In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

INCITE! Needs Your Help

A whole bunch of other feminist blogs have posted this, so chances are that you’ve already seen it.  But just in case . . .

Dear INCITE! friends and supporters,

On the eve of the 3 year anniversary of the devastation wrought by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and subsequent government criminal negligence and assaults on the low income people of color on the Gulf Coast, our sisters from INCITE! projects in New Orleans (including the local chapter, the Women’s Health and Justice Initiative, and the New Orleans Women’s Health Clinic) are bracing for the potential landfall of Hurricane Gustav, which is currently projected to hit the Louisiana coast on Monday or Tuesday at a category 4 or 5. Voluntary evacuation of New Orleans has already begun, and mandatory evacuation could be declared as early as today. INCITE! organizers in New Orleans have made over 700 phone calls to women of color and their families that make up the constituency of the New Orleans Women’s Health Clinic, working to prepare and implement evacuation and safety plans.

Your assistance is urgently needed to help the low-income women of color and their families evacuate safely if need be, stay safe for the duration of the evacuation, and return to the city as soon as possible so as not to fall prey to the pushout that has kept so many folks from being able to return to New Orleans since Katrina. Local organizers are using whatever resources and funds at their disposal to help women and their families evacuate, bond people being held in Orleans Parish Prison out, and support those who make the choice to stay in whatever way they can.

Your support is urgently needed: financial donations of any size are needed and would be greatly appreciated.

Donations online are preferred because we can more quickly send the funds to our folks in New Orleans .
You can send your donation to INCITE online by going to this website:
http://incite-national.org/index.php?s=137
Click the Donation button
Put New Orleans in the “Purpose” line

Or you can write a check directly to WHJI and send it to:
PO Box 51325
New Orleans , LA 70151

This money will go directly to supporting the hundreds of low income women of color that are the constituency of the New Orleans Women’s Health Clinic.

Once again, the particular vulnerability of low-income women of color and single female-headed households (including folks with disabilities, seniors, undocumented immigrant women, and incarcerated women) has been erased in the face of disaster and overlooked in the days leading up to the storm. With few resources, facing challenges and concerns for their families of their own, INCITE! New Orleans and WHJI have stepped in to fill the gap. Please send all your support, solidarity, sisterhood and strength their way, and join us in hoping for the safety and well-bein g of the people who are already suffering from Gustav in Cuba , Jamaica , and Haiti , and willing the storm to subside or veer off safely before it strikes the Gulf Coast .

We will keep you posted as things develop.

peace,
INCITE!

Good luck to INCITE!, and to everyone who is or knows someone in the path of Gustav. My thoughts will definitely be with you, and I’m hoping for the best.

How to Create a Feminist Burlesque Scene

I’ve been privileged enough to spend a good portion of the last two summers involved in creating a queer neo-burlesque scene in Mexico City with an amazing group of talented individuals. It all started two years ago when a group of new chilango friends found out I did burlesque and arranged for me to perform at the Festival Lésbico in Mexico City. I’d never performed for such a huge lesbian audience before, and it stands out in my memory as one of the best shows of my life. The crowd was amazingly supportive, cheering and hollering for more, offering me heartfelt congratulations as I walked off the stage, and eagerly talking to me and asking me questions after the show.

It was due to the success of that performance that my friends and I planned for me to teach a burlesque workshop in Mexico City the following summer, which was my first time teaching a burlesque workshop, as well as my first time teaching exclusively in Spanish. A friend of mine who had taught burlesque workshops in New York told it to me straight, “Teach from your experience, from your strengths. If you’re not a great dancer, don’t teach them how to dance. Teach what you know.” It was excellent advice, and in addition to teaching a bit about the burlesque history and what I believe are the elements of an interesting and entertaining burlesque act, I also tried to work conversations about feminist burlesque into the workshop.

I was so proud of the acts that were spawned by that workshop, and remain awed by the creativity and bravery of the participants, many of whom had never been on a stage before, let alone done a strip-tease before. Even more impressive than our “recital,” however, was the burlesque troupe that grew out of this workshop when the participants decided to continue performing after I had gone back to New York, producing their own shows in a city that doesn’t exactly have a surfeit of queer-friendly performance venues.

This summer, I was invited to join this group on a mini-tour to Oaxaca City, sponsored and organized by queer arts collective Luzónica, during which, two important things happened:

1) Our group participated in several interviews with local newspapers, during which we really tried to address this idea of performing burlesque that was feminist.

2) During our big show, almost all of the female performers were hasseled and/or groped by male audience members as we traveled from the stage to the dressing room.

These events got me thinking once again about what feminist burlesque means in the first place. First of all, I’m not one of those people who believes that burlesque is inherently feminist, just like I don’t believe that sex work is inherently feminist, or that motherhood is inherently feminist, or any other complicated activity/institution/tradition is inherently feminist. You can work to make them feminist. You can approach them from a feminist perspective (whatever that means). But they are not inherently feminist.

As the grandmother of modern musical theater, vaudeville, and striptease, burlesque has a complicated history. If we trace its origins back to the 19th century, burlesque started out as a form of theater for the working classes that would parody aristocratic traditions such as operas and other “high brow” art forms. Overtime, the role that women’s bodies and sexuality played in selling “burlesque” to the masses increased little by little, from featuring women wearing flesh-colored tights (racy in the 1860’s), to “belly dancing” and other “sexy” dance moves, to the type of striptease anyone who has seen Gypsy is familiar with. The “neo-burlesque” scenes that exist in so many American cities today draw from this rich history, but also have the opportunity, and, I believe, the obligation, to differentiate themselves from the parts of it that are ugly and unjust.

So, here’s a draft of my manifesto-in-progress about what it means to create a burlesque scene that is feminist.

Tips for Burlesque Performers

  • There is a long history of using racist stereotypes in burlesque themes and costumes and music. This is a part of burlesque’s history that we need to depart from. This means, if you’re not of Chinese ancestry, don’t do a “China Doll” number. If you’re not Native American, don’t do a “woo woo woo woo woo coyboys and Indians” number. If you’re not Latina/West Indian, don’t do a “Carmen Miranda”/”island girl” number. And, finally, if you’re not Black, don’t do a “primitive/savage” number, or an “Aunt Jemima” number, or a “ghetto princess” number. You can’t defend this by calling it “classic” or an “update on a classic.” At best, it’s culturally appropriative, at worst, it’s incredibly racist, no matter that you’re “not a racist” or “didn’t mean it that way.” Don’t take advantage of the fact that most burlesque audiences (in New York, anyway) are white (and apathetic/ignorant about racism) to perform your racist act. Just don’t do it. It’s fucked up, it’s not funny, and it’s lazy artistry. As a community of performers, we can and must do better than this.
  • If someone you’re performing with is doing a number you think is racist, don’t just ignore it. Just because the audience loved it doesn’t make it OK. Have a conversation with them telling them how you feel. Don’t be afraid of being “politically correct.”
  • Don’t be afraid to make your acts more political! Sure, it’s not for everyone, and not every act can (or should) have a “message,” but a well-constructed number that is fun, sexy, and also says something is something to be proud of. Don’t force it, but experiment with working one into your repetoir if it makes sense.
  • Be respectful of sex-workers. I mostly mean two things by this. First, being a burlesque performer does not make you a sex-worker (although, of course, there are performers who are both), so don’t go around claiming sex-worker identity just because you do burleque. It’s different. Second, don’t insult strippers just because being a burlesque performer is different from being a stripper. You are not better than a stripper just because you don’t take off all your clothes, or because you think you are more of an artist, or because you are not “in it for the money,” or whatever you are telling yourself to that effect. We can coexist supportively.
  • Strut your stuff and have fun. There are few things as awesome to see as a woman (no matter what age, shape, or size) enjoying her sexiness and working it on stage.

Tips for Burlesque Producers

  • Hire an M.C. who knows how to control the crowd and can set a supportive, fun, light-hearted tone. This is so important in making sure the audience has fun and the performers have fun and feel comfortable. The ideal M.C. should be able to teach the audience (if they are new to burlesque) how to cheer and be a good audiece, as well as what is not acceptable behavior and what the consequences will be. And, they should be able to do this in a way that is funny and makes the audience feel at home. I admit that these M.C.’s are hard to find, but they are important and great and they will make your show go smoothly by setting a tone that is supportive and fun. (Also, if most of your performers are women, try to mix it up between men and women M.C.’s. There are some great female M.C.’s out there that should not be overlooked!)
  • If you are producing a burlesque show, it is your responsibility to create an environment that is safe and comfortable for your performers. That means having staff on hand ready to deal with excessively drunk, aggressive, or abusive audience members. And by “deal with,” I mean “kick out.” Burlesque performers are hardly delicate flowers who live in fear of being crushed, but we don’t like to be heckled, groped, harrassed, followed to our cars, or otherwise made to feel unsafe or uncomfortable. Anyone giving the performers (or women or queer people of people of color in the audience) a hard time needs to be ejected and banned from future shows. Plan for this just in case.
  • Look at how the space you are using is set up. Are performers given adequate privacy when they are changing their clothes? Do performers have to walk through a crowd from the stage to the dressing room? If so, is someone on hand to escort them if the crowd is a little “grabby”? Maybe you know your crowd better than some of the guest performers, so use your expertise to see what changes need to be made to accomodate performer safety and comfort.
  • Different performers have different policies regarding photographs of their performances. Some want as many photos taken all the time, in all states of undress. Others are fine with photos as long as they don’t end up on pornographic websites. Others like to have some control of what photos are taken and what they are used for. Others still just want a copy of whatever photos are taken to use on their own websites and publicity. Again, burlesque performers aren’t delicate flowers. We are realistic about nude or semi-nude photos of us getting slapped up on the internet. But, if you are producing a burlesque show, as a courtesy, check with performers in advance about their own photo-policy preferences and decide ahead of time what the policy will be. Or, if you have a specific photo-policy in place, make sure invited performers know what to expect in advance, so that those with photo-limits will be able to decide whether they feel comfortable performing at your show. Also, make sure audience members are aware of your photo policy and that it is appropriately enforced.
  • On a related note, ask performers whether they are OK with documentary photographers or videographers coming back stage to take pictures. I can’t tell you how often this happens, often with no warning.
  • Take a good long look at who you are inviting to perform. If they are mostly white, mostly skinny, and mostly young, then you’ve got some work to do. I’m not talking about tokenism. (Simone de la Ghetto has incorporated critiques of tokenism into her performances.) Reach out to performers who fall outside mainstream (Dita Von Teese) standards of beauty. (No disrespect meant to Dita, but there are many talented performers out there who don’t have “perfect bodies” or white skin.) But don’t just reach out. Really look at what you can do to make the burlesque show/scene you are creating more friendly to performers that aren’t the average (white, thin, young, able-bodied). In case you were worried, know that audiences really do like all different kinds of beauty.
  • Look at your audience and your location. If your show is in Bed Stuy, but your audience is all white, then you’ve got some work to do. Where are you advertising? How are you advertising? What are you doing to make sure people of color are welcome at your show? (Not having performers or M.C.’s who trade on racism in their acts might be a start.)
  • On that note, if you know a performer does racism numbers, don’t ask her to perform in your show. Or, if you absolutely must invite that performer, explain that your show doesn’t allow racist numbers and that they aren’t welcome to perform certain acts. Maybe they’ll get the idea.

Tips for Burlesque Audiences

  • First of all, at a burlesque show, cheer like crazy whenever you see anything you like. Do everything you can to show the performers that you think they are beautiful, brilliant, and talented.
  • Don’t only cheer for performers that are skinny, white, with little waists and big tits. One of the best compliments I ever got was from some random guy after a show who said, “Thank you for making me think something is sexy that I never thought was sexy before.” He was talking about my armpit hair. So, keep an open mind. I’ve been blown away by the different kinds of sexiness I’ve encountered in burlesque shows over the years, from performers I never expected to blow me away.
  • Similarly, if you are a straight guy, and there happens to be a male performer (gay or straight), don’t groan with disappointment or murmur something homophobic to your buddy. Ditto if there is a performer who is a queer woman. Burlesque is pretty damn gay. Get over it.
  • Needless to say, don’t grope, heckle, or harrass the performers. If you want to grope someone, you should be paying them a lot more than what you probably paid to get into that burlesque show. If you have a tendency to do this when you drink, and if you have a tendency to drink when you go out, then do us all a favor and stay sober or stay home.
  • Needless to say, respect the photo-policy. It doesn’t matter if you are an “artist” or a “journalist.” When you are at a burlesque show you are a guest. Treat your hosts and their rules with respect.
  • If you’re going to write a review of a burlesque performance, focus on the artistry, creativity, and talent of the performers more than just descriptions of their bodies. After all, it’s not talent that gives someone a specific weight, height, or cup size, but it takes talent to keep six hoola hoops up in the air, to dance en pointe as you undress, to twirl tassels on your ass, or to turn a disgraced children’s show host into the vehicle for a burlesque act. Give credit where credit is due and don’t bother mentioning who has cellulite or who has big tits.

As feminist burlesque performers, producers, and audience members, we have an obligation to create a neo-burlesque scene that is safe for all women and queer people and otherwise socially responsible.

So, that’s my manifesto-in-progress. It’s far from perfect, far from original (and I suspect I am mostly preaching to the converted here), but it’s a synthesis of some things I’ve been thinking about. I welcome comments, questions, and additional tips, as well as stories of amazing burlesque performances they have seen. Please link to artists when possible to give them credit. Also, share your stories of challenges you have faced as burlesque performers or producers in trying to create burlesque that is feminist.

Sarah Palin and the Drink America’s Milkshake Party

Within twenty-four hours of Obama’s history-making speech, McCain made another historical announcement, the addition of the first female vice-presidential candidate for a major American party since the Mondale-Ferraro ticket. And just as in the case with Mondale, many pundits view the addition of Palin to the Republican ticket as a gamble, or as one commenter put it, “doubling down.” There are many feminist implications to the nomination, made particularly interesting by the failed Clinton campaign, because it’s clear that the conservative strategy is not only to ride Clinton’s historical coattails, but also to mock the sexism in the liberal camp that has divided the party for decades.

Many liberals are concerned about picking on Palin the person as opposed to attacking Palin the politician. One of the problems with Palin is that her executive resume is so thin there isn’t a whole lot to critique. We know by now that she has a reputation for being a reformer and a whistleblower, which is meant to compliment McCain’s old reputation as a maverick. [Though curiously McCain is stepping back on his old ideals and marching in line with his presidential predecessors, even resorting to the old Bush-Cheney fallback of arresting protestors before his political events, or merely relocating them, to give the appearance of being uncontroversial. Oh, and Palin may also be cool with socially-conservative censorship. So very maverick-y.]

So here is Palin on the issues:

Perhaps the most brilliant part of putting Palin on the Republican ticket is that her milkshake brings the oil-hungry wing of the GOP to the yard. The Republicans have been dead set on drilling in Alaska for the last decade. Conservatives decry the use of alternative fuel sources, pushing the theory that to achieve energy independence we must start drilling on American soil. McCain has touted his record in support for alternative energy sources, but the addition of Palin and her obnoxious eagerness to drill in her home state makes this stance a wash. Or as D puts it,

…she puts the lie to McCain’s support for alternative and renewable energy. Palin got a gas pipeline deal — which everyone knew would happen one way or another — but hasn’t departed from the Alaskan motif of sucking everything from the ground before the communists come to snatch our guns away and turn the entire state into a park. She’ll be a boon to the Drill Now/Drink America’ Milkshake sloganeering that McCain will continue to push until November.

And interestingly enough, Palin is quite literally in bed with Big Oil — her husband Todd Palin is a long-time employee of BP.

The other curious thing about Palin’s relationship to Big Oil and the GOP is that one of her most successful pieces of legislation as governor is the ACES program, a tax on Big Oil. The three basic provisions for this tax plan included an increase on taxes of oil profits, a windfall provision that raised taxes after a certain benchmark, and a tax floor that guaranteed the oil companies would still pay 10% on the price of each barrel even if the cost per barrel went below a certain benchmark. The program was very successful, producing much more revenue for Alaska than anyone, including Palin, expected. As a certain sort of socialist liberal, I have no problem with this legislation. But hey, a tax hike is a tax hike.

If Palin were a Democrat, this is the kind of jeremiad you’d be hearing from Rush Limbaugh and Grover Norquist, but instead of talk about looting American businesses and destroying incentives to invest, we get crickets. Norquist doesn’t even mention taxes here and Limbaugh, who’s been talking up Palin for a while, doesn’t either. “Babies, guns, Jesus. Hot damn!” was his reaction yesterday.

So: one of the first things Palin did after she took office was to propose a big tax increase that included a windfall profits tax on the oil industry. I don’t have a big problem with that, and I’m sure the McCain campaign will eventually treat us all to a blizzard of spin about why her tax increase wasn’t really a tax increase. But facts are stubborn things…

Further back in her career as mayor of Wasilla, “Palin, who portrays herself as a fiscal conservative, racked up nearly $20 million in long-term debt as mayor of the tiny town of Wasilla — that amounts to $3,000 per resident. She argues that the debt was needed to fund improvements.”

In short, Palin’s relationship to the GOP’s traditional platform — less government, less taxes — is slippery at best, certainly making her a gamble for the fiscally-concerned wing of the Republican party. But many are saying that Palin is really meant to galvanize the socially-concerned wing of the Republican party, the “babies, guns, and Jesus” wing, as Limbaugh puts it.

Read More…Read More…

John McCain thinks women are stupid

Last night, upon hearing that Sarah Palin was McCain’s pick for VP, I thought it was bad news for us (but a good decision on his part). But after watching her speech, I’m re-considering. The invocation of Democratic women — particularly Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton — came across as shameless pandering, especially in light of the McCain team’s strategy to try and woo former Clinton supporters. It’s clear enough that Team McCain thinks women are so dumb that if they just switch the skirt, female voters will come running. This is the same party that has demonized Hillary Clinton for years, and now they’re singing her praises at a huge campaign rally? Uh-uh, female voters are not that dumb — even those “disaffected, angry” Clinton voters who CNN keeps telling me tend to be “older women.”

The fact is that John McCain has chosen a staunch conservative to be his running mate. She is anti-choice. She is against civil rights for gay and lesbian people. She wants to drill in the Alaskan Wildlife Refuge. She’s a gun nut. She’s a Buchanan supporter (and it doesn’t get much scarier than that). She wants to teach Creationism in schools. She doesn’t believe in global warming. She talks about having a child with Downs Syndrome, but then voted against funding special-needs programs in schools.

The McCain camp has picked an anti-woman woman to deliver their anti-woman message. It’s a card the GOP has been playing for a long, long time. They seem stuck on that statistic that 27% of Hillary Clinton voters are not supporting Barack Obama, and are trying to pull those voters to their side by talking about the glass ceiling and feminism (did you ever think you’d hear words like that used by the Republicans in a good way?). I wonder, though, how many of that 27% were moderate to right-leaning women in the first place, who supported Clinton because she’s Hillary Clinton and would have otherwise been voting Republican anyway? I just don’t imagine that there are significant numbers of truly progressive women who would support McCain out of spite (I’m sure there are a few, but it’s no 27%). And I don’t imagine that there are lots of women who would support an anti-woman candidate just because she has a vagina.

One thing I’m not looking forward to is watching progressives toss out the same old sexisms against Palin that have always been used against female politicians. I don’t like Palin, and I don’t particularly want to be defending her against attacks by fellow Obama supporters and media-makers, but those attacks are most certainly coming. Just watching CNN International, the focus on Hillary voters as vengeful witches intent on ruining the election has been stunning. Certainly Palin will receive her fair share of sexist media narratives as well — I’m particularly looking forward to Hillary Clinton’s response to Palin’s quoting of her, and how that will be cast as the ultimate powerful woman catfight.

Women are not stupid, even if John McCain thinks we are. And the progressives among us will not be voting for an anti-woman candidate just because she happens to be female. But hopefully, we also won’t be excusing sexism and misogyny directed at Sarah Palin just because we find her views abhorrent. And hopefully media elite and progressive writers will have the sense to attack Palin on the issues, and not on what’s in her pantsuits.

Seriously, CNN?

Palin has been the VP pick for all of five minutes, and already one of the (male) reporters on CNN just asked another reporter something along the lines of, “Now, Palin also has a baby with Down’s Syndrome. Those children require an awful lot of care. Do you think she’ll be able to balance taking care of that baby with being Vice President? I mean, having a Down’s Syndrome baby takes up a lot of time and energy.”

Ugh.

The (female) reporter answered by saying that the McCain campaign would probably point out that a similar question wouldn’t be asked of a man. She then mentioned that although Palin “unfortunately” has a baby with Down’s Syndrome, having that baby was a choice she made knowingly as a person with strong anti-abortion views, and that may endear her to conservative voters.

Sexism, followed by ableism. This is a nice reminder as to why I hate TV news.

Crap.

Even in Viet Nam, we’re getting word (via NYTimes.com and various folks on g-chat) that it’s Palin for McCain’s VP. Not good. She has a solid resume. She’s not an old white dude, which makes McCain look less stodgy. Biden will have a harder time debating against her without coming across as a bully (especially since he’s something of a loose cannon prone to idiotic slips of the tongue, despite being an excellent debater). She could potentially woo white suburban politically moderate female voters. She’s likeable and has a very all-American story. She has a son in the military. The media are already swooning over her.

All that said: She doesn’t have much foreign policy (or any other governing) experience, which puts a dent in McCain’s argument that experience is everything. But… yeah, this was a smart choice on McCain’s part. Damn.

Thoughts?

_______________________________
(Yes, I am still in SE Asia, and no, I am not coming back to blogging regularly quite yet. I happen to have internet in my room tonight, but won’t have it again regularly for another two weeks. I may be popping in and out and I have a few post ideas that I’m working on, but won’t be back to Feministe permanently until mid-September. Continue to enjoy your guest-bloggers!)

Caught Between the Tiger and the Crocodile

SD from the Foreign Affairs blog (a blog which tagline reads: Rantings on Cambodia, politics, human rights, corruption, feminism, the environment and other topics that provoke, interspersed with posts on life, the universe and everything) posted this interesting video on the issues impacting sex workers in Cambodia:

SD writes:

The popular opinion is that the the 2008 law to outlaw sex work was an election game and a strategic international move to curry favour. Whether this is the case or not, the police are using the law to imprison sex workers in “rehabilitation” centres. Money must change hands to secure a release.

The police strategy is to lock up women who carry condoms, assuming they are sex workers. Putting aside the issue of how messed up that notion is, it clashes with the 100% condom use campaign to reduce HIV transmission. The 100% condom use was working although there are issues of secondary sex workers and police harassment. The HIV infection rate is declining in Cambodia.

To me, this video symbolizes all of the issues faced in trying to solve a problem without the input of those directly impacted. In this case, sex workers. The campaign to end HIV/AIDS transmission has been warped into another way to incarcerate women. Closing down brothels has put many women in worse positions, unable to make money and forced into paying bribes to escape from “rehabilitation.” Women caught on the street carrying condoms could potentially be imprisoned – because condoms, instead of being proof of responsible sexual practices, have come to symbolize something else. And the worst thing of all is that sex workers are now more vulnerable to violence coming from police officers and armed services.

Related Links:

Sex Workers Present – Videos made by sex workers all over the world
Juliana Rincón Parra – Global Voices Author, where SD found the video

Posted in Sex

As promised…

Well, my time here at Feministe draws to a close…technically, it ends tomorrow, but I have some doctor appointments today and a dance competition beginning this eve, so my presense will be fleeting!  I want to thank the Feministe crew for having me, and yes, now as promised…

Some sex workers rights/outreach organizations- of varying type and stripe- by no means is it complete or fully comprehensive, but it’s a place to start:

EDAC (Canada)
SWAV (Canada)
Salli (Finland)
UKNSWP (UK)
Hooking is Real Employment (HIRE); 847 Monroe Drive Atlanta, GA 30308Telephone: 1-404-876-1212
BAYSWAN (Bay Area Sex Workers Advocacy Network)
COP (Coalition on Prostitution)PO Box 210256 San Francisco, CA 94121 Telephone: 1-415-751-1659
Sex Workers Action Coalition (SWAC)Box 6724 Oakland, CA 94603Telephone: 1-415-435-7931
PONY (Prostitutes of New York)
North American Task Force on Prostitution (NTFP)- 2785 Broadway 4L New York, NY 10025-2834 USA Telephone/Fax: 1-212-866-8854
JACGUAR (Johns and Call Girls United Against Repression)-P.O. Box 021011 Brooklyn, NY 11202-1011
Sisters Offering Support-P.O. Box 75042 Honolulu, Hawaii 96836Telephone: (808) 942-5070 Contact(s): Kelly A. Hill
POCAAN (People of Color Against AIDS Network)1200 S. Jackson Street, Ste. 25 Seattle, WA 98144Telephone: (206) 322-7061 Fax: (206) 322-7204
HIPS (Helping Individual Prostitutes Survive)
Scarlet Alliance (Australia)
NZPC (New Zealand)
And also, I’d like to leave you with some more sex worker words (h/t to Salora for these)
And…the blogs of some people who have been involved in the sex industry…with very diverse takes on the whole thing…do me a favor and treat these people with respect, eh?
Isabella Lund (A Swedish Sex Worker)
Posted in Sex