In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Credit Where Credit Is Due

Good for these Evangelical leaders:

In recent years, conservative evangelicals who claim a Biblical mandate to protect Israel have built a bulwark of support for the Jewish nation — sending donations, denouncing its critics and urging it not to evacuate settlements or forfeit territory.

Now more than 30 evangelical leaders are stepping forward to say these efforts have given the wrong impression about the stance of many, if not most, American evangelicals.

On Friday, these leaders sent a letter to President Bush saying that both Israelis and Palestinians have “legitimate rights stretching back for millennia to the lands of Israel/Palestine,” and that they support the creation of a Palestinian state “that includes the vast majority of the West Bank.”

They say that being a friend to Jews and to Israel “does not mean withholding criticism when it is warranted.” The letter adds, “Both Israelis and Palestinians have committed violence and injustice against each other.”

The letter is signed by 34 evangelical leaders, many of whom lead denominations, Christian charities, ministry organizations, seminaries and universities.

Of course, there are still some Evangelical leaders who argue that Israel should have unfettered power and control over almost any area it pleases because God said so.

“God gave to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob a covenant in the Book of Genesis for the land of Israel that is eternal and unbreakable, and that covenant is still intact,” he said. “The Palestinian people have never owned the land of Israel, never existed as an autonomous society. There is no Palestinian language. There is no Palestinian currency. And to say that Palestinians have a right to that land historically is an historical fraud.”

Sure, if you believe that “history” means “what is politically expedient for me to say God said.” And his requirements for autonomy are… interesting. Does he mean that because there is no language called “Palestinian” that Palestinians don’t have rights to the land they live on? Surely he knows that Palestinians do, in fact, verbally converse and do speak a common language… right? Sadly, I’m not so sure.

While right-wing Evangelical leaders might ramble on about Israel’s right to every piece of land the Bible ever mentioned and cheer-lead a situation that has left Palestinians living as refugees for decades, keep in mind they aren’t doing it out of pure Christian altruism and love for Jews. No, they have their own reasons for supporting Israel’s dominance:

Mr. Hagee and others are dispensationalists, Mr. Weber said, who interpret the Bible as predicting that in order for Christ to return, the Jews must gather in Israel, the third temple must be built in Jerusalem and the Battle of Armageddon must be fought.

Which is a fantastic basis on which to make international policy, no?


8 thoughts on Credit Where Credit Is Due

  1. um…there is no american language. does that mean americans have no right to own land in america? oh…wait…nevermind…

  2. The self-interest behind (some) evangelicals’ support for Israel really bothers me. They want Jews to control the land because they want Christ to return and take *them* to Heaven.
    My mother and I had a big, blow-out argument about this once. She actually said Christians should support Israeli Jews because they play an important supporting role to Christians – they’ll occupy the land so that Christians can meet their heavenly destiny. So basically they’re using Jews.

  3. They also think that when Jesus returns only a small percentage of Jews will go to heaven- those who convert. The rest will go to hell. What friends of Israel! I have heard the Israeli leaders laugh at all this behind the Christan fundamentalists’ backs, but still make sure to get the support of these Christian groups. So both sides are using each other, to some extent.

    I have always found it strange that a significant population of Palestinaians are Christian, yet they don’t get support from many Evangelical American Christian groups. But I guess any group that thinks Palestinians don’t really exist wouldn’t have done too much research about them.

  4. A language does not a nation make and not having one doesn’t mean that a group isn’t a nation. However, what does make a nation exactly? I don’t remmeber Palestinians demanding a right to statehood when Jordan controlled what is now called the West Bank (and is called Judea and Samaria by others). Even during Turkish and British control, there were pan-arabic demands for independance from Colonialists, but the Palestinians were simply Arabs and Beduins living in the area. Sometimes they claimed to be part of Syria, other times Jordan. Egypt normally claimed ownership of Gaza Now, just because the history of the Palestinians being a nation is extremely brief, does not mean the best solution to the current crisis isn’t to give them a state of their own. But it’s dishonest to pretend that they are an ancient people with a capital in Jerusalem.

  5. I’m glad you posted this, Jill, and am hopeful that coverage of this declaration will serve as a wake-up call that not all evangelical Christians in America are dispensationalists clutching their copies of “Left Behind”. Some of us are fairly progressive politically, and while our reverence for the land of Israel as the site of God’s revelation is immense, most of us can separate that awe from support for the state of Israel.

  6. “Does he mean that because there is no language called “Palestinian” that Palestinians don’t have rights to the land they live on? Surely he knows that Palestinians do, in fact, verbally converse and do speak a common language… right? Sadly, I’m not so sure.”

    Well, then because there is no language called “American” then we don’t have rights to the land we live on. Duh. We don’t speak “American” we speak English. Does that mean the Brits own the US? I’m sure they’ll be glad to hear it. (I know I would.)

  7. Me and my ancestors would like to see white evangelical leaders leave our borders, because, being the original people in THIS land, we should own and populate it exclusively in the majority of its of borders.

Comments are currently closed.