In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

More Anti-Abortion Laws Come To The Table in Indiana

These proposed laws coming to the Indiana House Public Policy and Veterans’ Affairs Committee are piggy-backing on some of the more disgust-worthy legal actions across the nation. Both bills are suspect for many reasons, but the most interesting implications lie in that they proclaim to help women make better choices and protect women’s health, but when held up to already standing laws, do neither. Whatsoever.

From Planned Parenthood Indiana:

Senate Bill 76 (SB 76) would require a health care provider to offer a pregnant woman the opportunity to view an ultrasound image or hear the heart tones of the fetus before performing an abortion. This bill does nothing to improve the quality of care received by patients. Indiana’s informed consent law already insures that patients receive full information on the abortion procedure, possible risks, and alternatives available. All Indiana abortion providers already perform an ultrasound before any abortion, to confirm the gestation of the fetus; all patients are welcome to view the ultrasound at that time. However, a fetoscope cannot detect a heartbeat until 16—20 weeks gestation, and even newer Doppler technology cannot measure heart tones until 8-10 weeks. 58% of abortions are performed by 8 weeks’ gestation; with advances in surgical technique and the availability of abortion by medication, the percentage of early abortions will only increase.

“Supporters of SB 76 may say that their aim is to reduce the number of abortions; Planned Parenthood Advocates of Indiana knows that in reality, this is a politically motivated bill with no medical value, and that the best way to reduce the abortion rate is to ensure universal access to birth control and education services. Watch for anti-choice forces to insert part or all of HB 1607 into this bill.

House Bill 1607 is a dual assault on a woman’s right to choose. First, HB 1607 would require the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) to establish special procedures for the regulation, inspection, and licensure of some abortion facilities. New regulations like those proposed in HB 1607 not only force the state to spend money on implementation and enforcement, they increase the cost of abortion for both providers and patients, without improving patient care or safety. Indiana abortion providers already meet CLIA, OSHA, IOSHA, and ISDH standards, and according to the ISDH, the complication rate for first trimester abortions is less than 0.5%. While the author of the bill claims that it was written to protect women’s health, the bill would only regulate those providers who perform 4 or more abortions in a month, leaving women who can afford an abortion in a private office rather than a clinic unaffected. An amendment to correct this oversight was voted down.

“HB 1607 would also assume, without any medical evaluation, that every fetus of at least 24 weeks’ gestation has attained viability, despite the fact that every fetus develops at an individual rate, and the fact that it’s impossible to determine viability in such a generalized fashion. Most of the scientific and medical communities approximate viability somewhere between 24-28 weeks. Four times the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that fetal viability must be determined by a doctor on a case-by-case basis (Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 1976; Colautti v. Franklin, 1979, Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 1989; Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 1992).

“Planned Parenthood Advocates of Indiana opposes this blatantly political attempt to interfere with a woman’s privacy and with sound medical practice and judgment, which was summed up best by one pro-choice legislator, who called the bill what it is: vicious, mean, racist, classist, and sexist. HB 1607 did not move to the Senate, but the Speaker of the House has listed it as one of his priority bills for resurrection. This attempt of anti-choice legislators to override the judgment of trained medical professionals and the Supreme Court will likely resurface when SB 76 and SB 568 are heard.”

Oh, and did I mention we are also home to the KKK?

Come to Indiana! We’re right neighborly.


8 thoughts on More Anti-Abortion Laws Come To The Table in Indiana

  1. Barry here in the gret stet of Louisiana – home of that bastion of tolerance and decency, David Duke. If our legislators get a whiff if this bill it is sure to be introduced. Sigh.

  2. Hey, come on down to Bloomington! Bloomington is the liberal oasis of Indiana. If it weren’t for good old blue Bloomington, I’d have left this state long ago…

  3. Wow.

    Have they done a witch check sink/float test on the abortion doctors yet?

    Indiana needs an influx of liberals…now.

  4. I cannot wait to leave this state (Indiana) after I finish my undergrad studies. And people wonder why there’s a “brain drain” in this state. Maybe it’s because our legislators keep chasing people out of the state with these kinds of backward thinking, ultra-Conservative laws. I hope I get accepted into a Law School either on the East Coast or West Coast, even though the cost of living out there is ridiculous. Any Blue, Liberal, pro-women’s-reproductive-rights friendly state would be fine with me.

  5. As a native of “Hoosier”-Land, I’m not surprised. Remember, this is the land where Dan Quayle (‘how DO you spell potato?’) and Bobby Knight (‘torture, nah, I just kicked him, that’s all!’) are worshipped.

    And yes, most young people — or at least the non-redneck ones who do have half a brain and don’t drive a four-wheel drive with a Confederate flag license plate and gun-rack in the rear window — do leave for much greener (or ‘bluer’ depending on your take of things) pastures.

    I love this state but the narrow-mindedness of some of its people just boggles my mind. Unfortunately, it’s going to get worse before it gets any better.

  6. Raised in Lake County, college at Purdue, watched my family make the transition from Lake to Porter to Marion and, finally (?), Boone County. (I ran off to Seattle as soon as I had a degree in my hand.)

    LIke the Southeast, Indiana is a very small-to-medium town culture. Used well, it means people can be self-sufficient and creative to keep things going. Used poorly, it becomes the shell around which you avoid and sometimes irrationally fear the rest of the world, even it has something worthwhile to offer you.

    Minorities are few and far between in Indiana compared to other Big Ten states, still are looked upon with a lot of mistrust, and they tend to be isolated as much as possible. (Northwest Indiana, which has a huge AA and growing Latino polulation, is socially outcast – it’s part of Chicagoland, unless someone wants to deflect noticed corruption downstate with corruption there instead. Not that it doesn’t have it’s problems, but…) Indianapolis at one time had a thriving AA culture, but it petered out in the 1960s and hasn’t recovered since.

    Even when it isn’t their fault – the industrialization of dairy farming in Demotte, for example, which brought in a lot of Latinos willing to work cheap, and a lot of pollution and sudden infrastruture needs to a pretty narow-minded majority-Dutch-American poluation – they tend to take most of the heat – green beats brown, sadly. And in areas like small-town Indiana, you get your green while and where you can.

    The KKK can still make noise, but they really aren’t anything to worry about these days within the state. My youngest sister lives with her family in Nobelsville, where they used to have their state headquarters – the suburban growth of Hamilton Township chased them further south in the state, and presently their numbers are small. They try to make the occasional stink when they want to march in whatever town’s parade they feel will get them attention, but that’s about it.

    The religous right, like in many states, became the grunts of the Repugs in Indiana, starting in the mid-1980’s, when industrial jobs began to leave (the first big kick was when the steel mill works took it in the shorts starting in 1978, but again, that neck of the woods doesn’t count.) They got their support and ability to rally together thanks to newspapers like the Indianapolis Star, which isn’t worth using to keep birdcages clean. These new bills in the legislature are their payment.

    There are beautiful stretches of hill country off of I-74, between Indianapolis and Terre Haute. I wouldn’t mind owning an acre or so down there some day, but I don’t cotton to the idea of living somewhere where the struggle to survive is responded to by using God to make you feel superior rather than thankful, considerate of the suffering of others, and at least a little bit humble.

    My two bits…

Comments are currently closed.