In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

How is Steroid Use Suddenly A Partisan Issue? (Or, Republicans Defend The Rich Guy Against The Whistleblower, Again)

I don’t care about baseball. Of the major sports, it is my least favorite. I don’t devote much effort to following sports at all, but I follow boxing most closely, followed by Formula One, Scottish football and … well, everything else is far, far behind. I watch more of the Stihl Timbersports series in most years than baseball. (No, really.) So I was not exactly waiting on the edge of my seat for the Mitchell Report.

I did note, however, that the hearings about steroids have mostly been moralizing and grandstanding, which are always bipartisan issues. Politicians love to adopt the posture of moral scolds.

Yesterday, though, a partisan pattern emerged, I think for the first time.

For those playing catch-up today, as I was yesterday, here’s the scoop: legendary pitcher Roger Clemens, who threw fastballs effectively well into his forties and has won more Cy Young awards (seven) than anyone in history, was accused of using human growth hormone and steroids by his former trainer, Brian McNamee. The former trainer says he did the injecting; there is some physical evidence to back him up and in an affidavit Clemens’s former teammate Andy Pettitte (who admits that McNamee injected HGH into him) claims that Clemens admitted to him that Clemens used HGH. Clemens, who says he wants to clear his name, was offered the chance to backpedal from public hearings after the evidence began to mount, but instead he went full-steam ahead and testified publicly that McNamee is lying, Pettitte is misremembering and he never used any illegal performance enhancers.

If you don’t care about any of this, I don’t expect you to start now. In fact, all of this background is an extended windup to make a partisan point.

Yesterday, Republicans (even the “moderate” ones like Chris Shays from Connecticut’s “gold coast,” but also Dan Burton, Tom Davis* and Darrell Issa) engaged in moralistic finger-wagging, and Democrats like Seth Waxman (who chairs the committee and is the unofficial most serious prosecutor in the House) engaged in moralistic finger-wagging. Shays and Darrell Issa, Republicans, called McNamee a drug dealer for providing players with performance enhancing medications; while Democrats were mostly interested in finding out if Clemens cheated to win money and fame and then lied to cover up his cheating.

That is to say, Democrats are worried that the rich, famous guy with all the advantages broke the law and the rules to become even more rich and famous, and then lied to get away with it. The Republicans openly idolized the rich, famous guy and were only interested in blaming the whistleblower. And that, right there, is why the Republicans have turned our economy back to the Gilded Age.

*Ranking Republican on the committee Tom Davis (R-Va) made an incredibly racist statement. He likened the tough questioning of Clemens, a white Texan, to lynching. Yes, he really did.


11 thoughts on How is Steroid Use Suddenly A Partisan Issue? (Or, Republicans Defend The Rich Guy Against The Whistleblower, Again)

  1. Even the sports radio talk shows were mercilessly mocking the Members of Congress on the committee for their humiliating behavior. I posted about this today on my blog.

  2. I’m glad I’m not the only one who noticed that the GOP members of this panel carried Clemens’ water for him. And I’m *really* glad that ESPN, who really has no reason to even note it, made mention of how hard the GOP portion went after McNamee.

    If I’m McNamee, this is how it goes down:

    Ridiculous Texasphilic GOP Rep.: Are you a drug dealer? Aren’t drugs illegal?
    Me: Isn’t warrantless wiretapping?

    And then I leave.

  3. Plus, weren’t Republicans huge into investigating ‘roids in the first place? Bush made mention of it in a SOTU, and McCain and Crazy Old Jim Bunning were your headliners in one of the earlier rounds of hearings.

    I’m assuming, natch, that this was done thinking they’d nail Bonds. Which they did, congrats. What they didn’t count on was that Bush pal Clemens would get sucked into the mix.

  4. Yesterday the two hosts of the noontime show on our local sports-talk station were talking about rumors that Clemens had been calling the Republican members of whatever committee is handling this and lobbying his case. Clearly he knew which party was more likely to pucker up for the buttocks of a rich white guy.

  5. Charlie was watching this yesterday here; I was only sorta listening. But he did laugh out loud when I asked him, “Won’t he get impeached if he keeps lying to Congress?” After all, it Did seem like he was about to get a blowjob from the Republicans, and we all know how “bad” those are!

  6. My dad noticed this at his work place — the conservatives there defend Clemens because the talk radio guys told them to, more or less.

  7. My question is…doesn’t Congress have more important things to be worrying about than if Roger Clemens used steroids and/or HGH? I’ve never understood why there were Congressional hearings about this kind of stuff.

    I think I say something about the Pat’s head coach having to testify about “Spygate” on Capitol Hill as well.

  8. I agree with Molly. I have been wondering why this issue is being heard by congress instead of in a regular court. Perhaps someone can explain?

  9. Just thought I’d throw in here that the so called whistleblower has a history of lying. Not only about the very business of steroids he once claimed to have not been a part of (pretty damn relevant), but he’s also accused by NY police of lying about a date rape using GHB that he was involved in (not relevant to the subject but shows a history of lying). So for the first time I found myself cheering for the repubs b/c this guy is actually a scumbag and trying to play some hero, and apparently some are actually buying it. I’d also point out the democrats on the hill seem to have their poor view of Clemens b/c of his ties to the Bush family. That’s pretty damn lame given their refusal to take Bush to task for anything he does, but hey lets nail a baseball player who supports him?? Not exactly a proud day to be a democrat.

  10. I think you mean Henry Waxman, not Seth Waxman. The former represents parts of West L. A. and is on the committee. The latter was Solicitor General in the Clinton White House and currently works at a Washington Law Firm.

Comments are currently closed.