In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Statements to the Judge by Jane Doe of the OC Rape Trial (UPDATED)

Pinko Feminist Hellcat has two must-read posts on the OC Rape Trial that recently sent three men to jail for raping a girl and videotaping the act.

The first post details the low, low places the defense went to try and get the (young, rich, entitled) men acquitted. For one, Robbie Ruiz, a 28-year-old mortgage banker and the trial’s jury foreman, was intimidated by defense cronies:

Married and a fourth-generation Mexican-American from El Toro, Ruiz can look physically intimidating. If you passed him on the street, you’d see a husky guy with a shaved head, a goatee, big dark eyes and a right arm full of tattoos. But in a three-hour interview, he was also articulate, perceptive and easygoing.

But the case provided startling moments for Ruiz even outside the courtroom. During the latter part of the trial, he says, he was clumsily tailed by Haidl PI Warren to the Costa Mesa Inca Grill for dinner. One night, after the trial, two jurors from the first trial knocked on his front door. They wanted information to discredit the guilty verdicts. He says those ex-jurors, who were on the Haidl payroll, insisted the defendants are “really good boys.”

Some of the defense witnesses, former friends of Doe, were tempted by intership offers, and one admitted changing her statement to help the defense because of her sympathy for the men. They were later dismissed as witnesses and/or the judge found their statements to be provably false. Who needs enemies with frenemies like this?

Jane Doe, the rape victim, was intimidated as well. And harassed. And slandered. In PFH’s second post, a reader provides Doe’s full statement to the judge. I warn you, it will rend the heartstrings and turn your stomach. Triggers aplenty.

That is why we are here today, your honor. I haven’t been able to truly live since these men sexually assaulted me. I wouldn’t be able to until I feel safe and secure that they are behind bars for numerous years. When you make a decision on the amount of time you’re going to sentence these men to, I would like to tell you a little bit the about the harassment, intimidation and torture these men have done to me these last three years. I guess assaulting me and videotaping it wasn’t enough for them. They had to continue to make my life and my family’s life a living hell since. I feel that instead of showing remorse for their crimes, they have continued to assault me since every day since July Fourth.

The harassment and torture started immediately after the assault became known to the public. It started with private investigators sitting in front of our house day in and day out, watching our every move. Our family’s privacy was completely eliminated. The private investigators got worse when they began watching my parents at their places of work. One day I was driving home and a private investigator began following me. I panicked. I did not know what to do. I called my mom on her cell phone for help. All she could do was tell me to drive to the police station and try to calm down. In the parking of the police station the private investigator cornered me and began taking pictures of me.

I was still on the phone, hysterically crying for my mother’s help. I will never forget the terror and helplessness I heard in her voice. It tore me to pieces. These men have ruined me and my life, but now they are also ruining the lives of people that I loved the most. I had to stop driving alone because I was always being followed. I had to live a life in which I had to have permission to move, and my every move had to be observed for my safety. I didn’t understand – “Why were they still torturing me? Wasn’t that one night enough for them?”

Read the rest — and don’t let the sun set on your female ass.

UPDATE: Amanda has more on the story.


28 thoughts on Statements to the Judge by Jane Doe of the OC Rape Trial (UPDATED)

  1. The LA Times reports today that the rapists turned down a prosecution offer last year for three years each in prison… and they rolled the dice with a second trial and got six.

  2. Jury tampering. Nice.

    That will not serve him well in the civil trial (or the subsequent criminal trial for jury tampering).

  3. That will not serve him well in the civil trial (or the subsequent criminal trial for jury tampering).

    Here’s hoping it happens.

  4. I hope that Jane Doe is in cyberspace right now, reading the reactions to this trial and sentencing in the feminist blogosphere. She always had people rooting for her, even though we don’t know her personally – and I hope she knows that.

  5. Doe is right; they aren’t men. They should be castrated, bullwhiped and put in a dark place…forever.

  6. God, I read this and the comments of that scumbag defense attorny…..I mean, what the fuck? This guy enjoyed going after and harassing a sixteen-year-old girl? A sixteen-year-old girl?

  7. All I can think of is the last two lines of Sublime’s “Date Rape”

    I’m going to suspend my usual disdain for “eye for an eye” justice and hope that these guys get passed around every night for 6 years.

  8. She is going to abso-freaking-lutely own them after she wins her lawsuit, and those idiot children of privilege will get their just deserts from the other inmates.

    Only they’ll be awake.

  9. I know that Haidl Sr. was an Assistant Sheriff; anybody know if he was in office when this was going on? Because if he was using county resources to harrass this woman, she could have a civil rights claim against him and against the county.

  10. Here is an archive of reports filed on the Haidl case. Makes for very interesting reading and filled with lots of detail, like how the defense wanted to call a porn actress as an expert witness!!!

    For the lawyers here, how much case law exists on parental responsibilty for raising good law abiding citizens? The judge sentenced the rapists as adults, rather than as youths, so if they’re adult enough for sentencing then how can the parents be sued on the presumption that they need to monitor their 16 year old sons’ behaviors?

  11. I havent’ been able to find a copy of the civil suit online, but my understanding is that Jane Doe is suing the parents because of their independent actions, such as hiring private investigators to harrass her (and tamper with jurors) and smear her.

  12. What are your thoughts, in general, on the situation where the child is sentenced as an adult and there is a civil suit against the parents for the child’s actions? I’m wondering if the administration of justice can hold double standards.

    As for the parent’s actions I can see criminal behavior with jury tampering but not with a PI tailing Jane Doe through public spaces, taking her picture in public spaces, or going through her garbage.

    I would have thought that because the rape occurred in the Haidl family garage, was committed by the son, the son procured drugs and alcohol and offered them to an underage girl, that that would reflect back on the parents and open them to liability, but if the court thinks that the son is mature enough to be tried and sentenced as an adult I would think that that ruling would obviate the responsibility of the parents.

  13. The parents usually aren’t held responsible for the child’s actions, but they can be held liable for what happens in their home or for their own actions. So, they might get in trouble for allowing their kids to have a party with alcohol (because serving alcohol to minors is a crime in itself), but they’re not directly responsible for the kid’s actions.

  14. I would posit to think that the Haidls have enough of their fingers, hands and whole arms in the process of harrassing and intimidating Jane Doe that a civil judge may be interested in hearing the case.

    Correct me if I’m wrong zuzu, but isn’t the parental responsibility issue primarily one for criminal liability? I think that possibly civil liability has a broader net of interpretation as well as more liberal rules for burden of proof.

    The snarling of the defense counsel disgusts, but doesn’t surprise me, not in the least. I speak with men of all stripes quite often who have such a voice growling just under the surface, waiting for the appropriate time to come out.

  15. Oh, she’s already filed a civil case, and it’ll get heard. The parents don’t have criminal liability for the rape itself, but they might get nailed for jury tampering (the statute of limitations has probably run on the providing alcohol to minors thing).

    The really juicy part is that, as mythago noted in comments to my earlier post, the defendants can’t hide behind the Fifth Amendment anymore (at least the rapists — the parents and Cavallo might want to plead the Fifth). They will have to answer deposition questions and respond to discovery requests, and they can be asked about all of their disgusting smears and harrassment and tactics.

  16. I want to see them get nailed for saying, “I didn’t mean to cause you pain.”

    You know, in what world does a pool cue and a lit cigarette not cause pain? Huh?

  17. Kind of makes you wonder what that ‘private reproval’ Cavallo got from the State Bar was, eh?

    I don’t imagine that jury tampering will go over any better.

  18. I believe that Jane Doe is suing the Haidls and Cavallo for the leafletting, releasing her private medical information to the press, spreading rumors, and harassing her. It’s one thing to hire a dick, it’s another thing to have the dick corner you in the police station and start snapping pictures, or approaching your fellow students at your new school (where you had to go because it was so unbearable at your old school, thanks to the assailants and thier buddies). Releasing medical information is against the law. Full stop. And that’s what they did to Jane Doe–the defense asked for, and got, her records, and then released them. It’s bullshit.

    You can’t argue that’s investigating anyone or providing a vigorous defense–that’s harassment. (And if I was Ruiz and got approached by a member of the former jury with a lecture about how nice those guys were, and tailed by a private dick, I’d be on the horn to the cops as well as have a lawyer send a cease-and-desist letter to the defense.)

    I hope she soaks those snivelling fucktards. And I really hope that spineless prick Cavallo gets disbarred.

  19. Oh, yes. I’m not sure if he was born that way, or if he just practices everyday. Doesn’t matter–he’s still succeeded in attaining slimy prickdom.

  20. I was wondering if people are interested in sending Jane a letter of support.
    I have recently been given her civil lawyer’s phone number, and would like to ask him to give her letters of support to let her know that there are men and women that support her. This case is somewhat local to me, and I am also looking to find a group of supportive people to show up during the civil trial in support of Jane Doe. If you are local to the area and interested, please let me know. My e-mail is ihiroe@yahoo.com.

  21. Catty, just to let you know, you’re likely to be waiting two years or so for the trial, if it happens at all.

Comments are currently closed.