In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The other side of the Missing White Woman

Perhaps many Feministe readers have been following this story, but if you haven’t, Seattle has been abuzz with the story of Amanda Knox, a University of Washington student studying abroad in Perugia, Italy. Knox is being held on suspicion of involvement in the murder of her British roommate, Meredith Kercher. In addition, two men, one of whom was Knox’s boyfriend at the time, are being held in connection with the murder.

I won’t delve too deeply into the details of the case, but Knox has certainly not helped herself with the conflicting statements she’s given to the Italian police, particularly concerning her whereabouts on the night of the murder. Despite this, Knox still maintains her innocence, so we will have to wait and see how justice plays out.

One of the interesting twists to this case is that one of the suspects in the murder of a young, attractive white woman is a young, attractive white woman. This woman from Seattle who is studying in Italy has some observations about some of the coverage in Italy the case has generated:

Since this murder, to be a college student from Seattle has become shorthand for something else. Ms. Knox has been called “una bugiarda” (liar), “L’Americana,” or my personal favorite, “La Luciferina.” Even worse, her image-destroying online postings, in which she appears to be inebriated, have become part of this media circus. Italians have gotten all too well acquainted with “la studentessa di Seattle” (thanks again for the great press). Laughing about her constantly changing alibi, they now often refer to her just as “Amanda.”

And of course there was that unfortunate online name she gave herself: “Foxyknoxy.”

Sophie Egan’s op-ed has more to do with the images Italians have of American students, and specifically those from Seattle. I found it striking, however, that Knox has been portrayed in certain gendered ways. As Egan points out, Knox seems to be increasingly portrayed as some sort of femme fatale. The Times of London has certainly obliged us as well:

Rudy Hermann Guede, a suspect in the murder of Meredith Kercher in Perugia, has claimed that Ms Kercher complained to him that Amanda Knox, her American flatmate, was a “drugged-up tart”.

Guede himself is in a good deal of hot water, given that police have evidence that he had sex with Kercher the night of her death and Kercher had been sexually assaulted prior to being murdered. So it’s to his advantage to portray Knox in as negative a light as possible. When a woman’s involved, slut-shaming with a good dose of female rivalry thrown in never seems to fail.

I’m certainly not implicating or defending anyone here. All of the suspects are in a lot of trouble, and the police have good reason to suspect their involvement. But this sad tale has layers of cultural baggage placed upon it, most notably the stock story of young women going wild abroad, and Knox has been placed at the very center of it, even though the exact nature of her alleged involvement still isn’t known. If Knox weren’t a suspect, I wouldn’t be surprised if the focus of the coverage would be shifted to Kercher and we’d be hearing more lurid details of her lifestyle.

It certainly doesn’t help that there is, as Dave Neiwert at Orcinus points out, an ugly racial element to this case as well. Both Guede and a previously arrested suspect (who was implicated by Knox, but who has been released from custody due to lack of evidence) are immigrants to Italy from Africa. Combine girls gone wild, Italian style with fear of immigrants, and you’ve got a pretty potent brew.


16 thoughts on The other side of the Missing White Woman

  1. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Many critics of “pretty white woman” news coverage seem to reserve their outrage for stories about pretty white women who are the victims of male violence. Saturation tabloid coverage of pretty white women who are in the news for their own alleged bad behavior is apparently not a problem for them.

  2. Many critics of “pretty white woman” news coverage seem to reserve their outrage for stories about pretty white women who are the victims of male violence. Saturation tabloid coverage of pretty white women who are in the news for their own alleged bad behavior is apparently not a problem for them.

    Are you serious?

    Good behavior, victimhood, or bad behavior — it’s no excuse for the fact that when women of color, queer women, and disabled women turn up missing or are victims of violence, you hardly hear a peep from the mainstream media outlets. But I’d bet it’d be fairly easy to find these women caricatured routinely as monsters for “alleged bad behavior,” as you put it. That’s the main criticism of overexposure to “pretty white woman” stories.

  3. “If Knox weren’t a suspect, I wouldn’t be surprised if the focus of the coverage would be shifted to Kercher and we’d be hearing more lurid details of her lifestyle.”

    There was a brief burst of “virgin or whore” when the case first came to light. There was speculation that she’s voluntarily got involved in an orgy and been killed when it got out of hand. Her dad actually felt he had to go on the record to say she wasn’t that kind of girl, it’s just horrid that he’d had to do that a couple of days after his daughter’s had her throat cut. Then as the investigation progressed she was announced to be “morally innocent” by the prosecutors and slotted into the appropriate category.

  4. There was speculation that she’s voluntarily got involved in an orgy and been killed when it got out of hand. Her dad actually felt he had to go on the record to say she wasn’t that kind of girl, it’s just horrid that he’d had to do that a couple of days after his daughter’s had her throat cut. Then as the investigation progressed she was announced to be “morally innocent” by the prosecutors and slotted into the appropriate category.

    Oh, yes, I remember that now. On top of that, another rumor going around was that Knox pressured Kercher to take part and was upset when Kercher refused. Clearly someone had to be “that kind of girl” here.

  5. It sounds like there’s a lot more attention being paid to Knox than any of the other suspects–the three men (one now exonerated) who the investigation has been describing as having raped and slashed the victim’s throat. It’s hard to attribute this to anything else than sensationalism over having a murder suspect who’s a young American college girl.

  6. But I’d bet it’d be fairly easy to find these women caricatured routinely as monsters for “alleged bad behavior,” as you put it. That’s the main criticism of overexposure to “pretty white woman” stories.

    Yes, I am serious. Think of all the teachers who have been in the news lately for sex with young students: Debra LaFave, Pamela Turner, etc. All women, all young and conventionally pretty women. Mostly white, as far as I can remember; I think there was a case involving an Asian woman somewhere. When the Minnesota Attorney General’s (pretty, young, white) daughters made a scene in a nightclub in Chicago, it was all over the Chicago papers and the story was covered constantly for about a year. The news likes to show pictures of attractive young women. I have no idea if they are disproportionately likely to feature stories with white women as criminals or as crime victims, but I’m not sure that the whiteness matters to a lot of people who complain about these stories anyway; it’s not like most of the critics this supposed media sensationalism took the day off when the New York papers were covering Imette St. Guillen’s murder.

    I think it’s possible to raise questions about race and the media’s coverage of violence against women without referencing the “missing pretty white women” meme. The phrase is problematic because it’s often used by nonfeminists in a context that implies that news about violence against women is tabloid fluff unworthy of attention.

  7. It sounds like there’s a lot more attention being paid to Knox than any of the other suspects–the three men (one now exonerated) who the investigation has been describing as having raped and slashed the victim’s throat. It’s hard to attribute this to anything else than sensationalism over having a murder suspect who’s a young American college girl.

    Well, that’s what got me thinking. I wondered if there’s something more to the coverage of Knox beyond the intrinsic sensationalism of the story. I may have read something into the coverage that wasn’t there, but I did find it striking, so I blogged about it.

  8. Here is the second post I did about it last month–which asked some questions about online identities being used against people. (the whole Foxy Knoxy thing)

    It’s an amazing “murder mystery”, but I don’t think we’re getting the whole story over here.

  9. Thanks DaisyDeadhead. That’s a great post on your blog, and it’s illustrative of the sort of thing I’ve been trying to get at.

  10. The news likes to show pictures of attractive young women. I have no idea if they are disproportionately likely to feature stories with white women as criminals or as crime victims, but I’m not sure that the whiteness matters to a lot of people who complain about these stories anyway; it’s not like most of the critics this supposed media sensationalism took the day off when the New York papers were covering Imette St. Guillen’s murder.

    I think it’s possible to raise questions about race and the media’s coverage of violence against women without referencing the “missing pretty white women” meme. The phrase is problematic because it’s often used by nonfeminists in a context that implies that news about violence against women is tabloid fluff unworthy of attention.

    I’d actually argue the opposite for the second graf; when people raise criticisms along the lines of the “pretty white women” meme, it has to do with the fact that they’re a representative sample of the missing women and violence against women stories the media cover. It’s not an equal representation of the volume of women who are victims of violence who are missing. Definitely not trivializing the issue; more pointing to the hierarchy of priorities the media have in granting certain stories attention over others. Anti-feminists and critics probably agree about oversaturation, but they argue that point for different reasons. Doesn’t invalidate one because it’s similar to another.

    As for this particular instance, I definitely agree with the fact that the coverage seems guided by knowledge of who Knox is and her reputation moreso than the actual murder case. The media are taking their usual liberties.

  11. Our memories are short. In Canada there was this couple that did rape/murders. The woman got a walk. Then evidence came to light showing her wlling participation. Women can be just as evil and nasty as men. We choose to ignore this.

  12. Guede himself is in a good deal of hot water, given that police have evidence that he had sex with Kercher the night of her death and Kercher had been sexually assaulted prior to being murdered. So it’s to his advantage to portray Knox in as negative a light as possible.

    Guede isn’t just in hot water for having “sex” with Kercher. He claims that that night he had sex with Kercher, went to the bathroom, and came back to find Kercher with her neck slashed. “It wasn’t me, it was the one-armed man some random dude.” He also claims that Kercher died in his arms, even though the coroner’s report claims that it took hours for her to die.

  13. That’s true, Erika, and I should have been clearer on that. I was trying to avoid too many details in the post that might take away from my main point, but I think overcompensated in that regard and made Guede look less suspicious than he is.

  14. Incidently, Seattle is NOT abuzz about Amanda Knox’s probable involvement in the Meredith Kercher murder, to the contrary (I live here). They probably should be, but Seattle happens to be a place in need of promoting itself endlessly, and avoiding unpleasant gut reality as much as possible.

    That said, I wonder if it really seems more satisfying to you to look at this case in which all evidence points to a very unusual scenario–a woman assisting in the rape and murder of another woman–through the prism of the historical role of woman in society, rather than in terms of the meaning of this woman’s (Knox’s) actions in the here and now. Do you want to understand what went on, or sanctimoniously declare the discussion should be stifled because the perpetrator may belong to a historically oppressed group? I am a woman, and I care about why Knox participated in this murder, as I believe she did. Attempts to scold the public for expressing feelings about a bizarre case like this seem absurd to me.

  15. Deb, I also live in Seattle; perhaps “abuzz” isn’t the right word, but in my view, the Knox case has been getting a lot of coverage because of the local angle and I’ve been hearing and participating in a lot of conversations about it, so I figured I wasn’t off the mark in using the term.

    I do think you’re misinterpreting me somewhat. I don’t say anywhere in my post that discussion should be stifled because Knox is a woman, nor do I scold the public for expressing feelings about a bizarre case. Any criticism I do have is toward the media coverage of the case. Furthermore, I did say that Knox isn’t helping herself with her own conflicting accounts and that the police have good reason to suspect her (and the others’) involvement. I don’t know what that involvement was, but I do think she had some role in the case somehow.

    I was simply struck by the characterizations of Knox in the media and the kind of discussion arising in media accounts and I thought that it may have reflected some underlying attitudes that we’ve seen expressed in other scenarios in which a woman is the central figure. I am in no way trying to discourage genuine understanding of what happened and why and certainly didn’t intend to scold anyone interested in the case. Perhaps I should have been clearer on that.

Comments are currently closed.