In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Yeah no.

Look: I find Islamophobia offensive and disgusting. But no, it does not justify violence and bombing buildings:

Okay, so can we finally stop with the idiotic, divisive, and destructive efforts by “majority sections” of Western nations to bait Muslim members with petulant, futile demonstrations that “they” aren’t going to tell “us” what can and can’t be done in free societies? Because not only are such Islamophobic antics futile and childish, but they also openly beg for the very violent responses from extremists their authors claim to proudly defy in the name of common good. What common good is served by creating more division and anger, and by tempting belligerent reaction?

Again: I agree that Islamophobic antics are “futile and childish;” I agree that they serve absolutely no common good. But they “bait” Muslim people into violence? They just make it too tempting to blow up a building? Nope! You don’t get to use violence in response to rhetoric, no matter how abhorrent the rhetoric.

And you know, the vast majority of Muslim people respond to bigotry by pushing back, or being disgusted, or voicing their disapproval, or being quietly angry, or organizing. It seems more than a little condescending and insulting to suggest that Muslims as a group just can’t help getting all bomb-y when someone pisses them off.

7 Billion

Today, the world’s population hits 7 billion (well, not exactly today, but that’s as good an estimate as any). PSI, a leading global health organization, has extensive coverage of this milestone in their latest magazine. On their blog, you can read posts about the population boom by Feministing’s Lori Adelman, global health advocate and blogger Alanna Shaikh, and yours truly.

It’s a fantastic site that contains a wealth of information. Read, comment and enjoy.

In Norway, Gender Equality Does Not Extend to the Bedroom

A must-read piece about intimate partner violence and rape.

Sexual violence against women in Scandinavia shares characteristics seen in more unequal societies: It is all too common and rarely reported, and those who commit it are even more rarely convicted. Ancient prejudices about male prerogative and modern assumptions about female emancipation conspire to create a thick wall of silence, shame and legal ambiguity.

One in 10 Norwegian women over the age of 15 has been raped, according to the country’s largest shelter organization, the Secretariat of the Shelter Movement. But at least 80 percent of these cases are never brought to official attention and only 10 percent of those that are end in a conviction, the Justice Ministry says.

Nowhere is this taboo more stubborn than in the family home, long considered off-limits for law enforcement and the state.

“The statistics tell us that the safest place for women is outside, on the street — most rapes happen at home,” said Tove Smaadahl, general manager of the Shelter Movement. In a 2005 survey by the Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, 9 percent of female respondents in a relationship reported experiencing sexual assault.

“No, we don’t have equality between men and women,” Ms. Smaadahl said, “not until we have addressed the issue of relationship rape.”

Wednesday Oct. 26th: Debating Abortion Rights at Trinity College

On Wednesday Oct. 26th I’ll be at Trinity College in Dublin, debating the resolution “This House Believes Abortion is a Woman’s Choice” (you can probably guess which side I come down on). My sparring partner is Serrin Foster from Feminists For Life. I hope Dublin feminists can make it! And, for any Irish readers, what should the debate touch on? Any particular resources I should check out, or points that I should make? My familiarity with abortion politics is fairly U.S.-centric, so I’m particularly open to suggestions that address Ireland specifically.

As an aside, I’ll be spending the week in Ireland (working for much of it, but getting to travel at least a little). I’m hoping to do three days on the western coast, and the rest of the time in and around Dublin. Any travel tips or recommendations?

Peace for women is world peace

The 2011 Nobel Peace Prize today was awarded to Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee, and Tawakkul Karman “for their non-violent struggle for the safety of women and for women’s rights to full participation in peace-building work.” These women are three of now 15 women to have won the award in its 110-year history and the first to win for work centered largely around the female 50 percent of the world population.

A brief note (so brief as not to do these women justice): Johnson Sirleaf is the president of Liberia and the first woman ever to be elected president of an African nation. Gbowee has brought women together across ethnic and religious lines under Women of Liberia Mass Action for Peace. Karman is a longtime Yemeni activist and chair of human rights group Women Journalists Without Chains; at the time the award was announced, she was sitting in her protest tent in the middle of Sanaa, as she has been for the past eight months.

In acknowledging these three women, the Nobel committee also acknowledges something that seems to escape a lot of notice in global activism: Advancing women’s issues is advancing world peace–not because freedom and democracy in Liberia and Yemen benefit men as well as women, but because half the world is made up of women. Women’s concerns are global concerns. Johnson Sirleaf, Gbowee, Karman, and the women who take risks to support their causes aren’t significant because they support women but because they take action to promote peace through avenues and populations that many other activists and leaders have neglected. And as I am far from qualified to speak about any of this, I’ll give over to Leymah Gbowee instead.

[The message I hope to send is t]hat the other 50 percent of the world–the women of the world–that their skills, talents, and intelligence should be utilized. And I think this message is a resounding agreement to all of our advocacies over the years. That truly women have a place, truly women have a face, and truly the world has not been functioning well without the input, in every sphere, of women.

HIV/AIDS and UNITAID

Writing in the Guardian:

Daniel is six months old, and one of the more than a million children in Africa born of HIV-positive mothers every year. Without prenatal treatment, up to 30% of these children will contract the virus. Daniel is one of the luckier ones, so far. His mother, Elise, found out she was HIV-positive eight months ago, while she was pregnant with him. She took the necessary antiretrovirals to decrease the risk of transmission. But Elise lives in rural Cameroon, and since she was diagnosed has travelled two hours by car every month to the closest clinic to get the drugs necessary to prevent transmission to her child. The travel is expensive, but she wants her son to be negative, and she wants to be healthy. The type of drugs she takes require consistent usage; if they’re taken intermittently, she can develop resistance, which requires moving on to different (and more limited) treatment options.

When she showed up at the clinic last month, there weren’t any drugs in stock. When she took Daniel in to be tested, she was told she would have to wait a month to find out whether her baby had HIV.

We’ve heard the statistics. A baby born in a developing country is 13 times more likely to die before she reaches the age of five than a baby born in an industrialised country. A woman dies every minute from pregnancy-related causes. Three-quarters of all women with HIV live in sub-Saharan Africa. Sub-Saharan Africa shoulders 25% of the world’s disease burden, but represents only about 10% of its population and has 1% of its health workers. Ninety per cent of babies born with HIV are born in sub-Saharan Africa.

You can read the whole thing here.

Dining for Women

A young fistula patient lays in bed. She is looking at the camera and smiling slightly.

Another great event in NYC: Dining For Women, a movie screening and reception to benefit the Fistula Foundation. From their press release:

NEW YORK CITY – The two New York City chapters of Dining for Women are partnering with Mount Sinai’s student chapter of Physicians for Human Rights to host a movie screening and reception to benefit Dining for Women and the Fistula Foundation on Friday, September 23rd, from 6pm – 9pm at the Goldwurm Auditorium in Mount Sinai Medical Center’s Icahn Institute (1425 Madison Ave @ E. 98th St.)

This event features the New York City screening of the documentary, A Walk to Beautiful, which tells the story of five Ethiopian women suffering from obstetric fistula: the incredible struggle the condition entails, and the arduous journey the women undertake to seek a cure and to reclaim their dignity and their lives.

The film features the work of the Fistula Foundation and Hamlin Fistula Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The mission of the Fistula Foundation is to raise awareness of and funding for fistula treatment, prevention, and education programs worldwide. What is obstetric fistula? It is the most devastating of all childbirth injuries – an internal injury caused generally by days of unrelieved obstructed labor. Without timely medical intervention – such as a c-section – to relieve the pressure of the baby’s head against the mother’s pelvis, tissue dies and the woman is left incontinent. Founded in 2000, the Fistula Foundation has grown to help women in 13 countries.

The NYC chapters of Dining for Women are proud to host this event and especially pleased to welcome Marsha Wallace, Founder and President of Dining for Women, and Gail Smith-Peay, Executive Director of Dining for Women. Marsha Wallace founded Dining for Women in 2003 with one chapter in South Carolina. Since that time, it has developed into an international, nonprofit organization of over 200 chapters. Dining for Women is a dinner giving circle, which meets monthly to fund grass-roots programs in education, healthcare, vocational training, micro-credit loans and economic development. These programs are aimed to improve the living situations for women and their families, by providing the tools they need to make changes.

The event doors opens at 6pm, and the keynote addresses will begin at about 6:15, followed immediately by the screening. After the film has screened, there will be a short Q&A featuring members of the production staff—one of whom is a DFW chapter member!—and additional guests. A suggested entry fee of $10 will go to benefit DFW’s operating costs, and additional donations will be accepted to benefit the Fistula Foundation. To reserve your spot, please visit http://benefit2011dfw.eventbrite.com/ and RSVP by Friday, 9/16.

For more information about the Fistula Foundation, visit www.fistulafoundation.org.
For more information about Dining for Women, visit www.diningforwomen.org.

It will be a fantastic event for a fantastic cause. Learn more about Dining for Women and the Fistula Foundation, and then RSVP for the event.

On CNN International at 4:30 EST today

Miss USA in a ridiculous American Flag costume

I’ll be debating the Miss Universe pageant, my thoughts on which were outlined here a few years ago. But if you have CNN International, tune in! And if you have thoughts pre-debate, leave them in the comments — would love to hear any information or arguments I may not have thought through. Here, basically, is my position:

The feminist arguments against beauty pageants are obvious, and have been around even before the famous 1968 demonstrations at the Miss America pageant in Atlantic City, which spawned that impossible-to-kill myth of feminist bra-burning. But in 2007, when women are attending college and grad school in record numbers, when the first female Speaker of the House is in power, and when women have unprecedented access to almost all professional fields, why are we still playing dress-up for money?

Despite achieving simple legal equality, women still lag behind when it comes to the higher-up positions in business, law, academia and politics. Our basic right to bodily autonomy is on the chopping block, as more anti-choice legislation and jurisprudence is introduced every year, sending the very strong message that our bodies are not just ours. Beauty is still one of the most valued characteristics a woman can have, and images of beautiful women bombard us every day. Is it any surprise that, in a culture which views women as objects to look at and vessels for reproduction, women will try to use the emphasis on their bodies to their own benefit?

Women are not stupid. We are rational actors who respond accordingly to our environments. From the time we’re little girls, we’re bombarded with images that reflect a very narrow standard of female beauty, and emphasize the idea that beauty (or at least the attempt to be beautiful) is a basic requirement of successful womanhood. If you happen to be blessed with the features that are culturally idealized (whiteness and thinness, among others), why not use it and make some money off of what so many other women do for free, and to feel good about yourself to boot?

Certainly plenty of women like dressing up, and like the ritual of putting on make-up and doing their hair and feeling pretty. Wanting to be perceived as attractive is no great sin, and isn’t strictly a woman’s concern. The difference, though, is that being attractive is considered much more important for women than it is for men, and women are required to spend much more time, effort and money on their physical appearance. While marketers are no doubt trying to breed male insecurity in order to push more product, women still dominate when it comes to the purchase of beauty-related goods. Women still spend millions on make-up, hair care, and lotions and potions claiming to do everything from eliminate wrinkles to get rid of cellulite to plump up breasts and lips. Women still make up most of the plastic surgeries performed each year. Women still account for the vast majority of people with eating disorders. Women are still the primary funders of the diet industry.

There is no shame in being one of the millions of American women who live in this culture and who structure their lives accordingly. I’m one of them. So are the women in the Miss USA pageant. Feminists have been leveling thorough and valid criticisms at beauty contests and consumer beauty culture for more than 40 years, and yet the contests persist. Women continue to participate in them, and we continue to watch them on TV. It’s no big mystery as to why: Beauty contest participants reap great financial benefits when they win, and American viewers are fully accustomed to evaluating and watching women for pleasure.

Ideally, beauty contests will eventually go the way of the dodo. The Miss USA pageant is not, by any stretch, good for feminism or good for women as a class. But it’s not happening in a vacuum. For 40 years, feminists have been arguing that pageants are a small part of a larger-scale system of oppression which positions women’s bodies as objects to serve others — to give them pleasure, to make them money, to sell their product, to birth their baby. While many Americans have duly noted beauty pageants to be silly and outdated, we often fail to recognize how they operate within a greater context of generalized and widely accepted misogyny.

Outsourcing Porn

This whole article is pretty interesting — who would have guessed that porn only accounts for 4% of the internet? — but this part stood out:

So what’s the most popular porn site on the planet?

The single most popular adult site in the world is LiveJasmin.com, a webcam site which gets around 32 million visitors a month, or almost 2.5% of all Internet users!

You’re telling me a webcam site is more popular than PornHub?

LiveJasmin is the most popular adult site on the Web by a huge margin.

Basically, it’s interesting that what men prefer the most is watching women strip on a webcam and being able to talk to them while they do, telling the women what they want to see. Once this became available (through high-quality broadband streaming of webcam video) it just shot to the top of popularity; it’s even more popular than the tube sites like PornHub and RedTube.

The fact that 2.5% of the billion people on the Internet are using LiveJasmin each month is pretty extraordinary.

A global phenomenon! Where do the webcam women come from?

Almost all of the webcam girls are from eastern Europe or southeast Asia. At $8-$15/hour with no benefits, it doesn’t pay enough for American women… except teenage girls and college students.

Most of the foreign women do it without the knowledge of their friends and family and only do it for Americans so that acquaintances in their homeland won’t hear about it.

I am apparently not a very savvy consumer of internet porn, because I’ve never heard of LiveJasmin.com. And I am certainly far from anti-pornography; if you want to get naked on your webcam / watch people get naked on their webcams, fantastic, enjoy yourself. I personally find the whole concept of webcam porn kind of cheesy and hilarious and I guess sort of like the pornography equivalent of a Xanga journal, or the next logical step after some hot AOL Chatroom action? Do you start the webcam session by asking, “18/f/NY wanna cyber?” But also I am 86, so what do I know. Have fun on your webcams kids.

Oh, but.

Read More…Read More…

Where Dark Tourism Meets Global Feminism

This is a guest post by Jessica Mack.
If you haven’t heard it before, you probably already know the concept. Dark tourism is what happens when former places of tragedy and horror become memorialized, then patronized by droves of tourists. Like Ground Zero in New York City, or Nelson Mandela’s prison cell on Robben Island. It’s where dark memories, human curiosity, and capitalism mix.