In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

FNTT Season 7, Round 2: Magh v. PatRiarchy v. Karina

All the votes have been tallied in Round 1 of Feministe’s Next Top Troll. Now the trolls will go head to head until one is crowned the winner. Vote below in today’s three-way battle:


1. Magh

Radical feminism should be banned – period. No one ever gave the right in the first place to those deranged failures of females to speak in the name of all women. Those pests need a proper beating up with a wooden rod and locking up in a mental institution and not be allowed to corrupt society any longer, with their phobic, man-hating paranoia…
And if they guys don’t do it, I’m sure there is enough of us, ladies around who will.
Rape is about violence NOT ABOUT SEX! The vast majority of men aren’t at all keen on rape, because it is essentially against their own hunter instincts. In other words, it is demeaning for a guy to rape cause that means he’s failed as a hunter. However those radical feminist bimbos have gone so delusional they actually believe that the world is full of rape-hungry guys who are specifically interested in raping them. Sorry, bimbos, it’s only wishful thinking… :p


2. PatRiarchy:

Hey cat = have you ever thought of DOING anything about it? You know – like taking control of your own life. Your freedom of movement is guaranteed under the law so you could MOVE. Go somewhere where being queer is normal maybe. Or create your own queer paradise. Lease an island and invite all the queers to live there. Then you could have as many babies as you wanted without any fear or retribution.
Look at the lot of you. All whinging and whining and none of you prepared to do anything about it except blame others for your own choices. Then you wonder why there are few females at the top.
Soon we men will no longer have any need of you at all and females will die out. By 2020 there will be the first full functioning android released onto the market. To be politically correct it will be a female. But economically it will be female becasue men would be prepared to pay a once off cost for never having to compromise and she would never take his kids. She can look like any female he wants and to his exact specifications. She will have great physical strength. Every piece of information ever recorded in human history at her fingertips. Including the Karma Sutra. She will be better than any natural Western female on Earth. She will be supportive of everything he does. And the cost to keep her is significantly less than any Western female. So as time goes on the investment becomes amortised. You’ve seen the latest public release a few weeks ago in Japan. This project is about 2 yrs behind the true pace.
Soon we will be able to create and grow perfect male humans in vitro without ever having to worry about what harmful things a mother may ingest.
The world will change for females and, by the very nature of this planet, evolution will drive you out. The weak perish and you have allowed yourselves to become weak by claiming to be victims and thus claiming privileges whilst never having to be reponsible for your actions. The time will fall upon you too fast for you to comprehend what is happening. When there’s no more mooching off men your fortunes will rapidly change and you will disappear. We’ve carried you for 3.5 MILLION years. Image what we can achieve with all the resouces that are saved from not having to support females. It’s a BRAVE new world dawning girlies and unless you grow up fast and stop whining and get doing you will fail. That means you are gonna be forced to work as hard as men or you will fail. There is competition coming that will run the lesser over in a generation.

Prey tell. What are the privileged Dudes privileged with? Is it a man is 400% more likely to commit suicide than a female? That’s quite a privilege I assume. Is it that men’s health is vastly inferior to females’ since wherever medicare is free females use it (in $ terms) 60,000% more than men yet they pay no extra which means men are being forced to support inferior females because females can’t look after themselves. That’s quite a privilege I assume. Is it that men are 1,500% more likely to be homeless than a female? Sounds quite privileged in a psychotic sort of way. Would it be that females demand to be paid for sex and so much so it is law. The privilege to pay a female for sex. Inspiring. Would it be that females have a choice to be a parent or not but not only do men get no choice but they are forced to abide by a woman’s choice. Clearly men and females are being treated differently. Why aren’t females in the streets demanding to be treated the same as men? What was that about psychosis again? Would it be the lower academic achievemants of men be a privilege? Of course it beggars the imagination that there could be any disparity at all since females have been screaming to be treated equally for 50 years. Clearly females are not treated equally but you seem not to notice these things. Hmmm. Psychosis. What is the exact definition again? Could it be the privilege of being killed at work since, like in Australia 500 men never come home every year. How many females are killed at work. You can guess. The hint is it’s a very round number. That’s quite a privilege isn’t it? Hmmm. Seems to fit the definition admirably.

But that is the whole notion of feminism. Females other than feminists are completely stupid. Feminists claim men oppress females. In a Federal election there were 132 female candidates out of a total of 155 seats. ALL would have won a seat if ALL females voted for them. Only 42 were elected. So a significant number of females are too stupid to realise that men oppress them and so vote for men and more oppression. Feminists know how stupid females are and it’s just lucky that feminists are around to save them.
But feminism is only about denigrating men to create fear and hatred of men and thence destroying our societies. Feminists claim that not only does a child not need a father but it is better off without one. Now we have a disintegrating society filled with violence both physical and psychological. Females have no sense of “honour” or “duty” to society and are only interested in “me”. Hence the feminist notion that bugger the kids if you’re not happy then rather than have an introspective look it’s best to kick him to the kerb and not allow the kids to have a relationship with him so that it hurts him. Doesn’t matter that it hurts the kids as every non-feminist child-developmental specialist says. After all it’s about what makes a femle happy isn’t it.
The over-riding FACT is that not one single negative claim about men ever made by any feminist anywhere at any time is actually true.

When a female agrees to have sex she has enterd into a contract. It takes BOTH parties to negate a contract. So if a female withdraws her consent she hasn’t a leg to stand on with regard to rape. This has now taken over from the “withdrawl of consent” since a famous case where a female said she withdrew consent and he took 30 seconds to stop so she was raped. He went to jail. Subsequently, the complainant admitted she lied and the whole thing was cooked up by his ex and the “victim”. A judge sentenced both to 2 years in prison and it took him 14 years and over $1m to have his name cleared.

3. Karina

This is such a bunch of bullshit!!! There are millions of fat and obese women in the USA taking up WAY too much space than their pitiful, pathetic, fat-encased selves deserve. There have been many times when I sat next to grossly fat women on airplanes and had their sweaty, smelly hips, thighs, guts, and arms taking up my space. It disgusted me. I’d much rather sit next to a large man than a fat women any day. The men are routinely polite, the women crude and loud.

And did I actually read a poster say that men taking up space is abuse??? Wow, feminists say women are, “strong, smart, and feisty.” Only someone weak, stupid, and whiney would say this is abuse.



48 thoughts on FNTT Season 7, Round 2: Magh v. PatRiarchy v. Karina

  1. i liked magh’s reference to using mental institutions to control/oppress people with controversial political views. historical accuracy!

  2. Def Magh. impersonating a woman to attack other women with misogynistic, abelist slurs? Trifeca of cowardlyness.

  3. PatRiarchy took it for me. I mean, how can one (so stupid as a female like me) fight against the claim that we will be replaced with robots? I am looking forward to seeing this day! Robots take over the world, woohoo!

  4. I still love the robots. And if Pat creates robot blow-up dolls, he should know that this will not go well. He needs to read more sci-fi. Specifically the play that gave us the word “robot”.

  5. You got give something to Magh for thinking that “rape is about violence, not sex’ as an anti-feminist argument.

    I look forward to “the personal is political.” Did you ever think about that, feminists?

  6. Ugh! I have a feeling PatRiarchy is going to win the whole contest, and I’m annoyed because looking at his long rant was funny for the first round, but now it’s just obnoxiously taking up space. People, vote him out!

    I went for Karina cause men taking up space isn’t abuse, but women taking up space is offensive to her personal right not to sit next to fat women. I am really hoping the next time I’m on a plane I sit next to her, and somehow figure out it’s her, and then my project for that plane ride will be to eat as much gas-inducing food as I can so that she realizes it’s not just fat women that can be smelly. Hurray!

  7. Voting for PatRiarchy again. Really, in vitro doesn’t actually mean you can create fully functioning mammals without a uterus. Oyyyy.

  8. PatRiarchy wins it for me. Yes, he was too long for me to read all of his ramblings, but the bits and pieces I did read were so full of fail troll that I still voted for him.

  9. I’m so torn…

    Got to love Magh’s “women against feminists” angle. A classic, really, brilliantly executed.

    But the sheer breadth and simplicity of Pat’s science fiction fantasy where all the women he hates so much will be replaced by robots is the most entertaining, to me. Plus I love it when the troglodytes take themselves out of the gene pool.

    And, honestly, Karina’s generalized fatties-and-whiners hatred is almost too generic to strike my fancy.

    I think I’m going to have to go with Pat here.

  10. I am going with PatRATiarchy solely for the science fiction angle, but can we please lop off the rest of his long ass comment? Good lord, none of that stuff will be relevant once the robot slaves replace women, excuse me, females.

  11. I voted for Pat because he makes me laugh a lot, but Magh came in a close second. I think had ze put in the same amount of sheer effort that he did, it would have been an equal tie.

    Long live robots!

    And long live the moderators of Feministe, who have to read this stuff all the time.

  12. I had to go with maugh because I’m currently in proceedings to deal with my rapist and his defense lawyer has already lobbied most of those things against me. Including saying that I should be locked up in a mental institution for my delusional behavior

  13. I had to go with PatRiarchy. It was a hard choice between Pat and Karina, but the clincher was the idea of a “Karma Sutra.”

  14. I’m going with Magh because of the excellent rationales put forth by abby jean, It, and others, and in solidarity with sabrina. I wish you strength!

  15. Hmm, it’s hard to go past Magh (argh!) for the attention to detail (a *wooden* rod) but Pat wins, not only for the sci-fi fembot fantasy, but the “create your own queer paradise” angle – sounds like a board game.

  16. Pat, for, well… more things than I can count, thanks to his verbosity. But his utopian dream of a world without women and amusing misuse of the word “fact” were my favorites. Very funny, very stupid, very trollish.

  17. PatRiarchy should get troll of a lifetime award. I think everything he said pissed me off. Yup….everything.

  18. Pat wins, not only for the sci-fi fembot fantasy, but the “create your own queer paradise” angle – sounds like a board game.

    OMG I SO want a create your own queer fantasy board game!!

  19. PatRiarchy still cracks me up big time…almost every single sentence except his last comment which was just unoriginal and annoying. The rest of it though? HILARIOUS.

  20. but Pat wins, not only for the sci-fi fembot fantasy, but the “create your own queer paradise” angle

    Ooh, Pat hasn’t thought that one out has he? You know the fembots are all gonna make a beeline for that queer paradise. Game over bro; we’ve got your fembots. :p

    I also picked Pat because science. Just… science. 😀

  21. Magh for the complete butchering of all things psychological. AND I am no bimbo…it’s been at least a month and half since I’ve shaved my legs.

  22. Anyone who goes up against, “She will have great physical strength,” is going to lose in my book. I just picture Dwight from the office everytime I read that shebot fantasy.

  23. Magh, though all three of them at some point make good arguments. PatRiarchy just makes me so angry! I love Magh’s bit about rape being about violence, not sex. There is much evidence to support the claim.

  24. I had to go with Pat also. I admit I didn’t read beyond his second post, but after the robot fantasy, his percentage calculation skills cracked me up (60,000%????).

  25. Hmmmm, tough choice between magh and PatRiarchy (I thought karina was more hateful and issue-ridden than trollish). I found magh’s summary of the hunter gatherer subsistence lifestyle in regards to rape inspired, in particular using the words ‘keen’ and ‘rape’ in the same sentence, as if she was discussing afternoon tea.

    Alas, PatRiarchy had to get my vote just by the visual imagery his rant provoked: an exodus of queers to an island paradise, karma sutra fembots, mass rallies of women demanding higher suicidal tendencies and homicides at work etc etc….

  26. KARMA SUTRA! Dammit, I’ve been wasting these past 10 years with Tamil when I should have been studying Sanskrit for the good of the roborevolution!

    I actually did a search for Karma Sutra. Now I’m depressed. If you’re going to make a whole website based on a text, you might want to have a peek at said text first. (Prepare for disappointment, kids.)

  27. Magh, because I think Pat gets less funny the more times I read it.
    Also, Magh seems more clasically trolling for a response, while Pat is off doing whatever.

    HOWEVER, I too love that a close reading of Pat shows that not only will the fembots rise up, but they will flee to create the Queer Paradise.

  28. I’d like to give 5,000% of my vote to Margh, 25,000% of my vote to PatRiarchy and, oh, 200% of my vote to Karina, and that is only because of the idea of smelly hips.

  29. I had to go with Karina just for z/h/e/s/r/its toxic meanness. the others may have been trollier, but z/h/ aww, f8ckit – cruelty stopped me so hard that the rest got by me. In my nastier deep ecological moments I may think this way about humans, of any size, in general, but I try to keep that shit locked up in a deep, deep cave under a blasting slpell.

  30. PatRiarchy because it killed me with verbose…ness (verbosity?)… it was just omg so loooong. … I didn’t particularly like the others, either, though. The last one is a firestorm of fat-shaming, seriously.

  31. RatPatriarchy for sure!!! It’s a movie with a surprise ending. First, you think it’s a simple-minded homophobic rant plagiarizing aspects of Lost or Survivor. BUT THEN – just when you think you know where it’s going to go – there are F***ing robots (!) that know the “karma sutra” (which, maybe is some Buddhist take on sexy time?). (!!!) And THEN there’s some ominous 1984-esque patronizing about a brave new world… Which, am I to take from this there will be a sequel?
    I mean, it’s just. Spectacular. In all of its asininity. Post on, morons!!!

  32. I did not even read all of PatRiarchy’s nonsense, he just had my vote when he implied it is totally easy (and desirable) to lease your own island so you won’t be judged. Cause, you know, it’s either that or teach people not to hate, and who wants THAT responsibility?

  33. Wooden rod versus bizarre woman-replacing android fantasy was a tough choice (the fat-hating wasn’t very creative), but on balance I felt that the bizarre woman-replacing android fantasy deserved the win for its rich narrative complexity.

  34. I wasn’t sure at first, but upon further deciphering Pat’s post (are those supposed to be English words I’m reading?) I realized that the fembots will be OMG ASIAN!!! Furthermore, I will now devote myself to understanding the Karma Sutra. This complicated and mysterious book about sex and reincarnation may be able to answer my only question about the android utopia: how can I come back as an omnipowerful robot whose only purpose is to recompense men for 3.5 million years of bearing the female species? That is truly nirvana.

  35. As a text, PatRiarchy’s untitled epic serves as one of the most subversive anti-racist, anti-homophobia, pro-feminist masterpieces in the Western canon. At its most basic plot level, the narrative arc imbues the classic Christian tale of creation, destruction, and resurrection with complex female protagonists who ultimately emerge as Christ figures. In a clever parody, although initially fallen, the women return with “great physical strength” and “[e]very piece of information ever recorded in human history at [their] fingertips” in an inversion of stereotypical portrayals of women as weak and stupid. As other readers have noted, these women, in a symbolic repudiation of privilege, have in fact rejected their Western values in favor of a more multicultural perspective, combining elements of Japanese and Indian cultures. The rejection even extends to a recognition of the hegemonic power of the English language, with several playful grammar and spelling “mistakes” and the ingenious pray/prey pun that underscores the violence of the Christian tradition being subjected to scrutiny here.

    Not content with solely treating women, PatRiarchy also offers insightful commentary on men with the ironic treatment of statistics and evolution, domains of math and science typically reserved as male. As the absurd and historically revisionist inaccuracies mount, the gentle mocking begins to suggest a more nefarious design: the abuse of “objective rationality” to legitimize violence against the Other. Fortunately, an alternative emerges. The queer island, which the narrator describes as a utopic “paradise”, provides a reappropriated promised land in contrast with the failed garden of the status quo. By placing the description of the queer island at the outset of the epic rather than at the close (a decision that may have initially seemed aesthetically questionable), PatRiarchy suggests its proximity in both time and space. The optimism is refreshing: rather than finding ourselves at the end, we realize that we are only just now reaching the beginning.

  36. 3.5 Million years? Really? And evolution will root us out.
    Wow. Wanted to vote for PatRiarcy, but decided that FNTT should be someone with a little more biological knowledge… How stupid can you get? Literally, can you get any stupider?

Comments are currently closed.