In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The war against women

Susan Faludi has a new book coming out about how 9/11 and the fear of terrorism, has been used to push women back into the kitchen and out of public participation. Rebecca Traister has a wonderful review at Salon:

Before she can pursue the big picture, Faludi must start where everyone else in America did: her personal experience of Sept. 11. There is her prophetic dream on the night of Sept. 10, in which she is shot while on a plane, a bullet lodged in her throat; she wakes only to discover that the world is under attack. Before the end of the day she has received the phone call that provides her book with its foundation myth: A reporter asks for her reaction to the tragedies, crowing to Faludi, “Well, this sure pushes feminism off the map!”

Not 24 hours out, and Faludi has been handed the key to how this plot will unfold: To her mind, Sept. 11 will give the nation, uneasy with the strides made by women in the decades leading up to the attacks, an excuse to stuff them back into traditional boxes. That first gleeful caller is soon joined by others, all anxious to know how quickly women will abandon their corner offices and get back to tweaking their meatloaf recipes.

Apparently, Faludi has spent the past six years writing down the license plate number of every drive-by offense against gender parity, and the first two-thirds of “The Terror Dream” is her obsessive catalog — a simply staggering one.

There are the media stories promoting a never-realized post-9/11 baby boom and the “return of the cowboy/superhero” trend pieces. Here are the fawning portrayals of the macho Bush administration (she’s looking at you, Graydon Carter), the newscasters heralding the death of the “girly-man,” the breezily patronizing “We’re at War, Sweetheart” headlines.

You’d almost forgotten the feeling of impotence provoked by 9/11? Faludi hasn’t. Here’s her recounting of the people lined up at the blood banks with no one to give blood to, the police faking “live saves” to cheer up rescue dogs on the pile, because even the canines were depressed. There’s the adoration of the firefighters and of the “Let’s Roll!” male heroes of Flight 93 — remembered always for their college sports achievements and their regular-guy toughness — while the stewardesses who boiled water to throw on the terrorists were written out of the myth.

Just when you think there can’t be more, Faludi concludes Chapter 3 by asking, “If women were ineligible for hero status, for what would they be celebrated?” Well, see Chapter 4: “Perfect Virgins of Grief.” From here on out you’ll find the victimization of Jessica Lynch, and the tale of how widows — especially stay-at-home-mom widows, and especially widows who were pregnant — became the golden geese of the morning shows. She recalls articles about how lonely all those haughty, self-satisfied single career women were now that we’d been attacked by terrorists and they had no one to snuggle up with at night; the Bush administration’s phony interest in women’s rights in the Middle East; makeup tips on how to look like a pale, pure angel; the decrease in female bylines; the nesting obsession.

The post-9/11 era has most certainly been characterized by a swaggering macho mentality and a whole lot of fluttering over manly men, from the firefighters and rescue workers (the image of which was always male*, despite the fact that female first responders were killed, too) to Commander Codpiece and his Aircraft Carrier Potemkin (I mean, do you remember how much Chris Matthews swooned over the flight suit? How much the conservabots droned on about how “sexy” Bush was?** I sure do. Damned embarrassing, if you ask me). And the war, probably the ultimate expression of anxious masculinity out there, from Bush’s “Bring it on” to Thomas Friedman’s “Suck. On. This.”

Well, now some of the manly men on whom the backlashers relied to boost their own masculine cred — the firefighters and the soldiers — are rebelling. And the Presidential candidate who’s wiping the floor with everyone else, including the Manly Men of the Republican party — even Mr. 9/11 hisself, Rudy Giuliani — is a woman. The last election was all about who could be tougher on terror. This one, not so much. It’s more about, how the hell do we get out of this damned war and prevent our economy from tanking, and oh, yes, we’d like universal healthcare this century, please.

I’m going to check out Faludi’s book. It sounds like a keeper.

_________
* Granted, the fire department and unions such as the Ironworkers who worked at the site *are* overwhelmingly male. New York is a wonderful place, but there are certain deep streaks of the old-boy network, and FDNY and trade unions are some of the biggest. The NYPD’s done a much better job of hiring female officers and people of color; FDNY remains largely a legacy operation, which means it stays overwhelmingly male and white; women are most represented in the EMS service.

** I’ve said it before: Bush required an aircraft carrier and a sock in his flight suit to get the “sexy” label. You know it just eats up conservatives that all Bill Clinton had to do to be sexy was bite his lip.


10 thoughts on The war against women

  1. Interesting. Fits in with the general postmillenial dearth of strong women I was noticing.

    1999 — what can I watch on TV? Xena. Buffy. Scully kicking ass iwth a big gun.

    2000 comes, and 9/11 comes, and by 2002, what are the top shows? 24. CSI. SVU. Lots of weak women whining about not having men. Crime stories that feature awful victimization, week after week. Even more doofus men with hot wives and/or girlfriends who are always admitting the menfolks are right after all.

    Screw that. I’m watching Xena reruns on auto-repeat until the 00’s are over.

  2. Bush needed a sock and an aircraft carrier to look “sexy?” Sexy to whom? I don’t recall hearing a single woman of my acquaintance express lust over the spectacle of a middle aged man pretending to be the fly-boy he never was, but I do remember hearing G. Gordon Liddy and Chris Matthews fog their glasses talking about how hot he looked. That was when I noticed how much his performance reminded me of the Village People, without the musical ability. There’s a lot of repressed homosexual anxiety as well as neurotic fears of inadequacy in what Glen Greenwald has rightly called the Republican “cult of contrived manhood.”

  3. You can aaaall disagree with me on this one, but one of my secrets is that I think Bush is cute.

    Perhaps it’s because he reminds me of a monkey. 🙂

  4. Have women actually been pushed back into the kitchen and out of public participation? I think that’s complete nonsense. I accept that lots of stupid newspaper articles have been written. But I don’t believe there’s been any decline in women’s status since 2001. The opt out revolution is a myth, and all the stats on women’s status and trending upwards. I can’t see any real problem. If she want’s to complain about idiocy in the media fair enough, but I don’t think it’s had any real effect.

  5. Hell, I thought Bill Clinton was sexy.

    Faludi has a gift for identifying the zeitgeist — with “Backlash” and “Stiffed”, she made convincing (if over-generalizing) cases for a culture being transformed. She is a superb historian of the immediate past, for which I envy her.

  6. George Bush sexy? In the name of all that is holy, please don’t use those two words in the same sentence. He looks stupid no matter what he’s doing or what he’s wearing-quite an achievement.
    Xena, Buffy, and Scully? Those were characters on fantastical shows, and had no qualities that made them identifiable to real life women.
    Why can’t the entertainment industry portray women as we really are? Unbelievably strong sometimes, vulnerable sometimes, usually very smart but sometimes guilty of making bad decisions, sometimes thoughtless but sometimes very selfless, loving, cruel, petty, sweet…the list goes on. We’re human beings, for fuck’s sake, maybe the boys at the big studios-and let’s face it, there’s a lot more boys than girls-could portray us that way.

  7. Xena, Buffy, and Scully? Those were characters on fantastical shows, and had no qualities that made them identifiable to real life women.

    One minor and definitely topic-nonadjacent nitpick: Buffy was busting with characteristics that made her identifiable to real-life women. That was the whole point of Buffy. In the early seasons, at least, the concept was that of a girl – a normal, unassuming girl – being thrust into a world of demons and discovering that she had the power to defeat them, and it was all a metaphor for the struggles that the young women of her viewing public were facing every day. It may not have translated into a literal “I identify with Buffy because she has super powers and so do I,” but the metaphor was hardly fuzzy. I never really got into Xena or the X-Files, but I suspect that there were some similar elements in those shows.

Comments are currently closed.