In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Bearing Faithful Witness and the Social Justice Life

I choke up every time I read “She Should Write,” Ann Friedman’s farewell to Feministing earlier this year. (Jill recommended it here at the time.)

Being committed to social justice means, at its worst, living in defeat. Sometimes no matter how many victories I have, no matter how many wrongs I live to see righted, our capacity as a society to generate new wrongs and perpetuate old oppressions feels overwhelming.

Sometimes I despair of rising above my own failures — to acknowledge my own privileges, to speak up when I should, to “make an impact,” whatever that means.

Sometimes I get caught up in anxiety about whether or not I’m “doing enough” or “doing it right.” And sometimes, I’m ashamed to realize, that anxiety is more about myself and racking up points than it is about doing right by others or living well.

I have a housemate we’ll call Alex. He would rank pretty high on a list of truly decent people I know, but he’s also called me “militant.” I’ve gotten into arguments with him about rape culture and street harassment, and I’ve beaten myself up for not being able to convince him of my position. Which is silly, obviously, because I can’t control what he thinks.

Our household has had a kind of harrowing week or two for reasons I don’t need to go into here. Suffice to say that it all kind of came to a head a few nights ago. After the crisis passed, I sat down at the dining room table with a cup of tea and talked to Alex for a while. This time, about things we have in common. We discussed how corporate interests have warped the United States political system, and how journalism and politics have changed since 9/11. He went to school for journalism, and now he spoke with deep respect for a professor he had in the fall of 2001, who was committed to a form of truth-telling that seems to have grown scarce in this country since then. He described, almost reverently, how if there is an ultimate truth, it must have something to do with understanding the lived truths of all human beings, and finding whatever it is that we all share.

And slowly, I remembered something. Something I know, truly and deeply, but too often forget.

It is important merely to bear faithful witness.

It is vital. It is revolutionary. It is enough.

Tension rushed out of me. I thought, that I can do. I can fulfill a worthwhile purpose, and feel personally fulfilled, without gauging my success by how many people I can convince of anything. Or by how many blogs I follow, or how many online petitions I sign or protests I attend, or how many causes I adopt. I can document and represent, to the best of my ability, the truths of people and places and events and their contexts.

Which is really what social justice is about, right? Or at least, this is a way to do social justice. Because one of the great injustices, and a way that injustices are reinforced, is through narratives. Telling only a few stories, from only a few perspectives, over and over again until they become The Only Truth, is the foundation of oppression. The domination of cis, straight, white, wealthy, male, able-bodied, neurotypical narratives — you name it — is the precondition for anyone to continue believing that it’s ok to blame poor people for their poverty, or that “traditional marriage” is a thing, or that women bear responsibility for their own rapes, or that electing a non-white president means we live in a post-racial society, or … I could go on.

My telling can never contain all sides of the story. But I can acknowledge that there are more sides to the story, and more stories. I can refuse to parrot what isn’t true for me, and resist the urge to simply replace one illegitimately dominant narrative with another.

Even if I’m not perfect, faithfully documenting my stories and the stories I witness, in all their complexity and to the best of my ability, still adds another perspective. And that may be small in the grand scheme of things, but it’s also invaluable. One more story is all you need to show that more than one perspective exists.

Sometimes I worry that “just telling a story” is too passive. But the power of one more story cannot be overstated. For although coordinated messaging and unified voices have their place, social justice for me has never been about belonging to a club or toeing a party line. At its core, social justice is about finding the truth and holding ourselves responsible to it.

“She Should Write” gets to me not because closing the byline gap is important or because we need more feminist voices, though those are both true. “She Should Write” gets to me because it reminds me that what I’m doing, right now, is a big deal.

Telling the truth, whether through blogging or journalism or poetry or fiction, is the mission that kicks my butt without becoming impossible. (Even if it feels impossible to put the first word on the page, remembering that all I have to do is tell the truth usually helps.) It won’t be the same for everybody, but that’s what it is for me.

So I want to thank you all for allowing me to do that a bit of that work here for the past two weeks. Thanks to Jill and the other mods for inviting me, and thanks to the readers for your warm reception and engaging responses. Thanks for reading my truths and sharing yours. I’ve learned a lot.

As a parting gift, here’s a video of our buns fighting over a carrot. Cheers, folks!


14 thoughts on Bearing Faithful Witness and the Social Justice Life

  1. It is important merely to bear faithful witness.

    This.

    Yesterday, someone left this comment (TW: rape apologism in the post) on my blog:

    Keep talking. Eventually they will have to listen to us.

    And I think it’s worth expanding — Keep talking because someone out there needs to hear and is waiting to listen.

  2. Being committed to social justice means, at its worst, living in defeat. Sometimes no matter how many victories I have, no matter how many wrongs I live to see righted, our capacity as a society to generate new wrongs and perpetuate old oppressions feels overwhelming […] It is important merely to bear faithful witness.

    It is vital. It is revolutionary. It is enough.

    Tension rushed out of me. I thought, that I can do. I can fulfill a worthwhile purpose, and feel personally fulfilled, without gauging my success by how many people I can convince of anything. Or by how many blogs I follow, or how many online petitions I sign or protests I attend, or how many causes I adopt. I can document and represent, to the best of my ability, the truths of people and places and events and their contexts.

    The problem is, that some people can’t let go. I’ve seen it bandied about here, and in other SJ-arenas, that anyone passionate about SJ is “taking up a cause” on behalf of oppressed groups. It’s been said here at Feministe, in in other ostensibly feminist zones, that anyone complaining about [insert issue] is doing it for ally-points.

    I will admit that the majority of “Social Justice Warriors” appear to be straight, white, cis, TAB, binary-identified, middle-class women. These people can drop it all with a second’s notice, and carry on with life, if activist fatigue sets in. However, those who are actively oppressed, live daily under the thumb of institutions trying to do them harm, they don’t have that luxury. Some people have to scream, and fight and kick to get basic rights that most people take for granted. To let go, is to die.

  3. Thank you for this post. What you’ve said is so true and something that I needed to hear as I have, again, started to get to that maxed out point where everything seems hopeless.

    Just being here and saying the words can be enough. Gonna put that on my wall.

  4. The value system so many of us were trained to believe in encourages us to believe in hierarchies. And we’re all supposed to scratch and claw our way up by doing.

    “I say again, it is not what goes into the mouth that makes a person unclean. It is what comes out of the mouth that makes a person unclean.”

    Purity laws became excessive in Jesus’ day. Laws for the sake of laws were lain upon each other. These had to be followed in sequence before a person was free of additional ritual obligations. But it’s not what you eat that makes you an less feminist. It’s not the hoops you jump through, either.

    It’s what is in your heart that makes you feminist or anti-feminist.

  5. “She Should Write” gets to me not because closing the byline gap is important or because we need more feminist voices, though those are both true. “She Should Write” gets to me because it reminds me that what I’m doing, right now, is a big deal.

    I think this resonates especially now with writing — specifically blogging — is often seen as “not real” social justice work. As someone who doesn’t have a lot of outlets for real world work, I think it’s hugely important and very real.

  6. My telling can never contain all sides of the story. But I can acknowledge that there are more sides to the story, and more stories. I can refuse to parrot what isn’t true for me, and resist the urge to simply replace one illegitimately dominant narrative with another.

    I think this is it. We can never tell all the sides of any story — sometimes, we can’t even tell all the sides of our own story — but if we are honest about our limitations in the telling, and open to more knowledge, that, in and of itself, helps to heal the world. Sometimes just being one of the few who listens is an act of healing.

  7. On one hand, I appreciate that you’ve chosen bearing witness and telling the truth as your way of effecting change. If that’s what you’re good at and if that’s what you feel is possible for you, then that’s probably something you should do, and you should also feel good and proud of yourself for doing it. So keep it up!

    On the other, I disagree with some of the generalizations you make. If a certain choice is the right choice for you, that doesn’t lead to it being right for others, and I think that in your post you’re defending your choices as if they were somehow inherently right like that, and I think that leads to fuzzy expressions.

    For example, you write that

    It is important merely to bear faithful witness.

    It is vital. It is revolutionary. It is enough.

    But bearing witness clearly isn’t enough. It may be enough for you, it may be all you can do in a given circumstance, it may lead to some needed change, it may be what you’re best to do, but only not having anybody experience what you’ve witnessed would be enough, isn’t that right? I know it’s not an easy goal, but I am not willing to set as my goal a certain amount of rape or incest, and I’m sure neither are you. Sadly, I’ve seen your formulation of what’s enough that I quoted be used as a general guideline to group and individual action, and there all it leads to is inaction and people stepping away from the people they’re supposed to help as soon things get uncomfortable. Bearing witness is not necessarily revolutionary, which is it depends. It’s usually not as revolutionary in the US as it is in places like Afghanistan or DRC. It may be enough, or it may not be. Sometimes running away is the smartest thing you can do and sometimes it’s not. There is no easy and comfortable right choice, but there should be choices you and I can live with. If we can’t face the grimness of how bad the rape culture is and how from the socialization the youth get today it looks like it’s getting worse, then, well, so it is. Then look for supportive people, do stuff you enjoy, or write down a proper strategy or re-evaluate yours if you’ve got one and that’s what seems to be wrong. I usually wait too long before I look help, and that’s something I try to change.

    You also write about narratives and how powerful telling a story from a different point of view is. I basically agree with what you wrote, but I think that you should not stress the power of stories so much as to overlook the material side that also gives birth to those stories. Did you? What do you think?

    To explain, I believe that being abused and being unable to change that will lead an abused person to create a story that somehow naturalizes the abuse. In that sense, the oppression creates the stories that make it seem okay, and it will create pretty convincing stories so long as the oppression concretely continues to overpower people. Especially if it’s a child who’s begin abused by a supposed caretaker, she’ll come up with a story that tries to somehow portray the person she’s dependent on as something other than entirely unreliable and evil, and often blames herself. She’s the one who needs to hear your story, again and again until she believes it. Documenting a story is the beginning and you need the real strategy for what you do with it.

    I don’t know from experience, but I’ve read that a similar dynamic is seen in prisons, in concentration camps, between slaves and their factual owners and so on.

    The abuser does tell a lot of stories that naturalize the abuse, but I think that his stories are mostly importantly told to his peers. They’re often people who do the same abuse themselves or somehow benefit from it, and because of that, they’re already looking for just about any story to believe in to justify their own behavior. These people are not reachable and their behavior is not changed by offering another narrative. They have to be disallowed from continuing to believe in their own story, which means there has to be some kind of confrontation. Like with an abusive alcoholic, you can’t go shake things up unless the abused family agrees and you take careful steps to minimize risks to them. It gets murkier when it comes to more general topics, but similarly, I think I would have to be ready to do a lot more than tell stories if I were to shake up the community by trying to go as open about abuse as possible. That’s not to say public speaking about abuse isn’t important, but simply that a) it won’t reach the abusers, and b) the abused probably have good reason not to give a show of hands and buy into the story I tell, and so I should ask myself what can I do to create a sort of base for abused people so they’d feel safe enough to take part and so the cause could be upped a notch. Did that make sense? It’s not that I thought anything you wrote really disagreed with what I said, but I felt something like this needed saying.

  8. No, after reading some of the other comments, I want to say again, this is not about personal change or feeling good about yourself. This is about being effective. Whether you’ve got other outlets than blogging or not doesn’t have anything to do with whether it’s generally effective, it only has to do with whether it’s what you should do. If it is, you should feel damn proud about yourself, too, and not worry about some stupid person saying it’s not real work. And it’s definitely not what’s in my heart also that makes me a feminist, but simply whether I stand up for women when I should or not. What’s in my heart makes a difference there.

  9. Total tangent:

    I will admit that the majority of “Social Justice Warriors” appear to be straight, white, cis, TAB, binary-identified, middle-class women. These people can drop it all with a second’s notice, and carry on with life, if activist fatigue sets in. However, those who are actively oppressed, live daily under the thumb of institutions trying to do them harm, they don’t have that luxury. Some people have to scream, and fight and kick to get basic rights that most people take for granted. To let go, is to die.

    It’s not that I disagree with this statement at all, but I think one of the things that gets lost in this argument is that even straight, white, cis, TAB, binary-identified, middle-class women are actively oppressed. All women have stories worth telling and worth being heard, and we all face indignities and oppression for our woman status. If we want to be serious about not playing the oppression olympics, then we need to avoid privileging levels and types of oppressions as well as we attempt to avoid privileging privileged voices.

  10. I really enjoyed this post, and your stint here, Brigid.
    I become very agitated when people are dismissive of blogging. Blogging is work. Blogging is ‘real’ writing. Blogging is, for some of us, a way to do activism. I often think of that old phrase ‘the personal is political’, particularly in relation to the fat activism in the blogosphere. It’s about being visible as much as documenting lived experiences.

  11. Tori: This.

    Yesterday, someone left this comment (TW: rape apologism in the post) on my blog:

    And I think it’s worth expanding — Keep talking because someone out there needs to hear and is waiting to listen.

    I definitely agree that you should keep writing and talking because someone out there is waiting to listen. Someone out there is waiting for a different perspective. Someone out there is waiting for a chance. Keep writing and speaking your mind. Sometimes it feels desperate, but other days, it’s extremely rewarding, because you have made an impact on someone’s life.

  12. Spilt Milk:
    I really enjoyed this post, and your stint here, Brigid.
    I become very agitated when people are dismissive of blogging. Blogging is work. Blogging is ‘real’ writing. Blogging is, for some of us, a way to do activism. I often think of that old phrase ‘the personal is political’, particularly in relation to the fat activism in the blogosphere. It’s about being visible as much as documenting lived experiences.

    I think that the phrase “the personal is political” was simply supposed to mean the realization that unjust personal experiences often result from a shared political reality that you weren’t aware of. It was a matter of coming together to understand a shared political side of the oppression you experienced personally. That in turn was supposed to act as a point of departure from where effective political action could arise.

    What’s happened since is that there’s been a great turning inwards and even that phrase is used entirely wrong. Personal change and lifestyle choices are somehow supposed to have become politically significant now, therefore, “the personal is political”. Whatever you do personally is somehow supposed to make you all political and serious about it, as long as you focus enough on your own experience and are vocal enough about it. But that’s not serious. It’s self-centered like the rest of the culture, and the culture’s got no problem living with it — so often an activist is just another kind of consumer to cater to and make money off. In that sense, the personal is not really political, and it’s decidedly not challenging the man.

    I don’t like it at all how it looks like that latter view is embraced here too. I don’t mean to get frustrated or combative about it, because if there’s no acknowledgement that I might be onto something and no willingness to discuss, then there’s no point in making it a bad time for either any of you or I.

Comments are currently closed.