In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

In Which Nezua Finally Feministes (Limón Intro Mix)

HOLA Y BIENVENIDOS, me llamo Nezua Limón Xolagrafik-Jonez! But you can call me Nezua or just Nez. Please press any key on the keyboard to continue in English.

I think it’s sort of funny, it makes me smile, how once the phone loop machines used to ask you to press a number to continue in English, but lately with the anti-Hispanic ravings of Dobbs, Buchanan, Tancredo and all the rest, it has been decided that this line about choosing languages is simply too great an affront to The ‘Murkan eardrum, reverberating so mellifluously with all these Spanish options when—really—we’re just trying to enjoy a non-ethnic phone call into a corporation (which certainly does not employ any non-Englishers) so we can figure out how this extra forty cents got tacked onto our English-speaking phone bill! The funny part is the alternative. Because how have they solved this? Well, now the choice to press buttons and enter Español-world is given to the caller in actual Español! Which makes me smile. So is Lou happy? No button pushing for you, my fine friend! English now the default of smiling phonebots everywhere! But it looks like you have OPENED THE DOOR TO SPANISH and now it is being spoken from between the glossy lips of that pleasant phone operator, who seemed so damn pure, so damn non-hyphenated, so AMERICAN—but what the hell does it mean now when a smooth-voiced non-accented robotgirl on the phone can flip suddenly into perfect Spanish? It sort of makes you wonder, hey, Lou? It sort of injects a note of uncertainty into your whole Englishy day. It’s a note played by a secret Flamenco fingernail that must surely be wagging behind your head if only you could whip around quick enough! Whip it, Lou, whip it!


On that, let me say thank you to our operators—who are quite human—for giving me this brand new stool and this bright hot spotlight on the front page of Feministe, the very first blog to quote me as a woman. In fact, this has happened a few times, this thinking Nez is a woman. Or perhaps just allying me with ustedes as a way of insulting me. In fact, in most cases, this has been part of an interesting lesson online. A lesson in how women and men are perceived. For instance, if you are verbal, thoughtful, and care about how things might affect children or the environment, this often seems to edge you into a womanly frame to others. I don’t know. I have to say that paying attention to how men and women are imagined—in a very broad and online sense, of course—I don’t care for the model I am often primped for! But I never have and anyway, it doesn’t matter. I am what I am, just like that cat with the anchor tattoos says. And that is often a different thing from day to day. But anyway, big thanks to Jill, mostly, who I wrote back and forth with when she first approached me and wondered would I please Mexify the Feministe blog.

So yes, I am an American of Mexican descent, and that is why I am on the island. You can normally find me at The Unapologetic Mexican, though I have been known to guest post in a few highly-esteemed places, leaving piñata shreds and strains of brass in my wake. This is my introductory post, and I won’t get too deep here, just wanted to give you a feel for where I’m coming from, and where I am generally coming from is the viewpoint of a fellow who was born in exciting times (1969 and raised in communal homes/adobe houses/tents) to fascinating people (a Chicano poet from L.A. and an early grad valedictorian white girl from Queens who quickly became a full-blown hippie) who came together in an unusual way (shotgun in grandfather’s hand and his insistence on their marriage) in strange settings (see UCLA dorm room, see small shack, or tent on highway’s edge, or house with tree-stumps for stairs, or multiple family dwellings…). Because of much crossover and experience jumping lines (surname name changed when adopted at 8, changed my own first name at 8, moving every year or so from city to suburb to rural, etc), my life has erased the notion of hard lines and divisions and reliable labels, and I very often get into conversations with people about this. About this reliance on a label. I find many use them and forget once applied that they have just applied one. I find that often, I do this, too. But then I forget I have done it, and that, of course, eases my stress…. 🙂

I feel I exist and have existed in the netherspace where one is forced or empowered or given opportunity to navigate new ground, or to bring their purportedly dissimilar or impossible parts into harmony and discover the illusion (and the quite real pain) of dichotomy. It is a righteous and desirable pain, as it points toward a higher ground. This is an area sometimes called Mestizaje in the world of Chicanismo, or Chican@ literature and study, and the word is related to “Mestizo,” which to some is still insulting (due to the origins of the term which was once used to denigrate the offspring of the Mexican Indian and the European/white conqueror), but to many others simply means “mixed.” As I understand it, “Mestizaje” expands the “mixed” or “borderlands” notion in a metaphorical sense, and this explains perfectly my experience in so many ways. Sex definitions/roles, “Race,” Class. I have hopped a few boundaries and felt both sides. It’s been enlightening. It’s been endarkening. It’s been a hell of a ride. It’s opened my mind to the Other side. And…makes it tough to fill out multiple choice questions tests.

But here are some labels for now, because we need them at least as a starting point: I am an artist and an author (published under another name). I stay at home with my youngest daughter and juggle my art projects while her mother works outside of the house. I am a self-produced musician. I eat very healthy, and I drink good wine. I don’t have a lot of friends, but it is not because I am not friendly. I just don’t really know where to meet them anymore. Or I find myself hard to tolerate when they are around. Or maybe it’s them. I’m never sure. But I don’t mind being by myself, and I enjoy the projects I do by myself. That said, I think with all the amazing feats that can be accomplished in life, of all the fantastic sights to see, and the heady views and experiences, very little beats hanging out with good friends and just having a good time wherever you be.

imgSo the sun is exploding like a nuclear lemon in my eye, hot light spilling over the sill and oozing down onto my mixing board and keyboard. Here on the West coast of the USA, it’s just six am. I guess I’ll take that as my cue and say hasta pronto. But one more thing, as the man in the trenchcoat said. Let’s get the comment policy out front. I’m sure you are all very cool people, and from what I see, are able to think and speak quite intelligently as individuals. I know that here, people are very used to keeping an eye out for sexism, and I’m sure it’s a bit of the same thing as what I keep my eyes out for often. “Racism”—as we call the strange mixture of fear, ignorance, and hate—reminds me of Agent Smith in The Matrix. It’s really bigger than any one person, and any good person on the street that you see can suddenly quiver, shake and morph into that Agent Smith, can become a mouthpiece for that vast ocean of Othering that has taken place throughout time. Racism belongs to no one person or kind of person, or sex of person. We call can be Agent Smith at a given moment. So I don’t really take it personally when it comes my way, although blogging as an “unapologetic mexican” insures there is no shortage. I don’t take it personally, but I don’t take it, either. I won’t take it here, I won’t argue it. Nor will I delve deep into anger. Some people get into long comment threads where hostility is given vent and it goes on and on and back and forth. So I don’t mean to sound unduly antagonistic, but I am just making it clear up front that I don’t personally do that. If I feel hate or ignorance or willful non-understanding is trying to claim ground, I won’t endlessly engage it. I do not need to prove my resilience or tolerance or even joust it into the open where all can see it. I wouldn’t argue a citizen once they turned into Agent Smith, after all. I would run like hell. Here, if you are hashing something out between yourselves, cool. I won’t interfere. But if a comment thread wanders into ugly, unwarranted territory, or I feel this “racism” thing is aimed at me and a commenter won’t be cool even when engaged with reasonably, I will either ban said commenter (from my posts, not the blog entire) or delete them, period. However—with a little girl who needs most of my attention during the “working day” hours, and a graphic art business to tend, and my own blogging as well, I will not be on top of every single comment as it is made. More likely, I will have to come back and check on the thread and make responses much later. So if Agent Smith pops up, keep an eye out for me, cool? You know I got your back. And I do apologize to the general readership for this addendum, to those who do not need it. But I’ve been surprised in the instances where I thought such notices were unnecessary before. So better to have it out there and not needed, if that be the case.

Finally, thanks again, Feministe. And el gusto es mio, amig@s! Good to be here. Let’s get our week on.


40 thoughts on In Which Nezua Finally Feministes (Limón Intro Mix)

  1. Interesting post!

    About this reliance on a label. I find many use them and forget once applied that they have just applied one. I find that often, I do this, too. But then I forget I have done it, and that, of course, eases my stress…. 🙂

    I’ve been thinking about this myself lately as I’m reading Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance for the zillionth time (I’m hoping that one of these times I’ll actually understand what the heck he’s trying to say). The book itself is dense…but one of the things I’m relatively sure he delves into is this idea of labeling being a destructive process (as in things are more than the sum of their parts, and if we only notice the parts, we fail to notice the “something” that it was as a whole).

    Me, I’m less sure about labeling’s destructiveness. I think it’s the value assignments that are destructive. Calling something a circle isn’t necessarily destructive of the circle’s wholeness? I’m 5’3″. I don’t think being identified as 5’3″ is necessarily destructive. I think the value judgment that short people are [good/bad/stupid/smart/etc.] is destructive… because it assigns value based on a specific trait rather than the wholeness of a person.

    Anywho just some incoherent thought. Oy, these things make my brain melt.

  2. thanks kristen. yes…i know i’m dropping shorthand here. i think this is a good idea for me to carry forth into my next post here (gotta have something to write about!). but i will just say i agree, we need certain labels. but what so often happens is we say “left/right” etc and then promptly forget we’ve only decided there is a “folder” within which this person fits, in our file cabinet of ideas…at a given moment. we haven’t really summed anything up. the danger is just saying ‘oh, she’s on the Right’ and then promptly assigning a value like “dont need to pay attention to her thoughts” etc, get me? we just tag something, and then leave it be too often, leave the essence be.

    i just see so much of this going on lately, realized i was doing a bit of it in some ways, and well, it’s not the label i’m against, if we’re going to dive in. it’s the limit.

  3. Yay Nez!

    Yeah, my mom’s a Spanish professor. I grew up with a bilingual answering machine. I never really gave it much thought, till, well, encountering Some People. wtf crawled up Dobbs’ ass and died, anyway?

  4. Hey, Nez:

    I was glad to see you had got back to your crazy, prolific self after that well deserved rest during your move.

    Lou Dobbs, Tom Tancredo and the rest of those pigs who squeal in rage about immigrants adding to the burden on this country’s infrastructure while they crowd shoulder to shoulder at the corporateswilltrough that they feed from make me sad, for a moment that I am a U.S. citizen. Then I lose the sad and embrace the mad.

    I was standing in a friend’s kitchen (he used to support McCain and now I’m fairly certain he’s got a little crush on Freddy, “The Nightmare on K Street” Thompson) recently and he and I were drinking some of his nice wine. He watches a lot of CNN (not Fox, thank Christ) and there was Doughboy Dobbs prating about the scourge of “illegals” like some dime store William Jennings Bryant. I said (bearing in mind that my friend was serving a very nice red), “what a fucking asshole.”. He said, “I watch him because he’s the only liberal who’s willing to tell the truth.” Well, what the hell, I told him what I think Lou the louse is all about–he simply refused to believe it. We will, as we have done for forty years, remain friends. Too much has passed between us to let differences of that sort get in the way (besides he does not VOTE for guys like Fred unless they happen to be
    dems).

    The problem isn’t Bush, his thugs and sycophants or even his base. The problem is the uncommitted middle who are swayed by cheap theatrics instead of involving themselves in the process of inquiry that would surely lead to their discovery of someone like Thompson’s “real” cred.

  5. hey belledame, fancy meeting you in these parts. and cool answering machine. 🙂 i had nothing like that. i do remember a rotary with big polka dots painted on it.

    no, of course…logically, it makes no sense to want to know less language, right? then we remember that this language thing symbolizes a lot more to some people. i don’t know how representative they are of the public. they have such loud voices, tho. they carry so far.

  6. For instance, if you are verbal, thoughtful, and care about how things might affect children or the environment, this often seems to edge you into a womanly frame to others.

    I thought Kai was a woman when I first read his blog. I even blogged about this great woman blogger I’d found, and he was actually flattered, so it’s all good. So you two get to be members of the tribe, honorary hermanas. Welcome!

  7. I liked Lou Dobbs better before he started using all that tacky-ass Grecian Formula on his hair. You’d think a man drawing a CNN-salary could afford a nicer dye-job.

    His politics became far more aggressive at about that time, too, so maybe there is some connection.

  8. hey kactus! that is an honor for sure. yes…i remember laughing with kai and sylvia over this…where was that? the cantina? cannot recall.

    good to see you!

  9. nezua, I’ve enjoyed your blog before.

    I was in grad school at UCLA during the hunger strike to create the Chicano Studies Department while my dissertation superviser was the dean of social sciences. I did my oral qualifying exams in the midst of a near-riot. Good times.

    Anyhow, I like your blog and have for a long time. As I work to embrace my whiteness and opt out of Whiteness simultaneously(meaning celebrating my ethnic heritage while renouncing privilege), reading you is a challenge and an inspiration. It also is good for a chuckle or two. Cheers.

  10. hey the intermittent sweeps are working out.

    pleased to meetcha Linnaeus.

    hey there hugo, wild stuff!! wow. very cool.

    re embracing/opting out—yeah, it’s work on my side, too, but it’s good work people do, checking themselves out, seeing what they are, where they come from, how they relate to others. even if we stumble along the way, it’s a good effort, to be self aware. i appreciate the kind words on my writing.

  11. “Racism”—as we call the strange mixture of fear, ignorance, and hate—reminds me of Agent Smith in The Matrix. It’s really bigger than any one person, and any good person on the street that you see can suddenly quiver, shake and morph into that Agent Smith, can become a mouthpiece for that vast ocean of Othering that has taken place throughout time. Racism belongs to no one person or kind of person, or sex of person. We call can be Agent Smith at a given moment.

    I really like this metaphor.

    I think it can apply to lots of -isms, too, actually. (Not to suddenly go off about some other matter on you, though.) It’s like “whoa, this person was perfectly sensible a minute ago, where’d them shades come from?”

  12. Hiya Betsy, sorry I missed you!

    Yes, Daisy. The Aggressive Grecian does have a bit of charm to him, eh? Gotta admit. He’s got that whole chuckle-faced blonde-gray button-eyed doughboy thing working. Lately, tho, I agree. It’s just not enough. Lou seems…unbalanced, and well—deranged. There. I’ve said it, sorry Lou. But it’s true! It just ruins the whole “I’m here for the working class” mood.

  13. you know what i love, trinity? when i misspell and then my typo gets blockquoted. mmm. 🙂 naw, what i mean to say is thank you!

    yes, i hear you. that ugly “racism” part of us manifests in other shapes, i agree. overlap…a rose by any other name.

    the sudden shades! the most disturbing part is when you find yourself in agent smith shades for a moment! damn! spiritual fugue states, gotta love ’em.

  14. democommie Says:
    July 9th, 2007 at 3:13 pm e
    Hey, Nez:

    I was glad to see you had got back to your crazy, prolific self after that well deserved rest during your move.

    The joys of being stark raving prolific! Don’t ever let them medicate me, my friend. They just don’t know how to make a good cocktail.

  15. Aw, man, I was going to make some tongue-in-cheek anti-Mexican comments (“It’s not enough you steal our jobs? You have to steal oru internets, too?”), but now I don’t think I should after reading your last paragraph.

    Anyways, brilliant point about the robotronic phone lady slipping into the King’s Spanish without warning. I imagine other people make those kinds of calls for Lou, otherwise, he might already be dead. Wouldn’t it be even sweeter if she knew who it was, and went off in some kind of abuse Spanglish (since I don’t know actual Spanish, and can only imagine the former)? “That’s right, cabron, Spanish is spoken here. What’s the matter, never heard that before, you limp-dicked pasty-assed punto?” (Incidentally, i always think it’s interesting to find out what different languages/peoples consider obscene).

  16. Kristen: I always thought (and please, keep in mind I read this book a) a long time ago and b) when I was quite young… I think about 15 so I could be totally off the wall) he was saying that when we get into subjective labels, that’s the problem. A circle is a circle is a circle is define as the set of points equidistant from a point. 5’3 is five feet and three inches. But who gets to define what qualifies as, say, black (racially, not color-represented-by-the-absence-of-light)? or white? or female, or male? etc.

    like I said it’s been a lot time and I don’t think I understood most of it the first time around anyway (except the bit about how grades suck, which I pretty much agree with to this day). but that’s kind of how I remember it. or something.

  17. he was saying that when we get into subjective labels, that’s the problem.

    Maybe. I would agree with you if it wasn’t for the endish part where he goes on the quality= the merger of the Socratic dialectic (the “True”) and the rhetoric of the Sophists (the “Good”). So for his argument to be internally consistent the dialectic has to be distinct from value judgments.

    Then again maybe his argument isn’t internally consistent…that would make me feel much smarter. 🙂

  18. jeffaclitus, it’s cool. a joke is still a joke between friends, it’s a funny one! i hated even doing that comment policy thing at the end. i debated just skipping it, i tried to fit it in earlier, didn’t want to leave off on it, oh well. it’s done. now i can move on to just posting and i’m sure it won’t be an issue anyway.

    of course when i very often say “lou” i don’t mean “lou dobbs” the individual, but the people his show generally represent.

  19. Nez:

    I think the Lou Dobbs Increasingly Strident/Grecian Formula angle needs to be looked at. Actually I have been noticing for some time now (despite the fact that I actually watch or listen to very little in the way of political radio or tv programming, that several commenters on the Rabid Reich are constantly making incremental adjustments to their viewpoints. Odd, that.

  20. And who’s this “Tancredo” guy, anyway? That name sounds suspiciously Italian!

    (The same idiots that are blethering about “them damn furriners” would, only a short time historically, been confronted with similar comments about “wops”, “spics”, and “those dirty Irish”)

  21. Hey Nezua, glad you dropped by here! I’m a gringa who started learning Spanish at the earliest oppertunity (which, in a small hillbilly town, was high school) and haven’t stopped since. I am always so baffled at the people who actually get angry at Spanish options! I was at a bank once in Colorado and I noted that the deposit slips were bilingual, and the lady at the bank actually apologized to me! Now I have bilingual checks. I hope I piss someone off someday 🙂

  22. hey tzs, it’s a good question about tancredo.

    and unfortunately, “spic” is not a word relegated to history yet. it’s part of the current arsenal used against latino/hispanic people today, and ever since i can remember. but i do get your point.

  23. hey there PaleAndNerdy, that’s a funny story! apologizing for bilingual deposit slips. that says so very much. and yeah, that’s pretty much just what i’m talking about.

    thanks for the welcome! i hope you piss someone off, too!

  24. and unfortunately, “spic” is not a word relegated to history yet. it’s part of the current arsenal used against latino/hispanic people today, and ever since i can remember. but i do get your point.

    And any other pesky brownish people. My husband who is Japanese/Okinawan (for Chrcist sake) has gotten that treatment before. He likes to reply by calmly explaining the correct racial epithet.

  25. your husband is a man after my own heart! how funny.

    i like the spelling of “Chrcist.” i can’t explain why, but it really pleases me.

  26. What I find funniest is the response of the person who hurls those sorts of slurs. Particularly, when my SO gets really irritated and goes into “Professor Mode” (i.e., find a comfy seat and prepare yourself for a dissertation on the use of racial slurs against Japanese and Okinawan people and against Asian-Americans, past and present). They just stand there completely shocked, unable to process the fact that someone brown might speak better English, have a better education, and know more in general about their own prejudices than they do. In all these years, I’ve only seen one person walk away. Someday I’m going have a video camera with me and put it on youtube…I swear.

  27. no, you are absolutely right. when it’s not punching my gut, it’s actually fascinating, it’s impressive, it’s worth studying for the cold audacity and self-fulfilling density and sheer, blankfaced, vast, geography of itself—ignorance.

  28. yeah, turn it up! jeje. damn. i feel like i’m back in la ciudad suddenly…

    gracias for the cookies, donna. don’t mind if i do. 🙂

  29. I was at a bank once in Colorado and I noted that the deposit slips were bilingual, and the lady at the bank actually apologized to me!

    Yikes. Disgusting, but not surprising.

    I remember when the signs here first started to become bilingual. Every white person around was worried about it.

    Then the signs went up, and… all the white folks with their panties in a bunch went “oh wow, that really is just a sign and not the sekrit plans for the Revolution” and… ceased caring, as far as I could tell.

    Oh, I’m sure there are people who care in the pit of their souls and will rant if prompted about how “those people won’t integrate”

    but I remember just how surprised I was to find that all the infuriated “we can’t let those horrors of language happen here” went away so fast.

Comments are currently closed.