In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

:::Waves Lighter:::

Genius.

The Love Song Of J. Edgar Goldstein

Let us go then, you and I,
Where my leer is sprawled out upon the thigh
Of the lefty chick that waits upon my table;
Let me binge, in certain half-deserted streets,
With friends with pointed sheets

Through restless nights in Internet tirades
And sawed-off guys in chicken-hawk brigades:
Guys that swallow all my tedious arguments
Pusillanimous stray vents
That prompt in sane folk moral indigestion …

Oh, do not ask my meaning!
Let me get on with my preening.

On my blog the women come and bitch
Reading Ivan Denisovitch.

Read the rest.

Always Something Nice to Say

Eteraz asked me via email about whether there’d been any movement to establish chivalry among queers. He started wondering after seeing a show on MTV involving gay people being mean to other candidates. I’m not familiar with that particular one, but I’ve seen many other examples.

Read More…Read More…

Friday Feminist Round-Up

Kuwaiti women vote for the first time in the country’s history.

“I feel like I am a full citizen today,” said Maha Barjes, a member of Kuwait’s Human Rights Society and longtime women’s rights campaigner. “The results of this election will be very different. Even the men now acknowledge that.”

This is a big moment. Good for them.

Read More…Read More…

Grooms for Life

You’ve kinda gotta see it for yourself, but here’s a little preview:

Is there a way to radically decrease abortions without asking the government to do it? Adoption is often suggested here and that is a good alternative but I think there is another as well.

Marriage. I am not talking just about a return to the “shotgun marriage”; rather, I think an offer of marriage from a man who is not the father but will assume all the traditional responsibilities of fatherhood would be accepted by many unmarried pregnant women. The motif of a man proposing marriage to a woman pregnant with another man’s child is a common one on soap operas that are a fairly good gauge of female fantasy. These stories represent the truth that many pregnant women don’t really want to abort, and would not, if marriage and commitment were offered to them.

Grooms For Life could be facilitated on a practical basis by computerized matching of pro-life single men with unmarried pregnant women interested in carrying to term. Certainly, the number of Grooms For Life would fall short of the million and a half abortions per year–but the government would be able to ensure birth quite imperfectly as well. Additionally, female pro-lifers and married men could spend their time recruiting bachelors to their cause so that the screaming demonstrators outside abortion clinics would soon be replaced by swains in bow ties, holding rings and serenading the pregnant women.

Read More…Read More…

Friday Random Ten – the “I’m Too Busy Playing With This Celebrity Facial Recognizer Thing to Come Up With a Proper Title” edition

1. Van Morrison – You Don’t Know Me
2. Maxwell – Amazing
3. Herbie Hancock ft. Miles Davis & Wayne Shorter – Masqualero
4. Bob Dylan – Things Have Changed
5. David Bowie – Man Who Sold the World
6. The Bad Plus – Iron Man
7. Elliott Smith – Taking a Fall
8. The Harlem Shakes – A Night
9. Emiliana Torrini – To Be Free
10. Magnetic Fields – You’re My Only Home

Posted in Uncategorized

So…

Why is it that posts about blow jobs, religion and Wal-Mart are the ones that generate over 100 posts?

Common Sense Prevails

The federal advisory panel looking at the HPV vaccine has recommended, unanimously, that 11- and 12-year-old girls be routinely vaccinated, with vaccinations for girls as young as 9 up to the discretion of parents and doctors.

ATLANTA – Taking up a sensitive issue among religious conservatives, an influential government advisory panel Thursday recommended that 11- and 12-year-old girls be routinely vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices also said the shots can be started for girls as young as 9, at the discretion of their doctors.

The committee’s recommendations usually are accepted by federal health officials, and influence insurance coverage for vaccinations.

And this is great news:

The committee also voted to add the HPV vaccine to the coverage list for the federal Vaccines for Children program, which pays for immunizations for the poor. That could mean $50 million to $100 million in additional spending in the first year, government officials said.

What’s interesting is that, despite all the furor over the vaccine in certain influential conservative-Christian quarters (yes, Daddy Dobson, I’m looking at YOU), the actual public hearings weren’t exactly filled with the Sex=Death crowd:

Some health officials had girded themselves for arguments from religious conservatives and others that vaccinating youngsters against the sexually transmitted virus might make them more likely to have sex. But the controversy never materialized in the panel’s public meetings.

Sounds like the Schiavo Effect: entirely too much attention is paid to the whining of a minority of very loud religious leaders on an issue which the vast majority of people, including religious conservatives, feel is a private matter.

Now, the panel didn’t go so far as to recommend that the shots be mandatory for school admission, but you’d never know that from the whining coming out of Colorado Springs:

Another organization, Colorado-based Focus on the Family, was even stronger in voicing fears that states would require schoolchildren to get HPV shots.

“By giving its highest level of recommendation, the panel has placed strong pressure on state governments to make HPV vaccinations mandatory,” Linda Klepacki, a Focus on the Family analyst for sexual health, said in a statement.

“If that happens, state officials, not parents, would become the primary sexual-health decision makers for America’s children. That’s the way things are done in dictatorships, not democracies.”

Oh, but what’s this? Evidence that the wingnut’s main argument against the vaccine, that it would promote promiscuity, isn’t all it’s cracked up to be?

Surveys suggest the shots will have little effect on youngsters’ sexual behavior, said Nicole Liddon, a behavioral scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In a recent survey of virgins 15 to 19, only 10 percent of boys and 7 percent of girls cited fear of disease as a reason not to have sex, Liddon said.

So, congratulations to ACIP for making a decision on the merits, not on the noise from the religious right.

Now, if you could talk to the FDA about Plan B…

I Give Up.

I know I said I’d post about Hamdan when I got a chance to read it, but I haven’t, and anyway Glenn Greenwald has it covered. As does Scott.

Posted in Law