In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Where Dark Tourism Meets Global Feminism

This is a guest post by Jessica Mack. Jessica Mack is a Senior Editor at Gender Across Borders.

This summer while traveling in Southeast Asia, I learned a new term: dark tourism. If you haven’t heard it before, you probably already know the concept. Dark tourism is what happens when former places of tragedy and horror become memorialized, then patronized by droves of tourists. Like Ground Zero in New York City, or Nelson Mandela’s prison cell on Robben Island. It’s where dark memories, human curiosity, and capitalism mix. As the travel blog Vagabondish points out, with dark tourism there is a fine line between curiosity and exploitation. When I travel, as a feminist – and a very privileged feminist at that – I am constantly aware of that line.

I’ve written before about the value of shock in catalyzing meaningful social change, especially around issues of women’s rights. Graphic images and disturbing details are deeply troubling, and are triggers too difficult for many. But if bearable, they can be critical and experiential ways to deepen our work as activists.

It was in this spirit – part human curiosity, part social justice drive to witness, and part boredom – that I took a dive into the land of dark tourism one hot Cambodian afternoon a few months ago. On my last day in Phnom Penh, I hopped a motorcycle taxi to the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum. Tuol Sleng, also known as S-21, is a former high school that was converted into a prison by the Khmer Rouge from 1975 to 1979.

During those four years, an estimated 20,000 people were imprisoned, tortured, and killed. Right there, in the place you walk through. The museum’s website boasts 500 visitors a day now, which means that in just two months, as many voluntary, paying tourists will shuffle through as did torture victims and prisoners over four years.

Anyhow, I’m not really a new age-y person, but the energy in this place is heavy. Traveling through the maze of rooms is like walking through a spaghetti carwash of grief and horror. This becomes even more acute at the end, when you’re confronted with several walls of large, black-and-white prisoner mug shots. You stand there, gaping, and staring back at you, with deep fear in their eyes, are hundreds of men, women, and children who lived and died within those walls.

The photos are great quality so you can see very single detail of their faces. One woman’s prisoner number is obscured by the nursing baby at her breast. Seeing those eyes looking back at me – in particular the young girls and women – was too much. I sat down and heaved sobs.

For a second I wondered, why the hell am I here? Am I a weirdo that I chose to spend my last day in Cambodia like this? All alone, sweating profusely from the god-awful heat, and feeling absolutely helpless against the waves of horror I was taking in. I knew I wasn’t, I just had to remind myself that I was there on purpose.

When I finally exited, catching my breath, my motorcycle taxi driver smiled and waved me down. As we rode back through the evening rush hour, he began to tell me his own experience with the Khmer Rouge. His father, he said, had been a well-known army doctor. When the Khmer Rouge took power, and began systematic killings of the educated, elite, or suspected subversives, his father fled with his family to the country. There they set up in hopes of a simple, anonymous life. But his father was too well-known, and to save his own skin a neighbor alerted the authorities. Soon after, members of the Khmer Rouge arrived and shot him.

Immediately after delivering this horrible punch line, my driver nonchalantly offered me a stick of Doublemint Gum. In that moment, like a flash of lightening, I glimpsed the odd marriage of the mundane and the gruesome in Cambodia, where genocide is a solid part of the foundation on which the country’s present is built.

It’s not only like that in Cambodia, but other places around the world. When you travel almost anywhere in the world, you will see this, and it’s important to witness. Pain and suffering really are an integral part of reality – I think it’s just like the Buddhists say. In the US, Europe, and Canada we mostly have the funds and infrastructure to sanitize death or shut away horror.

Watching the world through feminist eyes, we see these walls break down and the result can be life changing. It’s not a result of hopelessness or helplessness, but one that should simultaneous deepen awareness of privilege, and strengthen commitment to action. Particularly among feminists who have the privilege to do so, it’s especially crucial to bear witness. So often in history’s tragedies – the Holocaust, the Khmer Rouge genocide, DRC’s ongoing war – women have either lacked the political, social, or financial power to change things, or have been singled out in their vulnerability to violence.

Traveling and participating in dark tourism, to a certain degree, is an important schooling in privilege as well. When I was in Ghana for work earlier this year, I visited Elmina Castle, the first slave-trading post in sub-Saharan Africa. It was built by the Portuguese, then served the Dutch and finally the British. An estimated 30,000 Africans passed through Elmina’s famous “door of no return” as they were loaded onto America-bound slave ships.

A black colleague and I took a guided tour, along with a plucky group of white Europeans who looked alternately clueless and troubled to be standing where their ancestors one might have. Some took typical smiling snapshots in the dungeon-like cells and I tried not to judge. I don’t believe my ancestors were slave-owners, but I knew that didn’t make me blameless in the hegemony of white power, by any stretch.

Walking through the stone-cold cells, I was mortified to realize how flimsy and one-sided my public school education had been on the history of the African slave trade. I had learned all about slavery’s proliferation and emancipation in the US, but next to nothing about the horror leading up to it: life for Africans in Africa during the trade. I was acutely aware of my privilege standing there, not only as a white person, but as an American. I was overwhelmed by the eloquence of our tour guide and the vibrant, gorgeous culture of this country I was spending several weeks in. I was so god damn sad, but also so lucky, to be standing in that castle amid the weight of history.

These experiences – which are deeply challenging on a personal and emotional level – mean so much to me, and I truly think can be a constructive, deliberate measure of deepening social activism. I call myself a “global feminist” because I strive to be globally minded. I live in a whole wide world, not just a house or a country. I want to connect, consider, and empathize with the realities of women 7,569 miles away. Or at least I will keep trying.


25 thoughts on Where Dark Tourism Meets Global Feminism

  1. “In the US, Europe, and Canada we mostly have the funds and infrastructure to sanitize death or shut away horror.”

    This is a very inaccurate generalization. What about the lives of many people of color, poor people, and particularly transgender people in all of these countries who regularly face horror, violence and death? Whether we like to admit it or not, the genocide committed against the Native Americans/First Nations people of the US and Canada continues today. They do not benefit from these “funds” or “infrastructure”. Such things are designed to keep the privileged in power and either oblivious, or able to ignore, ongoing oppression and atrocities.

  2. Yep, you’re right, and that was partly my point- while there are communities struggling in developed countries, by and large that realty is shut away or unspoken. I think it’s less relegate-able in many other parts of the world. I was by no means downplaying the difficult experience of those in the industrial world. It’s unhelpful to “compare” experiences of suffering, whenever you live in the world, and I’m not interested in doing so.

  3. ok: This is a very inaccurate generalization. What about the lives of many people of color, poor people, and particularly transgender people in all of these countries who regularly face horror, violence and death? Whether we like to admit it or not, the genocide committed against the Native Americans/First Nations people of the US and Canada continues today. They do not benefit from these “funds” or “infrastructure”. Such things are designed to keep the privileged in power and either oblivious, or able to ignore, ongoing oppression and atrocities.

    I think she means we have the means to hide these people and obfuscate their oppressions, not that we use these means to help them. Consider the relocation of homeless people in Vancouver during the Olympics.

  4. The we in question matters though. This whole discussion more or less assumes an audience of people who were/ are the ones who can afford to ignore or remain ignorant of the fucking terrible things in life. For a lot of people the fucking terrible things are inescapeable parts of their lives or their families lives. Tourism to sights of past attrocities means something different in that context.

  5. But his father was too well-known, and to save his own skin a neighbor alerted the authorities. Soon after, members of the Khmer Rouge arrived and shot him.

    Immediately after delivering this horrible punch line, my driver nonchalantly offered me a stick of Doublemint Gum.

    The driver’s behavior both in being open about his story and being unemotional about it suggests that he’s overcome it as an event in his life and moved on (and probably did so a long time ago). He didn’t let it crush him (otherwise he probably would not have been there that day) and he doesn’t seem to let it hang as a constant burden over him (otherwise he probably would not have been so forthcoming about the story). On the other hand, you were hearing it for the first time, so it was totally natural to have the completely different reaction of horror. Maybe his offering you a stick of gum was even his way of subtly flaunting his nonchalance, to show that yes, this happened, but yes, I have moved past it.

    Museums, too, partially serve a similar purpose. No matter how detailed and human visual designers can show us the faces, and no doubt they are real, the displays also imply a message that X event being depicted is firmly in another world, firmly in the past, and no longer a threat to whatever present society erected the museum. To a country overcoming a relatively recent horror such as Cambodia, such subtexts are important. True or not, they construct a narrative from a distance that implies both that the past is safely behind us, and that society is not afraid of confronting it.

    Anyway, in the name of bearing witness, I found this video of the museum you described (it’s actually the first link on YouTube)-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-SI8RF6wDE

  6. ok:
    “In the US, Europe, and Canada we mostly have the funds and infrastructure to sanitize death or shut away horror.”

    This is a very inaccurate generalization.What about the lives of many people of color, poor people, and particularly transgender people in all of these countries who regularly face horror, violence and death?Whether we like to admit it or not, the genocide committed against the Native Americans/First Nations people of the US and Canada continues today. They do not benefit from these “funds” or “infrastructure”.Such things are designed to keep the privileged in power and either oblivious, or able to ignore, ongoing oppression and atrocities.

    I slightly take issue with this comment because it implies that poor people and people of colour don’t benefit from living in developed nations, which seems to absolve them from the guilt or responsibility of being collectively wealthy on the backs of other people. Being poor in Germany is not like being poor in Cambodia, and is definitely not like being caught up in genocide in Cambodia. Every German profits from the exploitative activities of Western companies.

  7. I have participated in dark tourism without having its name, I guess, and I really like your explanation and narrative here. Now I want to go to that museum when I’m in Cambodia, which is maybe weird but hey! Why not!

    My one critique centers on your need to tell us that Ghana has a “vibrant, gorgeous culture.” No. It has a culture. People wear bright colors and have accents. You liked it. Ohio also has a culture, but I doubt you would describe it as “vibrant” or “gorgeous” because it’s not exotic, foreign, and full of people of color. Seriously, the words “vibrant” and “gorgeous” in travel writing are almost exclusively used by white people to describe the cultures of brown people. For example, you might describe Mexicans as “vibrant” but I doubt you would thus describe the Irish.

    Ghana could also, I imagine, be described as “poor” or “full of crushed discarded water bottles, the bane of all developing nations” or as “having actual people with leprosy and elephantiasis begging on the street.” Such a description would be equally accurate.

    This is not meant to be nitpicking, though it may sound indeed nitpicky. Rather, it is meant to show that our (white American) reactions to travel tend to make us sort the world into either things that are horrific or things that are “vibrant and gorgeous” and we have a real real need to counteract the one by an insistence on the other.

    This act is a form of exoticization that strips cultures of their complexity and of their everyday character which is–when one looks at daily life–one of deep normality that is actually (in the absence of our foreign desires and viewpoints) really banal.

  8. I think she means we have the means to hide these people and obfuscate their oppressions, not that we use these means to help them. Consider the relocation of homeless people in Vancouver during the Olympics.

    This frequently happens in the developing world, too. Often for the benefit of those same Western tourists, so that they can travel to unspoiled paradise without seeing the poor people their tourist dollars have displaced. It happens because of Western “dark tourism,” when the government decides that it must mediate foreign reactions to unpleasant complexity. Misery stays safely in the past, out of the realm of complicity.

    One thing about this piece: Tuol Sleng was only one of the prison/killing sites built by the Khmer Rouge. There were hundreds, all over the country; they were part of an elaborate structure of repression, torture, and murder. And there are thousands of mass graves. 20,000 is also a small fraction of the total. Nobody is entirely sure how many people died, or what the proximate causes of death were; the Khmer Rouge also inflicted starvation, displacement, ruinous war, and general chaos on the Cambodia. And then, of course, we inflicted all of those things on Cambodia. But estimates range up to 1.5-2 million, or nearly a third of the population at the time.

  9. Pretty much nobody.

    Cambodians! Cambodians look, and care, and Western white people, feminists included, are generally ignorant of the history of this part of the world.

    Please don’t pat yourself or feminism on the back in reaction to a post about one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in modern history. It’s gross.

  10. You article really resonated with me as I found the same of thing in SE Asia when I went. When my travelling companion and I visited the Killing Fields, we were shocked to see people taking pictures of the exhumed mass graves. Am I being picky? There were pieces of bone sticking out of the ground for god’s sake. Literally you would see pieces of white sticking through the walking path and people were photographing this as well.

    On the other hand, and not related to Cambodia, I thought the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin (the square with all the different sized blocks of stone and museum underneath) was memorable (for artistic reasons and otherwise) as well as very respectful. These places and events need to be documented but it is so hard to prevent these places from turning into turnstiles of disconnected tourists!

  11. While I generally agree with the sentiment of this piece, I really don’t like the phrase dark tourism. It sets up a divide between those experiences and a “normal” type of tourism. I think it’s incredibly important for people visiting other countries to see (in a respectful, and often carefully managed, way) the bits of that place that are troubling or saddening or challenging. Robben Island and Khayelitsha are every bit as much a part of Cape Town’s past and present as Table Mountain or the waterfront. We shouldn’t be setting up Tokyo as the norm while singling out Hiroshima as a slightly sinister sounding “dark” alternative.

    And I second the comment about the OP’s description of Ghana. I cringed when I read that passage — the combination of the generic “vibrant” description coupled with praise for the (presumably local) guide’s eloquence was more than a little unfortunate. I understand the sentiment the author was getting at, but surely there was a better way to say it (particularly since, although I don’t think it was her intent, the way it is worded makes it possible to read the author as saying that the terrible history of Elmina Castle is part of the “vibrant, gorgeous” culture of the country, in a weirdly festishizing way).

  12. Rosie: You article really resonated with me as I found the same of thing in SE Asia when I went. When my travelling companion and I visited the Killing Fields, we were shocked to see people taking pictures of the exhumed mass graves. Am I being picky? There were pieces of bone sticking out of the ground for god’s sake. Literally you would see pieces of white sticking through the walking path and people were photographing this as well.

    Photography can be a really important way of processing tragedy. When I was 17, I went with a group of other young Jews to Poland, to visit abandoned Jewish sites and concentration camps. I have about 400 pictures from that week. It helped me process then, and it helps me remember now.

    That said, the hotdog stand outside of Auschwitz was really…ugh. And in Cracow, it was weird to see non-Jews “celebrating the rich Jewish culture of the past”. Erg.

    Basically, I feel like, if you’re an outsider and doing this kind of dark tourism, you need to tread carefully and be sure that you’re being as respectful as possible. I think you have to be cautious not to let your, rightly, horrified reaction try to trump the experiences of those it has directly affected.

  13. piny: Cambodians!Cambodians look, and care, and Western white people, feminists included, are generally ignorant of the history of this part of the world.

    Please don’t pat yourself or feminism on the back in reaction to a post about one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in modern history.It’s gross.

    Calm down. Take a deep breath. Light a cigarette if need be. If not, chewing gum could be a good substitute.

    Yes, I’m sure many (hopefully most) Cambodians care. They should. But the key words in my post are “pretty much.” Cambodia has a population of approximately 15 million. We exist on a planet of approximately 6.9 billion people.

    So, looking at those numbers, isn’t it safe to say most people are ignorant of this catastrophe, regardless of their race/sex/religion/ethnicity? Go out on the street tomorrow and ask the first 100 non-white people what they think of the atrocities Pol Pot’s regime inflicted upon Cambodia’s populace after taking control of the country after the Vietnam War. Go ahead. Check it out. Let us know how that works out for you.

    Piny, it’s not just Western white people. I know on this site they wear the crosshairs best, but I think human beings in general don’t care. Oh! But if it’s THEIR family being gassed/incinerated/bombed, then it evolves into a travesty. Call CNN/ABC/NBC/CBS and the motherfuckin’ United Nations.

    All week long I’ve been hearing 9/11 this or 9/11 that. Thousands of American died that day. But the Khmer Rouge killed so many people we CAN’T COUNT THEM ALL. But do we even want to? Why should we? They weren’t in the towers of the WTC on 9/11. So who gives a damn?

    THAT is what is beyond gross, piny. THAT is what you have to accept as a citizen of this realm called Earth. That’s humanity–and reality.

  14. Thank you for this thoughtful article. Something that resonated with me when I was in Cambodia was the ability of the Cambodian people, who have been through so much, to continue on, smiling, open and hospitable. There is a warmth and generosity in that society that I have not felt elsewhere and I think it is one we can learn from.

  15. Esti:

    coupled with praise for the (presumably local) guide’s eloquence was more than a little unfortunate.

    I think you might be projecting a little on the OP with this part (although I agree with your assessment of ‘vibrant’). She never calls the guide eloquent, just relates a story he told her and his subsequent nonchalance about the shocking (to her) topic. I don’t think it’s disrespectful of the guide.

  16. “I don’t believe my ancestors were slave-owners, but I knew that didn’t make me blameless in the hegemony of white power,”

    That line really bothers me. The actions of people in the past absolutely shape your experiences in the present, but they do not confer guilt or innocence on you. It is your own actions – or inactions – that do that. You can bear no blame for things done before you existed – even horrible things done by those related to or resembling you. You can, and did, express horror and empathy and disapproval, but your self flagellation over something that you had no part in seems self centered to me. Would you claim credit for something someone of your race did in the past, if it were a positive thing? If not, then why accept blame? You can care about a situation or event without being guilty of causing or allowing it.

    I also took issue with the “vibrant, gorgeous culture” comment, but someone else already addressed that.

    Overall, I did like this article. It was an emotional and personal examination of “dark tourism” and processing tragedy, and it touched upon several important historical sites and events.

  17. Shoshie:
    Wow, Marksman2010, that may be the most condescending thing I’ve read all day.Kudos.

    Maybe, but its mostly true. Although its not a reflection on their character. People have limited time and resources and they need to make decisions on how to spend them. Our society functions by specialization. Marky, explain to me how every single person is going to be educated on the details of every single genocide ever. How many do you know about? 5? 10? 15?
    I do think people on this site tend to expect more of whites, males, westerners for some bizarre reason.

  18. Everyone annoyed about my use of the word ‘vibrant,’ point taken, but what was behind my choice of that word for MY experience of Ghanaian culture, in a very contained period of time (not the culture on a whole), was the totality of my experience there and which this post doesn’t fully cover. Suffice it to say I chose vibrant, which to me means pulsating, up and down, memorable, etc., because my experience of Ghana was a combination of these issues/things: abortion, sexual violence, delicious food, intimidation, wonderful new friends, gorgeous landscape, loneliness, history, ruminations on tragedy, contemplation of privilege, etc. etc.

  19. Jill: think you might be projecting a little on the OP with this part (although I agree with your assessment of ‘vibrant’). She never calls the guide eloquent, just relates a story he told her and his subsequent nonchalance about the shocking (to her) topic. I don’t think it’s disrespectful of the guide.

    In reference to the taxi driver in Cambodia, she only remarked on his nonchalance (and I had no issue with that). But when describing her experience in Ghana, she said: “I was overwhelmed by the eloquence of our tour guide and the vibrant, gorgeous culture of this country I was spending several weeks in.”

Comments are currently closed.