Publius at Obsidian Wings wrote a post about high-risk pools:
Here’s the nickel version. McCain’s proposal seeks to push more people into individual plans (rather than employer plans). The problem, however, is that lots of people would be disqualified on the individual market on the basis of, say, pre-existing conditions. In response, some states have established programs where the government subsidizes insurance companies to take on these higher-risk, high-cost individuals. McCain has made these pools a lynchpin of his larger plan – indeed, he has to, given that he’s otherwise doing literally nothing for people with pre-existing conditions. (Jonathan Cohn has a more extensive background on these programs here).
(You should read the whole thing, which discusses high-risk pools both as they are and as they fit into the proposal.)
Everything Publius says about high-risk pools is true. They are a very thin veneer over the worst failure of the market solution.
Instead of writing people off completely, high risk pools offer less care at a higher price. Thus, better than absolutely nothing, which is what the industry is otherwise prepared to offer them. But they’re not a solution, especially for people who can’t pay several thousand or several hundred thousand dollars for treatment. These people–the sickest, the poorest, the most vulnerable–are cut off from the rest of the population and forced to accept a much greater burden. Kinda like now.
And that’s the quick point I wanted to make: This isn’t just the problem with McCain’s proposal. It’s the healthcare crisis. It’s the problem his proposal is supposed to solve.
It isn’t that “high-risk” candidates would be fucked on the individual market. They already are fucked on the individual market and have always been fucked on the individual market. It’s not profitable to provide healthcare to them, so they get no healthcare, so they suffer and die.
High-risk pools are a slightly less severe version of this same toxic dynamic: those who need most pay most and still receive the least help. The extra cost is prohibitive; the deficiencies are basic and torturous. (Also–“high risk” is a very broad category. It doesn’t just mean people who are very sick or sick right now. And as most of you probably already know, out-of-pocket is so costly that it becomes prohibitive at a very basic level.)
The high-risk arrangement doesn’t just expose one segment of the population to disease and death, either. It means that health ceases to have social worth right around the time an illness becomes serious enough to require social assistance. It means that the system incorporates a lack of interest in providing treatment to people who need it.
If we use the insurance industry as a rubric–and like Publius says, that’s exactly what McCain wants to do–that line really does creep downward to problems most people would not define as life-threatening or incapacitating–or uncommon–let alone terminal. So cooperative healthcare is itself protection worth paying for on a community level, and high-risk pools aren’t.