In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Plain Girls Pretty

Because I do not like the scars that result from double-incision and prefer not to have them myself, I have spent most of my time and energy focusing on top-surgery options that do not involve much scarring. Just recently, I was discussing surgery options with an ftm friend and his girlfriend. When she asked why “keyhole” surgery–one of the ones I’ve been contemplating–was called “keyhole,” my friend answered that it could be because the incisions were so small. And I said, “As opposed to double-incision, where they just throw the doors open!” My friend gently explained that maybe it wasn’t such a good idea to say stuff like that in front of someone who had undergone that procedure, like for instance him.

He was absolutely right. That was a deeply insensitive thing to say. He really doesn’t need to hear that from me or anyone. I won’t want any comments on sagging leftover tissue or overlarge nipples after I’m done.

When transgendered people talk about transition, the general rule of order is to make personal statements, and to keep the language as respectful and neutral as possible. It’s difficult to remember this at times, since most of us are negotiating some very strong, if subjective, dysphoria, and a lot of us are very eager for whatever results we’re chasing. But the pre-op genitalia some other guy can’t live with is the vagina I don’t want to live without. The metaoidioplasty I think of as inadequate to my needs is perfectly satisfactory to some other guy. The pregnancy that one guy could never endure is the pregnancy another guy can’t wait for. And the phalloplasty that one guy sees as a “frankendick”* is another guy’s dream come true.

All of the possible decisions, from whether to undergo phalloplasty to whether to transition at all, are hateful to some people and necessary to others. If it’s personal, keep it personal. If it’s unkind or humiliating, keep it to yourself. We hear plenty of that kind of transsexual body-hatred from outsiders, and most of us will be fighting its echoes all our lives. We don’t need to encounter it in supportive or private spaces.

(This is also why I’m extremely leery of discussing my bottom-surgery preferences among people who are not transsexual. I don’t want anyone to get the idea that the current options for ftms are inadequate in some objective, overarching sense simply because I’ve opted out of them. For a lot of ftms, they work, they satisfy, they complete. You can have orgasms with them and all kinds of good stuff. Mainstream press articles tend to repeat uncritically the idea that transmen just don’t get good dicks. While it’s true that some guys reject them and some guys settle, it’s neither respectful nor accurate to treat post-op transmale genitalia as a crap knockoff of the real thing. And it’s just plain sexist to argue that transguys can’t have penises, and that’s that.)

Anyhoo, I opened up the paper yesterday morning and saw this, and now I am, what’s the word, enraged. All it took was a couple of too-too-clever references to character actors in the wrong context.

But nothing really worked. A transsexual who decided late in life to transition to female gender, Roberts went to San Francisco plastic surgeon Douglas Ousterhout last fall and requested a new face. She wanted to “pass,” which in her case meant altering a Governator jaw, a large nose and a low, protruding brow line that “made me feel about as feminine as one of the females in ‘Planet of the Apes.’

“I felt like I could not shift over to a full-time gender position until my face — my identity — was correct,” explains Roberts. The 59-year-old Seattle musician and retired business executive is 6 feet tall and has a 25-year-old son. He found out about Ousterhout’s innovative facial feminization surgery online and decided to take the leap. The results, five months later, are dramatic: instead of the receding hairline, lantern jaw and (actor) Geoffrey Rush profile, Roberts is a perfectly plausible female.

Fuck you, Edward Guthmann. Look, it’s true that the transwomen you interview in this article describe their preferences in rather colorful terms, and it’s true that their phrasing is not exactly respectful, but you? Can shut the fuck up. Yes, you, Edward Guthmann, who has never been mocked in any newspaper article as an utter failure at being Edward Guthmann.

You did a modicum of research on facial feminization surgery; you know that it costs money:

For $22,000 to $40,000 — roughly twice the cost of sexual reassignment surgery — Ousterhout’s patients undergo as much as 10 1/2 hours of surgery. They remain in the hospital two days after surgery, then transfer to the Cocoon House, a bed-and-breakfast facility run by two nurses in Noe Valley, for eight days of convalescence.

Do I need to tell you that that kind of price tag means that facial feminization surgery is completely out of reach for a great many transwomen? Do I need to tell you that some of them might yet desire it? Do I need to tell you that some of them might reject it for a variety of reasons? Do I need to tell you that most of them, however they feel about their faces, would probably like to be seen as female without having to satisfy Edward Guthmann’s definition of plausibility? Do I need to tell you that some of them might also have to listen to the same verbal abuse on which you riff with such virtuosity? Do I need to tell you that some of them might be reading this very article? Do I need to remind you that the “Linebacker in a Dress” stereotype is so firmly embedded in the mainstream consciousness that it hardly requires paragraph after paragraph of remedial ridicule to bring it to glowing life in the minds of your readers?

Apparently so!

“I also don’t like the width of my nose,” Windsor adds. In fact, it’s as masculine and unavoidable as Adrien Brody’s. The surgery will also lift her upper lip closer to her nose, allowing for a more feminine smile. It’s a subtle difference, Ousterhout says, but men have a vertically longer upper lip than women. It’s not noticeable when they smile, but when a man’s lips are parted a few millimeters, the upper teeth are hidden. Ousterhout shortens the upper lip by making an incision immediately beneath the sill of the nose.

Aw, Eddie, you charmer, that’s so sweet! I wonder if she knew what you were gonna say about her face before she opened up yesterday’s paper.

And of course there are the truly pathetic transwomen who are just fucked, regardless:

She’s got a point: Think of Roberta Muldoon, the professional football player-turned-lady played by John Lithgow in “The World According to Garp.” Or Roy “Ruth” Applewood, a Midwestern husband and dad, played by the bearish Tom Wilkinson, who shocks his family by coming out as transgender in the cable drama “Normal.”

Oh, but there’s more. Any woman brought up on a steady diet of teen magazines knows what comes after the excoriation of an abnormal body:

Not everyone agrees that FFS is desirable for transitioning transsexuals. San Francisco entertainer Veronica Klaus had genital reassignment surgery and breast augmentation but decided against facial surgery. “While I think it can be an important step in realizing one’s potential, it’s more important that one’s self-esteem come first from the inside.”

We mustn’t forget to mention self-esteem! It’d be like leaving the sprig of parsley off of the plate of saltimboca! Lip-service to inner beauty–you know, like the kind all the women you just insulted will have regardless of whether or not they’ve made their bodies acceptable to you or anyone else?

*This is a slur, so much so that I share it with reservations.

Diary of a Brazilian Call Girl

This book is going on my Amazon list.

A Brazilian call girl / blogger-turned-author is scandalizing many with her unapologetic tone and sexual frankness. While I would love to get into a whole essay on the many feminist issues involved in prostitution, I’m sadly forced to forgo it in favor of administrative law. So I’ll leave it to all of you in the comments.

To Do Tomorrow: Party!

For all the feminists and pro-feminists out there looking for a good time in NYC, Feministing is hosting their second anniversary party tomorrow at Sweet and Vicious (one of my favorite bars. Nice choice, ladies). I will be there with a cabal of feminist friends, and it will be my only breath of fresh air until finals are done on May 10th. If you’re in the city, you should drop by. The details:

fem

Friday, April 28th, 9pm
Sweet & Vicious
5 Spring Street (btwn Bowery and Elizabeth)

Selling out and Buying in

So Jay, just like me, tends to get kinda ranty whenever anyone denies ambiguity in his current bodily circumstance, or elides it as part of his claimed body:

Some people tell me that by having surgeries and taking hormones I’ve lost my ambiguity. Usually they make these statements as expressions of their own ambivalence around transsexuality.

Wonder what they’d think if they saw me in my birthday suit?

A commenter, EL, articulated something that’s bothered me for a long time:

What I’m saying is that the cisgendered folks who feel so self-righteous about “calling out” transfolks on their “buying into gender norms” and such are rarely themselves radically transgressing norms of gender expression, and have few qualms about it. It’s cool, in their minds, to play “male” or “female” straight-up, but if someone is going to have the gall to transition, then by golly, they better be confounding gender norms externally every minute of their lives.

What ze said, except I would describe the argument as going even further. If you transition, you cannot possibly confound gender norms externally or conceptually; you’ve gone and sold out to them, and defined your life and identity in service to them.

My transition did not make it more difficult, let alone impossible, for me to personify either ambiguity or human variance from inhumane gender rules. All it did was give me a different set of laws to deviate from. I’m not sure why passing as a woman prior to transition somehow fails to play into people’s assumptions in ways that passing as male post-transition succeeds.

Thank You All

The Catholicism discussion below is probably, as Lauren noted, the longest discussion thread here at Feministe that has remained both civil and interesting.

So, thanks for keeping it that way and thanks for not trolling.

I think one of the things that may keep things civil is that any assertion about doctrine can be fact-checked against the Vatican’s own website, which is one of the benefits of a top-down religion with a giant library and research apparatus.

10 Questions Meme

From Erica at Swirlspice:

1. When is the last time you had a papercut? Today. The LAW is document-intensive.
2. Would you rather have a 5 pound tumor on your face or a 50 pound tumor on your back, neither of which could ever be removed? I’m going to have to go with Erica’s answer here: *shriek* On my back, I guess. I could not look at that in the mirror every day.
3. What was the best part of your weekend? The napping. It’s always the napping.
4. Do you like peanut butter? Hell yeah. There was a time in my childhood when I wouldn’t eat anything but.
5. List three foods you can’t stand. Mayonnaise, ranch dressing and oysters.
6. Did you make your bed this morning? Of course not.
7. When it comes to handshakes, are you firm? Yes. Not hand-crushingly so, but firm.
8. What was the most effective punishment for you as a kid? The slotted metal spoon. Which was one step up from the wooden spoon. One lashing with that thing and the memory of the sound of it going through the air was enough to keep you to spankable offenses.
9. What is your favorite way to fix/eat potatoes? Roasted in olive oil, with salt, pepper and rosemary.
10. Ask me something. If you were to wear underwear commonly ascribed to the opposite sex, what kind would it be? (Or, for the transgendered: what kind did you start wearing when you started to transition?)

It’s not racist! It’s just racist!

I see nothing potentially offensive about this at all! Why, it’s just good business practice to alienate a good portion of your patrons by implying that they’re dirty and difficult and that their patronage is unfairly burdensome to you. Think of it as actuarial hair, aggressive shearing of overhead costs. It’s not like there’s any system that would allow stylists to charge for actual rather than hypothetical service–what more reliable measure of hairstyle or hair maintenance is there than race? Dillard’s is downright progressive!

Go read the post. Then read all the comments from, ahem, preferred customers whose hair is a time-consuming pain in the ass to style. Oh, and go here to read about the easiest, breeziest style of all! (Okay, yes, Jill Gerston is apparently not of the good and it’s not like all the goldplate girls spend the price of rent on freaking dyejobs, but still. Like Pam said so eloquently, for the luvagod.)