In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Derailing for Dummies

For everyone in need of a laugh, especially bloggers and regular blog commenters, check out Derailing for Dummies (tag line: Making Discrimination Easier!).  Here’s the intro:

You know how it is. You’re enjoying yourself, kicking back and relaxing at the pub or maybe at the library; or maybe you’re in class or just casually surfing the internet, indulging in a little conversation. The topic of the conversation is about a pertinent contemporary issue, probably something to do with a group of people who fall outside your realm of experience and identity. They’re also probably fairly heavily discriminated against – or so they claim.

The thing is, you’re having a good time, sharing your knowledge about these people and their issues. This knowledge is incontrovertible – it’s been backed up in media representation, books, research and lots and lots of historical events, also your own unassailable sense of being right.

Yet all of a sudden something happens to put a dampener on your sharing of your enviable intellect and incomparable capacity to fully perceive and understand All Things. It’s someone who belongs to the group of people you’re discussing and they’re Not Very Happy with you. Apparently, they claim, you’ve got it all wrong and they’re offended about that. They might be a person of colour, or a queer person. Maybe they’re a woman, or a person with disability. They could even be a trans person or a sex worker. The point is they’re trying to tell you they know better than you about their issues and you know that’s just plain wrong. How could you be wrong?

Don’t worry though! There IS something you can do to nip this potentially awkward and embarrassing situation in the bud. By simply derailing the conversation, dismissing their opinion as false and ridiculing their experience you can be sure that they continue to be marginalised and unheard and you can continue to look like the expert you know you really are, deep down inside!

Check out the whole thing. Oh, the fun as you recognize each and every tactic, especially when you’ve just opened your blog that morning and run into a whole host of them sitting in moderation!

And though it’s really all quite good, I’m particularly fond of the step “You’ve Lost Your Temper So I Don’t Have To Listen To You Anymore” and especially, especially fond of “You Are Damaging Your Cause By Being Angry.”

via Renegade Evolution


8 thoughts on Derailing for Dummies

  1. I admit to preferring “You Have a False Consciousness” because it’s the one I see most often and it’s used by a certain stripe of online feminists to imply that others don’t actually have a feminist consciousness. It never fails to anger me.

  2. In stark contrast to Lucy, I found the “You Have a False Consciousness” section to be extremely unfair to feminism. Considering DforD is supposed to be a deconstruction of the many arguments used to silence marginalised groups (which should definitely include feminism), this also made it extremely hypocritical.

    By its bizarre and highly subjective selection of examples of feminists supposedly bullying supposedly ‘feminine’ women over their supposed ignorance of supposed patriarchal concepts, the section clearly brands feminists as being one of the privileged groups who are supposedly engaging in all this derailing behaviour. Given the misrepresentation, hostility, abuse, disdain, harrassment and, yes, marginalisation that feminists are subjected to on a regular basis, this is incredibly unjust.

    There is a strong mindset out there among feminism’s sworn (i.e. privileged) enemies that feminists despise any woman who does not fit some kind of mythical textbook version of feminism. Added to that is the mindset that feminists have come to control the media, the government, education, the divorce courts, and all forms of gender debate etc, and thus ‘marginalise’ all men. When I started to read this essay, I thought that the author was going to expose these blatant and bullying falsehoods for the supreme derailing tactic they really are. Unfortunately, the essay simply reinforced them.

Comments are currently closed.