In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Ciao Regazzi!

Well, its looking like my internet access in Sardinia is going to be slightly more limited than I thought (I also cant find the apostrophe on this keyboard, so please just pretend that its there in the necessary places). But I will try and post as often as I can. Im having a great time. Sardinia is gorgeous, the family Im staying with is amazing and incredibly hospitable, and the food is delicious — Im eating constantly, and its great. Life here is very relaxed. Im reading a lot (just finished “Manifesta” by Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards, and now Im re-reading “The Beauty Myth” and still working on “The World is Flat”) and doing a lot of writing. I spent all morning today at the beach — white sand, emerald water… its perfect.

The people Ive met are very interested in Italian and American politics, and have been telling me quite a bit about there opinions about both. A big issue for Italians right now is a referendum on fertility treatments that the Catholic Church opposes. As it was explained to me, the current law is very regressive: no sperm or egg donations, only two emryos can be implanted at once, embryonic stem cell research is banned, etc. The country will vote on all of these things this Saturday or Sunday (I think), and the Catholic Church is urging people not to vote. In Italy, if a referendum vote has less than 50 percent turnout, its considered invalid — so the Church is trying to create a situation where the vote wont even count. The referendum vote is also on a weekend, the weather is hot, and so theres lots of worry that they wont surpass the 50 percent turnout requirement.

Interest in American politics is also strong — most people want to know, “How could George W. Bush get reelected?” I dont know how to answer that question. It confuses me, too. The people Ive met say they miss Bill Clinton, and hope that Hillary gets elected in 2006. Its incredible to see how important American politics are to people halfway around the world — to the point where they know all the important political figures and closely follow what happens. It would be nice if Americans did the same.

On a different topic, I was talking to one extended member of the family Im staying with, and she was asking questions about the United States — “Whats the word for ___,” etc, and we were talking about how kids are raised, how we speak to them, etc. She asked if we have terms for little kids private parts, and said that in Italy boys have “little p’s” and girls have a “farfalle” — a butterfly. I thought that was so wondeful — to raise little girls with the belief that their vulva is beautiful, like a butterfly. Its a far cry from the non-discussion in the U.S., or the shame-based sexual education we give our children that leads to a larger perception of womens sexual organs as ugly. I think that if I have daughters, theyll be taught that they have a “butterfly” — not a “thing” that will not be named.


9 thoughts on Ciao Regazzi!

  1. Jill writes: Interest in American politics is also strong — most people want to know, “How could George W. Bush get reelected?” I dont know how to answer that question. It confuses me, too.

    a very good question… but you could always ask them how they managed to elect Silvio Berlusconi (noted apologist for Mussolini & all around criminal)?

    actually, i think he has a summer house in Sardinia somewhere…

  2. I can’t even imagine what American politics would be like if every referendum under 50% voter turnout was invalid. Nothing would ever get passed!

  3. Italy’s voter turnout is 92.5%, which makes it #1 in the world, according to the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. The US is #114. Just happened to read that in Ted Rall’s “Wake up… You’re Liberal” the other day…

    I don’t usually pay attention to stats, but wow, that’s embarassing.

  4. I’m glad that you’re having a wonderful time! It’s really inspiring. 🙂 I’m looking forward to more posts…when you can!

    I really like the idea of the “butterfly” as well. Beats getting compared to a fish.

  5. Pingback: Hillary Now
  6. In my Human Sexuality class we had a long discussion over how we call “hand” and “foot” and “head” and “arm” by their proper names but we have to call genitalia by things like “wee-wee” or “pee-pee” or “privates”. Any kid I have will be taught their body parts by their proper names and be told to not be ashamed of them. “Butterfly” is beautiful though.

  7. I taught my daugher that is was called a vagina and a penis. I try to shy away from calling it what it actually is as I don’t want my kids to think it’s in anyway different from the rest of their bodies.

    She knows babies come out of the vagina and is frankly horrified at the thought. At 7 she has declared herself childfree. I get no end of giggles out of this.

    We’re tossing around the idea of allowing her to watch the birth of the child I’m due to deliver in a few months. If anything, it will definitely cement the childfree idea. *grin*

  8. I love the word ‘farfalle.’ Isn’t it just fun and easy to say? I like the idea of calling a vagina a butterfly, it’s catchy.

    Peanut knows he’s got a penis and girls have a vagina. There was a time when he used to list all women he knew as having a vagina and all men he knew as having a penis – but in public restrooms. I’m guessing this was because peeing parts where at the forefront of his mind.

    I would only begin to laugh when I heard other women in the stalls next to us chuckling to themselves.

Comments are currently closed.