto a couch with a book to read while Bryan queued up a brand new CD that was just released.

“Stupid,” he taunted me from across the room. “You need to stop looking all dumb and learn to start acting like a girl. You need to look like this!”

He walked over, and shoved the CD cover in my face.

Doggy Style

Read More…Read More…

Posted in Uncategorized

Defining Transphobia

Lisa Harney, who is quickly becoming one of my favorite bloggers, has written an excellent post explaining what transphobia is.  For those who are unsure of what is/is not transphobic, and what is meant by “cissexual privilege,” this is a must-read.  For those who feel they’ve got a pretty good grasp of it, I recommend heading over anyway because it’s an excellent piece of writing.