In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Chicago

(This is a casserole post, one I started writing around late April, and never finished, a companion to ‘Key Largo.’)

So I was here in the city, and my well-meaning friends had conversation after conversation with me about my gender. The gist of almost all of them was as follows:

1) I did not look like anything other than a man.

2) I would have to invest a great deal of time and effort if I wanted to look like anything other than a man.

3) No one agreed on what, precisely, I’d have to do to look like a woman, or what, precisely, made me look like a man. But there was much work to be done! It would involve many elaborate and painful beauty rituals whose mechanics I had never mastered.

Then I went to Chicago. I dressed in boy clothes, since I was confident that I wasn’t passing as female at all and didn’t exactly want to travel as a transwoman. Passive-aggressive boy clothes, anyway, to match my passive-aggressive mannerisms: baggy sweaters and baggy pants and a hat jammed over my Jefferson Davis haircut. I had had one laser treatment, was smack in the middle of the grace period, and there was perhaps some breastiness there from the right angle and in the right light.

I was she and her and ma’am the entire time. I was sirred perhaps twice. I could not get gay men to look at me to save my life.

I even got shooed out of the men’s room at Borders! It wasn’t an, “Excuse me, are you…?” incident, either. It was a Class-A Wrong Bathroom Event. I was leaning against the wall across from the urinals, waiting for the two stalls to open up. The men in them had apparently gone into labor. A seventy-year-old man shakily relieved himself into one of the urinals in front of me. I was wondering if I even wanted to use the stalls when a guy who’d been washing his hands at the sink looked over at me. Maybe he caught the mingled disgust and doubt on my face, but he started cracking up and said, “Uh, you’re–you’re in the wrong washroom.” (What was I supposed to say? What can one ever say? “Is that why there are urinals in here? Oh, my God, I was so confused! Thank you so much!”) I said, “…No, I’m not.” And then he started yelling at the guys in the stalls to get out, because we had a line out here (i.e. me). So I’m kind of wondering if he even believed me.

Then I came back here, and my friends were once again telling me how mannish I looked and how much help I needed–which they were happy to give me! I was going a little nuts, actually. What was so different about Chicago? What was I doing differently? Was it the hat? I missed Chicago. I wanted to go back, maybe move there.

I was talking to a friend of mine about a week after my vacation, and she was telling me what I could do to convince her that I’m a woman, and talking about how incredibly male and masculine and manly I looked, and I said, “But, but, but, I went to Chicago last week and passed as a woman the entire time–even in men’s clothing! All I had to do was wear a hat!”

And she went off on this long rant (she wasn’t shouting, but I’m not sure how else to term it) about how, well, Chicago is the Midwest, and it’s different there, and they have all those enormous rawboned Scandinavian women, and they all wear those sloppy sweatshirts and baggy pants and they all look like big butch dykes even when they’re straight women, and they’re very tall there, and very broad-shouldered, and I was wearing that bulky overcoat….

I was listening to this and finally–finally!–I thought to myself, Wait a minute, that’s completely fucking ridiculous! That makes no sense at all! I was in a major metropolitan area, not a Soviet propaganda poster! There were plenty of femmey women in Chicago, and far fewer bearded lesbians! Baggy men’s clothing doesn’t make it harder for you to pass as male! I didn’t pass as female in Chicago because the Sasquatch would pass as female in Chicago! I passed because I–because I–because I looked like a woman! I looked like a woman in a bulky overcoat! And that means I look like a woman now! I’m not the problem! I don’t need to pluck my eyebrows! I don’t need to stuff my bra! I need new friends!

That was when I started to feel much better.

I had no idea that this would happen. Round the turn of the year, I believed that I might never be able to go back. Then I believed that I’d be “passing” as female, with a great deal of heartache and a lot of effort and expense, for years if not forever. Then I believed that I might be passing as female after several months. I believed all of this because this was what the people around me were telling me, including my transition therapist, because I’d been telling myself it was too late since shot one, and because I’d been passing completely as a big strong butch guy for about two years (okay, not so much with the butch part). I used (still use) the men’s locker room; the last couple of people I came out to as ftm didn’t believe me. Right before I quit, I was starting to describe myself as post-transition.

It was–is–weird just to be so modular. You’re not supposed to be able to change like this. I assumed that I’d be passing as female for years if not forever. Accepting the possibility of sex-change is itself counterintuitive; the idea that the reversal can be accomplished this quickly is really shocking. And it’s also strange to go from completely male to passably female.

And I’m having trouble figuring out how to process everything that’s happened. I’m under internal pressure to discard old proprioceptive genders, in order to sustain this new one. At the same time, I still have trouble trusting that I look like a girl to people I meet. At the same time, I’m having to sustain the male presentation at work, and doing so successfully (“Have you lost weight?”). At the same time, people who knew me as male still obviously think of me as male and do not believe that I can pass as female at all let alone do so without much effort. At the same time, people who knew me as female are either confident that I can become a girl, confident that I already am one, or insistent that nothing ever changed.

[That last bit is no longer true–I am full-time, as it were, and the people in my life have moved on from disbelief through amazement through praise to a stated belief that I always looked sort of androgynous. Progress. I decided to keep them all after all; it’s not as though I’m any more objective, and now they’re telling me what I want to hear.]


17 thoughts on Chicago

  1. I’m not sure where you are, geographically, but there really are huge differences between regions of this country, no matter how many Starbucks and Gap stores they build.

    I remember when I first moved to So Cal, a friend came out to visit me from Chicago and she was blown away by how many grown women were wearing clothes that only young teenagers wear in Chicago.

  2. I’m not sure where you are, geographically, but there really are huge differences between regions of this country, no matter how many Starbucks and Gap stores they build.

    Oh, I don’t doubt that part. And I think that acceptable masculine/feminine dress really does vary a great deal. I just don’t think that people in Chicago are more flexible than people in San Francisco.

  3. Well, I was going to crack wise about how you were in the City of Broad Shoulders rather than among a bunch of effete West Coast liberals, but looks like your friend beat me to it. Although my aim was to disparage (ironically, obviously) the masculinity of those latte-sippers, not the femininity of Midwesterners. In any case, I’m sure it was just a matter of your friends not noticing the changes in your physical appearance/exagerrating the traces of masculine appearance in their minds.

  4. In any case, I’m sure it was just a matter of your friends not noticing the changes in your physical appearance/exagerrating the traces of masculine appearance in their minds.

    Apparently. I didn’t actually believe that until I started dressing as a woman and…passing as one.

  5. Chicago is the Midwest, and it’s different there, and they have all those enormous rawboned Scandinavian women…

    Not to mention the Poles, the Slovaks, the Italians, the Germans, the Greeks, African-Americans, and so on, and so on…

  6. Yeah, but presumably your transition didn’t make you more -rawboned and enormous-, yanno.

    As you say: sometimes the solution is a bit simpler. Or, if not new friends, there probably is a point where you politely suggest the old ones shut the fuck up with the -advice,- thankee.

  7. I just don’t think that people in Chicago are more flexible than people in San Francisco.

    You’d be surprised — Chicago’s been solidly Democratic for many years now, even if they do tend to elect mayors for life.

    But I was more saying that the “masculine” and “feminine” dress codes in each place are different. In snowy places like Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, there is more acceptance of utilitarian dress, and they’re more used to it than people in relatively balmy San Francisco. So they were using different cues to guess your gender than your friends.

  8. Did you happen to be in the gayborhood(s) (i think we have at least two-three at last count.)
    I got my hair cut yesterday in Andersonville, the formerly-Scandanavian/lesbians-with-tots enclave that is rapidly swelling with gay men priced out of Boystown. And while at first the femme male stylist was saying “there’s my man” and, i dunno, attempting to affirm my masculinity, he ended up cutting my hair so that where my sideburns would be if they ever grew in was shaped into points ala Liza Minelli 20 years ago. But I’m only about 14 months into this whole testosterone thing, and while my voice is Johnny Cash-ish, my body is more “Pat”, the old SNL character.

  9. I live in Chicago, and I got ranted at the other day on the street for not having a masculine enough *walk* by a couple Streets and Sanitation workers.

    Anyway, I guess it would depend heavily on where you were at. If you were up in Boystown or Lakeview, or even down in Downtown, Wicker Park or Logan Square, there are so, so many gender-ambiguous people around that it’s possible a lot of people get good at spotting little things.

    But yeah, it’s more likely that your friends are just trying to helpful but don’t realize they’re being overcritical.

    Thanks for the post, as always; I’ve learned a lot from hearing your experiences.

  10. I wonder if part of it is that in SF there’s more of a category for ‘trans’, and so people see ambiguity more? Someplace where people are more likely to see someone as one thing or another, if you’re not ‘male’ enough, then you’re female.

    (Or, as Christian Slater’s character says in HEATHERS, “This is Ohio, if you’re not [something something] and drinking a brewski, you might as well be wearing a dress”.]

  11. You’d be surprised — Chicago’s been solidly Democratic for many years now, even if they do tend to elect mayors for life.

    I didn’t say anything about Chicago’s political orientation. I know that Chicago is solidly Democratic, and that it’s cosmopolitan. (Even if I hadn’t known that beforehand, my Chicago friend is very defensive about the flyover thing, and I had to listen to several variants on his, ‘PAUL WELLSTONE, BITCHES!’ speech before I left.)

    I was referring to what you’re talking about below: the codes for masculine and feminine–and transgendered. I think that San Francisco has a higher percentage of visibly queer and gender-variant people than almost anywhere else in the country. IME and that of most of the people I know, it can be more difficult for a transmasculine person to pass as male here than pretty much any other city; people are more likely to slot you into ‘masculine female’ than ‘excuse me, sir? you’re in the wrong bathroom,’ because there are butch dykes everywhere. So if I pass as a woman in Chicago (or anywhere else), I probably wouldn’t have a hard time passing as a woman in San Francisco.

    And this was borne out: as soon as I stopped believing that I couldn’t pass as a woman, people started responding to me as though I were a perfectly normal woman.

    But I was more saying that the “masculine” and “feminine” dress codes in each place are different. In snowy places like Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, there is more acceptance of utilitarian dress, and they’re more used to it than people in relatively balmy San Francisco. So they were using different cues to guess your gender than your friends.

    I disagree. See above re: butch dykes; San Francisco is pretty utilitarian even though the weather isn’t so bad, too.

    I think that my friends were not reacting to any set of cues. I think they were having difficulty seeing me in a new way. The people who believed that I could look like a woman again, or already did, were the people who knew me before transition. The woman who went off about how Chicago is the land of yeti met me after I’d started transitioning. Also, interestingly enough, she got stuck the first time ’round: she had a hard time seeing me as male long after I was passing everywhere. These days, like I said, the same people have trouble seeing my womanhood as anything other than self-evident.

    Did you happen to be in the gayborhood(s) (i think we have at least two-three at last count.)

    I was mostly downtown. I did get to see Andersonville, but only after dark. We had watery martinis.

  12. Yeah, but presumably your transition didn’t make you more -rawboned and enormous-, yanno.

    #

    I was already rawboned and enormous, I suppose.

    These things are true:

    1) Certain permanent things about my physiology (e.g. my height) make it easier for me to pass as male.

    2) Certain results of testosterone (e.g. my husky voice) make it easier for me to pass as male.

    This means that I can be androgynous with less effort. It does not mean that these things keep me from being modular, or that I have to try very hard to combat androgyny. They aren’t tells, exactly; that concept is, I think, based on a faulty conception of what ‘makes’ men and women, one based on the premise that people are objective.

  13. I know I have nothing to tell you about your experience or about “passing” generally (I’m not even sure if that’s supposed to carry a double meaning or not), but it might be worth remembering that most people, if there’s any gender ambiguity, will accept your explicit self-presentation (and won’t even think of it as “gender ambiguity,” but just that you’re a woman with a husky voice, etc.). Like the guy in the pissoir, who was apparently sure you were a woman, but when you said otherwise, wasn’t all, “Oh, so you’re a dude, are you? Well, then, let’s see it! C’mon, whip it out!”

    Smart-assery aside, it’s probably true that most people who aren’t thinking in terms of gender transition will see features like a husky voice and just think of you as a woman who has X. Not that I know what the hell I’m talking about or anything, just trying to make you more comfortable. But it does seem plausible.

  14. And she went off on this long rant (she wasn’t shouting, but I’m not sure how else to term it) about how, well, Chicago is the Midwest, and it’s different there, and they have all those enormous rawboned Scandinavian women, and they all wear those sloppy sweatshirts and baggy pants and they all look like big butch dykes even when they’re straight women, and they’re very tall there, and very broad-shouldered, and I was wearing that bulky overcoat….

    Oh fer cripes sake. Excuse me while I pick my eyes up; they were rolling so hard they fell right out of my head. Not at you . . . at the common perception of the Midwest that used to drive me nuts back when I lived out on the East Coast.

    I agree with Mnemosyne that you will find a more utilitarian style of dress here because of the weather, but I think your friend may be taking the old Sandberg characterization of Chicago as a city with broad shoulders a wee bit too seriously. From what I’ve seen, having grown up in Southeaster Wisconsin (where one would expect the “big boned Germanic woman” phenomenon to be even more pronounced), the assessment of Midwestern women as more “mannish” is utter nonsense.

    Now, that’s not to say that perceptions of gender are the same from region to region. I do think there are cultural factors at work that could explain the difference in your experiences. Now, I don’t know all that much about NYC, but there was one thing that I noticed when I lived in the South (both in the Plains and in the Mid-Atlantic states). The Midwest just is not as enslaved to the feminine beauty culture as other parts of the country. This is not to say that it doesn’t play a role in women’s lives, just that it isn’t quite as bad. This, in part, is due – I think – to the fact that this is still a very blue collar region. Added to that is the fact that this was one of the early bastions of feminism. (I don’t know when Illinoiis ratified the 19th Amendment, but Wisconsin was the first state to do so, and I doubt Illinois was far behind). Now, there are differences within the region (in Northern Wisconsin and the UP of Michigan, for example, telling someone you were getting a Brazilian wax would likely draw a look of utter confusion), but I do think – based on the observations and experiences drawn from spending the overwhelming majority of my life in the Midwest – the working class culture and comparative freedom from the beauty myth, have combined to create at atmosphere where the definition of woman is such that . . . well, I’m not entirely sure how to explain it. The best way to convey it this: back when I was living in VA, I would have never left the house without at least putting some make-up on; here I go without make up more often than I go with.

  15. i think that people who know us as one sex have a lot of trouble seeing us as another. we are raised in a culture that has an extremely hard line between the sexes, one that is not supposed to be crossed. moving 2500 miles away from where i transitioned, and the people who knew me as male, did wonders for my ability to “pass” as female.

    from my own perspective, i see myself as fairly androgynous, and i only need to make minor changes in my appearance, even to this day, to pass as male or female. wearing a padded bra and letting my hair down causes even the most homophobic men to whistle their cat calls at me. tucking my hair under a baseball cap, taking off the bra, and increasing my “swagger”, would undoubtedly cause people to start calling me “sir”.

    i have no doubt i could pass as a man again if i tried. though granted, having lost the ability to grow a beard, something i had always depended on while living and passing as a man, would create a challenge for me. and then there’s that whole standing up to pee thing. of course, i could always shave my head.

  16. Armagh444, your comment just affirmed something I’ve been wondering about myself. Why is it that in the 2 years I’ve been living in Chicago I’ve stopped with a large number of feminine body maintenance rituals that I felt were very important in Washington DC? Granted, a lot has to do with becoming my adult self (I’m mid-20’s) and socializing with a large number of revolutionary types, but nevertheless I was floored when a good friend recently called me a butchy femme. Here I was thinking I was high femme all this time (the fact that I’m straight is perhaps a separate topic for conversation). But hey, I spend less time in the shower since I rarely shave my legs and other parts. Thanks, Chicago!

    And thanks Piny for the great post.

Comments are currently closed.