In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

On Hating Rakhi Sawant

I first saw Rakhi Sawant in an awful music video a few years ago, in which she played the bespectacled-but-miniskirted secretary to an improbably attractive boss.I don’t think she was particularly well known back then (I’d certainly never heard of her). Now she’s famous and practically everyone I know hates her.

Rakhi hatred is especially interesting to me because of the number of issues of class and gender it brings up, so many that one post couldn’t begin to cover them. (By which I mean I know this is very incomplete and don’t yell at me later). Conservative critics dislike her because she is willing to wear revealing clothing and doesn’t act apologetic enough about it. The ‘liberal’ upper classes can’t disapprove of her sexuality (though they hastily tell us they think she’s ugly) or they’d lose their liberal cred. But she’s mockable for not having had that much education, for being ‘crass’, loud, often ignorant, and in some circles, for not speaking fluent enough English. As a result, anything she says is taken as a joke. We’ve managed to turn her into a mere punchline. I often suspect that she’s invited onto talk shows and the like purely so that the hosts and the audience can collude in mocking her. I missed the episode of Koffee With Karan (popular talk show/ self congratulatory, autoerotic exercise featuring a successful bollywood director and his friends) on which she appeared, but I’m told that it started out that way. I did see her on a Serious talk show (NDTV’s The Big Fight), where the topic of discussion was role models for Indian women. It was ugly, the other panelists and even the host were smirking at her in a way that was rather obvious. [At one point someone in the audience asked a question about women altering their bodies to look a particular way. Actress Dia Mirza, all pretty and eyebrowplucked and legwaxed, smirked and said that all such questions should be directed at Rakhi since, you know, she was the only one who had done anything of the sort.]

I told a friend of mine that I planned to write this post, and he seemed rather surprised. He said he’d thought that, as a feminist, I would disapprove of her – surely by being skinny and exposing her body she was participating in society’s sexualisation of the female body? And maybe he has a point, but Rakhi Sawant has done more for feminism in India than just about any other media personality I can think of. She’s talked about the casting couch and her experiences with it, something very few women in the industry would do, considering the kind of pressure they’re under to appear virginal and untouched. She’s talked about the eating habits she’s inculcated to stay as skinny as possible (since her income depends on her staying that way), and about her experiments with plastic surgery.

And perhaps most importantly, the Mika episode. Indian musician Mika (not to be confused with the adorable Mika Penniman) kissed Sawant at a party. She says it was forced, and all the video clips and pictures seem (to me) to indicate that this was the case. She sued. Nothing came of it, really – it’s hard enough to have someone found guilty of sexual assault as it is – when you’re Rakhi Sawant it’s so much worse. Responses ranged from a) Rakhi Sawant, LOL b)She didn’t make enough of a fuss at the time/That’s not how *I* would act if someone sexually assaulted me (because, you know, we all follow a sort of rule book for behaviour when something like this happens) c)It’s Rakhi Sawant. She probably wanted it at the time/she’s doing this for the attention. Etc. Mika, however, made a humorous music video about the incident (yes, this nauseated me too). Everyone stopped caring after a while. But it’s important to me that she sued. Compare this to the high profile Aishwarya Rai – Salman Khan relationship. Everyone seems to know that he assaulted her, but she’s never done anything about it; it’s as if it never occurred to her that he could be punished. Then Rakhi Sawant storms in and demands that maybe men should be held legally accountable for their actions. And India laughs it off because it’s Rakhi Sawant.

On the NDTV show, while all the other participants were going on about the Dignity of the Indian woman and how today’s woman wants to be perfect physically, mentally and emotionally (which is apparently a good thing and no pressure at all. wtf?), Rakhi Sawant insisted that a) women should get to choose who they want to be b) Indian men objectify all women, regardless of what they wear, and little can be done unless the men change. Again, it’s Rakhi Sawant and so it was laughed off.

Which is all very convenient, of course. Because class and gender aren’t merely reasons to hate her, they’re tools to make sure she’s never heard – a lot of what she has to say might actually be dangerous.


21 thoughts on On Hating Rakhi Sawant

  1. Fascinating. Sounds a lot like the “chavs” jokes [ha, ha] in the UK, as well as the whole “trailer trash” thing in the US. She’s like an Eliza Doolittle who tells Henry to stuff it and sticks with it, whereas poor actresses from ‘umble beginnings are supposed to hide their unfortunate past and “pass” as Mysterious Strangers, that’s the way it was in Old Hollywood at least, nowadays we simultaneously do/don’t talk about class, which makes us even crazy/er.

    I wonder what would have happened if Britney Spears had gone and just said/done this kind of stuff, instead of marketing herself as willing boytoy, “Hit me baby one more time” – if she ever would have become a pop star at all?

  2. there is clearly a market for the sort of entertainment rakhi sawant is employed to provide.
    its missing the issue to keep making her look silly.

  3. Yay! Your post about Rakhi Sawant is finally up! But an ‘item’ girl who happens to be sensible? Who talks about how all women are objectified in the eyes of Indian men? Who talks about women getting to make their own choices? Come on Aishwarya, we cant have that! That is against our ‘pure’ Indian culture! Really, women like you and me and Rakhi Sawant should be burned at the stake for our blasphemousness.

  4. definitely an interesting post with so many different angles that its difficult to know where to start. y’know, when camille paglia first defended madonna (as well as porn) while calling herself a feminist, it seemed so shocking. now its quite mainstream, especially the very effective use of class where mainstream feminist sensibilities about sex where portrayed as a cover for bourgeois repression.

    so today one can be pro-porn or anti porn and still be considered a feminist. there’s even a pro-hijab feminism. feminism has embraced everything in the name of choice. i don’t really have a position on this, other than to be vaguely on the side of the working class item girls (as they call them in the desh) or even sex workers, but i don’t know if that makes me a feminist, especially since i like paul wolfowitz…but i digress.

  5. great post!

    If only people will look at these aspects of her personality that have in fact brought out a whole lot of issues…

    I also feel that becasue she’s crass and more of a loudmouth…its fashionable to heate her…its like….we cool cultured people with class…how can be approve of someone so brash!!!

  6. You know who she always reminded me of? The character Lina from the movie Singing In the Rain. I hated this aspect of the movie…
    Anyway, it is nice to see an Indian perspective on Feministe!

  7. That was an excellent post – so much to think about. To be honest, I don’t even know who this person is (can I assume we’re talking about someone in Asia/Ameria?) but it was very thought provoking and could apply to a lot of female celebrities. Thank you.

  8. this was a really interesting post. nice (or, not nice, really, but you know, comforting, or maybe not? maybe just sad?) to know the same dynamics play out everywhere …

  9. I really liked this post and I think you’re right on.

    Only one thing bothers me:

    Compare this to the high profile Aishwarya Rai – Salman Khan relationship. Everyone seems to know that he assaulted her, but she’s never done anything about it; it’s as if it never occurred to her that he could be punished.

    Certainly, what Sawant did is very valuable and you’re correct in calling BS on the superficial reasons for which she is dismissed. However, this attitude toward Rai, like she’s too stupid to understand what she obviously should have done, like it never occurred to her that he could be punished is decidedly non-feminist. Women don’t report/prosecute domestic/sexual assault for many reasons. Whether to do so is the choice of every individual woman. It is no one’s place to judge them, certainly not in a feminist space, I would think.

  10. bellatrys – I han’t thought of the connection, but yes, there’s definitely a similarity with the chav jokes.

    sandinista – okay, don’t think I phrased that very well. I have failed to prosecute sexual assault in the past, and I’m certainly not in a position to judge another woman for not doing so. What worries me about Aishwarya Rai’s case is that when someone who is such a public figure in a country where there’s already a low awareness of women’s rights fails to sue, it enforces the message that women should just shut up and take it and that there’s nothing they can do for the public. Our public needs to be reminded that legal action is an option, and I see the Aishwarya Rai – Salman Khan thing as a missed opportunity more than anything else.
    (Any more hostility you may have sensed is just my resentment at her stealing my name)

  11. Aishwarya — how much does the Hindu rightwing have to do with the threatened suit against Richard Gere and Shilpa Shetty?

    From what I’ve been hearing, it’s the kind of thing that, yes, the kiss was taboo under a certain strict interpretation of conservative morality, but most people don’t actually follow that morality.

    Here, we don’t really have a judicial forum to dispute things like that, though the whole “OMG! Janet Jackson has nipples!” thing was pursued through the FCC. Which was headed by Colin Powell’s son.

    Okay, so the US is no less depressingly feudal than any other place on earth.

  12. Also — it’s amusing to me that Indian culture can be very conservative, yet the average Bollywood musical (and, indeed, even the average Hindu woman) exposes more midriff — oh, that sinful midriff — while wearing a sari than does the average actress in the average Hollywood film. And the wingnuts here hyperventilate over midriffs sucking out the morals of our chilluns.

    In other cultures, it’s the neck.

  13. zuzu – To be honest, I’m not sure where the Hindu rightwing ends and ordinary people begin. But no one really makes a big fuss about kissing in the movies and suchlike anymore.

    What did bother me about the Shilpa Shetty – Richard Gere kiss was that it clearly took her completely by surprise though she put a good face on it.

    It always fascinates me to see what different cultures consider unacceptable. When I see the sort of dancing that went on in hindi movies of the early 90s I’m made rather uncomfortable by the pelvic thrusts – far more so than by the newer ones that make our current guardians-of-morality so nervous.

  14. @zuzu: You are right about the Sari thingie. I remember when they made a decree in my sister’s college banning ‘western’ clothes and making it compulsory to wear sarees to the classrooms. Apart from my anger at people trying to control what they can wear, I thought it was stupid because a saree exposes more skin than jeans with shirts.
    Sarees have been used in hindi movies as an expression of sexuality. A sari clad woman dancing in the rain or under a waterfall is something that has appeared in innumerous movies. In fact, I remember seeing a documentary, I forget which, in which they showed a right wing religious celebration with a statue of Mandakini depicting such a scene was used. And these same people will lecture us about morals and kisses…

  15. All that I have been thinking since I read this post was: Why didn’t the inetrviewer ask Diya Mirza if she was a good role model for girls, what with her painted face, deformed eyebrows and all…..

Comments are currently closed.