In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Hate Crime in Indiana

A man was brutally murdered in Indiana because he was gay. And his murderers are using “gay panic defense” to justify what they did to Aaron “Shorty” Hall. Here’s what they did to him (trigger warning: graphic violence):

# As King held Hall down while Gray punched him and struck him around his eyes repeatedly

# As King and Gray ruthlessly beat Hall, with fists and with the heels of their boots, hitting him over and over and over again, over 75 times with a boot alone.

# As the two of them took turns jumping on his battered body

# As they pulled his limp body down a wooden staircase, dragging him by the feet so that his head “bounced down all of the steps,” in their own words

# As they propped up Hall between them, held out a camera phone, took a picture of the two of them with their arms around Hall’s broken body, and proudly texted a photo of Hall’s bloody and swollen face to their friend, James Hodge, where he worked, in order to show off their handiwork

# As Jamie Hendricks called Hodge back around 6:45 pm and declared, “They’re beating the hell out of that guy,” while Hodge listened to Hall’s screams and the sound of King and Gray literally pummeling him to death

# Which they did for “several hours,” spattering Hall’s blood throughout the kitchen, on the outside deck, the railing, the stairs, and in the living room.

# As they piled his body into the back of Gray’s pickup truck (spilling more blood) and continued to beat him while Hendricks drove them to the murder scene, a tiny field row off a deserted backwoods state road

# As Gray, still beating Hall, asked him if he wanted to die tonight. Hall, barely able to talk at that point, still managed to reply: no.

# As Gray and King, ignoring Hall’s request to live, dumped him in the ditch beside the lane and proceeded to beat him still further.

# As they left him there lying in the ditch, by this time completely naked, only to return with a shotgun later at Gray’s insistence that “they had to kill him or they would go to jail.”

# As Gray shot into the darkness – but by this time, Hall, still alive, had crawled out of the ditch despite his naked body, despite his bruises, his broken nose and his shattered ribs. Hall had crawled into the field, where they left him there a second time.

# As Hendricks and Hodges returned the next day, April 13th, to the spectacle roadside attraction (and because Hodge wanted to steal Hall’s coat) to find Hall dead in the field.

# As they all proceeded to wrap Hall’s body in blue tarpaulin and hide it in Garrett Gray’s garage, where it was found after James Hodge, perhaps realizing that turning stooge was his only way to avoid being listed as an assistant, reported the crime and the suspects to the police, who turned themselves in.

According to the Bloomington Alternative:

The beatings included repeated pummelings with fists and boots and dragging Hall down a wooden staircase by his feet as “his head bounced down all of the steps,” in one of the accused’s words. He died naked and alone, in a field, where he had crawled after his killers dumped his body in a roadside ditch.

According to Hall’s murderers, it’s his fault — he was gay and they panicked. In panicking, they killed him.

Of course, during their panic they managed to beat him for hours, drag his body around, make phone calls and take cellphone pictures.

This story has gotten almost no press. Locals apparently doubt it was a hate crime. Just, you know, a couple of good ol’ boys doing what had to be done.

Thanks to Megan for the link.


24 thoughts on Hate Crime in Indiana

  1. Honestly, where *are* the legions of people who should be rising up to shine light on such evil? It’s as if we are so steeped in horror that more just doesn’t do much.

    If there’s a fund for the prosecution, I’ll contribute. Those of us who are horrified are still human. Do we outnumber the ones who aren’t?

  2. Every now and then I have to explain to my partner why I, having grown up in a small town in the middle of nowhere, get tense and edgy whenever we kiss in public.

    Why I don’t visit my hometown and my old friends there.

    Why–well, lots of things.

    There are not even words for what those men are. I hope the world sees their vileness for what it is, and Mr. Hall’s family can get some peace.

    Taking posed pictures with captions like he was a goddamned trophy deer. Calling a friend so they can hear the screaming! I just–I don’t know what can be said.

  3. When is feministe going to insist on calling violent crimes triggered by the gender of the victim hate crimes? Honestly, insisting that it is impossible to persecute women and girls on the basis of gender (actually, men are persecuted all the time on the basis of gender according to Men’s Rights activists who combat “man-bashing”) is only possible if you assume females are not human beings and, thus, not deserving of basic rights.

    If homosexuality can be a target for bigots, certainly an immutable trait that ensures the (female) victim is at a physical disadvantage and involves the power of sexuality must be a legitimate target for bigots.

  4. When is feministe going to insist on calling violent crimes triggered by the gender of the victim hate crimes?

    Um, they do. All the time.

    That said … holy wtf batman? Who does that to someone? And worse — who claims that it was “panic”?! Ugh.

  5. When is feministe going to insist on calling violent crimes triggered by the gender of the victim hate crimes?

    The title of this post says “Hate Crime in Indiana.”

  6. WTF?
    There are so many things messed up in this story. Why did they invite this tiny guy, almost twice their age, to their house to go drinking? Was he their pal? Then they would have a good idea if he was gay or not. Heck, if he was gay, by age 35 everyone in town would be aware of it. In small towns everyone remembers everything the least bit remarkable about you till your dying day, especiallly all the embarrassing things you ever did. If you’re his neighbor, you either accept his sexuality or you shun him. You’re not going to suddenly freak out when you realize he’s gay.
    Even if he’s not gay, straight guys make jokes about homosex all the time without getting killed for it. One old-timer I worked with, who at the time was cheating on his long-term girl friend with a fortyish woman we had hired, promised me I’d never go back to women after a night with him. I had no desire to rise up and slay him, if for no other reason than I knew it was A Joke.
    I’m thinking they invited him to their house because as a little bitty guy, and perhaps the town weirdo, he was the omega male of the neighborhood. They wanted to kill him for that very reason, just as chickens will peck to death the chicken at the bottom of the pecking order. They were mean drunks, and when they got drunk enough they set their plan into motion.

  7. WTF?! I live in Bloomington, IN., and this is the first I’ve heard about this. I admit I am not a big Fox news/local news watcher but I’ve seen nothing on local newspapers or IndyStar either. I should spread this link around to folks here. This is pathetic. Especially their lame attempt to hide their violent crime with excuses like he was gay. If he made gay advances for real upto the point where he was dangerous, call the cops.

  8. Reading the article, it sounds like this was a fight that turned into a sadistic murder that was justified only after the fact with the ‘gay panic’ defense. It means that in some bizarre sense, the defendants are trying to say that they DID commit a hate crime, because it would be punished LESS than murder. That’s heinous.

    It’s pretty much a textbook case for making a hate crimes law – hatred compounds your actions, not minimizes it.

  9. Ewwwww…….
    I agree with Yuri, and I hope the judge has none of it.

    Right now I’m imagining the judge, the media or anyone else saying ‘but he wasn’t gay, so your defense isn’t even valid.’ That’s about the only thing that could make this case any more disgusting.

    If you don’t mind, I’m going to go back to looking at the abstract art.

  10. That is just…completely horrific.

    Thanks (is that the right word?) for sharing this–someone has to speak out, and it sounds like the media will not be doing that this time around.

    How disgusting. 🙁

  11. Oh, doing some digging on this in regards to the “why do we need a hate crime law when murder is murder” crowd. The answer is, it’s not. At least not in Indiana.

    Under Indiana law (see the Indiana Criminal Code) “sudden heat” is a mitigating factor which bumps the crime from murder to voluntary manslaughter, a Class B felony without a lethal weapon. Murder is a 45 year minimum with no possibility for suspension; voluntary manslaughter is six with the possibility for full suspension.

    If it goes to a murder trial, they can lay the groundwork for a “extreme mental or emotional disturbance” mitigating factor which will keep them away from a needle and give them the possibilty of eventual parole.

    Not that I’m an advocate for the death penalty, by any means. But the “sudden heat” defense isn’t something to sneeze at here.

  12. This is why we need a national hate crimes law so these evil scum have no place to run and no defense to hide behind. May they rot in a windowless cell for the rest of their miserable lives.

  13. This is why we need a national hate crimes law so these evil scum have no place to run and no defense to hide behind.

    It’s not likely that these pieces of shit are going to get away scott free for their crimes. It doesn’t matter if someone is gay or straight, white or black, male or female, you just don’t DO that to a human being and get away with it (generally). Policing people’s thoughts is not the answer.

  14. Gabbi:

    Policing people’s thoughts is not the answer.

    Hate crimes laws are not about policing thought. That goes right up there with “hate crimes laws say minorities are more valuable people than white folks/straight folks/men and their lives are worth more!” in the Hall of Fame of constantly-trumpeted, propagandized arguments against hate-crimes legislation. I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt, since this argument seems more prone to spreading among well-meaning people that the “more valuable people” one, but I find it, upon examination, pretty disingenuous.

  15. Holy shit. I’m another Bloomington resident, who hadn’t heard ANYTHING of this story until just now, and I’m just speechless. I grew up in rural, small-town Indiana, and I love most of the people I’ve known there. But despite my attachment to my home state, I have to admit that we’ve got some seriously fucked up people here. Bloomington is probably one of the best places in the state for diversity and progressive values, but even here we’ve got plenty of the scary types as well. It freaks me out. I love my people and my state but I hate it here sometimes, all the same.

  16. BTW, the hate-crime=policing thought argument was rejected by the Supreme Court in Wisc. v. Mitchell.

Comments are currently closed.