In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Massacre? What Massacre?

From the SF Chronicle, a letter to the editor about Haditha:

The alleged killing of civilians in Haditha by our Marines becomes a front-page item in The Chronicle (“Chilling claims of Iraq massacre,” May 27). Many of us wonder which side The Chronicle is on.

In the heat of battle, when you are tired, weary, scared and unable to determine just who the enemy is, you shoot because your life is on the line.

Rolling Back Protections on Whistleblowers

Go read Scott’s post on the 5-4 Supreme Court decision today making it much harder for government employees to file lawsuits challenging retaliation against them for exposing illegal government activity.

You know, like secret CIA prisons and vast NSA spying programs.

No surprise, Samuel “Strip-Search Sammy” Alito cast the deciding vote.

Swords into Plowshares

(Gah–blog rudeness update. I totally stole this link from Blue over at The Gimp Parade. Thanks very much! (And I forgot to link to the essay itself. Sigh.))

So you know that whole political lesbianism thing? As a Dorothy Allison fan who grew into queer maturity with the dystopic archetype of the miserable icy closeted-gay/lovelorn-hetero marriage, I have various doubts about its utility. There are also all the problems that attend the politicization of transition or gender-transgressive identities, and the self-righteousness, shame, and alienation that can produce. But I am neither a political queer nor likely to negotiate a relationship with one, so I’m happy to take the word of insiders that political lesbianism is both useful and enjoyable for those who want to practice it.

Anyway, something I’d never considered nor encountered was political sodomy for men. (On reflection: this isn’t quite true. There are deeply sexist antecedents, based on a political agenda that involves shielding men from girlie contamination and channeling their highest impulses towards worthier recipients. And I suppose you can argue the existence of a political queerness that defines sodomy as revolutionary, viz. Marco Vassi. I’ve never seen a concept of political male homosexuality predicated on anti-sexism.)

Philip Patston is one such gaymo:

Read More…Read More…

Lone Butch Blues

I went out on Sunday night to a spoken-word event with charity auction at a dyke bar. While there, I had a slightly tipsy discussion with a younger but fairly old-school butch dyke about butchness and how it was becoming much less common. She believes that there was a stark generational trend away from “butch” and towards “boi” and/or “babydyke” which is not exactly the same as “ftm” or “trannyboy,” although there is overlap particularly in one life over time. I asked her what she thought defined “butch” as opposed to “babydyke” and “boi,” and she said that bois were more genderqueer and less traditionally masculine. She indicated butches in the crowd, most of them older, and bois and babydykes, most of them younger.

Read More…Read More…

Appetite and Accountability

Via Alternet, the guy who wrote that book that I never got around to reading has written another book, about how we eat and why:

In the process, Pollan offers some insight into how it now seems reasonable to eat fast food several times a week, or cut out entire food groups while attempting to lose weight, or, for a frightening number of people, simply not eat. Pollan, author of “The Botany of Desire” and Knight Professor of Journalism at UC Berkeley, presents his findings with a crispness and clarity of thought. Transporting food worldwide, for instance, burns fossil fuels and is, in turn, bad for the environment. Consuming too much or too little of anything will not leave you nourished. And eating, by the way, is supposed to be fun.

Read More…Read More…

Great-Grandmothers

I was doing some cleaning this weekend, during which I came across an unfinished quilt that my great-grandmother, my maternal grandmother’s mother, had made. She had sewn every stitch by hand, and the fabric came from her housedresses, which became children’s clothes, which then became potholders and towels and quilts.

Coming across that quilt top got me thinking of Baboosha. She was from Poland and had never learned English, yet raised nine children (at least one of whom was killed in the Flu Pandemic) largely on her own after her husband left her. She had come over to the US with her brother at the age of 12 or so, and went to work for a wealthy Russian family doing cooking and housework. They settled in Pennsylvania coal country, and as far as I know, her brother went to work in the coal mines. She herself married a Polish-American who worked for the railroad (he had had pneumonia as a child and couldn’t work in the mines). From what I could piece together from my grandmother, he was controlling and abusive, and mocked her for her inability to speak English. And then he left, going off and starting another family somewhere else on the train route. But his family still lived in Hazelton, and threatened periodically to take Baboosha’s children away.

She eventually got the last laugh when, after years of struggle bringing up her children on her own, he died and she was awarded the widow’s pension from the railroad. He had never bothered to divorce her, and the railroad accordingly didn’t have his new family on the books.

She’s the great-grandparent I know most about, and the only one I met (she was a little terrifying, what with her being very, very old and not being able to communicate with her). But my mother’s father’s mother was also a strong character. My grandfather didn’t talk much about his family, but his father was the second son of a landed Irish family, which meant he got nothing. So he packed up his family and moved to the US, where they were as poor as they were in Ireland, but with more opportunities. My great-grandmother lined up all of her children and told them what they were going to do with their lives, and how that was going to be accomplished. I doubt my grandfather had any burning ambition to be a dentist, or his brother a doctor, or his sister a lawyer, but that’s what their mother had decided they were going to do, and she was not the kind of woman to be questioned. So the whole family worked to put each other through college and graduate school (my grandfather at one point delivering milk in a horse-drawn wagon and getting yelled at by Thomas Edison to get the goddamn horse off his lawn), and each succeeded in their fields.

I know even less about my father’s grandmothers, though I have heard tantalizing bits about my extremely uptight grandfather’s mother being the kind of free spirit who smoked when it was shocking for women to do so and who wore lots of bangles. Grams’ mother I know nothing about.

Tell us about your great-grandmothers in comments.

Survey

Ginmar over on her blog, aboout the inadequacy of language:

The issue of language is one I’ve wrestled with. I don’t believe an anti-feminst woman deserves the fruits of any feminist labor, and that includes language. Hey, fuck yourself all you want to, but fuck me and mine and you’re dead. I think if you’re actively anti-feminist, you should have to deal with it, too. Of course, in reality this would last about as long as it took for such a woman actually ran afoul of the patriarchy, in which case, past experience makes me wary that they’d ask for and accept help, then turn and kick my teeth in. It’s happened. However, it’s a complicated issue, and I won’t pretend otherwise. We need better insults. We need accurate insults. I frankly think ‘gay’ ‘pussy’ and so forth ought to be culled from the language; I don’t think there’a any redeeming them. Nor is there any equality in referring to a guy as a slut. No, I don’t care hat your intentions are. You cannot change the culture yourself, and in fact being called a slut is a compliment to a guy—at women’s expense. What is a slut, anyway? Why is it an insult? Asshole, if she just had sex iwth you, you’re an ungrateful—-what do I call him that doesn’t insult his mother?—–little shit who deserves something I can’t immediately think of because I don’t have the fucking vocab for it. I mean, you got laid, send flowers, asswipe. Or could it be that having sex is not the end-all goal for this type of guy? Could it be the conquest—salaciously related to his buds over beers—-is the whole point?

Duh. But anyway, I propose a language olympics. I don’t think it’s cool to call Ann Coulter a trannie or whatever. She’s scarily deluded, frightfully, deliberately vile, hateful, bigoted, exploitive, and an eager inciter of hatred. But calling her a man insults her by insulting her appearance and frankly, if she’s anorexic I feel sorry for her. I wouldn’t wish that on anybody, not even an enemy. What I would wish on them is a pithier dismissal than the one I had to resort to above.

I really, really want a word that sums up the sort of whiner who shows up and bitches, “But some women DO lie about rape!” Yeah, sure, like I give a shit. Did you know most pedophiles are straight white guys? How come when rape gets discussed the minority gets brought up, yet when pedophilia gets mentioned, the majority is hidden?

Well? The last time this came up, I believe over at Pandagon, someone nominated a term from some other language that translated to “sister-fucker.” What do y’all think? Where are the good insults? Is it enough to be merely scatological, or do we need to find some way of conveying the sheer moral bankruptcy of people like Ann Coulter? And if so, how?

So Much For Rick Warren Being a Warm-and-Fuzzy Evangelical

Mr. Purpose-Driven Life is involved with the production of a videogame based on Tim LaHaye’s Left Behind books that rewards players for killing those who resist becoming Christians. From Talk2Action’s piece, The Purpose Driven Life Takers (also up as a DKos diary):

Imagine: you are a foot soldier in a paramilitary group whose purpose is to remake America as a Christian theocracy, and establish its worldly vision of the dominion of Christ over all aspects of life. You are issued high-tech military weaponry, and instructed to engage the infidel on the streets of New York City. You are on a mission – both a religious mission and a military mission — to convert or kill Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, gays, and anyone who advocates the separation of church and state – especially moderate, mainstream Christians. Your mission is “to conduct physical and spiritual warfare”; all who resist must be taken out with extreme prejudice. You have never felt so powerful, so driven by a purpose: you are 13 years old. You are playing a real-time strategy video game whose creators are linked to the empire of mega-church pastor Rick Warren, best selling author of The Purpose Driven Life.

(Emphasis mine.)

Note to conservative Catholics who’ve been cozying up to the Christian Right and the Dominionists on issues of abortion and gay marriage: this is what they think of you. Come the theocratic revolution, you’re going to have to convert or die.

Read More…Read More…

Double Standards

You may be aware of the FBI’s search of Rep. William Jefferson’s Congressional office as part of a corruption investigation. You may also be aware that there has been much bipartisan wailing and gnashing of teeth and rending of garments over the privacy violation, of the separation-of-powers issue when a division of the executive branch obtains a warrant for the search of the office of the legislative branch, oh, the humanity.

But at least one member of Congress sees the hypocrisy of a Congress that protects its own while allowing the executive branch to run roughshod over the privacy rights of all Americans. Barney Frank:

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Madam Speaker, I disagree with the bipartisan House leadership criticism of the FBI’s search of a Member’s office. I know nothing specifically about the case, except that the uncontroverted public evidence did seem to justify the issuance of a warrant.

What we now have is a Congressional leadership, the Republican part of which has said it is okay for law enforcement to engage in warrantless searches of the average citizen, now objecting when a search, pursuant to a validly issued warrant, is conducted of a Member of Congress.

I understand that the speech and debate clause is in the Constitution. It is there because Queen Elizabeth I and King James I were disrespectful of Parliament. It ought to be, in my judgment, construed narrowly. It should not be in any way interpreted as meaning that we as Members of Congress have legal protections superior to those of the average citizen.

So I think it was a grave error to have criticized the FBI. I think what they did, they ought to be able to do in every case where they can get a warrant from a judge. I think, in particular, for the leadership of this House, which has stood idly by while this administration has ignored the rights of citizens, to then say we have special rights as Members of Congress is wholly inappropriate.

Remember, the FBI had obtained a warrant to search Jefferson’s Congressional office, after they’d found $90,000 in his Washington home freezer and videotaped him accepting $100,000 in bribes. That just kind of screams “probable cause” to me. The guy’s small potatoes compared to a DeLay, but that doesn’t mean the FBI should have to overlook his corruption. (He also commandeered some National Guard trucks during Katrina to remove items from his Louisiana house, at a time when some of his constituents were awaiting rescue. If he keeps $90K in the freezer, you have to wonder what was in the house then that he felt the need to remove while people died for lack of transport.)

By contrast, the NSA has not been obtaining warrants for its massive spying program, which potentially involves every phone call from every phone in the US. And Congress is rolling over on the nomination of General Michael Hayden to become the director of the CIA, even though he oversaw this massive, intrusive, illegal program.

Civil liberties, it seems, are not for the little people.

H/T TPM.:

Dog Park Drama, Part Deux

Remember how my dogwalker had the confrontation with the guy who accused Junebug of tearing up a Doberman?

Well, I got to see him this morning. It was supposed to be a nice, leisurely day, I was to be meeting my dog-park friends for a picnic breakfast, and things had already gotten off to a weird start (I’d been approached by some weird, possibly drunk, woman shoving an object wrapped in a paper plate at me, telling me to pass it on; when I dodged her, she tried to shove it in my bag, then threw it at me as I booked it out of there) when I ran into the guy. He actually doesn’t own the Doberman, a Russian woman does. She was there today. So he started up with the accusations, demanding my phone number. I told him I didn’t believe him, and told him I knew he’d tried to extort money from another dogwalker for the same injuries, and no, I wasn’t giving him my name or number. Then the woman, creepily, asked if my dogwalker was “legit,” and if she had insurance. Then I walked off, and the guy started shouting threats at me, including threatening to sic his dog on Junebug and/or to kick her, and, in a stunningly unoriginal move, called me a fatass and insulted my appearance. God, that’s tiresome.

Since it was still early and none of my friends were at the rendezvous point, I left the Nethermead after that, and after an abortive attempt to let Junebug offleash in another area (there was too much garbage from the weekend’s picnickers and barbecuers), I headed home. I was almost home when I met one of my friends, who convinced me to go back. We took the sneaky route and saw from our high wooded perch that the extorters were on their way out of the park. It was past 9 by then, so she didn’t get offleash at all, but we got to hang out and have breakfast. And I found out, when I told my story, that the guy’s dog has killed another dog and the woman has kicked a dog. What fun!

Pics below the fold.

Read More…Read More…