In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Aging Is (Not) Unnatural

Laurie and Debbie say:

Cross-posted to Body Impolitic. All photographs by Laurie Toby Edison.

Some photos below may not be okay for office viewing.

After our introductory post here last week, Daisy Deadhead asked if we wrote about age as a body image issue, since we hadn’t happened to mention it in that post. Great question!

Nahamura

We think age is a crucial body image issue, especially in this culture. On the one hand, we have the multi-million dollar “beauty” industry and ad agencies all striving to squeeze every dollar they can out of making us hate our bodies. On the other hand, we have the medical establishment frantically trying to make every human variation into a medical condition. Aging is just about the most fruitful area either of these groups can pick on. Contrary to all of this noise, aging is normal.

Read More…Read More…

Why Dr. LeRoy Carhart Won’t Stop Doing Abortions

Jill recently posted a link to an Esquire article about Dr. Warren Hern, a late-term abortion provider. Something the article got wrong (and there have been several criticisms leveled at it) was the idea that Dr. Hern is “the last abortion doctor” — meaning, the last late-term abortion provider in the United States.

That is demonstrably false. Though the number of such providers is dangerously small, Dr. Hern is thankfully not alone in the medical care that he provides. One doctor who does similar work to Dr. Hern is Dr. LeRoy Carhart. You may recognize Dr. Carhart’s name from several places — like the Supreme Court decision Gonzales v. Carhart, in which Dr. Carhart challenged the “partial-birth abortion” ban, and sadly lost. Or, more recently, from his plans to return late abortion care to Kansas, after the murder of his good friend Dr. Tiller.

Newsweek recently profiled Dr. Carhart, writing about his beliefs, his job, and his daily struggles to simply do it in the face of those who would rather have him dead. It’s imperfect, as every mainstream article I’ve ever read about abortion is, but it’s a strong and valuable effort.

Leroy Carhart was at his abortion clinic near Omaha when he got the phone call. It was Sunday morning, a little after 10, and the doctor was in surgery. He felt his cell phone vibrate. Carhart ignored it, finishing the abortion before checking his phone. The number for George Tiller’s head nurse in Wichita, Kans., flashed on the screen. The timing was unusual; Carhart didn’t often hear from Tiller on Sunday mornings. He thought it might have to do with a patient, maybe an emergency. But when Carhart called back, Tiller’s nurse was crying. “George is dead,” she told him through sobs, relaying the news that Tiller, the late-term-abortion provider, had been fatally shot at his Lutheran church.

Carhart was scheduled to work in Tiller’s clinic the next day; he was one of three abortion doctors who took turns assisting there. His car was already packed for the five-hour drive from Omaha to Wichita he’d made every third Sunday for the past five years. Carhart decided he would still go, to see Tiller’s family and help figure out what would happen to the clinic. But first he would see the patients at hand. His waiting room, after all, was full of women who’d crossed state lines and waited hours to see him. “I didn’t have any time to sit here and feel sorry for myself,” says Carhart. He hung up the phone, went back into the operating room, performed another abortion. By day’s end, he had seen a dozen women.

Carhart knows there are people who want him dead, too. A few days after Tiller’s murder, Carhart’s daughter received a late-night phone call saying her parents too had been killed. His clinic got suspicious letters, one with white powder. It’s been like this since Carhart started performing abortions in the late 1980s. On the same day Nebraska passed a parental-notification law in 1991, his farm burned down, killing 17 horses, a cat, and a dog (the local fire department was unable to determine the fire’s cause). The next day his clinic received a letter justifying the murder of abortion providers. His -clinic’s sidewalks have been smeared with manure. Protesters sometimes stalk him in airports. The threats, the violence, now the assassination of his close friend—all of it has left Carhart undaunted, and the billboard-size sign over his parking garage still reads, in foot-high block letters, ABORTION & CONTRACEPTION CLINIC OF NEBRASKA. “They’re at war with us,” says Carhart of the anti–abortion activist who killed Tiller. “We have to realize this isn’t a difference of opinions. We need to fight back.”

It’s about time that the general public is getting a better idea of what these brave health care providers face every day. Finish reading here.

via Jen

Palin’s anti-choice legacy

Via Feministing, a post by Clara Jeffery of Mother Jones tells us that one of Palin’s last acts in office was to accelerate a parental notice and consent law for women under 18 who are seeking abortion.

We see this shit all the time: my sisters’ rights to our own bodies are routinely taken away in the name of paternalistic “protection.” We saw it in the conservative media hoopla when the FDA approved over-the-counter access to emergency contraception for women 17 and older, as opposed to an earlier 18 and older policy (my favorite Mike Galanos quote: “With Plan B, they can do it now and deal with it later”). And we’re seeing it again with Palin. Nevermind that young women who don’t tell their parents about their abortion have damn good reasons for keeping quiet.

Before news of the resignation, Beverly Wooley and Jay Butler, two of Alaska’s public health experts, were essentially forced out of office for meddling in Palin’s anti-choice crusade.

Both [Wooley and Butler] made the critical mistake of wanting to present scientific evidence on the impact of parental consent laws to the state Senate. They never got the chance; the Senate “ran out of time.” From the Anchorage Daily News:

Wooley said she also intended to answer questions from legislators and said she would rely on data, not anyone’s personal beliefs. Whether she personally agreed with the governor is beside the point, Wooley said.

She intended to refer to studies from states that already had passed similar legislation, she said. Some of the research shows that, with parental involvement requirements, girls tend to get abortions later in their pregnancy, which is riskier and more expensive, she said. Other research shows fewer girls get abortions, which abortion foes like Palin likely would applaud. Wooley cautioned that the studies are small and not definitive because such laws are still fairly new.

That was enough to get her canned. And guess what? The next day, the very day that Palin resigned:

A proposal to require parental notice or consent before a female younger than 18 could have an abortion was certified Thursday by the state so that its backers can seek enough signatures to get the initiative before voters next year.

So, Sarah Palin may be gone soon. But her policies live on.

I’d just like to say: this is outrageous. Not only that Palin is so clearly shaming young women for having sex (how crazy is that? Women having sex?! News to me!); not only that she is firing staff for, in Clara Jeffery’s words, making the “critical mistake of wanting to present scientific evidence…to the state Senate” (I mean, I know Palin is scared of science, but come on!); but also that a young woman’s fundamental right to control her own body is being set aside in favor of abortion statistics.

Even if the stats show that requiring parental consent for teenagers’ abortions lowers rates — party at the Palin anti-choice mansion, anyone? I love me some barbecued moose — I still need the right to get the procedure without my parents knowing! Statistics and evidence are of course vitally important to crafting effective legislation, but reproductive rights and bodily integrity should not depend on whichever survey is being considered. They are fundamental.

Cross-posted at Women’s Glib.

Federal advisory panel recommends ban on Vicodin, Percocet

UPDATE, July 7: Via Lauredhel, the FDA has made a decision regarding pain pills Darvon and Darvocet, which are pain killers containing a different ingredient (propoxyphene, a pain killing ingredient related to methadone but less addicting) with similar concerns (accidental overdose). They have decided against a ban, but are imposing stronger warnings on the products.

The reason they give, at the end of the article: “the benefits of using the medication for pain relief at recommended doses outweighs the safety risks at this time.” If nothing else, it is somewhat encouraging. If this is their thinking on Darvon/Darvocet, we can hope that similar thinking will guide their decision on Vicodin/Percocet.

***

And according to the New York Times, the FDA

… is not required to follow the recommendations of its advisory panels, but it usually does.

Emphasis mine. In other words: the ball is rolling.

Vicodin and Percocet are two commonly-prescribed narcotic painkillers. They combine hydrocodone or oxycodone (respectively), the narcotic agent, with acetaminophen, brand name Tylenol.

Acetaminophen is coming under fire because abuse of the drug can lead to liver damage. The safe limit for acetaminophen has generally been regarded as 4,000mg per day. That translates to two extra-strength Tylenol (500mg each), four times a day (eight pills total). The dose of acetaminophen in various combination drugs varies, usually 325mg but ranging up to 750mg.

The panel voted against a ban on over-the-counter cold, flu and sinus relief medications, the vast majority which contain acetaminophen. Apparently these medications aren’t a concern, despite containing just as much acetaminophen and being available over-the-counter, where consumers do not have a doctor and pharmacist counseling them on how to take the medication.

Read More…Read More…

Well gee, I think I’ll go get that pap smear after all

It’s not at all uncommon in this world to see advertising images that are some variation on the message that women are only good for ogling and fucking. But somehow it has a particular sting when the ad in question is supposed to be about why women’s lives matter.

This image was posted on Sociological Images, and was created by BC Cancer Agency. The page where the ad was found has been taken down, but here’s a cache. Further, according to comments over at the Sociological Images post, these ads have been seen all over Vancouver.

To address some of the comments over at that post before they appear here: no, I don’t think the Birth of Venus is a sexually objectifying image. And I’m all about appreciating the beauty of the human body — whatever shape or size that body takes (including the one being mocked above).

But when you take such a lovely image and use it to argue that it’s the reason why women’s lives are worth living? Because men like to look at women and definitely don’t like to look at other dudes? That’s more than just a little bit offensive. Because actually, I’m pretty sure that this world “needs women” because we’re human beings, and we make all kinds of amazing and awesome contributions to society.

And I’m also pretty sure that the reason to prevent cervical cancer isn’t about whether or not “the world needs women” (who don’t all have cervixes, by the way). The reason to prevent cervical cancer shouldn’t be seen as any different from the reason to prevent any other cancer.  Which is, as is my understanding, because we value human lives and think they’re worth living just because . . . well, just because.

Salon Says Your Disabling Pain is Imaginary

Salon recently decided to publish an article called “Big Pharma Says Your Mysterious Pain is Real.” It’s about fibromyalgia, and the growing acceptance among doctors that those who have it aren’t making the whole thing up.  Seemingly, according to the writer, that’s a bad thing.  And while the article makes a halfhearted attempt at portraying itself as an attack on Big Pharma, it really only takes a few sentences to realize, as already feared and expected, that it’s actually an attack on individuals living with fibromyalgia.

In the second paragraph, Robert Burton writes this, for example:

I can tolerate Pfizer’s endless ads for Lipitor, the cholesterol-lowering drug, because the ad is doing a public service. High cholesterol is a serious health problem. But watching the kindly middle-age actress interrupt the evening news to tell me that “my fibromyalgia is real” raises serious medical issues and underscores the ruthless drive of Big Pharma.

Because you know what’s not a serious health problem?  Debilitating pain and fatigue that often can’t be alleviated with the help of pain medication.  As someone who does not have that health condition, he should know.  Also, how dare we tell the large scores of people, predominantly women, who have this very condition that they’re not just making it all up?  After all, admitting that they’re not making it all up forces people like Robert Burton to feel a little less superior.

Read More…Read More…

Dr. Tiller’s Clinic Will Remain Closed

Oh god. This twists both my heart and my stomach up into tight, hard knots.

The family of slain abortion provider George Tiller said Tuesday that his Wichita clinic will be “permanently closed,” effective immediately.

In a statement released by Tiller’s attorneys, his family said it is ceasing operation of Women’s Health Care Services Inc. and any involvement by family members in any other similar clinic.

“We are proud of the service and courage shown by our husband and father and know that women’s health care needs have been met because of his dedication and service,” the family said.

This is awful. Just awful. I feel quite literally ill and nauseous at the moment.

I can’t blame Dr. Tiller’s family. I don’t blame his family. I understand that they have risked, and lost, far more than enough. No one could have ever blamed Dr. Tiller if he had decided, after the years of harassment and threats on his life, to give up practicing at his clinic. And so we certainly can’t blame his family now for shutting the clinic doors, once those threats were actually carried out. And I also hear what Dr. Hern, who provides the same type of late abortions that Dr. Tiller did, is saying. Who would want to work there? We can talk about principle all day long, but when it comes down to it — a man was murdered because he worked there. How many of us would be willing to take is place? Exceedingly few.

But that doesn’t change the loss, and that loss is huge. The nation has now not only lost one of its bravest, most compassionate abortion providers. It has also lost one of only three clinics that performed life-saving and therapeutic abortions this late. (Please note: dozens of clinics perform abortions that would be considered “late.” Dr. Tiller’s, however, was one of only three that provided abortions as late as they did.)

Read More…Read More…

Denist Defends Sexual Assault of Patients as Medical Treatment

Trigger Warning

Since I’ve been blogging, I’ve come across a whole slew of excuses for rape and other sexual assault, made both by perpetrators themselves and their supporters.  The stream is almost never-ending, and they’re usually pretty easy to recognize.  There’s the “what did she expect dressed/acting like that?” defense, the “well, she didn’t say no” defense, the “oh, it was a joke!” defense — you get the picture.

But while not entirely unheard of, the “I was just providing medical treatment” defense is relatively new.

That’s precisely the defense used by a dentist convicted of sexually assaulting a dozen female patients during their visits to his office. Check it out (emphasis mine):

In an emotional statement, Anderson said he was sorry that the women he’s convicted of molesting didn’t realize he was simply providing treatment.

Anderson wept during his sentencing hearing before some of his victims and Judge Mock.

The prominent dentist, who once had a thriving practice and loyal patients, was convicted by a jury March 10 on a dozen counts of sexual battery for molesting female patients.

Anderson, 49, has been free on his own recognizance since his arrest in 2007.

In a courtroom packed with his victims, supporters and media in the historic Woodland courthouse, Anderson made his tearful statement to the judge. He insisted that what he had done was treatment for the women’s pain.

Anderson’s defense at trial was that he had touched the women’s chests as treatment for TMJ, or temporomandibular joint disorder, a painful jaw condition.

“What I did was an honest attempt to help my patients,” he said today.

[. . .]

During testimony at Anderson’s trial, victims said that Anderson reached into their bras and made comments about their breasts. Candis Barajas, 30, said Anderson had violated her trust and used his patients’ vulnerability in the dental chair for his own sexual gratification.

Later on in the article, Anderson’s actions are described as “fondling.”

Read More…Read More…

Breaking: Obama Overturns Ban on Stem Cell Research

I just watched it live on CNN.com!  Whoa!

The executive order is a reversal of an executive order issued by President Bush in 2001:

Because stem cells have the potential to turn into any organ or tissue cell in the body, research advocates say they could yield cures to debilitating conditions such as diabetes, Parkinson’s disease and spinal injuries. But because work on embryonic stem cells involves the destruction of human embryos, many conservatives supported the limits Bush imposed by executive order in 2001.

Dr. Harold Varmus, president of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and co-chairman of Obama’s science advisory council, said Sunday that Obama will “endorse the notion that public policy must be guided by sound, scientific advice.”

Obama’s order will direct the National Institutes of Health to develop revised guidelines on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research within 120 days, said Varmus, who joined Barnes in the conference call with reporters.

“The president is, in effect, allowing federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research to the extent that it’s permitted by law — that is, work with stem cells themselves, not the derivation of stem cells,” he said.

Obama also said that he hopes Congress will continue to support stem-cell research legislatively.  All of this is incredibly excellent news, and I cannot possibly express how very happy I am about the development.  It looks like we may in fact be moving towards a real “culture of life,” which values the lives of actual people.  Go President Obama!

h/t HollyOrd’s twitter