In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Updates on Troy Davis

Unfortunately, as is the case with many things lately, I am behind on these two latest action alerts regarding the case of Troy Davis, the man on death row for the murder of a police officer despite the fact that there was no physical evidence tying him the crime, and the additional fact that almost all of the witnesses who testified against him have recanted.  But while I’m significantly behind on them, I’ve heard of no changes since they were sent out — meaning that as far as I can tell, they’re still relevant.  So I hope you’ll act.

First up, from the NAACP:

A few hours ago, I met with Troy Davis on death row.

As you know, he is facing the death penalty in Georgia for killing a police officer — but since his trial, seven out of nine witnesses have recanted or contradicted their testimony. And with no physical evidence to link him to the crime, it is likely he is innocent.

Besides the fact that Troy is facing execution for a crime that he may not have committed, he also told me that he is being denied the right to speak out on his own behalf despite the fact that others in his position are allowed to do so.

Please contact Commissioner Brian Owens of the Georgia Department of Corrections to demand that he remove the gag order on Troy Davis.

In my meeting with Troy, I discovered that 60 Minutes, Dateline, and the Associated Press have all been denied media access to Troy. When Georgia won’t let the media talk to the accused man, it is a flagrant abuse of his First Amendment rights.

It doesn’t take a whole lot of guess work to assume that Georgia is likely refusing media contact to Davis due to the fact that they don’t want his story to get widespread, mainstream coverage.  After all, if it did, there might be significant public outrage that could force them into acting.  Which is, aside from the obvious need to protect First Amendment rights, precisely why this has to be stopped.  Click here to tell the Georgia Department of Corrections to remove the gag order on Troy Davis.

Next up, Amnesty International:

The Supreme Court will soon look at Troy Davis’ petition for a new trial. While we will be disappointed if the courts once again fail to intervene in a case that is so overwhelmed with doubt and a lack of evidence, Troy needs us to keep knocking on doors until one finally opens up.

Savannah’s new District Attorney, Larry Chisolm, elected in 2008 on similar principles as President Obama, could be that opportunity. During Chisolm’s bid for District Attorney, he laudably pledged to “increase the sense of fairness and transparency in the prosecution function.” If there ever was a case that required both fairness and transparency, then this is it. Urge District Attorney Chisolm to make good on his pledge by re-opening Troy’s case.

At the heart of this case is a brutal murder of a police officer that could go unpunished if an innocent man is put to death. The District Attorney has the power to re-open the investigation into this crime for which Troy was convicted. Only once we have all the facts on the table, can the courts truly begin to assess the fate of Troy Davis.

Click on through to contact Larry Chisolm — a man who seemingly has the ability to take meaningful, concrete action towards justice for Troy Davis.  Because as we’ve already sadly learned, we surely can’t trust the courts to do the right thing here on their own.

Responsibility.

The Tuscaloosa News publishes a Letter to the Editor from a “pro-lifer” who insists that his movement had nothing to do with Dr. Tiller’s murder:

Babies’ lives saved when Tiller was shot

Published: Sunday, June 7, 2009 at 3:30 a.m.
Last Modified: Friday, June 5, 2009 at 9:52 p.m.

Dear Editor: It should come as no surprise that the director of Tuscaloosa’s own abortion clinic, Gloria Gray, admired her murdered colleague, Dr. George Tiller. What a role model he must have been to those who are in the business of taking innocent lives. With tens of thousands of confirmed kills, he made ordinary serial killers look like rank amatures.

I have to disagree with her statement that the anti-abortion groups were directly responsible for his death, though. The only person directly responsible would be the individual who shot him, as well as Dr. Tiller himself, for choosing to engage in an activity that stirs compassionate people to react like Mr. Roeder did.

I don’t think that one murder (or approximately 60,000, for that matter) should be answered by another one, but I also wonder how many babies lives have been saved by this action. “Those who live by the sword shall die by the sword.”

Larry Jones

Tuscaloosa

Yes, you got that right: The man who shot Tiller was actually “compassionate,” and it’s Tiller’s own fault he was killed — because he provided a legal medical service to women.

Read More…Read More…

Officer Mehserle Will Stand Trial for Oscar Grant’s Murder

Good news:

Former BART police Officer Johannes Mehserle was ordered Thursday to stand trial for murder by a judge who told him he didn’t believe the explanation defense attorneys gave for his killing of an unarmed passenger.

After listening to seven days of testimony, Judge C. Don Clay concluded that Mehserle hadn’t gotten his stun gun and his service pistol mixed up when he shot Oscar Grant in the back at the Fruitvale Station in Oakland early New Year’s Day.

“There’s no doubt in my mind,” Clay said at the close of the former officer’s preliminary hearing in Oakland, “that Mr. Mehserle intended to shoot Oscar Grant with a gun and not a Taser.”

The decision set up the first murder trial of a California peace officer for a line-of-duty killing in nearly 15 years. It prompted sobs of relief from Grant’s family members, who spoke of having a sense of justice restored.

“This is going to be huge for people of color,” Cephus Johnson, Grant’s uncle, said outside court. “The community lacks faith in the judicial system when it comes to police officers.”

Like many others, I wasn’t actually expecting charges to be brought against the officer who pulled the trigger and ended the life of Oscar Grant, an unarmed man who was shot execution style while laying face down on the ground.  The enormous amount of leeway we give police officers, coupled especially with the racial dynamics (Mehserle is white; Oscar Grant was black), led me to expect very little.  So this news comes as a great relief.

Of course, as we all know, prosecution is not the same as a conviction.  I’m still, sadly, extremely skeptical that Mehserle will actually pay for his crime.  History has unfortunately shown the reluctance of juries to convict officers for the murder of civilians, let alone when they’re white officers who have killed black civilians.

But it’s something.  Not nearly enough, of course, but more than I was honestly ever expecting.  We can only wait now to see what happens next.

Check out Renee for more.

In the Name of Honour: An Interview with Rana Husseini

Natalia has conducted a wonderful interview with Rana Husseini, one of my feminist heroes. Husseini is a journalist who has long covered “honor killings” in Jordan. The whole thing is worth a read, but this is my favorite part:

N: And what about the “it’s their culture” argument? I’ve had highly educated people say that to me when honour killing is brought up, as in “it’s their culture, you can’t change it, you’re a bigot for even thinking about it in these terms.”

R: First of all, I would say to you – violence against women is part of global culture. It’s not isolated to any religion, class or country. However, some societies develop quicker than others and have better mechanisms for coping with it and discouraging it, and people there can’t ignore the struggle going on around the corner.

We need to remember that we are all human beings, and honour crime goes against human dignity. Ending this violence means a better world for everyone.

With Dr. Tiller’s clinic closed, anti-choicers lack a target

This article in the Times is pretty interesting — now that Dr. Tiller has been killed, anti-choicers no longer have a center on which to focus their hate. Wichita was long the focal point of anti-choice activism, and Dr. Tiller was a large part of that. I recommend this Rolling Stone article nearly every time I write on this subject, but really, if you haven’t read it yet, go. It illustrates just how much of a battleground Wichita really was, and the kinds of violence-inducing tactics that anti-choicers used. They made a point of publicizing the addresses and personal information of clinic staff so that other anti-choicers could stalk and harass them. They claim now that they had no idea people would take matters into their own hands and commit murder, but that’s a bald-faced lie. Abortion providers had been killed before, in their homes and in their clinics, because anti-choice groups publicized their information. They knew exactly what they were doing. But it turns out that anti-choice groups may have been their own worst enemies:

Since what is known here as the “Summer of Mercy,” when thousands of people from around the country converged here in 1991, blocking clinics and being arrested, the city has been a hot spot for the nation’s abortion debate and for an ever-shifting array of organization names, leaders, protesters and preferred tactics.

“There’s so much disagreement,” said Mark S. Gietzen, president of the Kansas Coalition for Life. Mr. Gietzen spent his time last week juggling calls from volunteers who wondered what would come of their regular shifts outside Dr. Tiller’s clinic, where they planted rows of crosses each day and tried to talk to women going in.

“If you went to a meeting, sometimes you would think the enemy was other pro-life people, not abortion,” he said.

Not all anti-abortion advocates, he said, favored the bloody “truth truck” (“Abortion is an ObamaNation,” it reads) parked outside his house or agreed on what protesters should call out to women going inside the clinic (obscenity-filled insults or offers of help) and how loudly.

Even now, Mr. Gietzen said, they were not of one mind about statements many groups here have issued condemning the killing of Dr. Tiller. “You can’t be pro-life and go around killing people, but some people are really mad at me for saying that,” he said.

So while anti-choicers are fighting over how loud they should scream at women entering clinics, they’re also shrugging off all the blame for Tiller’s murder:

Scott P. Roeder, a Kansas City man charged with murder in Dr. Tiller’s death, was not a member of Operation Rescue or a contributor to it, Mr. Newman said. But the authorities found a slip of paper with the organization’s name in Mr. Roeder’s car when he was arrested, as well as the name of one of its leaders and her telephone number. He had also met Mr. Newman at least once.

“I have been racking my brain to see if there was something I could have done,” Mr. Newman said of Mr. Roeder.

Dr. Tiller’s clinic was the one — the big one — Mr. Newman had always hoped to close. Still, he said, if it closed now it would be no victory for Operation Rescue.

“Good God, do not close this abortion clinic for this reason,” he said. “Every kook in the world will get some notion.”

Oh please. Troy Newman isn’t an idiot, and he’s not going to tell the Times that he’s happy Dr. Tiller is dead. But really, Tiller’s clinic was the major target. It’s what Newman and his hordes focused on for years. The only reason he’s disappointed that Tiller is dead is that now he’ll have to re-focus his efforts elsewhere.

And that’s exactly what anti-choicers are doing: Tehy’re already planning on protesting any doctor who fills Tiller’s shoes:

Despite the family announcement about the clinic’s uncertain future, some here seem convinced that it will secretly reopen on Monday. On Sunday, Mr. Gietzen said some of his more than 600 trained volunteers already were organized in shifts for a new week, in case visiting doctors were flown in.

“If it happened,” he said, “we’re going to act like the Minutemen and be there.”

But no no, they don’t actually want any harm to come to abortion providers…

Speechless

This is the latest cover of the National Review.

I don’t even know what to say.  Ann pretty much has it covered.

But, if Sonia Sotomayor actually was South Asian, I’d still find this an incredibly racist cover.  And of course, she’s obviously not.  As the cover itself acknowledges, she is Latina (specifically, Puerto Rican).  But apparently any ethnicity and culture that isn’t white just blurs together with all the others, and is too confusing to sort out.  A woman of color is a woman of color is a woman of color, right?  When you need a racist stereotype — and how could we ever talk about women of color without using racist and likely sexist stereotypes?, the media asks incredulously — any old one will do.

There’s a whole lot of levels of wrong here.  Incredibly racist wrong.  I’m pretty much speechless.