In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

South Carolina: A True Leader in Reminding Bitches That They Ain’t Shit

Well here’s something to be proud of.

South Carolina is one of the most difficult places in the United States to get an abortion, abortion rights advocates say.

Over the past two decades, a host of legislative restrictions — mandatory waiting periods, requiring “informed consent” information and regulations on abortion clinics — have jelled to limit access to abortions.

Those restrictions delight anti-abortion forces and dishearten those who advocate a woman’s right to choose.

The impact of the laws is evident in:

• The decline of S.C. abortion clinics to three from 14 in 1996

• The drop in S.C. doctors who perform abortions. South Carolina is the only state in the nation that has a law that defines a fetus as a person. Abortion rights advocates say that law could expose doctors who perform abortions to criminal prosecution.

• Two-thirds of the state’s reproductive-age women live in counties where no doctors perform abortions.

• A slight increase in the number of S.C. women going to other states to get abortions

As a result, abortions in South Carolina have dropped 53 percent since 1988.


“As a result” is stretching it a little bit. Abortion rates in general have dropped significantly since 1988, when the national rate was 27.3 per 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44. For teenagers, the abortion rate peaked in the 80s — and has since decreased by more than half.

So if the national abortion rate has dropped, and more women from South Carolina are going out of state for abortions, I’m not sure that the decrease in the SC abortion rate can be entirely (or even mostly) attributed to more restrictive laws. That said, I am sure that a great many women were unable to access abortion when they needed it as a result of these laws. I’m sure a great many women were compelled to continue pregnancies that they didn’t want. And while that may please the forced pregnancy crowd, it’s hardly a “victory” for anything.

But South Carolina is indeed a leader in giving the state control over women’s bodies — it’s one of the states where women have been convicted of crimes (including homicide) for using drugs while pregnant. And abortion rights aside, it’s a pretty shitty place to be a woman:

South Carolina is ranked #42 in terms of women’s political participation — and earns a grade of D-.
-South Carolina also ranked #42 (and earned a D) for women’s employment and earnings.
-South Carolina also earned a D in terms of women’s economic autonomy.
-South Carolina also earned a D and ranked #44 for women’s health.
-South Carolina has one of the highest chlamydia rates in the country.
-22 percent of adult women in South Carolina have survived physical or sexual abuse in an intimate relationship.
-In 2001, South Carolina ranked #1 in the number of women killed by their intimate partners, and in 2003 clocked in at more than twice the national average.
-Women in South Carolina also get screwed when it comes to pensions and benefits:

Related to the wage differential are the pension receipts and benefit levels gaps. The Status of Women in South Carolina in 2002 shows that almost 10 percent fewer S.C. women (17.4 percent) than S.C. men (26.6 percent) receive pension and other retirement income. These percentages compared unfavorably with national percentages of 18.4 percent and 27.8 percent, respectively. Wide gaps are evident when the median annual benefits were considered. For S.C. women, the median annual benefit was $5,100 or 82 percent of the national median for women of $6,200. A reversal is seen for S.C. men whose median annual benefits were $15,600 or 26 percent higher than the national median for men of $12,400.

Funny how that works.

At least South Carolina politicians have been consistent in their “bitches ain’t shit” message, though. Women in South Carolina are poorer, less educated, and more likely to be killed by an intimate partner — it shouldn’t surprise us that women in South Carolina are also forced to give birth when they don’t want to, and effectively barred from exercising their most basic right to self-determination.

But ok, no surprise there — it isn’t exactly a secret that “pro-life” politicians and activists could care less about women’s lives, and women in general. They’re concerned about the babies, right? If there’s one thing that pro-lifers love, it’s babies!

…or not. While politicians and anti-choicers in South Carolina may boast about their state’s women’s rights violations, they certainly can’t justify those violations by arguing that they really care about the children — because South Carolina is a pretty shitty place to be a kid.

South Carolina has one of the highest child poverty rates in the country — it’s ranked #42, with 1 being the best and 50 being the worst.
A full 10 percent of infants in South Carolina are born underweight, putting it at #48 when it comes to underweight births.
-South Carolina ranks #42 in terms of infant deaths
-South Carolina ranks #42 in terms of prenatal care.
South Carolina has a 50 percent high school drop-out rate, which is above the national average of 30 percent.

Let’s also keep in mind that 100 percent of the worst politicians for children are “pro-life.” South Carolina boasts three U.S. congressmen who earned a zero rating.

In 1996, there were 14 abortion clinics in South Carolina. Now there are three. And South Carolina is looking at a whole series of laws to restrict abortion access even more.

It’s not about babies — if it was, maybe “pro-lifers” would give a shit about them after they exit the birth canal. It’s about controlling and punishing women. There’s something to be proud of.


12 thoughts on South Carolina: A True Leader in Reminding Bitches That They Ain’t Shit

  1. Speaks for itself, doesn’t it? When are people going to get into the habit of ignoring what people say when their actions so clearly contradict their words?

  2. I can’t believe you ripped on my home state without consulting me first! :p

    If you’d asked, I could have added that the legislature changed cockfighting from a misdemeanor to a felony offense, yet voted against doing the same for wife beating.

    Plus also! The voters of South Carolina voted in Jim DeMint, who ran on a platform of banning single mothers from teaching.

    Horrifyingly, I think my dad voted for him. And my sister’s a single mother!

  3. Well Jill, about seven years ago South Carolina finally got around to removing the confederate flag from atop their statehouse. This was 135 years after the end of the civil war and 130 years after the 15th amendment was passed…. So given that the 19th amendment was passed in 1920, perhaps we can hope to see South Carolina get with the fucking program with regard to women’s rights by about 2050-2055. Sarcasm aside, your right, they are some kind of backwards and it shouldn’t be tolerated.

  4. Lord, Flea, you scared me to death. I’d just been thinking maybe we should try to organize an underground railroad to get women out of there and then I read your comment as saying you lived there now. “No, God, not one of ours! Get her out!”

    I realize that this sounds like I’m buying into the idea that we abandon whole states that have fallen this far and just try to save the women who want to get out. I know that’s not an answer. For one thing, I do care about the born.

  5. I do have to say that although SC did remove the flag from atop the Statehouse, it is now in front of the Statehouse.

    There is currently a bill that when intially introduced would force a woman to view a picture of her ultrasound before she was able to access an abortion. Now, after 7 hours of public testimony it has been changed to say that “she has the option” to view the ultrasound. According to the authors, “So she can have all the information necessary to make an ‘informed’ decision.”

    http://www.scstatehouse.net/cgi-bin/query.exe?first=DOC&querytext=S%2084&category=Legislation&session=117&conid=2797375&result_pos=0&keyval=1170084

    Sometimes there is just nothing more to say.

  6. Well Jill, about seven years ago South Carolina finally got around to removing the confederate flag from atop their statehouse. This was 135 years after the end of the civil war and 130 years after the 15th amendment was passed

    Memo to Confederate flag-wavers:

    You lost. Get over it. Stop fucking your siblings.

  7. As someone born and raised in South Carolina, who still lives here, I often protest that we have an undeservedly bad reputation. But when some of the worst shit about my state is listed like this, it makes me quite embarassed and wonder what the hell is wrong with my neighbors.

  8. Don’t forget the movement to create a Christian theocracy in SC.

    Christian Theocracy, or the people who want to move there in order to get enough votes to have South Carolina segregate from the union again?

    To be fair, if it’s the latter, most native South Carolinians find this embarrassing.

    Again, to be fair, if most South Carolinians weren’t so batshit insane the segregationists wouldn’t find the state so appealing.

    And Nell, I always cringe when SC’s flaws are laid out on the table like this. It makes it very difficult to talk about the parts of the state that you love.

    I grew up ten miles away from the Savannah River Plant, America’s number one shopping destination for refined Plutonium. The local papers censored reports of every single spill. I didn’t even know what the plant did until I moved out of state. Sigh. I can’t wait until the tumors start to grow!

  9. This reminds me of an article a few months ago in Vanity Fair called “Red State Babylon”. It brought together data in all kinds of maps and charts detailing how the most conservative states are overwhelmingly the ones with the poorest economies, the highest infant mortality rates, and a host of other bad things. The more conservative the states are, the worse their numbers get.
    I googled the name of this article several times looking for a conservative’s response to it but found nothing. I’m intrigued about what they could POSSIBLY have to say about it. If anyone knows of a place on the web where a conservative even mentions these trends I would love to see it.

  10. If anyone knows of a place on the web where a conservative even mentions these trends I would love to see it.

    To my knowledge, they don’t mention them. If they were to, they’d do so indirectly. That is, they’d link this post, for example, and from it launch a whine that there go the latte limousine liberals again, condescending to stouthearted, decent rural Americans. Which is why this–

    Stop fucking your siblings.

    –is the sort of cheap shot I avoid, just personally. I don’t like giving ’em ammunition. Your mileage may vary.

Comments are currently closed.