In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Question

So, it occurs to me that I’ve been writing things like, “We’re on the road to Gilead” an awful lot lately, and…well…I’m not exactly sure how to pronounce it.

I’ve been pronouncing it “Juh-LED” in my head, but mostly because that’s the way that Gilead, Connecticut is pronounced. Gilead is near Hebron, which is pronounced “HEE-bron” in Connecticut and “heh-BRUN” in the West Bank.

At least I know that BURR-lin, Connecticut is pronounced that way because of an effort to distance the town from Berlin during WWI. But I have no reference for Gilead.

Carrying the Organic Thing a Little Far

How nicely the feeling of personal virtue and moral superiority some people get from doing the organic thing dovetails with the feeling of personal virtue and moral superiority some people get from being pious. The latest, from Broadsheet and Jessica at Feministing: “Organic Sex“:

“Many women, in an effort to live healthily, who have [sic] turned to organic and unprocessed foods. They have come to also realize that artificial contraception isn’t very healthy either, and that its numerous side effects should be avoided.”

Now, there are plenty of reasons that women may be uneasy about taking hormonal birth control — I know I never had much luck with BCPs, seeing as how I had to take a high-dose pill due to getting my period every 22 days (16.6 times a year!) and missing a dose time by even a few minutes could get me bleeding for a MONTH — but there are plenty of very effective barrier methods that don’t involve altering body chemistry or inserting foreign objects into one’s uterus.

Oh, but no. According to the site quoted above, Contra-Contraception, the only way to have “organic sex” is to do away with all forms of birth control except the rhythm method, and to embrace Natural Family Planning.

Hmm. Now where have we heard this before?

Oh, that’s right! From Dawn Eden and her acolytes! And look — Contra-Contraception is a sister site to Mary Worthington’s No Room For Contraception, which takes an explicitly religious stance in advocating NFP (which may very well kill more blastocysts than hormonal BC). From Broadsheet:

The Contra-Contraception campaign also (untruthfully) denies any affiliation with the religious right, claiming that it’s just into natural sexuality. “It’s time to get to the heart of the matter, and time for the media to stop smearing the effort by labeling it as a religious movement,” the site says. “Organic sex is here to stay, and more and more people from all walks of life are enjoying it.”

Very sneaky, guys! But as Jessica points out, “Contra-Contraception isn’t some site run by organic-sex loving folks who are worried about the health implications of hormonal birth control.” Instead, it’s brought to you by Worthington, who, as Jessica noted back in March, has also likened birth control to euthanasia and speculated that contraception could lead to homosexuality.

Priya Jain’s Salon article on the religious right’s efforts to ban contraception contains a lot more information on Worthington. Incidentally, “Contra-Contraception” was the title Jill chose for her post on the huge New York Times Magazine article titled “The War on Contraception.”

We already have plenty of groups spreading lies and disinformation about the Pill and about Plan B and about the way pregnancy happens. The Contra-Contraception site’s information on NFP gives no indication of how exacting and time-consuming it is; it simply links to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Web page on NFP. The anti-contraceptive crowd will use any lever whatsoever to get contraception banned — without, of course, admitting that that’s what they’re doing. Why *not* use the Trojan (NPI) Horse of the organic movement and concern about environmental chemicals to push a religious agenda under cover of a progressive idea? The idea that contraception might be a personal decision never seems to occur to them — and really, I have yet to see them offer any sort of coherent rationale for their stance against barrier methods. As Broadsheet points out, there’s probably no danger to the well-informed from this tactic, but there’s plenty to worry about when it comes to the uninformed:

I’m not too worried that the organic sex campaign will deter anyone who has access to unbiased information about sex and contraception. But I am sincerely hoping and praying this organic sex palaver doesn’t get into — and further muddy the waters of — abstinence-only sex-ed curricula.

Real Simple

Sheelzebub on Voluntary Simplicity:

Disconnected individuals making haphazard consumer choices will change nothing. It has changed nothing. If we relied on that during the second wave of feminism, we’d still be seeing Help Wanted: Female in the classifieds.

(Since this is an abuse of the link button, I’d appreciate it if you’d go over there and join that conversation, already in progress.)

Ralph Reed Steps In It. Again.

Pity poor Ralph Reed. It’s soooo hard to be both a corporate bootlicker and a good antichoicer. The corporate bootlicking’s coming back to haunt him:

In August 1999, political organizer Ralph Reed’s firm sent out a mailer to Alabama conservative Christians asking them to call then-Rep. Bob Riley (R-Ala.) and tell him to vote against legislation that would have made the U.S. commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands subject to federal wage and worker safety laws.

The Northern Marianas are part of the US but thanks to the campaign cash of folks like Jack Abramoff and the cravenness of politicians like Reed and Tom DeLay, are not subject to US wage, hour and safety laws. The result is that a lot of companies set up sweatshops there with Chinese workers who are kept as virtual slaves while they work to pay back the “recruitment” fees for getting them their fabulous jobs in the US– and forced into prostitution and to have abortions if they become pregnant — and, because Saipan is US territory, those companies can then slap a “Made in the USA” label on their products to fool consumers who are cognizant about that kind of thing but who aren’t looking for the union label.

Here’s the text of the mailer Reed sent out:

“The radical left, the Big Labor Union Bosses, and Bill Clinton want to pass a law preventing Chinese from coming to work on the Marianas Islands,” the mailer from Reed’s firm said. The Chinese workers, it added, “are exposed to the teachings of Jesus Christ” while on the islands, and many “are converted to the Christian faith and return to China with Bibles in hand.”

So, it’s okay to pay these indentured servants slave wages, pimp them out to sex tourists, forcibly abort their pregnancies, and expose them to excessive hours and dangerous conditions because, hey! They’re a captive audience, ripe for prosetylization while they slump over their sewing machines, and they’ll get a shiny new Bible to take back with them to China, where they’ll undoubtedly be much worse off than when they left. Don’t believe me?

A year earlier, the Department of the Interior — which oversees federal policy toward the U.S. territory — presented a very different picture of life for Chinese workers on the islands. An Interior report found that Chinese women were subject to forced abortions and that women and children were subject to forced prostitution in the local sex-tourism industry.

It also alleged that the garment industry and other businesses set up facilities on the Northern Marianas to produce products labeled “Made in the USA,” while importing workers from China and other Asian countries and paying them less than U.S. minimum wage under conditions not subject to federal safety standards.

Check the spin from Reed’s spokeswoman:

“As a defender of the unborn, Ralph was unaware of any allegations regarding inhumane or illegal treatment of workers, and he would strongly object to such practices, if true,” she added.

Has he, though? And given how close he was to Abramoff (and how neck-deep in Abramoff’s other lobbying abuses he was), I doubt he could have been completely unaware:

Reed’s close friend and political ally, disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, represented the commonwealth as a partner of Greenberg Traurig. The islands’ government paid Abramoff $4.04 million from 1998 to 2002. Greenberg Traurig hired Millennium Marketing to print the mailing.
. . .

The Mariana mailing adds another hurdle to Reed’s campaign, which already has been plagued by the disclosures that Abramoff paid Reed more than $4 million to conduct grass-roots lobbying on behalf of Indian casinos seeking to prevent potential competitors from getting approval to open new facilities.

Remember, this is the guy that “moderate” Rudy Giuliani has campaigned for and endorsed. But Rudy doesn’t necessarily pick his friends well — just look at Bernie Kerik.

I am a bad, bad linker.

Am I the only blogger who has difficulty remembering this whole link thing, or keeping a reliable system of linking and communication in mind? Maybe the problem is that I’m a big technophobe. Two years ago, and well into my blog-commenting career, I was still, “What is this hy-par-tekst of which you speak?”

Thanks, Same-Sex Marriage Ban!

For not only persecuting gays and lesbians, but unmarried people as well.

DAYTON, Ohio – A constitutional amendment banning gay marriage bars prosecutors from charging some unmarried people under the state’s domestic violence law, a state appeals court ruled.

Friday’s decision by the 2nd District Court of Appeals is the first from Ohio’s 12 appellate courts to rule that the Defense of Marriage amendment, passed by voters in 2004, means that the domestic violence law does not apply to unmarried people.

Fantastic. Now, before the MRA’s and other opponents of domestic violence legislation get too excited about this, check out the facts of this case: It was a woman charged with abusing her boyfriend. See? Anti-gay legislation screws us all.

“Until the high court decides, unmarried defendants, who would have faced felony domestic violence charges, will be charged with misdemeanor assault charges in Greene County,” Schmidt said.

That’s right: Exact same crime, but depending on whether or not you’re married to the victim, you get a lighter sentence. Because in our fabulous patriarchal system, heterosexuality is compulsory and marriage is the only proper way to demonstrate it. Step outside of that mold by being gay, lesbian, or unmarried, and you lose basic state protections if you’re the victim of a particular kind of violent crime.

via feministing.

The Holocaust Was Not Christian

Thank you.

When I read Pope Benedict XVI’s words about the Holocaust, I was stunned at his attempt to turn the Holocaust into a Christian tragedy. Not that it wasn’t anything I hadn’t heard before from a handful of deeply narcissistic Christians with persecution complexes, but to hear the leader of the Catholic church say it? Unbelievable. As the writer of this op/ed says:

Benedict falsely exonerated Germans from their responsibility for the Holocaust by blaming only a “ring of criminals” who “used and abused” the duped and dragooned German people as an “instrument” of destruction. In truth, Germans by and large supported the Jews’ persecution, and many of the hundreds of thousands of perpetrators were ordinary Germans who acted willingly. It is false to attribute culpability for the Holocaust wholly or even primarily to a “criminal ring.” No German scholar or mainstream politician would today dare put forth Benedict’s mythologized account of the past.

Benedict did say correctly that the “rulers of the Third Reich wanted to crush the entire Jewish people.” But he then turned the Holocaust into an assault most fundamentally not on Jews but on Christianity itself, by falsely asserting that the ultimate reason the Nazis wanted to kill Jews was “to tear up the taproot of the Christian faith” — meaning that their motivation to kill Jews was because Judaism was the parent religion of Christianity.

Read More…Read More…

Arrived!

I got into Athens safe and sound yesterday afternoon. Today has mostly been getting all my stuff together — unpacking, going grocery shopping, setting up my computer at work, etc. The place I’m staying is beautiful, about an hour outside of the city — but in the middle of nowhere. Literally. There’s a church, a bakery, a taverna, and the beach across the street, and that’s it. Even the grocery store is twenty minutes away by car. But it’s pretty and there’s a bus into Athens every hour, so it’s not so bad. And I’m perfectly happy sitting at the beach with my book in the evenings. I’ll post pictures tomorrow, and will return to regularly blogging soon — if not in a few minutes, when I get bored.

If you want a postcard, email me your address!