In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

In Remembrance: The Montreal Massacre

Yesterday was the anniversary of the massacre at Ecole Polytechnique, which left 14 women dead. Sixteen years ago, a man (whose name I’m not writing because he deserves no recognition, no legacy, and no mention here) walked into the school toting a semi-automatic rifle — with a plan to kill women, simply because they were women and in a “man’s” place. He shot and killed one woman in the hallway, then entered an engineering class and told all the men to leave the room. He lined the women up, and open fired on them while screaming, “You’re all a bunch of feminists! I hate feminists!” Then he went downstairs, firing at random on the way, and he killed three people in the cafeteria. After that, he went into another classroom, where students and professors were cowered under their desks. He climbed on top of the desks to shoot the women underneath them, killing four more people. Then he killed himself.

It is the worst single-day massacre in Canadian history. Two more students who were there the day of the killings committed suicide afterwards. From the killer’s suicide note:

Please note that if I am committing suicide today … it is not for economic reasons … but for political reasons. For I have decided to send Ad Patres [Latin: “to the fathers”] the feminists who have ruined my life. … The feminists always have a talent for enraging me. They want to retain the advantages of being women … while trying to grab those of men. … They are so opportunistic that they neglect to profit from the knowledge accumulated by men throughout the ages. They always try to misrepresent them every time they can.

Attached to that note was a list of 19 prominent Quebec women. He wrote, “[These women] nearly died today. The lack of time (because I started too late) has allowed these radical feminists to survive.”

The killer had been rejected from Ecole Polytechnique, and blamed affirmative action policies intended to increase the percentage of female students.

Sixteen years ago, this tragedy mobilized Canadians to address the issue of violence against women. Gender-based violence is certainly not a problem that we’ve solved yet, and it remains a far-reaching one. It’s just usually quieter and more private than this.

This man’s act was intended to terrorize women everywhere, and his aim was to scare them back into traditional roles. He thoroughly failed: From 1989 to to 1999, the number of women in Canadian engineering schools more than doubled, to more than 9,000.

The names of the murdered women are:

Geneviève Bergeron, aged 21;
Hélène Colgan, 23;
Nathalie Croteau, 23;
Barbara Daigneault, 22;
Anne-Marie Edward, 21;
Maud Haviernick, 29;
Barbara Maria Klucznik, 31;
Maryse Leclair, 23;
Annie St.-Arneault, 23;
Michèle Richard, 21;
Maryse Laganière, 25;
Anne-Marie Lemay, 22;
Sonia Pelletier, 28; and
Annie Turcotte, aged 21.


27 thoughts on In Remembrance: The Montreal Massacre

  1. Here in Australia I’d never even heard of this. How terrible, but how wonderful that his twisted goal of terrorising all women out of technical education failed.

  2. Pingback: Whimsley
  3. I live in Montreal and this a big, no huge, deal every year. You haven’t mentioned his name but I know it. In Quebec, maybe even in the whole country, his name is know like Dalmer or Bundy is in the States. It is a name everyone remembers it. Just mention his last name in Montreal and people know. I remember when it happened, the shock and rage was palpable and 16 years later people still remember.

  4. Canadian nutjobs, who woulda guessed? But I suppose the frosty punditry of the day blamed it on their bloodthirsty, hoplophilic, Republican neighbors to the south, so it’s okay. Fount of all that is evil in the U.S.? Check. Fount of all that is evil in Canada? Que l’enfer.

  5. Canadian nutjobs, who woulda guessed? But I suppose the frosty punditry of the day blamed it on their bloodthirsty, hoplophilic, Republican neighbors to the south, so it’s okay. Fount of all that is evil in the U.S.? Check. Fount of all that is evil in Canada? Que l’enfer.

    That I recall, the blame wasn’t put on Americans. However, despite the fact that the gun he used was already illegal, they did managed to blame it on “guns” and passed new laws further limiting them. The politicians had to seem to be doing something.

  6. David Thompson

    – well, no actually, the “frosty pundirty” didn’t do that at all.

    But if it makes you feel better to believe they did, then go ahead.

  7. I visit Montreal for 1 week each year: My friends there found such a crime incomprehensible.

    Here in the heart of red-state Amerika—well, that’s another matter entirely.

    We can bicker and argue about the blame, but…A good time to remember the families of the slain in our thoughts and prayers.

  8. “But I suppose the frosty punditry of the day blamed it on their bloodthirsty, hoplophilic, Republican neighbors to the south, so it’s okay. Fount of all that is evil in the U.S.? ”

    I remember standing frozen in place as the news came down. Awful, awful, awful. As I recall, most people blamed the man’s sexist paranoia.

  9. I visit Montreal for 1 week each year: My friends there found such a crime incomprehensible.

    Here in the heart of red-state Amerika—well, that’s another matter entirely.

    Huh? Americans may do a lot of screwed-up stuff, but I don’t think that the execution of feminists is a very popular idea here.

  10. Wow. I don’t remember this incident and I am so sorry. It wasn’t very important in Los Angeles at the time, they seem to be think it is only important if Americans get killed.

    Thank you for remembering.

  11. I remember this. It got front-page coverage for a couple of days in my local (American) newspaper. Proximity might have had something to do with it; we were so close to the Canadian border that we got a few more bits of news about Canada than the rest of the United States apparently does.

  12. Women across Canada organise vigils and in some places this coincides with “Take Back the Night” marches, every year, in memory of this terrible event (and to address the issues that infringe upon the right to walk our own streets in safety). Even in the small city I live, the numbers of participants are staggering and the solidarity is heartfelt.

  13. Jill:

    I don’t recall hearing about this before, which is a sad comment on the state of U.S. journalism. Thank you for posting it.

    Canadian nutjobs, who woulda guessed? But I suppose the frosty punditry of the day blamed it on their bloodthirsty, hoplophilic, Republican neighbors to the south, so it’s okay. Fount of all that is evil in the U.S.? Check. Fount of all that is evil in Canada? Que l’enfer.

    Yep, that’s right, this is all just part of our worldwide left-wing conspiracy to blame everything on the conservative Republicans in the U.S. Speaking of which, I’m late for the Left-Wing Conspirators Meeting, and I’m supposed to bring the chips and dip! Gotta go!

  14. Thank you for not saying his name. I take huge offence to it when people do, for immortalizing him and for creating the perception that this was an isolated event.

    Candace

  15. *is sad*

    I haven’t heard of this before. The discription you wrote is heartwrenching (this from someone with dry eyes on September 11), and I thouroughly agree with your reasons for not posting the monster’s name.

    Genevieve, Helene, Nathalie, Barbara D, Anne-Marie E, Maud, Barbara Maria, Maryse, Annie St. A, Michele, Maryse, Anne-Marie L, Sonia, Annie T: Blessed be, all of you, by whatever God is yours.

    And Nemesis, Ma’at, and Furies of Hell and Hades, a free hand I wish to You all in dealing with he-who-will-not-be-named (may he rot).

  16. a prof of mine had an article on her door about the massacre which talked about how you raise your children in a world like this and wanting to teach them caution, but not fear and certainly not stupid ‘how to avoid rape’ tips.

    does this sound familiar to anyone and if so, does anyone know where I could find it?

  17. Americans may do a lot of screwed-up stuff, but I don’t think that the execution of feminists is a very popular idea here.

    Try an Operation Rescue meeting. You’ll find plenty of people willing to execute feminists. Fortunately, they do not speak for all or even the majority of US-Americans any more than the man in question represents most or all Canadians.

  18. Thanks, Dianne. I would probably quibble over whether there are “lots” of people into the idea of executing feminists, but I think we’re in agreement. I just get so embarassed when I see remarks like Don Drennan’s because, just like most Americans and Canadians aren’t into mass murder, most liberals don’t think red-staters are into mass murder.

  19. Thank you for not saying his name. I take huge offence to it when people do, for immortalizing him and for creating the perception that this was an isolated event.

    I understand your point to an extent but luckily this kind of thing was an isolated event. I’m not aware of any other similar attacks in North America, thankfully.

  20. Thank you for posting about this. It’s something that Canadian women will never, ever forget, and yesterday when I posted to my blog about it, it was another culture shock for me (I’ve experienced many since moving to the States this past summer) to discover that most of my American friends had never heard of the Montreal massacre. Hard to comprehend that the one event which shaped my feminism went almost completely unnoticed in a country so close to mine.

  21. I definitely remember hearing about it, and I didn’t grow up anywhere near the border. (I was a teenager when it happened.) What I don’t remember hearing was any feminist analysis of the event. I don’t remember thinking it had anything to do with me at all. It was about a crazy guy who killed a lot of people, and the people who he happened to kill were women. He could just as well have been a crazy guy who killed everyone wearing sneakers or who had brown hair. It wasn’t until much later that I connected it in any way with other forms of misogyny or other forms of violent misogyny.

  22. I suspect that this will not be a populare opinion here, and do not wish it to seem as a denigration of the memory of the slain women, but I wish one of those who died that day had been armed.

    You want to really cut down on violence against women in this world? Arm as many of the women as you can.

Comments are currently closed.