In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

No sex for the poor

I guess I should introduce myself. Hi. I’m trailer park, a 26-year-old (former teenage) mom living in Austin, TX with my eight-year-old abstinence-only baby and my husband of three years who (shockingly) didn’t mind that his bride wasn’t a virgin. I’ve been online for years, but I only started my little public blog a few months ago, and I’m thrilled to be guest-blogging at Feministe for a week. And now, with that out of the way…

Jennifer Roback Morse must be crazy:

A poor cohabiting teenager using the Pill has a failure rate of 48.4%. You read that correctly: nearly half of poor cohabiting teenagers get pregnant during their first year using the Pill. If she kicked her boyfriend out of the house, or if she married him, her probability of pregnancy drops to 12.9%. At the other extreme, a middle-aged, middle-class married woman has a 3% chance of getting pregnant after a year on the Pill.

Wow, who knew that wedding rings worked as a contraceptive? It’s as if quality education and access to health care have nothing at all to do with one’s ability to use contraception effectively.

These figures cast new light on the debate over contraception education. The commonly quoted failure rates of 8% for the Pill and 15% for the condom are inflated by the highly successful use by middle-aged, middle-class married couples. Yet, the government promotes contraception most heavily among the young, the poor and the single. The “overall failure rates” are simply not relevant to this target population.

Planned Parenthood and its allies in the sex education business have had conniptions over federal funding for abstinence education. But at least abstinence actually works. If you don’t have sex, you won’t get pregnant. It works every time.

Poor people just shouldn’t have sex! That’s the ticket! It’s not like poor people need anything fun or pleasurable in their lives, right? Sex is not a natural, normal part of human pair-bonding, it’s a luxury like champagne and caviar!

God, who do these people think they’re fooling? Even before the sexual revolution, 90% of Americans had premarital sex. Poor, young, single people are NOT going to stop having sex, and raising the risks of sex only leads to tragedy:

Three times in the last eight years, investigators have fished the body of a newborn from a lonely stretch of the Mississippi River in Minnesota, haunting detectives and residents in the area.

This week authorities announced a horrifying development: Two of the three children likely came from the same mother.

The nearest abortion clinic to Red Wing, MN is an hour away, and the only Planned Parenthood clinic in town is open two days a week. There are, however, dozens of anti-abortion pregnancy centers in the area. If lack of access to abortion and birth control forces the young and the poor to remain abstinent, just how did those three dead babies wind up in the river?

Resnick said the typical profile of a mother who commits neonaticide was a 19-year-old young woman, often unmarried, who may still live with her parents, and may not be able to face her parents’ disappointment — both that she’s had premarital sex and that she’s become pregnant.

“Some may feel that they will literally be rejected from the house,” he said.

Resnick, who treated a woman who killed two of her newborn children, said that such fears can become so overwhelming that the mother completely loses sight of what she is doing. He points to the remarkably difficult circumstances under which neonaticides often take place.

“These women deliver alone, without pain relief, and without crying out, for fear of discovery. Oftentimes the parents are in a different room in the house. Then [the mothers] manage to wipe up all the blood, dispose of the baby and do all of this unaided. In that sense, you can see how the women are so much more terrified of discovery than they are of actually taking a human life.”

So much for the idea that slut-shaming creates a “culture of life.”

hat tip, Amanda

cross-posted


40 thoughts on No sex for the poor

  1. That’s another thing, get rid of abortion/contraception and you’ll see a lot of dumpster babies.

  2. Wow, who knew that wedding rings worked as a contraceptive?

    Well, if it’s a really big one…and you sealed the rim on one side with Saran Wrap…and then the husband…

    Oh, never mind. Sorry I brought it up.

  3. Poor people just shouldn’t have sex! That’s the ticket!

    I too feel that this is the point the nutsos are trying to make. How else do you interpret the “don’t have sex unless you can take ‘responsibility’ for the consequences” rhetoric?

    Of course, dontcha also love the baby=consequence mindset (I’d hate to have one of these so-called-pro-lifers for a parent) as well as the implicit classism that poor people not only shouldn’t have sex but that they make bad parents?

    I wonder if these whackos even realize what they truly believe or if they are in denial about their own beliefs?

  4. I can’t remember where, but there was something mentioned once about there being a drop in the number of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome cases in the years following Roe v. Wade.

    I am googling for a statistics sheet, but so far no luck. It does make sense, though—the concerns and fears about dealing with a baby don’t go away by forcing women to give birth against their will, and the nature of SIDS makes a convenient excuse for someone who didn’t manage to either abort the pregnancy or conceal the birth.

  5. There’s not one part of this that makes sense. Getting married makes you less fertile? Teenagers cohabiting? Access to condoms and education re: their use gets you pregnant? My head hurts.

  6. “A poor cohabiting teenager using the Pill has a failure rate of 48.4%. You read that correctly: nearly half of poor cohabiting teenagers get pregnant during their first year using the Pill. If she kicked her boyfriend out of the house, or if she married him, her probability of pregnancy drops to 12.9%. At the other extreme, a middle-aged, middle-class married woman has a 3% chance of getting pregnant after a year on the Pill.”

    Gosh, you mean that wealthy, middle-class people have better access to healthcare and birth control? And this better access affects their likelihood of getting pregnant? Who knew?

    Also, newsflash — sky is blue! Film at 11!

  7. I remember hearing that an great-aunt of mine had many (at least 6) “miscarriages” in the 1930’s and 1940’s, addition to the 7 children she did raise. Supposedly they were buried beside a stream on their family farm.

  8. Wow, who knew that wedding rings worked as a contraceptive?

    Um, most married people I know? Unless you’re damn lucky, sex post-marriage tends on average to be less frequent.

    Marriages increase abstinence.
    CHILDREN vastly, vastly, increase abstinence.
    Marriage rings followed by children are one of the best anti-sex methods created by the FSM.

    Sorry, that was just to funny to let pass. 🙂

  9. Um, most married people I know? Unless you’re damn lucky, sex post-marriage tends on average to be less frequent.

    Guess I’m damn lucky, then. Since getting married, I have the same amount and quality of sex I always had.

  10. Um, most married people I know? Unless you’re damn lucky, sex post-marriage tends on average to be less frequent.

    Actually I think the true stats are the other way around, married people have MORE sex.

  11. But at least abstinence actually works. If you don’t have sex, you won’t get pregnant. It works every time.

    Ahem. Abstinence has a failure rate too, because it’s got to account for the fact that most people using the method give in and wind up having unprotected sex sometimes. Morse is assuming *perfect use* of abstinence here. If she made the same assumption about hormonal contraceptives, it’d be working more than 99% of the time and not that 50% bullshit she’s tossing around.

  12. Poor people just shouldn’t have sex! That’s the ticket! It’s not like poor people need anything fun or pleasurable in their lives, right?

    Hmm…okay, what I’m about to say is based on my own personal experience and that of some close family member (which means…this is probably horribly politically incorrect, I suspect lots of people will disagree with me).

    I’m not sure it’s poverty directly. I come from a family where I was the first female…ever…to finish high school without getting pregnant. Sure a great deal of that was complete stupidity when it came to sex, what would and would not result in pregnancy, and how to avoid pregnancy…after all someone has to show you how to put on a condom correctly and how/when to take birth control…But, to some extent, for my cousins, it was also about fear and hopelessness. At 16 they thought their only options were to get married and have kids and they were desperately afraid of being alone because they didn’t understand they could make it without a man to support them. Sex (and for at least one of my cousins, her first child) was their way of connecting to another human being and feeling less afraid. Sure, one of my cousins was poor, but the other 4 were all middle or upper-middle class kids. So I think it may be more about hopelessness than poverty (although clearly those things are linked…but not necessarily so.)

  13. Also, I have a sneaking suspicion that Morse is conflating user failure and extraneous failure. (Where forgetting three pills in a row, for example, would also be lumped with not having enough money for this month’s supply.)

  14. Did those studies even check whether those teenage girls KNOW how to use the pill? Because at that age people have VERY strange ideas how to do that. Like “forgot one today, gonna pop in two tomorrow” and they don’t remember to use condoms after stomach problems… And if one starts the pill not with the last period but somewhere in the middle of the cycle…

    Being middle-aged there’s a good chance a woman has taken the pill before and already knows to do it right…. But then that would ruin the statement.

  15. And women in this environment can become politicians and CEOs in any significant number? Are pro-lifers anything but misogynists, terrified of a world where women wield any power over anyone. Authority starts somewhere. If you live without power over your own existence, how do you ever develop the mentality necessary to exercise authority over others?

    The right pretends they aren’t misogynists and woman haters, scared of having women in politics and running their own businesses, but how many girls in such straits can be reasonably expected to get anywhere in life?

    Protecting the mental health of women by banning most or all types of abortion? Right… I’m sure killing your own flesh and blood yourself is a lot easier to live with.

  16. Kristen: I think you have a good point there, actually. It’s something I keep tripping over, as I’m heading in the direction of a career in mental health, do a lot of “inner transformation” work; and then, well, there are the political circles, and it’s…I find myself wishing there were more interaction between those modalities. Because yeah: it’s both/and. The material, structural situation; but also the murky world of subjective experience: thoughts, feelings, relationships; and it’s a very chicken-or-the-egg thing, so where do you start?

  17. The right pretends they aren’t misogynists and woman haters, scared of having women in politics and running their own businesses, but how many girls in such straits can be reasonably expected to get anywhere in life?

    They ARE misogynists, and they are afraid of women in power. The original post on this over at Pandagon included some pictures from Morse’s blog that underscore this truth. Here is my blog response: The Family Values Crowd Should Stop Lion

  18. If a wedding ring’s effective contraception, I’d like to know why I got pregnant every year the first six years I was married.

    There also seems to be a theory that a set of wedding rings, worn by people who are producing children, are like the goose in the fairy tales…somehow adding the wedding rings means there will be enough money for however many kids you can manage to create in that time. That one’s not true either.

  19. SoE,
    You have a point. My public high school and middle school didn’t offer any type of sex education at all. They also didn’t cover basic puberty info like how to use tampons. Some of the girls when I was in middle school thought that women couldn’t use tampons when they were virgins or it would take their virginity. I knew better, but they wouldn’t believe me. They also thought that women couldn’t go swimming during their periods. Hopefully they have learned better, but that’s what their female relatives told them.

    Another issue is that women and girls who get birth control for painful periods or other health issues aren’t necessarily told how to use it to prevent pregnancy, and some teenagers may think that just because they are on birth control it will prevent pregnancy. My gynecologist certainly assumed when I got birth control for health reasons that he didn’t need to tell me how to use it to prevent pregnancy when I told him I didn’t have sex and wasn’t planning to have sex.

    I’ve taken birth control for painful periods since midway through high school. I remember my mom calling the gynecologist’s office when I was in high school and forgot my birth control on an overnight school trip. They told her that I should just take the dose I missed with the next dose. That works fine for some medical conditions, but not to prevent pregnancy.

  20. Oh the heck with it, let’s just go back to dumping unwanted babies on the hillside like the Romans and be done with it…..

    Found in many cultures. The Western world had its tradition of “baby-farming” which produced the same result, Japan has had “mabiki”, China has had its own version…

    People have sex. Any belief system which avoids this fact is just flying in the face of human nature. The Christian sects which babble about “transmission of the possibility of life” also conveniently ignore the fact that historically, most of your kids got killed off with disease, and Mom was most likely to die in childbirth. Do we really want to go back to that time?

    Birth control or abortion or infancide. Or you can have wars and plague to get rid of your surplus population. Take your pick.

  21. Wedding ring as contraception. Umm.

    The husband and I have used about every kind of contraception known to man – they all worked, but then again we had access and knew how to use them.

    We’ve had sex w/o contraception exactly twice in our 15-year marriage. They’re wonderful kids, both of them. Apparently we didn’t get our wedding rings properly charged up or something?

  22. Actually I think the true stats are the other way around, married people have MORE sex.

    That’s not what I heard. Marriage frequently leads to children and little or no sex. Getting up several times a night to feed a colicky baby doesn’t exactly put you in the mood.

  23. That’s not what I heard. Marriage frequently leads to children and little or no sex. Getting up several times a night to feed a colicky baby doesn’t exactly put you in the mood.

    Children lead to less sex. Marriage doesn’t necessarily lead to children. Marriage by itself doesn’t lead to less sex. If you were cohabiting before, you’ll likely have the same amount and quality of sex, but if you weren’t, you’ll likely have more. If you have children, whether your single, cohabiting, or married, you’ll have less sex.

  24. The material, structural situation; but also the murky world of subjective experience: thoughts, feelings, relationships; and it’s a very chicken-or-the-egg thing, so where do you start?

    I guess it’s just my existentialist bent, but I always think we have to start by providing people with options. If we provide people with appropriate education, which is basically where everyone else comes out. Except that I think the education can’t just be for the poor. My upper-middle class cousin had FOUR children by the time she was 20 and six children by 25. I blame it almost entirely on her nearly fundamentalist upbringing (these people made her get up in front of a church of thousands at 15 and apologize to the churchmembers) and the resulting lack of education and self-worth.

    The whole self-worth thing I don’t know if we can fix, other than to add another dimension to the educational system [which I personally think we should], but we can make sex ed mandatory for children…even when the parents object for religious reasons.

  25. Kristen, that story about your cousin is fucking terrible.

    And I totally agree with making truthful, factual sex ed mandatory, parents be damned. Even if one has parents willing to talk to them about sex (which seems pretty rare), odds are the parents will give at least some misinformation or leave something out.

  26. Marriage frequently leads to children and little or no sex.

    If it’s children, plural, then at least the first one didn’t lead to no sex.

  27. I don’t know if anyone on this post recalls this, but if any of you are on LJ: do you remember the drama in poor_skills about… maybe half a year ago… concerning getting birth control pills for cheap and people being TOTALLY ignorant about how difficult it is to get BC without insurance/lots of money? actually, it was a series of posts, if i recall: all in the same week, there were maybe three posts about obtaining BC pills w/o insurance, and THEN there was the obligatory ‘welfare mamas’ post, which set people off really badly. it was amazing how we actually had privileged folk on poor_skills. in any case, the basic attitude ended up being, ‘if you don’t gots the moneys, don’t fuck!’ great.

    i’m not the only one who remembers this, right?

  28. Kristen, really effective education is about expanding the student’s imagination of the scope of the possible, and teaching people techniques for evaluating options and making informed choices. Part of the reason to champion strong public education is that it can, in many cases, be a kid’s only access to a wider sense of the possible.

    Because you’re right, if someone grows up in an environment where the only possiblity is motherhood and/or wifedom, where the only soure of closeness is sex with whoever comes along, where a meaningful enthusiastic “yes” to anything is not a possibility, then they’re going do the best they can with those crappy options.

    In order to want something, be it a career, a healthy relationship of equals, a better car, or a pony, you have to be able to imagine getting it, and doing the things necessary to get it. You have to know what that looks like.

    One of the things that public education does is present kids with pictures of people doing things differently from how their families do them. It should also foster in them the skills to do things their families may not be able to do, and provide them with access to information and ideas their families may not have access to or feel are important enough to share.

    Good sexuality education not only tells kids how to avoid pregnancy and disease. It also provides them with a way of framing their own thinking about sex and sexuality and introduces tools for building healthy sexual interactions. Which, may be the first time a kid’s even considered the possibility of healthy sexual interactions, sadly.

  29. They’re actually very explicit about their “no sex for the poor” agenda. The Mathematica abstinence-only report released in April of this year gives a summary of Title V, Section 510 (b)(2)(A-H) of the Social Security Act (P.L. 104-193), saying that one of the goals of abstinence-only education is to “[t]each the importance of attaining self-sufficiency before engaging in sexual activity.”

    That’s a pretty nice way of saying “Don’t fuck till you’ve got the bucks,” but it’s pretty unambiguous. Of course, they’re also conflating “marriage” with “economic self-sufficiency,” but there’s probably something to that, since a certain cohort of low-income people don’t get married because they feel they can’t afford it, most probably due to the patriarchy-approved Wedding Industrial Complex™.

    The Mathematica report is here: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/impactabstinence.pdf.

  30. Interrobang: that makes no sense! Marriage isn’t “supposed” to be about self-sufficiency, but mutual dependency. Sounds like they’re basically saying I have to be a wealthy single woman (or have the a good escape plan for my marriage) in order to have children.

    Well good on them for blessing single motherhood 😉

  31. The only wedding rings I know of that prevent pregnancy are the ones used here in Massachusetts at the same sex weddings we are the only state to allow. Don’t you think that if the right wanted to prevent abortions, I mean really prevent them, they would promote gay and lesbian relationship and, in fact, encourage youth to be gay and lesbian.

    I want to hear a presidential candidate use that as a board in the platform, “I am pro same sex marriage because it will decrease abortion and increase wanted children.”

    Funny thing is that the most recent Youth Behavior Risk Survey information shows that gay and lesbian kids are more likely to become pregnant or impregnate someone (what better way to prove you aren’t gay?)

    YRBS article: http://baywindows.com/ME2/Audiences/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=59C560AFCEA14E5AA8FFBB6A41B300BC&AudID=0813BC739F2044E5A03DCF2DE3FDF7C9

Comments are currently closed.