In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Scopes Monkey Trials, part deux

Why are we still debating this? Listen up, wingnuts: Science class is for teaching science, not religion. Not “we don’t know, so God must have done it.” Not “evolution is only a theory” (gravity is also only a theory, but I’m not gonna start agitating for my kids to be taught intelligent falling). End of story.

“Nearly 2,000 years ago, someone died on a cross for us,” said board member William Buckingham, who urged his colleagues to include intelligent design in ninth-grade science classes. “Shouldn’t we have the courage to stand up for him?”

I must have missed the part in the Bible where Jesus says, “Thou shalt not teach your children accurate scientific information.”

Performance-Enhancing Soft Drinks… For Four-Year-Olds

No, it’s not a joke. The latest sports drink, Spark, is being marketed to kids between the ages of 4 and 11, and contains as much caffeine as in a cup of coffee — purportedly to encourange athletic performance (another version of the drink contains twice as much caffeine and is being marketed to teenagers and adults).

Not only is caffeine probably not the best thing to be giving young children, but putting it in a sports drink implies that (a) improved athletic ability is more important than physical health, and (b) in order to perform at your peak, you have to take an enhancement drug. That’s a dangerous mindset to project onto children.

In an advertisement on its Web site for youth products, AdvoCare described an elementary school wrestler as a “high-performance athlete” and quoted him as saying: “I feel the products are helping me grow stronger, and my focus when I’m wrestling is better. I take them before and after games and practices, even if I’m just playing football for fun with my friends.”

It also seems to be putting a lot of unnecessary pressure on elementary school kids to refer to them as high-performance athletes.

Angela B. Foster, whose 12-year-old daughter, Taylor, is featured in another endorsement for AdvoCare products, said in a telephone interview that Spark was safe and helpful for not only Taylor, who practices 20 hours a week and is hoping for a college scholarship in gymnastics, but also for her 11-year-old brother, who plays soccer and runs track, and her 7-year-old sister. “We use Spark for all of them,” Foster said.

The Foster children use the teenage and adult version, with 120 milligrams of caffeine, even though it is labeled as not for use by children. “They don’t use the kids’ stuff,” Foster said. “They said it tastes too much like Kool-Aid.”

In her endorsement for AdvoCare’s children’s products, Taylor said: “I have more energy and I like them a lot. I would suggest that anyone try them!”

Nothing like sacrificing your kids’ physical health for sports — kind of the opposite of the whole point of being an athlete, isn’t it?

Don’t Play Games, Won’t Play Games

NEWSFLASH: When a person acts too smooth to be real, s/he probably ain’t bein’ real.

The Guardian reports on a new book, The Game, that teaches nerds how to pick up women by being manipulative and smarmy. The author, Neil Strauss, is lauded as the hero of “the secret society of pick-up artists” and a man who teaches the reluctant virgins among us how to be master PUAs themselves.

Take the key PUA tactic of ‘negging’, in which, tapping into female insecurity, you offer a woman a line that is both compliment and insult: ‘I like your skirt. I just saw another girl wearing the same one a moment ago.’

…The PUA alphabet turns out to be a dizzying cacophony of mind games, all designed to make a woman feel intimately connected to him, painstakingly mapping her psyche for manipulation.

Strauss reveals his interesting methodology: he read “The Second Sex” before writing this book, attempting to map women’s insecurities in order to turn empowerment against women to get them to spread like butter. Charming.

Emmy at Gendergeek tears this article apart, perfectly summing up my feelings on the matter:

reading this stuff makes me cringe because the stereotypes that surround sex and relationships are so tired. Specifically, the idea that men are on some continual quest (successful or otherwise) to have meaningless intercourse while women are perpetual engaged in husband baiting. For men, human sexual relationships are a ‘game’ which they can win if they outwit their opponents. Women, on the other hand, are required to follow the rules. In these kinds of characterisations, it’s men who have all the power; to seduce, to get what they want. A false dichotomy between male desire and female submission has always been a feature of our culture’s representation of sex.

I never played games and can’t imagine being dishonest with other people’s feelings just to get laid. I’ve seen friends and acquaintances play these games and get burned and humiliated in the process — what manipulation like this reveals is a startling amount of insecurity. If you don’t feel good enough to meet people with your own merit, you manipulate them into liking a facade, a sad interpretation of what you wish you were.

The best pick up line? Shake my hand. “Hi, my name is…” Treat me like a human being. Avoid seeing women as conquests and men as competition. I’ll take a directionless, listless lad over a smarmy womanizer anyday.

I find it telling that Neil eventually fell for and married a woman who wouldn’t submit to his manipulations. Reportedly, his tactics and his old buddies only annoy her.

More at Moment to Moment
See also, How can I become cool? Please do not follow most of the offered advice.

Posted in Sex