In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Sorry Horowitz, Academics Won’t Shill for the Right

Quick intro: I’m Ryan. I’ve only been blogging for a couple months and, in that time, I have contributed to both Why Are We Back In Iraq? and Watching the Watchers. A few days ago, I started a blog called Imposter Syndrome that will chronicle my experience as graduate student in the Hoosier State. I haven’t found a home for this piece, so I thought it would be perfect for a feministe guest post. I hope you enjoy it.

(Note: This is an expanded, and more satirical, version of a letter that I wrote to the Indiana Daily Student. It was published about a month ago and can be found online here; it’s the second one.)

Welcome to the world of Indiana politics. With the first Republican Governor in 16 years and a few new Republican lawmakers (including at least one Elvis impersonator) the Hoosier State is in for a hell of a lot of interesting, and ultimately useless, legislation as a just matter of state governance. (Think Texas politics with a lot less money on hand to throw around.)

My letter to the IDS deals with HB 1531, a proposed “Academic Bill of Rights”. Now, I don’t have to point out to the astute reader that this is a great title for a bill like this. It’s up there with “No Child Left Behind” and the “Clear Skies Initiative”. Who could be against civil rights for students and professors? Who could oppose this bill?

That’s obvious to David Horowitz and Sarah Dogan, the leading figures behind the Students for Academic Freedom: It’s the pink-o commie behind the lectern, that’s who.

If you’re not familiar with David Horowitz, then consider yourself lucky. He’s the prolific civil rights advocate and editor-in-chief of the conservative outfit frontpagemag.com. I pretty much think he’s a moron, but I’ll let you judge for yourself. Let’s thank Media Matters for America for making things easier on me by sharing this beauty:

Modern liberals are socialists, they’re not liberals. What are they liberal about besides hard drugs and sex? Everything else they want to control in your life. That’s true of the Democratic Party. It’s true of the British Labor Party. They’re socialists. That’s their religion.

Horowitz made this statement for a 2004 documentary titled, “Roots of the Ultra Left”, which was produced by the Leadership Institute. Yep, that’s the same Leadership Institute that “trained” “Jeff Gannon”.

Getting back to the actual bill, its main purpose is to protect students and professors from discrimination based on any political, religious, or ideological leanings. As far as state universities in Indiana go, this whole “controversy” has revolved around the case of Brett Mock’s experience at Ball State. As far as I can tell, he was upset that a Peace Studies course he willingly enrolled in did not discuss perpetual warfare as viable alternative to world peace. An op-ed by Ball State Pres. Jo Ann Gora revealed that “[i]n fact, Mr. Mock has never made a direct complaint to the university – formal or informal – and he waited until months after the course had concluded before first making claims in an article published by Mr. Horowitz’s online magazine.” Gee, I wonder if Mock got paid by Horowitz for that article.

Also, no op-ed would be complete without a rebuttal that doesn’t address the issues raised. More specifically, Dogan and Horowitz do not establish that there isn’t sufficient administrative machinery in place to address the discrimination of students at the hands of professors. This is because they can’t. They’ve tried, believe me. Just visit their site.

To wrap things up, I have just a few questions for those in support of this legislation. Since when are professors supposed to be high priced babysitters? If you’re so concerned with being recruited by the Communist Party against your will, why didn’t you apply to Bob Jones University? (You get a pass on this one if you did, but weren’t accepted.) And finally, do you consider yourself to be Republican, or even Libertarian?

If you answered “yes” to this last question, I think you need to clarify that position with a comment. Wasn’t it your hero Ron Reagan who claimed that “man is not free unless government is limited…. As government expands, liberty contracts”? If you want to bring government control into institutions that have shown an ability to police themselves, go ahead. I don’t think you’ll particularly enjoy the consequences. Also, stop bastardizing the word “conservative”.

Finally, to David, I’d like to express my sentiments, and those of many of my fellow Hoosiers, with what Melvin Udall tells his neighbor in the 1997 film As Good as It Gets: “Sell crazy someplace else, we’re all stocked up here.”

(For some useful information on how to fight HB1531, visit the Indiana Conference of the American Association of University Professors (INAAUP). For now, the bill is dead in the water), but it might be a good idea to make some calls to make sure it stays that way.)


6 thoughts on Sorry Horowitz, Academics Won’t Shill for the Right

  1. I just realized that the “dead in the water link” refers to the 1999 General Assembly. I’m pretty sure it’s still accurate, and with the Dems refusing to lay down over the Inspector General legislation, I doubt this issue is a priority right now.

  2. David Horowitz rants: Modern liberals are socialists, they’re not liberals. What are they liberal about besides hard drugs and sex? Everything else they want to control in your life. That’s true of the Democratic Party. It’s true of the British Labor Party. They’re socialists. That’s their religion.

    while it never fails to amaze me how deeply Republicans & conservatives misunderstand Democrats & liberals, it is often a mirrored reflection of the misunderstanding Democrats & liberals have of themselves…

    it reminds me of when Dean followers were running around telling everyone he was anti-war, pro-environment, pro-gay marriage, a transparency advocate, anti-corporate & the like when even a cursory examination of his record as Governor & his statements while campaigning would have shown the fallacy of all these views. but hell, people thought Kerry was anti-war too….

    anyway, i’m not trying to promote thread drift here. we’ve got a local “I’m a VICTIM of the SYSTEM” Republican here at a local college whining as only a white man can – in fact, he’s one of Horowitz’s poster boys for the vicious campaign of suppression our socialist leaders have been directing against poor widdle conservatives who goshdarnit are just trying to promote “diversity”… this despite the fact that he was granted tenure (y’know, as opposed to having threats made on his life & the lives of others, his car painted with swastikas, the state governor & board of regents calling for the termination of his job, being subjected to a national smear campaign, et cet era…).

  3. hmmm…i’m going to continue the thread drift (especially cause I know that Ryan won’t mind lol).

    While it’s true that Governor Dean’s record in Vermont isn’t as “liberal” as Dean followers (I’m one) would like it to be, I think you’re way off with the “statements” part of your post, jam.

    Governor Dean clearly was to the left of Kerry, on the campaign trail, especially on the subject of Iraq. While the term “anti-war” would be a stretch (Rep. Dennis Kucinich can be more accurately considered the “anti-war” candidate in the 2004 race) there is no doubt that Governor’s Dean’s views on the war were in line with the millions of people in this country who have marched outside to protest the Bush Administration’s illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq and the needless death of over 1500 United States men and women, hundreds of thousands (but not even counted by the Pentagon) of Iraqi civilians, and dozens of journalists from around the world.

    As a New Yorker who proudly stayed home during the 2002 New York City Mayoral elections because a former liberal named Mark Green and his hard turn to the right while campaigning, I will only support Democratic candidates who remember what party that they are running for.

    I like Dean. He may not be a liberal. But he listens to us…and he supports us (I like Kerry, too…but maybe I like Kerry more now since he’s been doing the right things since he was forced to stop fighting a stolen election) and I hope he fights for us.

    If he turns out to be one of those guys like Bush who lie when they run for office, I’ll be one of the first bloggers to attack him. I wasn’t crazy about what Dean had to say about abortion the other week, but I do appreciate the fact that he is trying to broaden the appeal of the Democratic Party. Words are one thing, though, action would be another. Pro-choice is and always will be a “litmus test” with me.

    peace

  4. Ron, i’m a bit confused… how exactly am i “way off”? is there some characterization of Dean i made that was inaccurate? if you’d like i could provide you with more info on each characterization (btw, “being to the left of Kerry” means little, given Kerry’s positions).

    there is no doubt that Governor’s Dean’s views on the war were in line with the millions of people in this country who have marched outside to protest the Bush Administration’s illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq

    actually, Ron, this is where you are way off. the people who marched did so to protest the war. in other words, they were against the invasion. Mr. Dean was not against the invasion. he simply wanted a different timetable & UN approval (y’know, so it could be a “legal” invasion). he even talked about the threat of WMDs, just like King George & Co. – so, no i wouldn’t say the millions of people who marched & Mr. Dean are really “in line” at all with each other (& it’s sad you think that the desires of millions of people could be reduced to a political platform as simplistic as Dean’s).

    If he turns out to be one of those guys like Bush who lie when they run for office, I’ll be one of the first bloggers to attack him.

    but he’s already done so – broken campaign promises, not to mention promises made during his tenure as governor (not that it’s easy to check anymore since he had his records sealed). so, if he lied while campaigning for governor don’t you think he’d lie to become president?

    Pro-choice is and always will be a “litmus test” with me.

    pro-choice is a good litmus test (& like you pointed out, Mr. Dean is already showing signs of waffling – gee.). but y’know another good litmus test? the willingness to invade other countries & massacre thousands of people to advance US foreign interests. Dean seemed fine with the idea, though he differed in his methodological requirements. hell, Clinton ensured the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis without ever even declaring war…

    of course, Dean is not the only one. the Democrats have rarely been anti-war or anti-imperialist… i’m confused as to how they get perceived that way.

    p.s. i’m curious as to how Kerry was forced to stop fighting a stolen election? i seem to remember him conceding the day after the election. he put up even less of a fuss than Gore did (& that’s not saying much).

  5. The truth is that most of what you wrote in response is basically true. The other day I just felt like sticking up for a democrat…go figure. i think you were a little hard on Dean. But…only Kucinich was really, really anti-war.

    But as for Kerry. It’s obvious that Kerry and Edwards didn’t make that decision. Just like it’s obvious that Gore didn’t make the decision to back down four years ago when he had a much stronger position (the popular vote numbers). It’s the DLC…and hell…the fucking chicken ass alist bloggers who don’t want to commit “political suicide” that forced us to accept another obviously stolen election.

    Kerry is one of the few politicians who has been talking about election reform (he couldn’t object like Boxer in January because it would have destroyed any credibility Conyers and etc. had).

    None of those politicians ever really represent the left…maybe one day.

  6. None of those politicians ever really represent the left…maybe one day.

    maybe, one day, dude… maybe one day.

    & THAT will be a good day, no?

    peace.

Comments are currently closed.