In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

More About the Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints

FLDS
FLDS founding patriarch Rulon Jeffs with his last two wives — sisters Edna and Mary Fischer — on their wedding day. He received the pair as a 90th birthday present.

The recent raid on a fundamentalist Mormon sect in Texas has been all over the news, and it’s a tragedy from all angles — sad that it happened in the first place, sad that there are hundreds of children with no place to go, sad that only the women and girls are having their faces shown on TV while the men who exploited them maintain some privacy. But as Sara Robinson points out, there’s a lot more to the story than just the headlines about polygamy — this is about a right-wing cult’s ability to completely separate itself from the rule of law and the protections and oversights that our society is supposed to afford all its citizens.

The FLDS had its own hospitals, which it used as tools of social control:

FLDS communities put a priority on providing as much health care inside the community as possible, so they’re not dependent on outside medical professionals. (To this end, pregnant mothers have often been sent to Hildale or Bountiful in their last months, so they can be attended by the FLDS midwives there.) Hildale/Colorado City has its own hospital — built partly with public funds — that has employed only doctors and nurses who have pledged their first loyalty to the Prophet.

As a result, the group’s women and children get much of their primary care from people who feel no accountability to established medical standards of practice, state record-keeping requirements, or any of the existing mandated reporter laws. (Most people in these communities have no idea these laws even exist.) The spotty record-keeping that results is why the state of Texas has made the wise decision to do DNA testing on all the kids: it cannot be taken for granted that their birth certificates are accurate (or, in some places, exist at all).

The FLDS has also co-opted mental health services into another form of wife abuse. In Hildale/Colorado City, FLDS doctors have proven quite willing to declare unhappy women crazy. Daphne Bramham found that up to a third of FLDS women are on anti-depressants; and that women who are express acute dissatisfaction with the life have often been committed to mental hospitals in Arizona by the community’s doctors. According to Bramham, the fear of being labeled insane and shut away in an institution is one of the most potent threats the community has used to keep women in their place.

And their own police and court system:

Much of the power of the prophets has been drawn from the fact that they historically controlled both the cops and the courts that served the Hildale/Colorado City area. Though these were officially chartered law enforcement agencies and nominally public courts, they weren’t concerned with civil law. Instead, their task was to enforce the law according to the FLDS and its Prophet. The people in these communities had no effective recourse to the laws the rest of us live under. They could be arrested, fined, jailed, and have their property seized by nominally “official” cops and courts, acting under full authority of civil government, for violating church laws.

And women who tried to escape were dragged right back to their families, or to the hospital for a mental health examination.

There’s not even oversight for the dead:

These communities also bury their own dead (and at least one has its own crematorium), which opens the way to record-keeping anomalies with death certificates — and ensures that no questions will ever be asked, and no autopsies will ever be performed. Given the genetic instability and volatile control issues within this group, it may not be wise for them to have the means to dispose of dead bodies without official oversight. We need to be asking questions about who’s in their cemeteries and crematoria, how they got there, and what kinds of records are being kept.

Lots of disturbing stuff. Read it all.


41 thoughts on More About the Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints

  1. Calling it disturbing is nearly dealing in euphemisms- this stuff is demented and wretchedly, horribly sickening.

    For anyone that’s interested in reading more about the subject- from an ex-Mormon, no less- pick up Under the Banner of Heaven by Jon Krakauer. Krakauer is better known for Into Thin Air (fatal Everest expedition) and Into the Wild (loner dies in the wilderness), but Banner is extremely well-written and, IMO, far more relevant to modern society. Not exactly an easy read (because of the subject matter- his writing is excellent, again IMO), but an informative one.

  2. Another good book on the subject is Escape, by Carolyn Jessop, one of about eight “wives” of the man who’s now running FLDS in Warren Jeffs’ absence. Harrowing stuff. What’s especially tragic is that this college-educated woman—she was, IIRC, one of the last FLDS women to graduate from college—was truly convinced that there was no salvation for her outside the sect, and that everyone outside her narrow little society was doomed.

  3. As I grew up in the LDS church (not to be confused with the FLDS) I’ve long been researching this subject. Kind of a “there but for the grace of the Flying Spaghetti Monster go I.” If some of my ancestors had made different choices, I’d be walking in those pastel skirts.

    I think Sara makes some excellent points regarding oversight of the community. The police force in Colorado City/Hildale (the enclave before the El Dorado/YFZ ranch was set up) was completely under FLDS control. The cemetery on the outskirts of town tells an even more disturbing story:

    http://pixelfish.livejournal.com/370964.html is my old post about the cemetery. Here’s some disturbing facts as reported from this page here:
    http://childpro.org/2005/fbi_letter.html

    One disturbing thing which I hadn’t come across in my readings before, but which has apparently come to light in the last year, is the existance of the “Babyland” graveyard in Colorado City. Here are the quick statistics on it:

    425 graves

    56 entirely unmarked child graves

    227 child graves all together for a total of 53% children under 10

    A high number of children suffering from strange accidents. A disproportionate number of children who just happened to be “run over”. A number of children who have just “disappeared”. The death rate is particularly high among boy children, ages 11-20.

    (Side note: that was a few years ago, when I first discovered these stats. At that point the cemetery in question had only been in operation for a few years, and yet, the number of deaths seemed abnormally high for a population of maybe 10K.)

    http://childpro.org/2005/fbi_letter.html – Read this. Chilling allegations about child deaths, punishments, and disappearances.

    http://scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0503/S00014.htm – Has a picture of a section of “Babyland”.

    Teresa Nielsen Hayden of the blog, Making Light, also has this post from some years back, which tells of two girls who tried to escape the FLDS:
    http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/004560.html

    The two Fawns ran away in the aftermath of an internal upheaval within the FLDS. Warren Jeffs became upset with some of the men and assigned their wives and children to more faithful followers. (Which is something I point out to folks yelling about the CPS “breaking up families”. There is no autonomous family structure in the FLDS group–just whatever Warren Jeffs says.)

    If you follow the links at my posts and Teresa’s you’ll find stories about how the FLDS leaders systematically used the welfare moneys to line their own pockets. They preach to their followers that this is “bleeding the beast”–that it’s acceptable to lie and steal from the US and state governments, that god gives them dispensation.

    The police force, the doctors, the town officers, the teachers are all under control of the FLDS church. (Which is organised as a communal structure, where all property is deeded through the “prophet”.)

    BTW, it really bothers me that they have been practicing with the almost tacit knowledge of both the Utah and Arizona governments (though I’m told that Janet Napolitano had made cracking down on Jeffs a priority). But for decades this behaviour went on, unchallenged. (Partly because of the abortive Short Creek raid in 1953. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_Creek_Raid

    Then the Arizona agencies were pressured by the national attention, complete with the pictures of “women being torn from their children.” After that raid, the community became more insular than ever, and in some way, led to the situation today.

    I really really really hope that Texas doesn’t back down, because it may pave the way for Utah and Arizona to finally take decisive action.

    Again, this is one of those things that produces a cold shiver up my spine–many of those girls could be my distant cousins.

  4. He was given a set of young sisters for a birthday present?! Ugh, yuck, damn it and hell!! They’re women not suits, ties, pipes or whatever else you give 90 yr old men as presents…you sure as hell don’t give old lecherous men two sisters!!

    Isn’t nice when religion means you can as many young, underage wives as you want? Its so great when God wants what you want..isn’t it?

  5. A *birthday present*?!?! Are you kidding me or what? Even within their mindset, it seems like that would kind of undermine the narrative about women being precious helpmates or whatever if they get *explicitly* (as opposed to implicitly) handed out like door prizes.

  6. Jill, something I’ve been wondering: for whatever reasons, the Arizona AG’s office has repeatedly started investigations into goings-on in Colorado City / Hildale, only to never actually pursue any large-scale cases against the leaders of the community. As I understand it, the government of Utah has actually been much more proactive in dealing with the problems caused by the FLDS. In the absence of leadership at the state level, what options are open for dealing with what is clearly a fringe sect that, at the very least, holds the mores and values of the country in which it’s located in contempt? (Specifically, their practice of “bleeding the Beast” by soaking up government assistance and subverting civil institutions such as law enforcement and healthcare.)

    I’ll reluctantly cede the need to avoid another Waco (while at the same time believing that the Waco tragedy was more due to botched execution than being a bad idea per se), but given that both Arizona and Utah have explicit constitutional bans on polygamy, shouldn’t that be enough to justify action on the part of the AG, even in the absence of legislation outlawing multiple marriage / polygamous cohabitation? I mean, isn’t that why the US government of the time insisted upon the inclusion of very specifically-worded anti-polygamy clauses in Arizona’s and Utah’s constitutions in the first place? I understand the difficulty in finding witnesses willing to testify against their entire community, especially given the nature of the FLDS’s socialization of its children, but it seems like an adequately determined AG or DA would be able to build a damning enough case strictly by putting the FLDS elders on the stand and cross-examining them.

    I single out Arizona’s AG because, from what I’ve read, Utah’s AG has been much more aggressive in pursuing cases against the FLDS, but the jurisdictional gamesmanship implied by building a town on the Utah / Arizona state line has allowed the FLDS to get away with murder (perhaps literally). Governor Napolitano clearly knows that FLDS is bad news, from a long time back but she’s refused to do anything about it since becoming governor: http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/search/?keywords=Polygamy%20in%20Arizona

    Clearly Texan authorities decided the situation was intolerable; my question, inasmuch as I have a constructive one, is what kind of deathgrip do conservative Mormons have on the Arizona legislature, why do they support something mainline Mormons long ago decided was incompatible with their larger goals, and what can outsiders do to hold Arizona’s government to account anyway?

  7. Forrest — I see your point, and god only knows if this was a polygamous community of black people the gummint would attack it with rocket launchers. However, I do think part of the reasons prosecutions have fallen apart in the past is the impossibility of getting anybody to testify. Maybe DNA testing will make a difference. If you can say, absent testimony, that these men have fathered children with girls and that therefore they have incontrovertibly commited statutory rape, it may finally be possible to get more of them in jail. That should have a powerful chilling effect on the future attractiveness of this particular mode of exploitation. Though I don’t know enough about Utah law, it may be that the age of consent is 14 and the plural marriagers have been wily enough to wait till these girls’ fourteenth birthdays to start raping them. In which case maybe, really, nothing can be done. Because no doubt most of these girls and women will attest to having consented, where can they go if they sever their community ties?

  8. Pixlefish: My God! That’s evil beyond imagining, if they really did murder teenagers and prepubescent boys. I hope the authorities get to the bottom of that while they have the chance. If there was widespread murder of young boys going on, I’d hope one of their mothers would eventually cry out. They can’t all be that brainwashed.

  9. FLDS founding patriarch Rulon Jeffs with his last two wives — sisters Edna and Mary Fischer — on their wedding day. He received the pair as a 90th birthday present.

    Weapons-grade creepy. @_@

  10. but given that both Arizona and Utah have explicit constitutional bans on polygamy, shouldn’t that be enough to justify action on the part of the AG, even in the absence of legislation outlawing multiple marriage / polygamous cohabitation? I mean, isn’t that why the US government of the time insisted upon the inclusion of very specifically-worded anti-polygamy clauses in Arizona’s and Utah’s constitutions in the first place?

    Yeah, but these are not legal marriages. The way that they get so much welfare, as someone mentioned, is that most of the women are registered as single women with dependent children.

  11. It would not surprise me if young boys were murdered. With all this news coverage and discussion, my husband (came from a country where these sects don’t exist) asked me where were all the younger men with their wives. I am assuming they were competition for the older men. Is that right?

    I find the entire thing disturbing; that we tolerate the subjugation of women and children in the United States all the while we are fighting the Taliban and Osama bin Laden (has how many wives?).

    Another reason the government is investigating and doing DNA testing is because alot of this was funded through taxpayers – welfare. These men have multiple wives all collecting welfare checks. Add up how many dependents each woman is claiming and we are talking about a good sum of money.

    Overall it appears to be organized crime by a bunch of sexual predators.

  12. One thing that keeps being ignored about this group in the media coverage is its explicit racism. The Southern Poverty Law Center has a good post here.

  13. I see your point, and god only knows if this was a polygamous community of black people the gummint would attack it with rocket launchers.

    Yeah, it’s hard to look at the situation and not compare and contrast it to the much more relatively harmless MOVE and what happened to them. The main substantive differences other than race are the location of the FLDS out in the middle of nowhere and the fact that all of the FLDS violence has been directed towards members of their own community.

    Though I don’t know enough about Utah law, it may be that the age of consent is 14 and the plural marriagers have been wily enough to wait till these girls’ fourteenth birthdays to start raping them. In which case maybe, really, nothing can be done. Because no doubt most of these girls and women will attest to having consented, where can they go if they sever their community ties?

    As I mentioned a couple times, Utah has been more aggressive about pursuing justice on these issues. Not enough to shut down Hildale completely, but enough to keep the bulk of the community on the Colorado City side. The Phoenix New Times series I linked to goes into the jurisdictional issues and relative strictness of Arizona and Utah’s law enforcement in some detail.

    I say this based only on my own surmise, but it seems to me that the official LDS hierarchy has a clearly vested interest in preventing their reputation from being tarnished by the FLDS, which is a tiny fringe, and given the influence the LDS has over the Utah government, they’ve encouraged more aggressive investigation of the FLDS in Utah.

    Of course, they did allow the community to persist, so they’re clearly not blameless. The Short Creek Raids only explain so much.

    Yeah, but these are not legal marriages. The way that they get so much welfare, as someone mentioned, is that most of the women are registered as single women with dependent children.

    That’s why I included “/ polygamous cohabitation”. The constitutional language used is intended to close the exact loopholes the FLDS elders are exploiting. It’s quite explicit. I do agree, though, that the entire way the FLDS structures its discourse with the outside world is designed to frustrate evidence-gathering and the traditional mechanisms of jurisprudence. That’s why I posed the question to Jill (as, y’know, a lawyer) in the first place.

    I have a major problem with cults and cultish sects, especially when they’re so clearly contravening both the letter and the spirit of the law and the American social compact. Even if only as a taxpayer, I don’t want to see my values mocked by a group of people who are using my tax dollars to enable their mockery. (And really, that’s only the beginning of my objections to the FLDS’s shenanigans.)

  14. It would not surprise me if young boys were murdered. With all this news coverage and discussion, my husband (came from a country where these sects don’t exist) asked me where were all the younger men with their wives. I am assuming they were competition for the older men. Is that right?

    Yes. FLDS doctrine states that each man has to have a certain number of wives to make it into the Celestial Realm, so obviously something has to be done about the surplus of younger men competing for wives. There have been a number of (heartbreaking) stories of the “Lost Boys” that the church cast out to fend for themselves. Given that the whole sect is built on the belief that you’re condemned to Hell if you’re cast out of the community, and that the teachings of the church reach deep into the skulls of these boys, I’m not sure it’s possible to get across the depths of their abjection and trauma after being cast out. The Phoenix New Times series I linked up above has a number of stories, and there are others on the NYT if you search their archives.

    I find the entire thing disturbing; that we tolerate the subjugation of women and children in the United States all the while we are fighting the Taliban and Osama bin Laden (has how many wives?).

    That’s exactly the part that bugs me the most too.

    One thing that keeps being ignored about this group in the media coverage is its explicit racism.

    I guess I didn’t call that out because racism just scratches the surface of this group’s overwhelming hatred for the entire world outside their community. Racism, homophobia, xenophobia (although I haven’t really seen much attention paid to the links between the US FLDS and similar hardline / fringe Mormon settlements in Canada and Mexico), misogyny — there’s not a whole lot of bigotry the FLDS doesn’t subscribe to, which is a cheap irony given their near-primal belief in themselves as a martyred, persecuted minority.

  15. I used to live in San Angelo, which is just down the highway from Eldorado and I remember when this group first came into the area. I’m actually a bit surprised – and sickened – that it took the authorities so long to raid the place. This comes from a purely ‘I don’t like organized religion’ place, but I think it’s ridiculous what people can do under the umbrella of ‘religion’. Abuse and kill their children by denying them surgery and life-saving medication, girls and women treated like chattel and breed stock, young boys maimed and humiliated, adults who dare to go against the teaching of their church ostracized, the list is endless.

  16. There are some great organizations doing work to help people leave cults. One in the Midwest that has helped people I’ve met is called Free Minds. Their motto: “At Freeminds we believe that nobody really joins a cult. They simply postpone leaving.”

  17. This situation is grotesque, but I’ve been thinking about it with regard to the feminist value of listening to/believing women’s experiences, voices, and self-definitions of the circumstances of their lives (especially over the words of the police/govt.). Many of these women are insisting that they aren’t/weren’t forced into marriage or sexual activity, that they excersize choice, agency, and free will.

    It seems obvious that this isn’t the case, and that these women are quite literally, brainwashed by the patriarchy, in every possible sense. How can this be reconciled? I know that many feminists resent the idea of oppression, coercion, and exploitation as they relate to things like sex work, BDSM, feminine attire and appearence….the tendency is to accept a woman’s statement of consent.

    For the record, I certainly think the women and children in this case have been raped and abused. But how do we listen to and respect their own framing of this?

  18. Coming across this posting was the best thing for me. I have been very interested in this story since it began. I watched the videos on foxnews.com and the women seem like they are programmed to answer questions. They don’t understand what they are being asked, they can’t hear the questions, they don’t answer the questions correctly or fully, it’s just amazing. They seem numb to what is going on. But, since their children have been taken away, maybe it’s a good act to put on? The one reporter at Fox News says to the women in one of the clips about abused women who are afraid to answer questions correctly in fear for their lives. I hope that thought will help these women and their children to safety. There is so much life to live. Growing up in Central Pennsylvania I have been around the Amish community. I do believe a pure life exists in that community, but with the FLDS, I have to say there is no such thing.

    God help them.

  19. A lot of the boys end up on the streets in Vegas or LA or Phoenix or southern Utah. Sometimes they end up in houses that they share together–some of the boys try to help new ones out–but a lot of times they end up as prostitutes or drug addicts or both. And in almost all cases, they STILL think they are going to hell and that all the non-FLDS people are out to get them. They often have paranoia about outsiders which makes them difficult to help out. It’s heartbreaking.

  20. It seems obvious that this isn’t the case, and that these women are quite literally, brainwashed by the patriarchy, in every possible sense. How can this be reconciled? I know that many feminists resent the idea of oppression, coercion, and exploitation as they relate to things like sex work, BDSM, feminine attire and appearence….the tendency is to accept a woman’s statement of consent.

    I think the situation is analogous (in some ways, but not in others) to the conundrums posed by those societies who practice FGM as a coming-of-age ritual performed by elder women on girls. Which is to say, I don’t think there’s a single solution to all the issues raised, and there may not be any solution that bridges the values of the women of the FLDS with the “basic values” held by America at large.

    From the accounts I’ve read, one of the most effective threats used against FLDS wives is that of either taking their children away from them or of harming them as a way to coerce their mothers into behaving “properly”. So to promise these women they won’t be separated from their children if they leave the community, and that their children will not be harmed is one thing. And another is assuring them that they will never be divorced from their husbands and wed to somebody else by a third party — again, from the narratives I’ve read, the breaking up and reforming of families is a way the elders maintain control. But at the same time, they’re raised to believe that their entry to heaven is contingent upon them being one of a set of wives, and they’ve also been trained to believe that the outside world is against them, is out to trick them, and is otherwise a set of trials set to tempt them into damnation.

    This isn’t like deprogramming cult members, and is one of the reasons I avoid calling the FLDS a cult. Most cult members come to them as adults, or were raised by parents who came to them as adults, so there’s a preëxisting set of values to use as a basis for comparison when trying to bring them out of the cult mentality. The FLDS has been as close to a hermetically sealed culture as you can create inside another country for the last century, and since the mothers tend to start having children very young, that means there have been more generations for all this behavior to get set. That the entire culture is warped, and designed to resist outside influence, is obvious to people outside the frame (the most telling thing I’ve read about the FLDS is that children are raised from infancy to not tell anyone outside the community their names – or who their parents are), but to those inside the community (with the exception of the elders who manage relations with the outside world, who I think are the real monsters of the FLDS) it’s a consistent, complete society.

    There’s also the question of the younger husbands in the community (one of the most pernicious things about FLDS society is the way it reduces everyone down to husbands, wives, and children — there are no other categories available), but a big part of me just wants to say “fuck them”. The number of men who truly benefit from the FLDS social structure is tiny, but the rest of them are way higher up the kyriarchy (h/t Sudy) than their wives or children. They’re complicit, both in the abuse of the women they claim to treasure, and in the expulsion of the boys who would otherwise ruin their chance at heaven.

  21. I find the entire thing disturbing; that we tolerate the subjugation of women and children in the United States all the while we are fighting the Taliban and Osama bin Laden (has how many wives?).

    Haven’t you figured it out? The goverment isn’t gonna just fight a war to help out the women and children in the Middle East. That’s an added bonus. It’s just like the North didn’t fight the Civil War to end slavery. They fought it to keep the states together. The end of slavery was a by-product. The government isn’t gonna go and raid all of these polygamous sects just because they treat women and children like chattel. Nobody gives a s*** about women. If they’re helped in the process, great! If not, well, no one will exactly notice. /snark

  22. Forrest:

    “…the much more relatively harmless MOVE and what happened to them.”

    FLDS is creepy beyond words and I admit to being a little freaked out by the lobotomy-cadence of the FLDS-mothers in interviews, but to refer to MOVE as “much more relatively harmless” just doesn’t make sense.

    Harmless to who?

    – MuscleDaddy

  23. Muscle Daddy, surely you are not suggesting that dropping a firebomb on an entire city block and burning 50 houses down, was justifiable?

  24. Absolutely not – my point of debate was how “Harmless” MOVE is (or more to the point, isn’t)

    – MuscleDaddy

  25. Since they were slaughtered like dogs, they are no longer harmful, harmless, or anything else.

    Are you justifying that action here? If not, let the dead rest in peace, please.

  26. MuscleDaddy, you missed comparison class. MOVE took up one block in Philly. FDLS is creating cities and includes thousands of people. That makes them “relatively more harmful”. I’ve gotta go with Daisy here. One of the most corrupt police forces in U.S. history dropped a bomb on these people. Let them lie in peace and focus on the living for now.

    AlicePaul wrote: “t seems obvious that this isn’t the case, and that these women are quite literally, brainwashed by the patriarchy, in every possible sense. How can this be reconciled? I know that many feminists resent the idea of oppression, coercion, and exploitation as they relate to things like sex work, BDSM, feminine attire and appearence….the tendency is to accept a woman’s statement of consent.”

    Someone who is brainwashed “in every possible sense” would be little more than a robot. Cults don’t need that kind of power and their members aren’t complete idiots.

    Cults thrive by fulfilling basic needs that mainstream society fails to provide. These women are not complete idiots: they have gained companionship, childcare, health care, and a relatively safe community (as compared to what you see on any Law and Order show every day). My feminism tells me to respect these women but not their decisions. My feminism tells me to provide alternatives that they may not know are possible. Support those groups that shelter cult survivors.

    Most of all, I wish they had pulled the men out and left the women and children in a place they feel safe.

  27. MuscleDaddy, your point is a fair one. MOVE were a dangerous, cultish organization (although the pages you link are far from impartial). My personal take on MOVE is that they lived in that weird grey zone between commune and cult that so many groups ended up in during the 70s, and were headed towards the far, bad end of craziness, no matter how idealistic they started. The authorities had the right and responsibility to deal with them, but bombing the compound was disproportionate, tragically risky and even insane behavior for a law enforcement organization.

    My point is that MOVE harmed (and had the potential to harm) a much smaller number of people than it seems the men of the FLDS have. The FLDS elders have potentially subverted the civil institutions of a swath of Utah and Arizona, defrauded state and federal governments, dumped who knows how many of the boys in their community on the streets – friendless and alone, raped and sexually brutalized a large percentage of the women in the community, abused their own children, and through neglect or purposeful action allowed infants in their care to die – and this has been going on at least since the Rulon Jeffs / Warren Jeffs takeover of the sect in the 80s. They have totally warped the lives and well-beings of the thousands of people under their control. They’re not the only organization of their kind I have such strong feelings about, but it’s clear to me that they’re a danger, to the women and children of the FLDS at the very least.

  28. Speaking of the boys, the AP reported these numbers, which seem extremely suspicious, to say the least:

    Of the 463 children, 250 are girls and 213 are boys. Children 13 and younger are about evenly split — 197 girls and 196 boys — but there are only 17 boys aged 14 to 17 compared with the 53 girls in that age range.

    Where did all of the boys between 14 and 17 go? You almost hope they’re on the street, because with everything Jill and others were posting about suspicious deaths, you can’t help but wonder.

  29. FLDS Children in custody, the numbers according to Salt Lake Tribune:
    http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_9091635 (I can’t seem to find these same numbers on the Texas Dept of Family & Protective services site, http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/ )

    There are a total of 463 FLDS children – 250 females, 213 males – in state custody in Texas. Here is a breakdown of that count:
    * 0-2: 101, 49 females, 52 males
    * 3-5: 99, 46 females, 53 males
    * 6-9: 131, 68 females, 63 males
    * 10-13: 62, 34 females, 28 males
    * 14-17: 42, 27 females, 15 males
    * Disputed age: 26 females, now classified as 17 or younger.
    * Two boys who turned 18 while in state custody also have voluntarily chosen to stay with younger boys.
    Source: Texas Child Protective Services

    By that, the kids under the age of 6 (most likely born on the ranch, or newborn when moved there) leaned towards males, but when you get to the 6-9 year olds, the number of boys starts to taper down, and continues shrinking as we get to 10-13 & 14-17. Creepy, indeed.

Comments are currently closed.