In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Why We Fight

Courtney Martin has an interesting interview with Sisterhood Interrupted author Deborah Siegel about feminist in-fighting. A few of Siegel’s comments really struck me, including her characterization of the underlying issues in the inter-feminist conflicts:

In the early days of the second-wave women’s movement — and actually all the way through the 1990s — feminists debated whether the best way to make serious, lasting change was by changing the world outside or changing ourselves. Today, we’re debating the merits of “choice feminism” and “Sex-and-the-City”-style empowerment, but we’re asking ourselves the same question: What needs transforming, our head or the world? Depending on your answer, feminism becomes a culture or a cause.

The individual versus the collective solution does seem to be a major divide, even though I suspect many feminists would say that both our head and our world have to change. I think we just differ on the proportions.

The latest fight, as Martin points out in her questions, seems to be the Mommy Wars — something that many feminists have been arguing is over-hyped and largely created by a trend-hungry media. Siegel agrees:

You know, I’m not a mom yet, but my best friend, who’s an active professional and a mom, keeps telling me how peacefully SAHMs and moms who work outside the home coexist in her social circle. The media really has the whole “war” thing overblown. It’s a great distraction from the real work that needs to get done (and that groups like MomsRising and the Mothers Movement Online are, thank goodness, now doing).

So what can we learn from the past? Not to believe the hype. Mainstream media have been historically lame about truthfully covering women’s realities. Other lessons from the past: Read books like Adrienne Rich’s Of Woman Born.

I’m with her on that. And now I want to read her book.

Full Frontal Feminism



Jill and Full Frontal Feminism. Because of the giant ego!

So I said that I was taking a break, but here I am.

I’m writing specifically in response to the number of criticisms of Jessica Valenti’s new book, Full Frontal Feminism. As far as I can tell, several of the critics haven’t actually read Jessica’s book, but that hasn’t stopped them from taking other bloggers’ words at face value, and indeed leveling broad judgments against Jessica because of the book’s cover. So, to start, I’ll say that I have actually read the book. All of it. I finished reading it more than two weeks ago, and have been meaning to write a review, but hadn’t found the time. But after reading the criticisms that other bloggers have thrown at Jessica, I’m a little heated. So, first, review time, and then response time.

Read More…Read More…

Call for Younger* Feminists

A professor at Mary Washington is conducting a research project, and is looking for women to take a survey about their beliefs and experiences. Women of all ages and belief systems are invited to participate, but they are particularly in need of younger feminist perspectives. If you’d like to help her out and take the survey, click here. It should take about 30 minutes — and I hope you’ll take it, since feminist voices are always important!

*”Younger” is being defined by the survey conductors as 18-25.

From The Special Moderation Queue

The “unclear on the concept” edition:

Considering the fact that you’re feminists and most likely therefore lesbians wearing jean shorts, hiking boots and flannel shirts, who in their right mind would WANT to (your words) “fuck with” you?

Posted in Uncategorized

Calling All Feminists and Yogis

If you’re in New York, come get a great stress-relieving work-out and help women at the same time. It’s a yoga class open to all levels, and it’s by donation — and anything you give will go to Women for Women International, a great group which assists women in war-torn nations. The details:

Wednesday, 1/24
2:30-3:45pm
Laughing Lotus Yoga Center
59 W19th St, 3rd fl (between 5th/6th aves)
By donation (proceeds go to “Women for Women International”)

Hope to see some of you there!

Purity or Integrity?

What would you rather be — sexually pure or a person of integrity?

The purity balls are back, but this time for boys. And since they’re for boys, “purity” isn’t the issue, since apparently that requires having a hymen. No, boys are supposed to have integrity. Which apparently means looking at women as objects to be bought — and when you’re buying something, you want the newest model. They do a better job at explaining this than I can:

After the meal, Jackie Detweiller spoke to the gathering about her experiences. Detweiller is an attractive 19-year-old young woman who is practicing abstinence. She told the tale of a person who had waited a long time to buy the car of their dreams, but when the day arrived to drive it home, the dealer told them that the steering had problems, that it had a lot of mileage on it, and had been in a few wrecks. She likened this word picture to sexual purity and the hopes for a future spouse.

Read More…Read More…

So, what do you hate yourself for?

Jill asked this question on Alas, and I’m ganking it and pretending that it’s an actual post by me:

Moving away from the highly predictable “Fat is unhealthy! Let me come in here and explain how unhealthy it is because you have probably never, ever heard this before! I’m doing you a favor!” conversation, I think a similar analysis can be applied to reproductive rights — that is, for many feminists, having a feminist ideology can make you feel like you have a greater obligation to make the “right” choices and not screw up.

I’ve never been unintentionally pregnant, but some of my feminist friends have. And the reaction I see most isn’t guilt over abortion or inability to decide what to do, but feelings of foolishness and stupidity. These same women would never judge anyone else for getting unintentionally pregnant. They understand that birth control fails, that things happen, that we’re human. But when they get accidentally pregnant, they feel like they should have known better because they’re feminists and they have all the tools to know better. That’s what they beat themselves up over.

As I said, I’ve never been pregnant. But if I were to have an unintended pregnancy, I imagine I’d be thinking along the same lines: How did this happen to me, when I “know better” because of my feminist and reproductive rights work? How could I be so stupid?

I see a parallel there to the body image conversation, and the individual frustrations that feminists face when they have body issues. It’s not a perfect comparison, but perhaps one worth discussing. Thoughts?

Honestly, I get the sense that this is something that can be applied to the way women are taught to think about themselves and their choices, period–no matter how normal their decisions or how unappealing their options. Motherhood–including the decision not to become a mother–is one of the handiest examples only because women are so frequently defined, one way or another, as babymakers and baby raisers. And the choices they have are often defined as free when they usually aren’t. Early moms vs. late moms. Stay at home moms vs. working moms. Daycare moms vs. homeschool moms. Too many children. Too few children. Children with the wrong partner or no partner or too many partners. As though these decisions were no more difficult or forced than picking out a bathing suit that most flatters your figure, and as though most people can just walk away from a paycheck or repair a loveless marriage or pull money out of thin air. Should you quit your job? Should you look for a restrained floral print or a dark solid?

The effort required and the potential consequences for the chooser are represented as trivial, so much so that she should be ashamed of even worrying about her own comfort and eventual happiness. Any ambivalence on the part of the chooser is chalked up to a lack of committment. At the same time, the potential consequences for the rest of the world–spouse, economy, national security, little babies both immediate and distant–are presented as cataclysmic.

Bodily changes are treated the same way. Your pain is minor. Your effort is meaningless. The idea that anyone else should be required to look at your fat ass or scarred thighs or verdant treasure trail, however, is disgusting. And as with life choices, it’s the woman’s fault that she managed to end up with a mustache or stretch marks or arm fat. They’re not inevitable, they’re something she should have been able to predict and fight. You know what your mother looks like! Why weren’t you prepared?