In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Letter to the Editor Update

My letter to the editor was printed today. Of course they would take the most provocative (remember it’s Indiana) line in the letter and use it as the title: “Isn’t a queer dollar just as green?”

And Linnaeus, you will be pleased to know that they edited out that pesky apostrophe (Word, Mac).

I hate that, as one commenter said, the rhetoric of equality, rights and freedom do not resonate with many of my neighbors. Sometimes Lorde’s master’s tools/master’s house must be inverted. Whether or not the appeal to the most conservative free market Republicans among us is successful can be debated, but it is obvious that words like “liberty” and “love” mean little to this kind of people when the subject regards those that upset their delicate sensibilities. I am also sure that should someone of that vein come by and read this, that same charge will be reversed.

I, for one, am tired of seeing my gay and lesbian friends have their plans and dreams disrupted by a vocal set of neighbors and lawmakers. The disappointment grows deeper.

Knowing the community I live in, and considering the flood of other liberal letters printed today, I expect a response in the next week. Ten bucks on someone writing in objection to the use of “queer.”


3 thoughts on Letter to the Editor Update

  1. Glad to see they edited the apostrophe out, Lauren. I think I need to drink less coffee, but then I might lose my residency here, as coffee consumption is essential. 🙂

  2. it is obvious that words like “liberty” and “love” mean little to this kind of people when the subject regards those that upset their delicate sensibilities.

    I have spent the last two or three years alternately trying to understand the viewpoint of the social conservatives, and throwing up my hands in despair at it. I am no longer sure this is something I ever can understand without more honesty from that side–and despite a loudly-professed love for things like, oh, say, the ten commandments and the Bible, which extol the virtues of honesty, I am increasingly convinced that they are not being honest about their reasons for being against equality for the GLBT community.

    I suspect that if they were honest about it, what would emerge would be a core belief that gay love is quantifiably different from, and inferior to, heterosexual love. I don’t see how, without that core belief, one could otherwise claim to be simultaneously for individual liberty and against gay marriage; only by saying “their feelings are not our feelings, their feelings aren’t worthy of our feelings, their feelings are a shallow mockery of our feelings,” could one arrive at that conclusion, I think, though maybe there is something I am missing here.

    Thus I usually end up not having these conversations with social conservatives to begin with, because I know ultimately that’s where they’ll founder. It’s depressing.

  3. I’m so scatterbrained and longwinded that in all the previous comment, I forgot to mention how much I liked your letter. Pithy and right on target.

Comments are currently closed.