In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The Stem Cell Moral Dilemma

One man says that it’s not a dilemma at all — or shouldn’t be. And I agree with him. But I think he underestimates the so-called “right to life” movement. His argument is that most of the embryos used for stem cell research would be derived from fertility clinics, which produce more embryos than they need in order to maximize a woman’s potential to become pregnant. These fertility clinics discard large numbers of embryos, with very little political consquence.

In short, if embryos are human beings with full human rights, fertility clinics are death camps—with a side order of cold-blooded eugenics. No one who truly believes in the humanity of embryos could possibly think otherwise.

Read More…Read More…

Aggressive Measures

MySpace is being sued in the wake of a sexual assault.

MySpace’s age verification practices come under attack by the plaintiff’s attorneys. The site requires users to be at least 14 years old, asking for name, date of birth, e-mail address, sex, and country of residence. However, it does not attempt to verify the information, which is the basis for the lawsuit.

In a statement, MySpace chief security officer Hemanshu Nigam said that the site takes “aggressive measures” to protect its members and encouraged all Internet users to use “smart web practices” and “have open family dialogue on how to apply offline lessons in the online world.”

While I sympathize with the fourteen-year-old and her family–because, my God–I’m not entirely sure that there is a better approach than the one MySpace is advocating.

MySpace has come under increased scrutiny lately. Federal legislation was recently introduced that would regulate access to that and other, similar sites from public computers in libraries and schools. Sponsor Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA) has called social networking sites aimed at younger users a “feeding ground for child predators,” and it’s all but certain that this case will provide more ammunition for similar criticism of the site and strengthen calls for regulating access to it by children.

As the friend who sent me the link put it, is there any way to regulate access by sexual predators instead?

And is a sixteen-year-old that much less likely to mistake predation than a fourteen-year-old, or less deserving of protection?

I am leery of this for a few reasons. First of all, subcultures need the internets. If I had been unable to go online for information and support, I would have been deprived of a vital resource. Second, subcultures tend to be under much heavier scrutiny, and tend to face disparate-impact dangers from legislative and policy definitions of obscenity, sexuality, and explicit content. Third, some of the protective information and support resources available to young women must be explicit in order to be useful. A teenager seeking candid advice about unplanned pregnancy or sexual abuse could likely have her network choked off by measures established to protect her. Look at the way wingnuts talk about Planned Parenthood.

From a follow-up link (sent by the same friend), it looks as though MySpace is working to make it more difficult for predators to operate. I wish it hadn’t taken three (reported) assaults and a lawsuit to prod them into action. It’s not as though the spectre of sexual assault facilitated by the internet is a new development:

The site will also stop showing advertisements for certain products–like online dating sites–to those under 18.

(snip)

Next week, the site will restrict how users older than 18 can contact those aged 14 and 15. Older users sending a message asking to become friends with younger users will have to enter the recipients’ actual first and last names or their e-mail addresses, rather than simply their user names.

(snip)

MySpace will also start to allow all members to designate their profiles as private and thus available only to their named list of friends. MySpace had allowed and encouraged those under 16 to set their profiles to be private, but profiles of anyone older than that have been available for any visitor to the site to read.

It doesn’t look like they’re doing much about verification, though:

Parry Aftab, the executive director of WiredSafety, a group that promotes online privacy for young people, dismissed the change in the contact rules for those under 16 as ineffectual.

“Kids that want to do the open stuff will set their ages to 16,” she said. MySpace does not verify users’ ages.

So Much For Rick Warren Being a Warm-and-Fuzzy Evangelical

Mr. Purpose-Driven Life is involved with the production of a videogame based on Tim LaHaye’s Left Behind books that rewards players for killing those who resist becoming Christians. From Talk2Action’s piece, The Purpose Driven Life Takers (also up as a DKos diary):

Imagine: you are a foot soldier in a paramilitary group whose purpose is to remake America as a Christian theocracy, and establish its worldly vision of the dominion of Christ over all aspects of life. You are issued high-tech military weaponry, and instructed to engage the infidel on the streets of New York City. You are on a mission – both a religious mission and a military mission — to convert or kill Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, gays, and anyone who advocates the separation of church and state – especially moderate, mainstream Christians. Your mission is “to conduct physical and spiritual warfare”; all who resist must be taken out with extreme prejudice. You have never felt so powerful, so driven by a purpose: you are 13 years old. You are playing a real-time strategy video game whose creators are linked to the empire of mega-church pastor Rick Warren, best selling author of The Purpose Driven Life.

(Emphasis mine.)

Note to conservative Catholics who’ve been cozying up to the Christian Right and the Dominionists on issues of abortion and gay marriage: this is what they think of you. Come the theocratic revolution, you’re going to have to convert or die.

Read More…Read More…

PDF: A Wrap-Up

The Personal Democracy Forum was fantastic. Thanks again to Claire Cole and the Younger Women’s Task Force for the comped ticket.

The panels were all really interesting, and I met a lot of fantastic people — notables include Liza Sabater, Deanna Zandt, Peter Daou, Ari Rabin-Havt, Matt Stoller, and “Philo” (who I will not out here, since I’m not sure s/he wants her/himself revealed), among others who I am too exhaused to name and link to right now. But connections were made, people were met, and I left happy. The panel discussions were great — there was one that I didn’t liveblog because my computer was charging up, featuring Jonah Seiger (moderator), David All, Cheryl Contee, Mary Katherine Ham, and Matt Stoller. Mary Katherine and Matt were my favorite participants. Now, I don’t suspect that Mary Katherine and I will ever see eye to eye on a whole lot of issues — the woman does run Townhall, after all — but she had a lot of interesting things to say about the interaction between bloggers and the mainstream media, and was very insightful. Ditto for Matt.

Post-panels, there was an open bar at a lounge across the street, and we all got some good mingling in. Then a few of us went to Turkish food for dinner, and now here I am. All in all, a good — but long — day. I feel slighly less nerdy, though, having met other bloggers in real life and having realized that we aren’t all cave-dwelling pajama-wearing anti-social freaks (I swear, it’s true!). So it was fun. Pictures below the fold.

Read More…Read More…

Liveblogging the PDF: Where Are the Women Bloggers?

(This post was written this afternoon, but not posted until tonight. That should explain the weird tenses).

My laptop died, and so the liveblogging was slightly interrupted. But it’s been re-charged, and now I’m back.

The biggest update is that the panels on blogging have been fantastic sausage-fests.

Read More…Read More…

Liveblogging the PDF: Eliot Spitzer Keynote

OMG it’s Eliot Spitzer. I. Love. Him.

I also just made eyecontact with Mary Katherine Ham in the hallway, and we exchanged smiles. Woah. She looks really, really young. She looks even younger than me.

And now Spitzer is speaking. I’m sitting next to my dear friend Shankar Gupta, a regular Feministe commenter, who’s here on a press pass. He’s groaning as Elliott is being introduced. Don’t worry, I glared at him and shook my head. He just doesn’t understand the greatness that is The Spitz. Jessica from Feministing and Gwynn from The Real Hot 100 are sitting next to him. It’s a good row.

Spitzer’s speech is fantastic. If you haven’t ever seen him speak, you should try. He’s incredibly engaging and passionate. Today, he’s discussing access to broadband in the United States, and in New York in particular. Not everyone has access to this technology. Broadband is multiple times more expensive in the United States than in other industrialized nations. We are the only industrialized nation without an explicit policy promoting broadband access. Spitzer further points out that areas like Red Hook in New York City don’t have access beyond dial-up. We’re at a transition point when it comes to the internet and technology, and our country and our localities need to catch up. While New York has a vast infrastructure to move goods, “we don’t have that infrastructure to move ideas,” Spitzer says.

Read More…Read More…

Liveblogging the PDF

Breakout Session: Local Blogging

First, it was Deanna from Alternet, and I did meet her. She is fantastic, just as suspected. And since I have a total blog-crush on her, I was really excited.

Nancy Scola started the discussion out by quoting Markos (daily kos): “I think local blogs are where it’s at.” The other panelists are Gur Tsabar of Room Eight, Liza Sabater of CultureKitchen and Daily Gothamist, Scott Sala of Urban Elephants, Juan Melli of BlueJersey.net, and Aldon Hynes of Orient-Lodge.com.

I’ve never read Room Eight, but it sounds interesting. Gur started it to “hold the political establishment accountable,” and it certainly does. “You now can point fingers, you can call out names, you can hold that person accountable,” he said. “That’s why I’m in this.”

I do read CultureKitchen, and I do adore Liza. I know it’s slightly anti-feminist to point this out, but I can’t help but say that Liza is absolutely beautiful. She’s a great speaker — she’s funny, intelligent, interesting, etc. She has that manner of speaking that makes you want to listen — and she has such a great smile that you can’t help but smile, too. And I’ll defend that observation by saying that I point it out only to destroy the stereotype that bloggers are all anti-social dorks who hide their faces behind their computer screens. She starts out her piece by laughing at the media’s paranoia about bloggers taking over and coming in to destroy their companies, and saying, “I can’t even fathom competing with the New York Times.” When she describes herself, I have to smile: “I’m a feminist runaway academic stay-at-home home-schooling mom who happens to be a prolific writer about politics, culture and many other things.” She also gives the best description of what bloggers do that I’ve heard all day: “What I do, instead of breaking stories, is I deconstruct stories. And that to me is absolutely what bloggers do. We don’t compete with major media, we deconstruct it.”

Liza got herself into the New York Times website, and blogged live. They accidentally left the door open, and so she went in and started blogging. She wrote a lengthy email about security, and how the New York Times could develop a site on a life link and not have it secured. She took a screenshot, but blurred out the URL. The Times closed her out after 36 hours and five or six blog posts, but they still haven’t acknowledged what happened, despite it being covered on CultureKitchen, Gawker, and several other blogs. Her point is basically that the Times doesn’t know what they’re doing, and “coming from a journalism background doesn’t make you a blogger. Coming from a media background doesn’t make you a blogger.”

And now we’ve got the Republican speaking. Scott Sala used to write for SlantTruth, and now is at Urban Elephants. He said about three sentences.

Juan Melli from BlueJersey is a great example of a community blogger. New Jersey is largely ignored by the media, and their information gets swallowed up by bigger neighboring markets (i.e., New York). The community blogs in New Jersey have grown out of demand.

Aldon Hynes worked for the Dean campaign, and is currently working on a Democratic campaign in Connecticut. He’s speaking about blending local blogging with national blogging — although he did just mention Daily Kos as a “good example” of bonding social capital, and you all know how we feel about Daily Kos. But he points out that far more people read sites like Xanga and Livejournal than political blogs, and asks how we reach out to those people.

Also, Ben Smith just walked in. Hot.

Scott Sala says he sees himself “sort of as a journalist, and sort of as an activist.” Aldon Hynes is rolling his eyes. Ha. Sala says that in order to maintain his journalist cred, he didn’t want to endorse anyone, he just wanted to support the GOP in New York City in general. He says he tries to maintain a journalistic mindset, while remaining hyper-partisan. Which I think is bullshit. Bloggers are not journalists.

Liza follows up and kicks ass, referring to herself as an “activist op/ed writer.” She says, “I really think you need to make a distinction between journalists and on the beat reporters and op/ed writers.” Yes, yes, yes. Liza, I love you. Having studied journalism and worked as a reporter, I do resent the idea that political bloggers are “journalists.” They aren’t. Some do investigative work, and many do a very good job — but political bloggers are essentially op/ed writers. We may attempt to present our opinions as “truth,” but they aren’t. Not that journalists present an objective truth, but there is a training process for presenting both sides of the story and at least making a good-faith attempt to disseminate information instead of pushing an opinion. That’s not what bloggers do.

Plus she just dropped Jay “Thank me for wearing pants” Rosen’s* favorite line, “Presumption of innocence in journalism.” She says, “And I love that because it really is true. There’s this presumption of innocent and objectivity in journalism, and it’s absolutely false. There’s no objectivity in writing, and to presume that you can manufacture that and that it gives you some sort of objectivity” is entirely false, and that’s why they go to blogs. They know your bias, and they can hold you accountable in a way that they can’t for newspapers.

Should I say it again? Liza is rad.

But I do think that she just identified a big difference between the way that the right views blogs, and the way that the left does, although she doesn’t point out the right/left divide (it’s evident enough in what she’s saying compared to what her tablemate, Scott Sala, is saying). The right blogosphere, in general, seems to see themselves as “citizen journalists” rebelling against what they view as a left-slanted media. They pat themselves on the back for taking down Dan Rather and “investigating” the “MSM.” The left blogosphere, on the other hand, sees themeslves as deconstructing news stories and opinion pieces, and building like-minded political communities. Some, like Kos, seem to view themselves as arms of the Democratic party, making grassroots efforts to get Democrats elected and push the party in the right direction. Others, like me, see themselves as conversation-starters and community-builders, and are more interested in discussing ideas and growing personally and intellectually than making sure that Democrats win elections. But it doesn’t seem that people in left blogosphere have delusions of journalistic grandeur the way that many on the right do. But perhaps I’m just creating this divide in my head. Thoughts?

And I stand corrected on my previous post: It turns out that Elizabeth Edwards is a blogger.

Panel discussion is over. Time to work up the courage to introduce myself to the fabulous Ms. Liza, and then meet up with Jessica. It’s blog-crush central up in here.

*Jay Rosen is a journalism professor at NYU, and advised the Washington Square News when I was the opinion editor there. A famous Jay Rosen story around our newsroom was when he came to an editorial meeting and announced, “Thank me for wearing pants,” a line he also used when being interviewed on the Daily Show. Recycling jokes. At least it was funny.

Liveblogging from the Personal Democracy Conference

Thanks to Claire Cole and the NCWO’s Younger Women’s Task Force, I’m spending the day at the Personal Democracy Forum, a conference on how technology is changing politics.

I saw Jessica from Feministing on the email list, so I think she’s here, but I haven’t spotted her yet. Other super-star bloggers are speaking: Liza Sabater, Joshua Michah Marshall, Markos Moulitsas, Ben Smith, Chris Nolan, Jerome Armstrong, Peter Daou, David Sifri, Chuck Defeo, Mary Katherine Ham, Jonathan Garthwaite, Joe Green, William Greene, Mike Krempasky, Juan Melli, Roger L. Simon, Matt Stoller, and more.

And then there are some super-star non-bloggers: Elliott Spitzer (swoon), Elizabeth Edwards (double swoon), ABC News’ Mark Halperin, Ari Rabin-Havt (Harry Reid campaign), Joe Trippi, Matt Bai (New York Times Magazine), Rep. Anthony Weiner, etc. If only the silver fox and the green giant were here (he needs a better nickname than “green giant,” but it was the only one I could think of — suggestions?), it would be perfect.

Right now we’re in the opening remarks. There was a networking breakfast earlier, and I found myself sharing a table with Roger L. Simon, the CEO of Pajamas Media. Goldstein, I thought of you, although I refrained from name-dropping. Either way, I had to smile to myself that I was having breakfast with the Pajamas Media CEO and his two business partners, of all people. I told them that I write for a left-wing feminist blog, and they smiled politely, but I suspect they were secretly horrified. Roger Simon was actually really nice, and said that he’s looking to branch out to other blogs and expand Pajamas’ base. Maybe I’ll hook Feministe up.

Right now, there’s an opening panel discussion on the influence of blogs on the mainstream media (a favorite topic of both bloggers and people in the mainstream media). The speakers are Chuck Defeo, founder of Townhall.com, Joshua Michal Marshall of TalkingPointsMemo, Chris Nolan of Spot-On, David Sifry, founder of Technorati, and Ben Smith of the New York Observer’s Politicker. Chris Nolan is awesome, but Ben Smith is my favorite so far. He’s the one who seems to have the most original things to say, and has suggested that perhaps it would be in the best interests of papers like the New York Times and the Washington Post to hire bloggers. There’s obviously a demand for quickly-updated news, opinion and news analysis, and, as he said, the people who are good at doing that already exist. Let the print reporters be print reporters, don’t force them to file six times a day. Hire those of us who are already filing six times a day. Everyone wins.

To up the nerd factor, there’s even a “live chat” going on, and it’s posted on a big screen behind the speakers. I see a Deanna Z — could it be Deanna Zandt from Alternet’s The Mix? I’m guessing yes, and since she’s fantastic I’ll try to meet her. I’ll have to investigate. (See? I am a real journalist!)

Chuck Defeo (Townhall) has said a few words about where the blogosphere is lacking: Local news. People still turn to their local TV stations for local information; where are the bloggers who are going to compete with that media? He says that “Mainstream media is actually doing local news coverage better than we are,” and I think he has a good point.

But Chris Nolan (Spot-On) disagrees, and points to Greensboro, North Carolina, where a local news organization adopted a blog (Greensboro101), and it’s a really great example of using a blog for local activism. These aren’t people who are about getting hundreds of thousands of hits; as Chris says, “They just want the five people that they care about to know, and to use these sites as bulletin boards.” She makes a good point, and these kinds of sites are great community-builders.

Update from Jessica: She and Gwynn from The Real Hot 100 will be here at 11. Awesome.

Next up are the break-out sessions. The main hall has MySpace for politics, and the smaller rooms are Regulating Online Politics, Making Online Work Offline and in the Field, and The Rising Power of Local Political Blogs. Liza Sabater (culturekitchen, Daily Gotham) is speaking at the last one, so I think that’s where I’ll be. More soon.

Another One For the “No Shit, Sherlock” Files

Female screen names draw more threats and harassment.

In the study, automated chat-bots and human researchers logged on to chat rooms under female, male and ambiguous screen names, such as Nightwolf, Orgoth and Stargazer.

Bots using female names averaged 100 malicious messages a day, compared with about four for those using male names and about 25 for those with ambiguous names. Researchers logging on themselves produced similar results.

Michel Cukier, the study’s author and a professor at the University of Maryland’s Center for Risk and Reliability, said the findings show the risks of placing personal information on the Internet, “even disclosing just your first name.”

Well, I suppose it’s valuable to have studies quantifying what anyone who uses a female screen name knows, to pull out to show people who don’t think that harassment exists. I remember my first forays into AOL chat rooms circa 1994, using my friend’s account and her screen name of zsa zsa something-or-other. I’ve never had so many people ask me about my pubic-hair grooming habits in my life.

Another interesting finding shows that it’s highly unlikely that the harassment is done by bots:

Cukier said the difficulty of writing computer programs, or scripts, that can tell the difference between males and females online shows the menacing messages were not generated automatically.

“These are real users who seem to look for female names,” Cukier said.