In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Earth v. Bush

I would just like to take a minute and thank the President for the fact that I wore a summer dress to school today, and had a pleasant walk home, as it was 60 degrees despite the fact that the sun had gone down hours before. I know this isn’t exactly his doing, but he is certainly putting forth an effort to make sure that those of us who are used to having snow during the winter will be able to enjoy more 70-degree December days. Let’s hope that activist judges don’t blow it for him.

Michael J. Fox: 1, B-List Godbag Celebrities: 0

The Republicans are bringing out the big guns to respond to Michael J. Fox’s incredibly moving ad promoting candidates who support stem cell research: James “Movie Jesus” Caviezel, Patricia “Feminist For Life” Heaton, and a couple of Missouri football players.

Let’s get this straight: Because there won’t be cures for 15 years, stem cell research is useless. Because fertility clinics can pay women for eggs (which they already do), stem cell research is bad. Because proponents of stem cell research spend a lot of money on ads, it’s a lie. Because Movie Jesus tells you in a foreboding tone that “You know now. Don’t do it,” you shouldn’t.

Strong arguments you’re presenting there, guys. Maybe next time you should just invite Rush over to give his two cents, and perhaps hear a little bit from Dr. O’Reilly.

(Anyone here speak Aramaic? What the hell is James Caviezel saying at the beginning of the video?)

Bras vs. Headcoverings

Okay, so in comments to one of the Hijab Monday posts folks got onto the subject of what kind of article of clothing worn by Western women might be equivalent to the hijab in terms of cultural/patriarchal pressure to wear it, wearing it won’t protect you from harassment but might keep you from getting branded a slut, not wearing it might be the proper feminist choice, it’s restrictive and/or uncomfortable, and something that women would probably not choose to wear had they their druthers. And the answer seemed to be: the bra.

Allow me to quote from an article I found at Bitch, Ph.D.’s place to demonstrate why, for me, that kind of talk is crazy talk:

A pair of D-cup breasts weighs between 15 and 23 pounds—the equivalent of carrying around two small turkeys. The larger the breasts, the more they move and the greater the discomfort. In one study, 56 percent of women suffered from breast pain when jogging. . . .

Computer systems then track the breasts’ motions in three dimensions by following the moving lights. “We can actually work out exactly where they’re going, how they’re moving, and how this movement is affected by bras,” Steele says. Breasts move in a sinusoidal pattern, Steele has found, and they move a lot. Small breasts can move more than three inches vertically during a jog, and large breasts sometimes leave their bras entirely. “We have videos of women who, particularly if the cup is too low, spill all over the top,” Steele says.

The larger the breasts and the more they move, the more momentum they generate. To change or stop that momentum requires a large force, usually applied through bra straps. When straps are thin, the pressure exerted through them can be so great as to leave furrows in the shoulders of large-breasted women. As the straps dig into the brachial plexus, the nerve group that runs down the arm, they may cause numbness in the little finger. In some cases, breasts can slap against the chest with enough force to break the clavicle.

I like my clavicle as is, thanks.

Good News!

The Male Pill may soon be a reality:

For the first time, a safe, effective and reversible hormonal male contraceptive appears to be within reach. Several formulations are expected to become commercially available within the near future. Men may soon have the options of a daily pill to be taken orally, a patch or gel to be applied to the skin, an injection given every three months or an implant placed under the skin every 12 months, according to Seattle researchers.

Several men interviewed for the story, however, think it’s a great idea — for other men — but are afraid to take hormones.

Sack up, fellas, women have been doing it for decades. Your balls won’t fall off.

Fact-Checking Lazy Sexist Assumptions

You’ve probably heard someone make the assertion that women use 20,000 words and men only use 7,000 or thereabouts. And you’ve probably wondered exactly where that statistic comes from, because the person citing the stat typically waves in the direction of “studies” to support it. But, you know, it sounds like it might be right, because everyone knows women are more verbal than men, right?

Well, not exactly.

It’s easy to see how funky numbers about an exotic language can turn into an urban legend. But it might surprise you to find apparently authoritative sources doing the same thing with basic facts about your own language use.

Here’s one example: Over the last 15 years, a series of books and articles have told us that women talk a lot more than men do. According to Dr. Scott Halzman in Psychology Today, women use about 7,000 words a day, and men use about 2,000. On the other hand, Ruth E. Masters, in her book “Counseling Criminal Justice Offenders,” tells us that “Females use an estimated 25,000 words per day and males use an estimated 12,000 words per day.” And according to James Dobson’s book “Love for a Lifetime,” “research tells us” that God gives a woman 50,000 words a day, while her husband only gets 25,000.

A bit of Googling easily turns up at least nine different versions of this claim, ranging from 50,000 vs. 25,000 down to 5,000 vs. 2,500. But a bit of deeper research reveals that none of the authors of these claims actually seems to have counted, and none cites anyone who seems to have counted either.

Fancy that.

Read More…Read More…