In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Mother Nature Hates You. Sorry.

It’s downright amazing to me that in such a short period of time, the same theories of animalistic violence that can’t be controlled have been dusted off and moved from black people to men, but this time the exact opposite conclusion has been reached. Instead of men’s supposedly inherent violence being used as an excuse to lock them up and throw away the key, it’s being touted as a reason for feminists to give up and suggest to women that we just put up with it or somehow tailor our behavior somehow to fix it. (This particular theory that Begley criticizes suggests that partner-murder is tied into female infidelity, which is a slap in the face to the thousands of women killed each year who did not “ask for it” by cheating.)

That the exact same “just so” story can be used for wildly different ends is just more evidence that the actual theories touted are utterly irrelevant–regardless of the evidence, regardless of the theory, the conclusion is always the same–the current power structures and hierarchies of society are intractable and a product of nature. In other words: “Sorry, oppressed and battered peoples of the world, wish we could help, but Mother Nature hates you and likes us.”

Read the rest.

Note To Self

Don’t put eardrops in Doug’s ears without rubber gloves, rubber pants, and a rubber jacket. Line walls with plastic sheeting.

Summer Reading

After a long night of knitting and homeworking, I am about to curl up in bed with a book I’ve been looking forward to rereading for a week. In fact, I managed to line up a good deal of my summer reading in one fell swoop.

Nostalgia crept over me when I passed the discount table outside of the bookstore last week. The entire Earth’s Children series by Jean M. Auel was on sale for $1 per book. I couldn’t resist. I loved these books when I was a kid, and now that I know a bit more about history and evolution, hope to reevaluate the books from a more critical perspective, and assuage some of that nostalgia for little Ayla as she grows from a child to one of the finest fictional role models I had as a sniveling tween.

It had better be as good as I remember it.

A Request for Civility

Because a select few find it prudent to post abusive and/or inappropriate comments to my blog, I have a quick note to all the newbies sent here via Amanda’s radio stint:

Read More…Read More…

Kos Gets Real

So over the weekend, certain segments of the community have erupted in anger over the TBS ad for their reality show, the Real Gilligan’s Island. Apparently, having two women throw pies at each other, wrestle each other in a sexy, lesbianic manner, then having water splashed on their ample, fake bosoms is degrading to women. Or something like that.

Whatever. Feel free to be offended. I find such humorless, knee-jerk reactions, to be tedious at best, sanctimonious and arrogant at worst. I don’t care for such sanctimony from Joe Lieberman, I don’t care for it from anyone else. Some people find such content offensive. Some people find it arousing. Some people find it funny. To each his or her own.

But I am not Lieberman. I won’t sit there and judge pop culture and act as gatekeeper to what I think is “appropriate”, and what isn’t.

And I certainly won’t let the sanctimonious women’s studies set play that role on this site. Feel free to be offended. Feel free to claim that I’m somehow abandoning “progressive principles” by running the ad. It’s a free country. Feel free to storm off in a huff. Other deserving bloggers could use the patronage.

Me, I’ll focus on the important shit.

Is the ad in and of itself offensive? Not necessarily. What is offensive is Kos’ dismissal of feminist complaint, concern and criticism regarding a pretty sexist ad designed for het male titillation run on the most widely-known progressive blog for his own personal profit.

Objectifying and demeaning any minority group for the sake of profit, be it corporate or personal, is abhorrent. This is exactly why I resist the Democratic party and most of its advocates. Women and women’s opinions don’t matter if they run contrary to the bottom line.

UPDATE: Echidne has something to say on this “liberal anti-feminism” thing as well.

Ciao Regazzi!

Well, its looking like my internet access in Sardinia is going to be slightly more limited than I thought (I also cant find the apostrophe on this keyboard, so please just pretend that its there in the necessary places). But I will try and post as often as I can. Im having a great time. Sardinia is gorgeous, the family Im staying with is amazing and incredibly hospitable, and the food is delicious — Im eating constantly, and its great. Life here is very relaxed. Im reading a lot (just finished “Manifesta” by Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards, and now Im re-reading “The Beauty Myth” and still working on “The World is Flat”) and doing a lot of writing. I spent all morning today at the beach — white sand, emerald water… its perfect.

The people Ive met are very interested in Italian and American politics, and have been telling me quite a bit about there opinions about both. A big issue for Italians right now is a referendum on fertility treatments that the Catholic Church opposes. As it was explained to me, the current law is very regressive: no sperm or egg donations, only two emryos can be implanted at once, embryonic stem cell research is banned, etc. The country will vote on all of these things this Saturday or Sunday (I think), and the Catholic Church is urging people not to vote. In Italy, if a referendum vote has less than 50 percent turnout, its considered invalid — so the Church is trying to create a situation where the vote wont even count. The referendum vote is also on a weekend, the weather is hot, and so theres lots of worry that they wont surpass the 50 percent turnout requirement.

Interest in American politics is also strong — most people want to know, “How could George W. Bush get reelected?” I dont know how to answer that question. It confuses me, too. The people Ive met say they miss Bill Clinton, and hope that Hillary gets elected in 2006. Its incredible to see how important American politics are to people halfway around the world — to the point where they know all the important political figures and closely follow what happens. It would be nice if Americans did the same.

On a different topic, I was talking to one extended member of the family Im staying with, and she was asking questions about the United States — “Whats the word for ___,” etc, and we were talking about how kids are raised, how we speak to them, etc. She asked if we have terms for little kids private parts, and said that in Italy boys have “little p’s” and girls have a “farfalle” — a butterfly. I thought that was so wondeful — to raise little girls with the belief that their vulva is beautiful, like a butterfly. Its a far cry from the non-discussion in the U.S., or the shame-based sexual education we give our children that leads to a larger perception of womens sexual organs as ugly. I think that if I have daughters, theyll be taught that they have a “butterfly” — not a “thing” that will not be named.

PandAmanda on His Side

Amanda of Pandagon will be the featured guest on Men’s Rights Activist Glenn Sacks’ radio show tonight from 5PM PST / 8PM EST.

This is how Sacks frames this particular show:

The American Coalition for Fathers and Children and a myriad of Michigan fatherhood organizations are sponsoring the Families and Fathers Conference 2005: Healing Our Families–A Time for Change. Speakers include: ACFC President Stephen Baskerville; family law attorney Jeffrey Leving; Dr. Ned Holstein of Fathers and Families of Massachusetts; Dr. Steven Walker of Families in Transition; and others. Many conference attendees and supporters see the fatherhood movement as the civil rights movement of our era.

Feminist writer Amanda Marcotte disagrees. She believes that both the Conference and the fathers’ movement as a whole seek to “reverse feminist gains in divorce and custody laws,” and help men “use children as a tool” in order to “regain control of their ex-wives’ lives.” Marcotte labels Parental Alienation Syndrome a “fake syndrome” and says “the underlying issue for a lot of fathers’ rights activists is paying child support.”

Fair enough. But the “civil rights movement of our era?” I think there are more pressing civil rights movements in the world than reframing divorce laws. While you’re listening, be sure to check out the ads during the show. Your head might fall off of your neck.

Click here to listen live. This page also includes instructions on how to call the show. Amanda would appreciate live, active feminist support.

NOTE: Listen to the mp3 recording of the show. Pay attention to the ads.

Hurry!

Link to me, or the Bible gets it!

Alright, people, I’m gonna get tough. You know what I want, and you’d better give it to me.

I’ve got a bible here, and a 44oz. Diet Cokeā€¦lots of liquid containing a diuretic, to boot. In about an hour, I figure my bladder is going to be pretty full. You know what could happen.