In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

School for Pick-Up Artists?

I can’t quite figure out if it’s the class itself, the attitude of some of the guys in the class or the way the article is written that leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Ben had a rough Friday night picking up women on the Hotel Gansevoort’s balcony after being coldly rejected by two attractive blonds.

The 23-year-old documentary filmmaker, who asked his last name not be used for fear of ridicule, suffers from an acute case of “premature ejectulation” — ejecting himself early from promising conversations with women for fear of rejection.

Such was the diagnosis from the coaches of “Charm School Boot Camp,” a three-day crash course on seducing women that Ben and five other men paid $1,600 apiece for in early August.

“If I were to look at it objectively, I would feel really good about it, and then just leave,” Ben said.

Right now, I’m leaning toward the article and/or the school being the creepy ones. Ben here has a problem he’s trying to fix. I’m sure we all know guys who are really, really wonderful but inexplicably unsuccessful with women. I can’t vouch for Ben’s wonderfulness, but it sounds like he loses confidence when he’s talking to women, or just pre-emptively takes himself out of the game because he’s been rejected so many times. And given that guys are socially conditioned to do the pursuing (and women are socially conditioned to wait for the pursuer to make the first move), a lack of confidence in this area is going to mean that Ben spends a lot of time alone. (Shy or unconfident women have less of an issue with this, because sexually confident men can always seek them out. They’re in a position of turning down unwelcome advances, not making them.)

But, ew, is this really a course on seducing women? I’d be fine with it if it were a course on flirting or improving social interactions, or what have you, but the idea of the school itself or the reporter characterizing it as “seduction” makes it sound like the goal is to pick up women and dispose of them like Kleenex.

I’m also a bit leery of the idea of taking guys who are socially awkward and feel pressured and sending them off to the Hotel Gansevoort. Pretty swanky for a practice run, and probably a bit high-pressure. But, I guess if you pay your $1600 to seduce women, you want a bit of that “Sex and the City” aura. However, I wouldn’t be surprised if there weren’t a Nice Guy™ or two in the class who got shot down and blamed it on the stuck-up golddigging bitches. Or maybe it’s the reporter with the Nice Guy™ issues, what with the “cold” rejections and the seduction and the pickup lines.

Check the reporter’s description of the course against the description given by the founder of the school:

Ben is not the only man with crippling fears when it comes to chatting up women. That’s why Charm School, run by an Ann Arbor, Michigan-based company called Charisma Arts, has no problem finding men who need intense guidance and fieldwork approaching women at places like bookstores and bars.

“People think we’re teaching guys with no confidence who are bad with women,” said Charisma Arts co-founder Wayne Elise. “We teach guys how to be themselves in a very unnatural environment, how to cold approach strangers and make them comfortable enough to open themselves up.”

Sounds like someone found his hook and is working it to death despite a lack of supporting quotes.

Social skills are important, and people don’t always pick them up (NPI) on their way to adulthood. If Elise’s description is accurate, it seems like these skills might carry over to other contexts — in other words, it doesn’t sound like they’re simply cranking out a bunch of Leisure Suit Larrys.

The Charm School’s lesson plan stays away from canned lines and instructs men to think on their feet when talking to women, to put their insecurities aside and react naturally to a women’s subtle cues, said Johnny Saviour, 21, a Charisma Arts instructor.

The class starts on Friday afternoon with the instructors going over Elise’s attraction theory. They then practice the theory by approaching each other as if they were women, and they do word association exercises to get their minds tuned into keeping a conversation with a woman rolling.

After a night approaching women at a bar or club, the instructors hold a debriefing the next morning and go over what the participants did right and wrong. Then they head out again to hit on more women.

Okay, first: Johnny Saviour? For real?

And again, the reporter’s voice creeps in: they go out to “hit on” more women.

I wonder if these word choices reflect a contempt of men who feel they have to resort to such lengths as well as an attitude that the only measure of “success” with women is to leave a string of one-night stands behind you? Surely, this guy seems to be sneering, if these guys were Real Men, they’d be dragging women off by their hair!

Actually, I wouldn’t be surprised if that were the case, and if the subjects were quite aware of the reporter’s contempt — at least as aware of his contempt as of that of the men back home whose reactions they fear — not one of these guys gave a last name for fear of humiliation.

Ben and the five other participants, ranging in age from 21 to 43, met with their four coaches Saturday at a McDonald’s near Union Square, the morning after a deflating evening of hitting on women at the Gansevoort.

Sam, a stocky, recent college graduate from Boston with shaved head and thick chain around his neck, said he is tired of sleeping with “drunk chicks” and wants to learn how to properly “pursue and attain” the women of his choice.

Tim, 23, a New York piano tuner, said his new full-time job makes it hard for him to meet women.

“This was something I was willing to splurge on,” said Tim, who also did not want to give his last name. “I live in a city with millions of women, and I want to meet some of them.”

Ben said that despite his lack of luck with women on Friday night, he tried to “learn a little from each interaction.”

Well, I’m sure a course that sends its students off to mingle in bars is going to do a lot for Sam’s drunk chick problem. And is it me, or is that “thick chain” bit a little ethnic/class snobbery? But, again, the editorial voice: they’re “deflated” because they struck out. But Ben at least sounds like he’s getting something out of this, so good for him.

Ben next moves onto a bookstore, where his attempts to strike up a conversation with nearby women do not bear fruit. But again, check the characterizations:

“A lot of guys defeat themselves right away,” Saviour whispered, looking on. “If he thinks she’s not interested, he’ll clam up. That’s exactly what happened.”

To get Ben back on track, Savior has him talk to a male store clerk so he can interact with another person without pressure. Soon, Ben approaches another woman but she too walks away without noticing him.

“I feel a bit shaken up,” Ben said after his latest rejection. “There is information coming from a lot of different places. I feel a bit like a pickup artist.”

So, how exactly is it being rejected when the woman didn’t even notice he was there? I guess in this guy’s world, the women are all exquisitely tuned to every movement of the man, and therefore, any failure of the woman to submit to the attentions of the man is a rejection. And he’s never, ever been rejected in his life, he swears.

Next up: Drunk chicks from Jersey! Sam’s gonna be so happy:

By the early hours of Sunday at a crowded rooftop bar on Fifth Avenue, Ben finally has a confident glow. Other Charm School students are partying on the fringes of a drunken bachelorette party full of New Jersey women.

The story at least has a happy ending, with Ben having mingled and built up his confidence by being himself while interacting with women in a somewhat structured way.


39 thoughts on School for Pick-Up Artists?

  1. So, how exactly is it being rejected when the woman didn’t even notice he was there? I guess in this guy’s world, the women are all exquisitely tuned to every movement of the man, and therefore, any failure of the woman to submit to the attentions of the man is a rejection.

    I think you’ve put your finger on it. For all that Nice Guys complain that they have to do “everything”, the problem is that men are conditioned to expect women to do everything. Courtship is the up front phase where men do all the work (or we pretend they do) to “attain” a woman so they can relax and spend the next 50 years having someone do all the emotional and sexual work for them. To many men, even the phase of pretending to work for a woman’s affection is daunting; they’ve not been trained for that. Women are supposed to be the emotional servants, not men.

  2. But, ew, is this really a course on seducing women? I’d be fine with it if it were a course on flirting or improving social interactions, or what have you, but the idea of the school itself or the reporter characterizing it as “seduction” makes it sound like the goal is to pick up women and dispose of them like Kleenex.

    Reading this I can’t help but long for an aesthetes look at seduction. Whither have you gone, Johannes?

  3. Wow. “Good for Her,” in Toronto, has seminars on how to flirt that run around the $35 CAD price range. $1600 USD?! You’ve got to be kidding me. (Not to mention that the Good for Her seminars aren’t explicitly gendered and sound like they’d leave less of a bad taste in your mouth. Unfortunately, they don’t have the flirting seminar on their current schedule of events.)

    I was pretty shy back in the day and seriously didn’t get any dates at all. I don’t think I ever got over the shy part, but eventually I was lucky enough to meet some people who worked on the same “become friends first, then have a relationship develop from there,” wavelength that worked for me. Still, I have to agree with what you’ve tangentally referred to here and what I’ve always called “Nice Guy Calculus.”

    People who think of themselves as “Nice Guys,” in a way that implies that they’re always under the world’s heel often pick a woman who they think is the be all and end all of their existence and pine after her until their desire reaches explosive levels before they even consider saying anything. Then if she says no, they continue pining after her for another two years, complaining about how nice guys get short shrift.

    There are two problems with this. First, nobody likes a serious imbalance. If I think someone’s okay and they think I’m okay, maybe that can develop into nifty on both of our parts and then really quite swell on both of our parts, etc. But if I think someone is The Goddess Of All That Ever Was and she thinks I’m some guy in her math class who she doesn’t even know exists, then when I hand her my overwrought love poetry and run, she’s going to be creeped out no matter how nice I am. The imbalance is a problem. By cooping up their feelings until they’re blown entirely out of proportions, people damn themselves to failure.

    But the “Nice Guy Calculus” part is this: If the nice guy pines after a woman for a year, asks her out, then wallows in failure for two years before he becomes interested in someone again, he’s asking out one woman every three years. The so-called “Jerk” is maybe asking out one woman a week. Suppose 20% of all women would say yes to the nice guy — a really high rate, if you ask me, given compatability being quite tricky. That means that the nice guy has to ask out five women to get a date. At three years each, that’s fifteen years of “rejection” per experience of someone saying yet. That’s going to feel pretty harsh. On the other hand, suppose 5% of all women would date “The Jerk” — maybe they’re just people who are willing to give anyone at least one chance. He has to ask out twenty women before one says yes. But at the rate of one a week, he’s got a date every five months. The “Nice Guy,” concludes that women like Jerks, despite the fact that in the above example, the “Nice Guy,” is actually four times more popular than the “Jerk”.

  4. People should just read Guerilla Dating Tactics, which before I lost the damn book, seemed to be a pretty good guide on how to meet people without being creepy, privileged, or anything of the sort.

    ‘Nice guys’ are some of the worst, most manipulative people around. 🙁

  5. Ha! I’ve been in that MacDonalds several times. It was very not cool of me, but then I never had enough cash for the hipster cafe around the corner.

    “If” has a great take on the Nice Guy calculus, though. Wish I’d thought of that.

  6. I think I have a couple of problems with the evaluation of this article. Firstly, I see nothing to suggest the “catch and toss” methodology that you are all picking up on somehow. The phrase “hit on,” not to mention the word “seduce,” has no undertone of being temporary. It means to entice someone (usually to do something wrong) or, in keeping with the context, to attract in order to win someone’s love or sexual favor. None of these definitions suggest that “the goal is to pick up women and dispose of them like Kleenex.” The only reason why the guys seemingly go through the women so quickly is because they get rejected that quickly, so they move on to another person.

    Secondly, the evaluation of this paragraph:

    “A lot of guys defeat themselves right away,” Saviour whispered, looking on. “If he thinks she’s not interested, he’ll clam up. That’s exactly what happened.”

    To get Ben back on track, Savior has him talk to a male store clerk so he can interact with another person without pressure. Soon, Ben approaches another woman but she too walks away without noticing him.

    “I feel a bit shaken up,” Ben said after his latest rejection. “There is information coming from a lot of different places. I feel a bit like a pickup artist.”

    I saw a couple of people saying that Ben was wrong to see a “didn’t notice” as a “rejection.” However, there is no clear and necessary relationship between the interactions mentioned in the second and third paragraph. The “latest rejection” does not need to be the other woman who didn’t notice Ben. This evaluation especially made me think that maybe some people are trying to find fault with some of these things, and trying with determination at that. Furthermore, you seem to be castigating Ben for (not) doing exactly what women do: attempting to attract a mate by passive means and then characterizing ignorance as rejection.

    Thirdly, I take something of a personal issue with the label “Nice Guy” being applied so negatively. I personally am male, and I’ve been called many synonyms of the word “nice,” such as kind, considerate, caring, thoughtful, and the list goes on. And, interestingly enough, I also happen to have problems speaking to unfamiliar women on the fly. This is probably because I was bred to believe that any attention I directed toward a female should be done under the banner of friendship, due to the fact that women don’t really enjoy having random men making advances and would rather become acquainted with a man first (fair enough, it makes more sense this way and thus I agree). I was also bred to show respect to everyone as well as to have enough self-respect to expect the same, and if I did not receive the same, to terminate regular interaction with the person that treated me in this manner. I’ve found that acting aggressively to the point of what I would consider offense has worked far better than being courteous in attracting women, and only when a woman has been attracted can I allow myself to embody all those nice synonyms listed above.

    So why exactly would you expect something other than bitter scorn when someone like me is “shot down,” not for any true character flaws, but for not being able to say the right words in the right manner early enough? Why is this seen as predictably deplorable behavior?

  7. zuzu, I think you’re exactly right on several fronts. I agree that there’s a strong “these guys are losers for having to take this course and must be depicted as losers” tone in the article, and it’s fucking frustrating. There are guys who just don’t know what they’re doing with women, and there are ways to get over it. This kind of education (well, maybe not this specific company, but generally teaching men how to get it together) kills Nice Guys. If done with the aim of teaching mature masculinity (IE: not just being able to pick up, but to be honest and self-posessed men) it also kills Jerks.

  8. Vendetta Guy, the term “Nice Guy” as a long and establish set of connotation on this blog (borrowed from Pandagon), and probably doesn’t mean what you think it means.

  9. the word “seduce,” has no undertone of being temporary. It means to entice someone (usually to do something wrong) or, in keeping with the context, to attract in order to win someone’s love or sexual favor. None of these definitions suggest that “the goal is to pick up women and dispose of them like Kleenex.” The only reason why the guys seemingly go through the women so quickly is because they get rejected that quickly, so they move on to another person.

    (thefreedictionary.com)

    seduce:
    se·duce (s-ds, -dys)
    tr.v. se·duced, se·duc·ing, se·duc·es
    1. To lead away from duty, accepted principles, or proper conduct. See Synonyms at lure.
    2. To induce to engage in sex.
    3. a. To entice or beguile into a desired state or position.
    b. To win over; attract.

    It *is* a bid shady, but I can definitely recognise undertones of “making a woman do things she doesn’t want to do”. And this, in turn, rings unpleasant bells in my mind, such as date rape. Which is your male privilege not to have to think about, but you don’t get to say it doesn’t exist.

    also:

    “the right words in the right manner”

    this implies:
    1. you’re obliged to get a woman to like you. Who’s forcing you? Some universal law that women are a gift from deity and their beauties be cherished and ploughed and exploited?

    2. women will fall for a guy (/girl?) who is clever with words. Tell me you’re not saying that being a bad orator is what’s fundamentally wrong with a man who is “rejected by women”… Please tell me that someone who doesn’t really care about a woman *ought* to use his gift of words to date her anyway just because he can. Try reading this again by replacing the word “woman” with the word “person”

    So why exactly would you expect something other than bitter scorn when someone like me is “shot down,”

    ergo, you want women to expect your scorn when they shoot you down. How infantile of you. I suppose (and hope) that as a lesbian you would “respect” my wishes if I shot you down. Why is that any different from being shot down by any other woman who doesn’t want to date you? How is she obliged to succumb to your whims, so that when she doesn’t she is rightfully scorned?

    Furthermore, you seem to be castigating Ben for (not) doing exactly what women do: attempting to attract a mate by passive means and then characterizing ignorance as rejection.

    er.. is that how women attempt to attract a mate? Because in my world, potential mates first take a liking to each other and then eventually talk about it and either bond or don’t.

    I always suspect it’s a troll post when I feel the need to reply to so much in so little time…

  10. Damn, I wish I could remember where I saw it… a few years ago, I read a MUCH longer article on these schools. (I think it was either boston globe or NYT magazine)

    The article had a lot more analysis than this one. I’ll see if I can track it down today.

    Still: If you are socially incompetent, you will have difficulty meeting people even if you would be suited to each other. We all know that there’s a “hump” to get over when you first meet. Teaching someone to get over that hump doesn’t seem per se offensive.

    But OTOH the teachers have a lot of really nasty thoughts. women are often “targets” and “acquisitions”. There’s a huge focus on physical appearance (as opposed to, say, whether someone’s nice or an asshole).

    Worse yet, a lot of these courses focus on disguising YOURSELF to the women you’re meeting. You are supposed to come across as a “peacock” and a “cool guy” and… well.. what if you’re not?

    I can’t say that I entirely fault people for signing up. I can imagine it’s really frustrating if you are n inherently decent person and just too damn shy to ever meet anyone. But still these classes creep me out; the balance is way too far on the “nasty thoughts” end of things.

  11. The thing that always bothers me about these types of programs and books is that they all have men assume that every woman who is just going about her business is sexually available right at that moment, and that if she “rejects” him it means that he’s doing something wrong. There are any number of reasons that a woman will reject a man at a grocery store, book store, and yes, even a bar! Being out at a bar doesn’t require that a woman be single and looking. I go out with my committed girlfriends all the time. We aren’t looking to get laid or hook up, we’re looking to have some fun on our own because we’re in relationships in which we don’t need to be with our man every second of every day. I have one friend who goes so far as to wear a ring on her left hand just to make it clear that she’s not a piece of meat for purchase that night.

  12. Furthermore, you seem to be castigating Ben for (not) doing exactly what women do: attempting to attract a mate by passive means and then characterizing ignorance as rejection.

    Wow, Vendetta Guy, way to misread everything in the post. I thought I was quite clear that my issue was with the way the article was written, and how it characterized Ben as a loser who was getting rejected by women even when they didn’t notice he was trying to get their attention.

    I’m not even going to touch your “bitter scorn” remark.

  13. ‘Nice guys’ are some of the worst, most manipulative people around. 🙁

    Thank you for saying this; so often the “soft touch” can be deceiving.

  14. Assuming you’re posting in good faith, Vendetta Guy, there’s a big difference between a nice guy and Nice Guy (TM). If you’re not sure which you are ask yourself whether other people refer to you as a nice guy more often than you refer to yourself as a nice guy. When other people call you a nice guy, or some synonym, chances are you’re the real deal. When you start claiming to be a nice guy you’re meandering awfully close to the Nice Guy (TM) line, when you start explaining away women’s “rejections” in terms of “women love abusers” and “nice guys finish last,” you’re over the line. Probably the definitive article on Nice Guys is found on Heartless Bitch International’s website and is titled something like “Why I Don’t Date Nice Guys.”

    If you don’t mind, my off-the-cuff Nice Guy analysis of you is ambivalent. In your post you relied an awful lot on gender stereotypes, such as the old trope about how women play a passive role and men are forced to be the active party. I’m married to a nice guy and I did the upfront pursuing (he still didn’t get I was into him after I’d handed it to him written out and showed up to a meeting with chocolate covered strawberries, this was high school). You also referenced a pet peeve theory of mine that there’s some magic combination of words that will get a woman to drop everything she’s doing to pay attention to you. The reality is that women are individuals going about their lives, they might just be trying to buy a jar of peanut butter before they rush back before their favorite show comes on. Plus it’s just not that safe to allow yourself to be picked up. But you did seem to realize that that’s the case and you also acknowledged women aren’t too keen on being approached by strangers, which puts you out of the Nice Guy (TM) running in my book.

  15. What makes me scratch my head about the guys referenced here — nice or Nice(tm) or otherwise — is the question: Don’t they have any female friends? Co-workers? Chat-over-the-fence/laundry/mailbox/lobby neighbors? Do these guys somehow live in purdah? How do they talk to their friends? Don’t they ever think of asking them out? Whaaa?

  16. You also referenced a pet peeve theory of mine that there’s some magic combination of words that will get a woman to drop everything she’s doing to pay attention to you.

    “Every morning I do fifty chin-ups using only my tongue.”

  17. Well, Ron, maybe they don’t. Just to use me as an example, which I know is not representative of the general population, I have a bad case of either me or my friends moving away for one reason or another and ending up knowing nobody. (occupational hazard of going to graduate school.) Actually I might be representative of the general population since there was just an article making the news rounds about how people have fewer friends on average than they did 20 or 30 years ago.

  18. Don’t they have any female friends? Co-workers? Chat-over-the-fence/laundry/mailbox/lobby neighbors?

    Maybe they do, maybe they don’t. For some guys it doesn’t matter.

    I have a friend who is a smart, witty, and an all-around helluva guy. He’s got a good job (predictably, he’s a computer programmer) and he’s not terrible to look at. But unfortunately, he’s painfully shy and socially inept with women. I’ve seen him speaking to women, and it makes me wince every time. For whatever reason, when he’s around women he seems to lose his ability to string together coherent sentences, let alone be charming or witty.

    As I read this article, I thought of him. I think this class could be useful for guys like him.

  19. frumious b, presumably you know some of your classmates? Professors? The random person who always eats lunch in the student center at the same time you do?

    It’s not really whether you have a close knit circle of friends, it’s the fact that most of us – unless we’re odd and live like recluses – are surrounded by people. Why not ask some of them out, rather than targeting strangers at the library?

    I don’t have a boyfriend and I’m content with that. But if I were really desperate, well, there’s a guy who rides the same bus I do every morning who seems nice, and there’s another guy who’s part of the group I play pick up soccer with on weekends who’s TOTALLY hot and the only reason I haven’t asked him out yet is that he doesn’t speak English and I don’t speak Spanish very well. He even tried to flirt with me in Spanish last week (I think) and I blew it because of a lack of vocabulary. There are three guys I know from campaigns who are nice and quite good looking, and then there’s one I met at a Young Democrats’ function who I quite liked but when I asked him out he blew me off. Oh well, his loss.

    The point is that if you have an interesting and active life, you are going to meet people! And some of them will be attractive. So why not hit on THEM instead of complete strangers who are minding their own business? I wouldn’t dream of assuming that my only hope for a date or for sex is to pick up some random guy off the street, just because that YD wouldn’t answer my emails asking if he wanted to go out, or because I blew it with a guy whose language I didn’t speak well enough. But then I’m not packing around a hundred pounds of people-I-find-attractive-must-date-me privilege either.

    (For clarity’s sake, that last paragraph is in criticism of these guys who only hit on strangers, not of frumious b, who I have no reason to believe is of this sort – I just think he may have missed the point Ron was making.)

  20. That was a joke, fellas. Licking a floor doesn’t do it for the more fastidious ladies.

    Oh, it would get my attention, all right. But the attention it would get would be that I would back away slowly.

  21. On the other hand, I have a male friend that would desperately love to meet a woman, fall in love, get married, have kids, white picket fence in the burbs, etc.

    But he has no idea how to ask women out and has lost a great deal of confidence in the past couple of years after two bad break-ups. I wish there were a class that could teach him how to approach women and ask them for a date in a way that would be both successful and respectful, because he definitely has a lot to offer a nice woman.

    It’s a shame that it comes across in such a shady/sleezy way in these classes.

  22. Those sorts of courses are a license to print your own money when you’re a ‘commission sales’ mentality. (Or one of those personality profiles Ms Robinson has guest opined on over at Orcinus). You know, the kind that would sell their own mother life insurance at inflated rates to be the number one producer that month.

    Variations of this pop up every year around here, mostly in time with the big city fair/rodeo — an event they tout as one long chance to get laid. Which it pretty much is, given the party palaces.

    The latest version was so lazy, they were attempting to recruit marketing students off the local U campus to actually fill their ‘classes’ *for* them, demanding uber professional expertise and promising them something like barely bearable wage with the whiff of a signing up Enough Losers bonus. Not a promise, just a maybe, if you work 80 hours in the next week, whiff.

    They included a ‘tutorial’ schedule in their demands to prep the ‘recruiters’ on what sort of near steer guy cattle were wanted. Upshot — desperate young het bull wannabees with no brains, but LOTS of money to throw away to get the alleged big L off their foreheads.

    And who would be teaching these amazing classes? Why the guys running the seminar of course. Because they had like…resumes or something…to back up their claims of 100 percent seducing women…not. No women instructors in sight, just…claiming to be hot shot, het pick up gods.

    That’s what really gets me. I opined at the time that if the poor suckers just paid some woman in the sex trade the money these con artists wanted, they’d have action all fair long and learn something from an actual female at the same time.

    Barnum was right.

  23. human: I think one reason a lot of “Nice Guys” look to meet strangers rather than people they already meet is a fear that they’re going to be rejected, and probably with horrendous consequences for future interactions. Back in school, I never hit on any of the women in the clubs I was a part of because I didn’t want to drive them away, or feel compelled to avoid them.

    trouble: Agreed that a lot of guys could use a “charm school” class dedicated to teaching social skills. Thing is, a responsible class isn’t going to make the claim that you are going to be able to make the person of your choice fall in love with you. The shady seduction gurus do imply this, I think.

  24. Thing is, a responsible class isn’t going to make the claim that you are going to be able to make the person of your choice fall in love with you.

    Of course, there are plenty of books selling that line to women – how to get a guy to marry you, guaranteed, in X amount of time! The main difference being that women aren’t supposed to be cold approaching strangers or be particularly in need of getting laid.

  25. So why not hit on THEM instead of complete strangers who are minding their own business?

    There ARE ways to talk to strangers who you find attractive without being creepy. I’ve definitely done it before. No pick up lines, nothing shady. Do I get them in bed? Usually not. I sometimes make friends. Sometimes we never talk again. I met my last ex by asking him (who was a random guy at the time) for a cigarette. I made a friend a couple of months ago because I saw him looking at me and my friend talking at the bookstore.

    The biggest mistake people make with the stranger-talking — and, well, actually any ‘pick up’ — is the intention. You can’t go off talking to someone only thinking, ‘I HAVE to sleep with this person.’ Ew. They can TOTALLY sense it!! You can hope for getting a date, but realistically, you’ll most likely ever only become friends with them. What’s wrong with that?

  26. A close friend of mine and I had a conversation about this problem over the weekend. He’s very smart, very funny, charming, decent guy (yes, he was a boyfriend for a time and we’re still very close). But he’s commented on the difficulties in meeting people (He’s in his 40’s) without triggering the “creep” button.

    He’ll admit to his own difficulty in reading signals from women he might be interested in. He also has a morbid fear of being the Nice Guy(tm) that he’s heard me hold forth about at great length. And if we aren’t talking a “pick-up” situation, he can talk to anyone (women included) with no real difficulty.

    I think a lot of men – or at least men who don’t want to be sexist jerks or Nice Guys(tm) – have trouble with the mixed messages they get from our culture. The culture says they should “pursue” or “convince” or “seduce” a woman, even if she’s initially disinterested. He’s supposed to treat being shut down as “no big deal” (because it’s all about the conquest). But when they figure out just how and why that kind of crap is wrong, they get caught again because they don’t want to play those power games – and yet there are plenty of women out there who do.

    I’m all in favor of different types of “dating” services (groups, online stuff, you name it) that help bring people into a group to provide opportunities to meet people outside of bars, but I don’t think this “Charm School” will really help guys like my friend – because they don’t really want to devolve.

  27. Forgive me for not explaining the “scorn” thing better. What I meant to convey was a sort of annoyed/hurt dismissal rather than scoffing off the fact that I was rejected and chalking it up to the rejector’s foolishness or something. Women are free to reject me all they want. I’m not going to be happy about it when it happens, though.

    An aside: what exactly would the alternative be anyway? If I ask someone out for coffee, and she says no, I can’t just say, “sorry, I don’t accept that, so I’ll see you at five.” So I’m a little confused as to how I could disrespect someone’s wishes in this vein.

    Back on topic, this is exactly the reason why I don’t hit on friends and such. For one thing, I’m more likely to hear “let’s just stay friends” which is fair enough, although if I wanted to stay friends I wouldn’t have said anything. But the main problem I have with asking out my friends is the fact that it will make things awkward later. When I ask out a friend, and she rejects me, then she’ll probably not feel comfortable hanging out anymore, and I’ll end up feeling like I’ve got the plague or something. Thus, I would never ask out a female friend.

    I would also not want her to think that the only reason we were friends was because I was hoping for something more. I wouldn’t want her to think I didn’t value her friendship. And I wouldn’t want to overstep my boundaries by pursuing someone under the guise of friendship. It may happen that over the course of a friendship I realize how high quality a woman is and develop an attraction to her, but I am willing to ignore that for the sake of the friendship.

    I’m not too sure how Christina got “obliged to get a woman to like you” from “right words in right manner.” Considering that many guys are reduced to inarticulate grinning idiots when faced with a certain woman, and others aren’t, some can say certain things in order to express themselves better than others. Also, it’s interesting how she also implied that some men who don’t care about a woman will just attempt to win her over with smooth talking. In somewhat shyer males, the ability to express oneself goes down as the interest level goes up. Thus, I sometimes find myself wanting to date someone too much, and for fear of losing the only contact we have, refrain from saying anything about it.

    In contrast, it’s easy to appear “smooth” and exude confidence when you don’t have any personal stake in the matter, i.e. when you don’t care about the woman you’re trying to “pick up.” A little personal tidbit: this is what made me a poor salesman. My employers said that I cared too much about whether or not the product I was selling was bought, and so it caused buyers to become wary. My point of view on the matter was that this should not be a method of determining who you’ll see again (or what products to buy!) although I see it happen often. In fact, this is probably what drives a lot of the “Nice Guys” to whom I think you are referring to the point where they think that women only want “jerks.”

    I also would still say you’re going too far with the seduction thing. It’s not a word meant to convey the depths of meanings you’re assigning to it.

    On a somewhat unrelated note, I would appreciate it if people did not assume that as a male, I never have to worry about date rape. You do not know me. You don’t know what I’ve been through, and what personal issues may have led me here. I also don’t quite understand the immediate hostility that I received upon coming here, especially from human and Christina. I was under the impression that a forum could have people who agreed and disagreed with the mainstream modes of thought. If not, then say the word and I’ll be gone.

    To Glimmering: Thank you for giving me a chance. I’ll address some of your comments.

    On wording things: You brought up the converse of the idea I was trying to convey. I don’t think that a man can just follow an incantation and expect women to fall all over him. But if he says the wrong things, he can expect to be left well alone. As you said, women have a lot of good reasons to be on guard, and thus guys have to be careful how they present themselves. Thus, this is more about not saying something stupid to the wrong person who might be offended in some manner, and using your best judgement.

    On attraction: I have personally never had someone who was interested in me say so until much later, after I’ve assumed they’re not interested and moved on. For the most part, it has seemed passive to me. I was in error to assume the same of everyone else. I see what you are saying, but it is just so foreign to me. It could be because I come from a more conservative background, where more people are used to gender archetypes.

    On being a nice guy vs. a “Nice Guy”: This is actually somewhat tough, based on your guidelines. I’ve been so used to being the teddy bear/sweet guy/thoughtful guy that I don’t really think about how often people actually say it. Also, in my search to understand what is wrong with me, I’ve called myself a nice guy because I truly believe that is one of the fundamental things about me that makes me who I am. I think I’m closer to the genuine side than not, but obviously no one is just going to fit into one of two categories. People have different shades.

    I apologize for the length of this, as well as the victim mentality it seems to reek of as I analyze it now. Unfortunately I’m not sure how to change either without altering the message I am trying to give. Also, I recognize that my handle may have raised a few eyebrows; it’s just supposed to be a nod to a favorite new(ish) movie of mine.

  28. Vendetta Guy – It’s been suggested in this thread before, but I’ll second it. Get thee to Heartless Bitches International (heartless-bitches.com because I don’t know how to do a link) and read the Nice Guys Bleah if you are genuinely serious about understanding the Nice Guy(tm) thing. And then be honest with yourself. If those have been your behaviour patterns, and you don’t like it, then start to change. But just realize that if you’re changing it to get a date, then you’ve gone from a Nice Guy(tm) to a jerk.

  29. Women are free to reject me all they want. I’m not going to be happy about it when it happens, though.

    An aside: what exactly would the alternative be anyway? If I ask someone out for coffee, and she says no, I can’t just say, “sorry, I don’t accept that, so I’ll see you at five.” So I’m a little confused as to how I could disrespect someone’s wishes in this vein.

    The alternative is to graciously accept it. Rather than saying, “Oh. Well, you’re probably a lesbian anyway,” as some have said to me in the past, smile and say, “Thank you for your time,” or “It was nice to (sort of) meet you.” It’s so much more considerate to say that than to grimace and shrug wordlessly, then walk away; not to mention, letting her see how unhappy you feel is a way to exact petty revenge by trying to make her feel guilty. That’s not nice, is it?

  30. The alternative is to graciously accept it. Rather than saying, “Oh. Well, you’re probably a lesbian anyway,” as some have said to me in the past, smile and say, “Thank you for your time,” or “It was nice to (sort of) meet you.” It’s so much more considerate to say that than to grimace and shrug wordlessly, then walk away; not to mention, letting her see how unhappy you feel is a way to exact petty revenge by trying to make her feel guilty. That’s not nice, is it?

    Exactly. The more petulant you are, the more confident she’ll be that she dodged a bullet.

    Plus, it’s good practice for how to behave when you finally do get a woman to go out with you!

  31. frumious b, presumably you know some of your classmates? Professors?

    ewwww…….

    I’m not in school anymore. It gets a lot harder to meet people once a person is out of school. It’s not just harder to meet potential dates, it’s harder to meet running partners and drinking buddies, too. It’s not just single people who have this problem, either. Talk to parents whose children have finally moved out and find themselves with no friends b/c their life has revolved around the kids for the last quarter century. It comes as no surprise to me that there are men who don’t know any women. There are probably women who don’t know any men, too.

  32. Vendetta Guy – It’s been suggested in this thread before, but I’ll second it. Get thee to Heartless Bitches International (heartless-bitches.com because I don’t know how to do a link) and read the Nice Guys Bleah if you are genuinely serious about understanding the Nice Guy(tm) thing. And then be honest with yourself. If those have been your behaviour patterns, and you don’t like it, then start to change. But just realize that if you’re changing it to get a date, then you’ve gone from a Nice Guy(tm) to a jerk.

    The real reason HeartlessBitches dont like nice guys is because they’re heartless bitches. Its not rocket science. Just that they’d rather project their own issues onto nice people rather than themselves.

    A better site for you to check out Vendetta is: The NiceGuy

  33. Sorry frumious b, I thought you were in school since you mentioned grad school. I agree it is a lot harder to meet people once you are out of school, but… well… it’s not rocket science either. If all someone does is sit in their house and stare at the wall/tv/computer monitor then yeah they’re not going to know anyone, but once you start getting out and doing stuff, you meet people. To me that’s a much better strategy of human relationships than walking up and (essentially) demanding that strangers have sex with you. Not that you do that, or anything. Just saying.

Comments are currently closed.