In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Justice?

I hate Paris Hilton. I think she’s one of the worst human beings in the world. She’s an entitled spoiled brat, and watching the way she treated people on The Simple Life made me sick. I was happy she was sent to jail. I was happy when she was sent back.

But let’s not pretend that this is any great victory for “justice.” Yes, she should have to do her time just like anyone else. Yes, there’s a question as to whether anyone else would have received a jail sentence for doing what she did (as far as I can tell, the answer is probably “no”). But this isn’t about justice or injustice — it’s about seeing someone we dislike finally get theirs, through an incredibly flawed and thoroughly unfair system.

I’ve found a lot of the conversation around the Paris Hilton jailing to be very troubling — people don’t want to see her incarcerated because she broke the law, but because she’s a “stupid bimbo,” a “skanky little whore,” a “stupid bitch,” a “ho,” a “piece of white trash,” a “ignorant cum hole on a stick,” a “fucking whorebag,” a “whinning pussystretched crab infested skank,” a “spoiled cunt,” etc etc. And those are just from the first 150 comments on the post linked above. Other commenters hoped that she’d get a “full-cavity search,” talked about their sexual gratification at the sight of her crying and the description of her being dragged off by a prison guard, expressed their desire for her to be raped, and even said that “the next story should be about the whore dying.” Even artists are getting into the game, supposedly critiquing drunk driving by depicting Paris dead, naked and with her legs spread open (created, notably, by the same dude who did the pro-life Britney-birthing statue).

I think it’s fascinating that of all the disgusting things Paris Hilton has done — using racial, anti-Semitic and sexual slurs, mocking “lesser” rural people on The Simple Life, acting condescendingly and generally cruelly toward anyone who crosses her path, driving drunk — what people are really upset about is the fact that she’s a slut. Yes, she’s technically being punished for driving without a license, but that isn’t what makes everyone so gleeful about her stint in jail — it’s the pretty-little-rich-whore getting her comeupance.

I’ll admit that I’m happy to see her finally be forced to take responsibility for something. I’m with Joan Walsh — meritocracy is a myth, but perhaps if certain members of the rich, powerful and perpetually enabled class had been taken to task for their bad behavior earlier, we would all have been spared some of their far-reaching mistakes.

But I’m not happy about the conversation surrounding her jail sentence, nor with the criminal justice system in general. It reminds me a bit of the “pot princess” brouhaha that happened while I was still an undergrad at NYU, where NYU student Julia Diaco was arrested for selling thousands of dollars worth of illegal drugs (including marijuana, cocaine and LSD) to undercover cops. Diaco was from an incredibly wealthy family in New Jersey, and, despite the incredibly restrictive Rockefeller drug laws in NY and state prisons that are overcrowded with petty drug offenders, was sentenced to 10 months in rehab and 5 years probation. Her paltry sentence was frustrating to those of us who long opposed punitive drug laws, and who saw how lower-income people, and especially people of color, were treated far more harshly than Diaco was, for far lesser crimes.

But I’m with my friend Jason Rowe on this one:

I’m into forgiveness, not retribution. I don’t enjoy seeing anyone’s life ruined, regardless of who they are and what they have done. I am glad Diaco was granted leniency by the court. I only wish leniency was granted more often to other people facing similar charges.

What Diaco’s deal illustrates is how race and economic class have led to a great discrepancy in the severity of the penalties handed down in criminal sentencing, especially drug crimes.

This double standard has a truly profound effect in a state like New York, where laws stipulate mandatory minimum sentences for a series of drug crimes. Known as the Rockefeller drug laws, after Nelson Rockefeller, the governor who instituted them in 1973, these laws established harsh minimum sentences, including a minimum of 15 years for possession of four grams of cocaine. Critics of the Rockefeller laws have long argued that people of color have disproportionately been subjected to these harsh minimum sentences.

Consider the case of Martha Weatherspoon, a 75-year-old grandmother of 35 who was released from prison about three weeks before Julia Diaco entered her plea. Like Diaco, Weatherspoon was arrested for selling drugs to an undercover cop in 1988. Unlike Diaco, Weatherspoon was poor and black.

Weatherspoon had eked out a living for herself and her daughters as a farm worker upstate. One day on the job she fell off a ladder, disabling herself permanently. No longer able to work, Weatherspoon entered the drug trade that ran rampant through the housing projects she and many other poor families were warehoused in. When she was arrested, Weatherspoon was not granted a lenient plea bargain. No, Weatherspoon was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison. She served 15 of those, and was released early because of good behavior. She may now be subject to resentencing of up to 25 years in prison if she doesn’t complete a drug rehabilitation program.

The criminal justice system is fundamentally flawed. It is unfair. Justice is rarely done. The prison industrial complex* is a major money-maker for private companies, and it is a racist institution that destroys lives, offers no help or recovery, has devastated entire communities, and serves little if any positive purpose.

Personally, I’m of the belief that punitive systems have been massive failures. Yes, we have to protect society from violent and dangerous criminals. Yes, people must be held accountable for their actions. But punitive drug laws illustrate just how thoroughly those ideas have been corrupted and abused.

While I’m highly critical of our criminal justice system, I still understand that we have to operate in it right now, because it’s all we have — which is why I secretly gloat when Paris gets sent to jail, because that’s the form of punishment that our society levels at legal offenders. But let’s not act like this is proof that our justice system is fair, or that the rich and the poor and the black and the white are treated the same (if you think that’s the case, I’d suggest spending a few days on Death Row, particularly in Alabama). And, while we can still hate Paris Hilton for being an entitled, racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, classist, shit-for-brains, soulless asshole, she should be punished for breaking the law, not for being a slut.

*See Angela Davis;


56 thoughts on Justice?

  1. Even the entire premise of The Simple Life — pampered princesses get taken down a few notches in the “real world” — has always struck me as sexist. Would anyone ever even think of making the same show about two rich boys?

  2. I really don’t care that Paris Hilton likes sex. And I don’t think that she deserves to go to jail for being a racist, classist, anti-semitic jerk. I find her personally deeply unappealing, but I really don’t want people to go to jail for being awful people.

    But she isn’t in jail for being a horrible person. She’s going to jail for a few weeks for driving drunk and then for not abiding by the very lenient and moderate punishment she was given for driving drunk. And to be honest, a few weeks in jail seems to me to be pretty appropriate punishment for that crime. We’re not talking about the Rockefeller drug laws. If she were going to prison for ten years, I’d be the first person to protest. She’s not, though. In a just society, I think she’d probably get about what she’s got in our unjust one.

    It’s very hard to think of another punishment that would mean anything to Paris Hilton, since fines are meaningless to her and since she treats any other punishment with contempt. Take away her license and she drives anyway. (That’s what got her in this whole mess. And taking away her license shouldn’t even be much of a punishment for her, since she can hire a full-time driver.) Put her on house arrest and her family plans huge house parties so her house arrest doesn’t cramp her style. I’m pretty sure that nothing awful is going to happen to Paris Hilton in jail, and I think that the injustice that would be perpetuated by letting her get away with drunk driving would be worse than the injustice that is perpetuated by exposing her to a system that is often brutal and unfair, even though she won’t see it’s brutal and unfair aspects.

    Finally, I guess that I just think that driving drunk is a really big deal. It’s a violent crime, and it deserves to be treated as such.

  3. Much as I despise Paris Hilton and her superficial celebrity, I sense that she was caught in a firestorm that has been brewing for a while. If I thought she was more concerned about jail reform than that her roots will be showing when she gets out, I might be able to muster some pity for her. Since that is unlikely, I leave her out of the equation.
    This is less to do with the blonde in the chair than the three sides fighting for control over the punishment. The prosecutor, the judge and the sherrif all have conflicting needs and restrictions under the hodge-podge of legislation that has been foisted on them by years of infighting between the political parties. If this case does anything I hope that it shows that there are deep problems in the justice system that will only be solved by cleaning up the Houses that pass laws without changing them, that make new legislation without cleaning up the old. If letting the top 1% by income start feeling the pain that everyone else has felt starts making the elected work for the electorate then good will come of this, until then I’m betting her roots are mousy brown.

  4. But she isn’t in jail for being a horrible person. She’s going to jail for a few weeks for driving drunk and then for not abiding by the very lenient and moderate punishment she was given for driving drunk. And to be honest, a few weeks in jail seems to me to be pretty appropriate punishment for that crime. We’re not talking about the Rockefeller drug laws. If she were going to prison for ten years, I’d be the first person to protest. She’s not, though. In a just society, I think she’d probably get about what she’s got in our unjust one.

    Right, but people aren’t gloating about her jail time for driving with a suspended license. People are gloating because she’s a whore who finally got hers.

    As I said in the post, I don’t dispute the argument that she should go to jail for what she did. I think she should be in jail. Duh. That’s not the issue I’m writing about. I have a problem with the idea that it’s some sort of great judicial victory, and that it proves that our system works. I also take issue with the way people are celebrating her punishment — by focusing on the slut factor.

  5. Right, but people aren’t gloating about her jail time for driving with a suspended license. People are gloating because she’s a whore who finally got hers.

    I don’t know about “people,” because obviously people are gloating for all different kinds of reasons. But I don’t think it’s as simple as her being a whore. I think people are gloating because she’s someone who publicly didn’t think the rules applied to her, whether those were the rules surrounding sexuality or the rules surrounding anything else. And while it’s fun to watch people who can do whatever they want, it’s also fun to watch them get cut down to size.

    I’m not saying this is a good dynamic: it’s unsettling, especially since it mostly seems to apply to women. But I think that, for a lot of women, it has to do with our own complex relationship with the rules that govern our lives. On the one hand, we resent them, and on the other hand, we want to be acknowledged and rewarded for following them. There’s a certain wish-fulfillment when we get to watch people who can defy the rules, and there’s a different wish-fulfillment when they get their comeuppance. And I don’t think that just has to do with sexuality. It’s not just that Paris doesn’t have to abide by the “don’t-be-a-slut” rule. it’s that she doesn’t have to abide by the “be polite” or “work hard” or “make it seem like you’ve earned your goodies” rules, either.

    And the thing is, a lot of those rules are bullshit. “Don’t be a slut” is a bullshit rule. But “don’t put other people’s lives at risk rather than calling a cab” is not a bullshit rule. Neither, really, is “be polite,” although it has some shitty applications. And I think that what the Paris Hilton morality tale does for us is confirm that some of the rules that govern our lives are rules worth following. The problem is that we’re confused about which rules those are, and we sometimes elide strictures that don’t have anything to do with each other. So we think that “don’t be a slut” is somehow related to “don’t drive drunk,” when they’re not the same at all.

  6. I am thinking about this, and this may be wrong, so let me toss it out there with that in mind:

    Paris’ sex life, clothing, public persona, etc are part and parcel of what has made her famous. (she was always rich, but not always famous.)

    Her fame is what has contributed both to the awareness that her get-out-of-jail card was unfair and undeserved, and ALSO, in all probability, to the house parties, driving drunk, etc etc.

    There’s a lot of slut-shaming, which makes me wince. But I think the way Paris lives her life may well be pretty relevant to the way this jail thing has panned out. So I am leaning towards thinking that discussing her persona w/r/t this is perfectly fair game.

    I may be wrong; as I said, i’m still trying to work this out.

  7. the15th- there was a “reality” show a summer or two ago where a (multi?)millionaire made his two lazy sons work to inherit his money. The name escapes me cause I only saw promos for it, and I can’t speak to whether their sex lives/appeal played into the show at all. But the angle, from what I saw, was definitely “two pampered princes getting taken down a notch in the real world.”

  8. Right, but people aren’t gloating about her jail time for driving with a suspended license. People are gloating because she’s a whore who finally got hers.

    I think, to a certain extent, the sexualized insults are proxies for class-based insults that don’t exist: they are words intended to injure women, not to convey meaning. I can’t think of any other situation in recent memory where this amount of vitriol has been unleashed on a woman who is simply sexually promiscuous.

    Frankly, the sexualized insults seem more like threats of rape directed at someone who doesn’t deserve their privilege than some kind of general social opprobrium against sluts.

    — ACS

  9. there was a “reality” show a summer or two ago where a (multi?)millionaire made his two lazy sons work to inherit his money.

    Ok, but what do you think that it says that it wasn’t nearly the cultural phenomenon that The Simple Life was? I don’t think the Simple Life would have worked with male stars. The whole point was that it fused class stereotypes with dumb blond stereotypes. It worked because it combined resentment (and envy) of rich people with resentment (and envy) of uppity bitches.

  10. the15th- there was a “reality” show a summer or two ago where a (multi?)millionaire made his two lazy sons work to inherit his money.

    Heh, that’s pretty interesting…I wonder who it was. I stand corrected.

  11. It worked because it combined resentment (and envy) of rich people with resentment (and envy) of uppity bitches.

    That’s true — it seems like there’s an assumption that rich women are catty shrews who can’t relate to women of other social classes, but rich men can sit back and have a beer with poor men and relate to them on the basis of their shared guyness. That’s why some of these housework debates as played out on the pages of publications like The New York Times annoy me, because it’s not just about work conditions (can the gardener afford to feed his family on this salary?) but about emotional issues (how does the nanny’s employer feel about her? how does she feel about her employer? is the nanny too attractive? is the employer a bitch? catfight!!!)

  12. God help me, but I feel sorry for the woman. I don’t think she’s bad, just extremely immature. If 40 is the new 30, Paris Hilton is proof that in some cases, 26 is the new 16.

    In any case, it was unforgivably cruel to let her think she was going to be let out of prison early and then yank her back in. That would have unhinged people with much stouter emotional makeups.

  13. I don’t think the gloating is over punishing Paris for being a slut, that it is primarily for the other reasons you named, but I do think it’s very interesting that the primary choice for insulting Paris is using sexual language.

    What does it say about our culture that we would rather call her a whore than a snobby, entitled brat when we want to insult her?

  14. Americans get sexual retribution mixed up with criminal justice constantly, not just regarding women either. What’s the number one favorite American moron response to hearing that any guy the moron dislikes has gotten sentenced to jail? “Huh huh he’s gonna get raped in prison huh huh huh.”

    Yeah, rape, so funny! Americans are fucked up.

  15. mk,
    The show you’re thinking of was called The Princes of Malibu. One of the reasons that it didn’t become a cultural phenomenon is that only two of the six episodes aired.

  16. What does it say about our culture that we would rather call her a whore than a snobby, entitled brat when we want to insult her?

    That snobby, enttiled brats have a substantial amount of control over the lexicon, and sex workers almost none.

    — ACS

  17. the 15th and mk- I think that you are referring to The Princes of Bel-Air which was about David Foster and his two step-sons (the sons of Bruce Jenner and his first wife). It was a real train wreck and the thought that kept going through my head was – if I had ever tried something like that I would have been thrown out so fast I would have left body parts behind. The funniest part was the Spanish speaking staff whose subtitled comments were all basically- back away slowly, rich people are crazy.

  18. I’m conflicted over the whole Paris brouhaha… I do believe she should serve her time, but again… just as happens with Ann Coulter, MeMe Roth, Michelle Malkin, hell, even Jessica Valenti, women who generally conform to societal standards of beauty, intentionally or not, are called sluts, transsexual, anorexic, etc, etc, etc… rather than called out on their actual transgressions (real or perceived). People talk about the invective coming from the wingnuts, but I am no longer surprised to see the same knee-jerk, misogynistic BS coming from the supposed left. It’s really shocking, especially online, to see the hate that people allow to show; things that I think they would be deeply cautious about saying to anyone face to face. (Ah, the wonderful anonymity of the internet!) Yes, Paris is spoiled, entitled, sarcastic, dismissive and cruel. But she is human, and sometimes I get the feeling she’s not really very happy. Have you ever seen a picture of her smiling where it looked like she was smiling because she was happy? Do you think she has any REAL friends? Do you think she thinks she does? I feel sorry for her that her life seems so superficial. Is it her fault she is who she is? Yeah, to an extent… Is it her fault she was born to rich, white parents? No more than it’s anyone’s fault to be born to their parents. How would I have turned out if everything I ever wanted was handed to me on a silver platter without ever having to TRY? Without ever having to ever work for anything, or accomplish anything? I don’t know. Would I feel any compulsion to fight against a system that gave me everything I wanted? With parents reinforcing my entitlement? Where should she have looked to learn differently? It’s not right, but it’s certainly understandable. I get no joy from Paris going to jail other than maybe it will wake America up to the American injustice system and it’s racist, sexist, and overall classist prejudices. (Funny, racist and sexist are just fine, but the spell check doesn’t like classist… How surprising.) Paris is a symptom, the warped justice system is the disease. What’s the point of all this? I dunno… But I always thought the left was more about being able to try and empathize and not judge quite so harshly and out of hand. There may be real evil in the world, but it’s not Paris… She’s just ignorant because she’s never had any incentive to be anything else. We all have our faults…

  19. This was an awesome post. Thanks! I think about this kind of stuff all the time when it comes to hate crimes — or heck, even when it comes to what should be done with the guy who ran Erica Keels over four times. It’s atrocious that the police refuse to do anything about this, and I kind of want to see her killer “brought to justice,” but at the same time, justice? What justice? We’re groping in the dark for something that’s dangled and promised to us, that rarely happens in this system, and in truth, would not really involve punitive solutions if it were real justice.

  20. would not really involve punitive solutions if it were real justice.

    Does it make me a terrible liberal that I’m not sure I agree with this. Obviously, I think the current system is often too punitive, or punitive for the wrong things. But I don’t have a problem with the idea of punishing people.

  21. One of the reasons that it didn’t become a cultural phenomenon is that only two of the six episodes aired.

    I suspect that had to do with low ratings and reflects, rather than shaped, people’s interest in seeing rich guys taken down a peg.

  22. Does it make me a terrible liberal that I’m not sure I agree with this. Obviously, I think the current system is often too punitive, or punitive for the wrong things. But I don’t have a problem with the idea of punishing people.

    No, it just makes you a liberal as opposed to a radical, and not terrible at all. The idea of doing away with punitive justice, which I agree is not likely to happen in our lifetimes or our children’s, is a fairly radical view. It would probably require a massive overhaul of our entire society (see also: “revolution”)

  23. Thanks, debbie! My impression from those promos was also that the show dealt more with the “princes” continuing to drive their dad crazy than them mucking up other people’s lives while they tried to work in the “real world”–the latter being one aspect of “The Simple Life” I often hear discussed. (I have to admit I’ve never seen it, hence my total lack of interest in Paris Hilton one way or another. My only opinion of her is that she was pretty bad in the remake of House of Wax, an otherwise terrible gore-fest, and that her single was rubbish.)

  24. No, it just makes you a liberal as opposed to a radical, and not terrible at all.

    I don’t buy that, actually. I’m not saying that I am a radical, but I don’t think that the distinction between radicals and liberals has a thing to do with whether you believe in punitive justice. I think there are plenty of liberals who believe that the purpose of “justice” is to provide people with incentives to be good, and if you can be sure that letting someone get away with rape wouldn’t affect whether they or anyone else will rape in the future, so be it.

  25. I don’t think that’s the entire distinction, of course. But you suggested that the punitive system of justice was in need of reform, which is the classically liberal approach, because it’s too punitive or punitive for the wrong things. Not all self-described radicals advocate for abolition of prisons or punitive approaches to crime, but it’s a radical position because it advocates doing away with the system altogether instead of reforming it. I’m not sure what you meant by your last sentence, but that just sounds like a different rationale for punitive justice — as a deterrent, as opposed to “punishment is just, in and of itself.”

  26. I really hate all the bullshit relating to Paris that I see in the media. Yes, I think she is spoiled, but at the same time- she has probably never had anything expected of her, how would she know that she needs to enroll in some classes on race relations? Had I not graduated high school (and been given a free pass on that by my mother) I might be as ignorant as she is. To a certain extent, I don’t think she knows to act better than she does, because no one ever gave her any discipline as a child.

    Paris as whore in our media is disgusting. Every one of her negetive traits can be boiled down- by our media- as “its because she has sex.” The whole thing makes me sick.

    The Princes of Malibu probably failed because they weren’t famous- the Simple Life succeeded in part because these were two famous girls.

  27. Last I checked, Mel Gibson has a few bucks, is an anti-semite, and drove drunk. He is not in jail, nor are people calling for him to be gang raped to teach him a lesson. Paris Hilton is Marie Antionette. Had you been married to the King of France at 14 without ever having dressed yourself in your entire life, your lack of empathy with the world at large would likely be astounding. Also, 50 years from now when we all have our personal porn videos on our myspace pages, her exploits will seem quaint and all our tisk tisking will make us seem like horrid fuddy duddies. Like poor Marie, all of society’s loathing and fear about class and sex are being focused on one lucky woman.

  28. So anyone who wants to reform rather than abolish anything is by definition a liberal rather than a moderate? I mean, what if you want to reform rather than abolish the agriculture system? Or public transit?

    I don’t believe that it is possible to construct a society in which nobody will ever do wrong. I just don’t. If that makes me a liberal, a bad feminist, an evil person… whatever. I can deal with that. Even come the revolution, people will still drive drunk, because they’ll exercise poor judgment or be too lazy to figure out an alternative way to get home. (And if no one drives come the revolution, they’ll misbehave in other ways. Belligerent drunks will still pick fights and punch people.) We won’t magically be made perfect once we abolish capitalism. And even come the revolution, driving drunk will not be ok. Whether prison is the right punishment, I don’t know. But I don’t think there will ever be a society in which we never need to punish anyone.

  29. I just don’t care about frigging PH at ALL. she’s a vapid, pointless celebutante who I really resent even knowing who the hell she is.

    but yes, the cutesy sniggering about “a night in Paris” and so on, even from people who i think should know better, i can do without that, too.

    AND now i resent feeling like i’m even defending her. I. DON’T. CARE. about these people! god, can this era -ever- be over?

  30. supposedly critiquing drunk driving by depicting Paris dead, naked and with her legs spread open (created, notably, by the same dude who did the pro-life Britney-birthing statue).

    oh, cute.

    did i mention that i hate right now?

  31. I’m with belldame–I don’t care, I have other things to worry about. I don’t even get why people care about PH, or anyone else who is famous for being rich.

  32. Even the entire premise of The Simple Life — pampered princesses get taken down a few notches in the “real world” — has always struck me as sexist. Would anyone ever even think of making the same show about two rich boys?

    Well, the novel is 110 years old this year, but see Captains Courageous by Rudyard Kipling.

  33. I don’t think the Simple Life would have worked with male stars. The whole point was that it fused class stereotypes with dumb blond stereotypes. It worked because it combined resentment (and envy) of rich people with resentment (and envy) of uppity bitches.

    right, because the default assumption is that rich -men- must’ve at least done -something- to deserve all that cash.

    watching vapid playboys run around and make asses of themselves wouldn’t have even been “cute,” it would’ve been–well, either they’d get a “job” as a CEO a la Patrick Bateman/Dubya and we’d all assume they somehow “earned” it, or, if they -really- acted like Paris & co., there’d be actually i think a lot more rancor.

    but there probably wouldn’t be nearly as many jokes about their genitalia, even if they did have homemade porn tapes out on the market.

  34. Considering that nearly 2/3rds of the country believes in special creation of humans less than 10,000 years ago (damn the carbon dating and most fields of modern science), this obsession, both in the mainstream media and elsewhere, seems oddly appropriate. It may be less illustrative and more just a little bit of history repeating, like the Summer of Condit prior to the 9/11 attacks.

  35. I don’t even feel obliged to form an opinion about Paris Hilton’s moral character before concluding there’s nothing edifying about this latest Day of the Locust spectacle. She’s not the really appalling thing, the spectacle is. Read James Walcott’s blog on it.

    Resentment of her alleged sexual conduct – others may be more expert than I am about what acts she’s performed with how many people – can’t just be a proxy for resentment of the rich. Poor women aren’t exactly feted for being sluts, & neither are ones at the 50% percentile of the income distribution. The resentment may take different forms, but chalk that up to the intersection of class & gender (& celebrity , & other stuff).

    It’s obviously not really some sober national dialogue on the criminal justice system, & it’s not just MADD people who’re savoring the schadenfreude. There was similar nastiness at the death of Anna Nichol Smith, who was charged with no felony. It’s not entirely these women’s fault that, even though they’d won no talent contest, the society raised them up as celebrities. It always was a condition of their fame that, when things got rocky, the crowd would finally turn on them. I leave it to others to decide who should go to jail, but prisoners’ misery rarely makes me giddy.

  36. Resentment of her alleged sexual conduct – others may be more expert than I am about what acts she’s performed with how many people – can’t just be a proxy for resentment of the rich. Poor women aren’t exactly feted for being sluts, & neither are ones at the 50% percentile of the income distribution. The resentment may take different forms, but chalk that up to the intersection of class & gender (& celebrity , & other stuff).

    I don’t think I was particularly clear. I didn’t mean that the sexualized insults were not really sexualized insults — just that insults, in general, occupy a conceptual space similar to obscenities.

    — ACS

    (I think the thought process involved goes like this: women should suffer consequences for having sex –> Paris Hilton never suffers consequences for anything! –> What a slut!)

  37. Well, yeah.

    Good point on the justice system, though. It’s nice to hear it from someone actually doing law. The more of us who get what a mess it is, the better chance we have of fixing it.

  38. People evidently really think there’s empirical warrant to call her a slut. If they thought she were celibate, they wouldn’t call her a slut, even if they thought she never suffered consequences for anything she did do.

  39. If they thought she were celibate, they wouldn’t call her a slut,

    With all due respect, I’ve seen virgins and monogamous women called sluts. Slut has nothing to do with the state of a woman’s bed and everything to do with people wanting to use an insulting name that will cause instant shame in her.

  40. All the glee that some people have over Paris Hilton’s fall reminds me of certain cultures that treat human sacrifice victims extraordinarily well for a time before they’re sacrificed, like the Aztecs’ sacrifices to Tezcatlipoca. It’s this ritual that we perform, over and over, with our celebrities, knowing full well and anticipating what will come with at least some of them.

  41. Deoridhe, I take your point, which I tried to anticipate in 33. But sometimes people do attack women for the imagined state of their beds. I think in this case “slut” isn’t used just as a generic misogynist insult. The malice expressed toward this woman does have something to do with, is made more virulent by the fact that she’s publicly held up as an actual slut. All women are subject to this kind of abuse, but perceived real sluts get the worst of it.

  42. There was also a reality show called Survival of the Richest, where pampered princes and princesses were paired with broke kids and all were forced to do scut work.

  43. I don’t know about California, but in Massachusetts, a second driving with a suspended license offense in just a couple of months would result in a mandatory jail sentence.

    As for the whole slut thing, I’m pretty sure the judge couldn’t care less about it. I think what he DID care about was a spoiled child who decided that the law just didn’t apply to her.

  44. I don’t know how many people hate Paris for being a “slut”. I am sure there are quite a few, but most of what I have read over the last week in blog comments has absolutely nothing to do with her free style sex life. It has to do with class.

    For myself, I have no problem with who or how or where she screws. The tragedy of Paris has everything to do with the rich feeling entitled to dodge accountability and the rule of law.

  45. We should feel ashamed for paying attention to her at all.

    On Saturday, I went to work for overtime and on the 7 AM NBC broadcast was the news of Paris Hilton’s return to jail – first news item. Second was a meeting between the chief executive of the world’s largest superpower and the chief executive of the world’s largest religious organization on the morality and ethics of the continuing [Civil] War in Iraq. Burn my tongue for saying this but Bush and His Holiness deserved better. So did the soldiers at Walter Reed who are learning in occupational therapy how to use a urinal while standing on a titanium leg.

    We Americans who crow arrogantly about how “good” we are fueled this insanity. We have gotten so used to being convinced of our greatness that we as a people have forgotten decency and prudence, if we ever knew it. L’Affaire Hilton is a petty sign of our vapidity as a people. One strains to imagine the Belgians, the Dutch, the Moroccans, the Thais engaging in such a piece of stupidity. Imagine how losers gave up other activities to put ink to signs proclaiming “Free Paris!” around the LA County courthouse; one hopes perversely that they were actually losers-for-hire paid off by Hilton’s Hollywood publicity machine to be there, rather than volunteer losers working pro malo publico.

    Maybe this country is actually not worth saving, one wonders. Maybe it’s time to amputate and cauterize, rather than save, if one wealthy LA County drunk driving probationer outranks the Pope and the President combined on a matter of life and death.

  46. I don’t know how many people hate Paris for being a “slut”. I am sure there are quite a few, but most of what I have read over the last week in blog comments has absolutely nothing to do with her free style sex life. It has to do with class.

    Yeah, and I think this is true, but why are people using slut as shorthand for brat? And why can’t I even think of an appropriate slur to use against someone who is too rich or high class? The default language seems to be misogyny when people can’t express their disdain accurately.

  47. the only part of this post I disagree with is this:

    Yes, there’s a question as to whether anyone else would have received a jail sentence for doing what she did (as far as I can tell, the answer is probably “no”).

    She drove drunk with an invalid license, then violated her probation. You can bet your ass if I’d done that (and I’m a “nice looking” little white lady) I’d have gone to jail. I was once pulled over sober with a suspended license (I didn’t know it was suspended) and the cop wanted to take me to jail right there -he was actually kind of adorably cluelessly jovial about it and looked genuinely surprised at my dismay – but I manage to talk him into letting me go if my boyfriend drove. Now imagine if I was drunk. Now imagine I’d been busted for both those things and put on probation then violated the terms of my probation. No way in hell I wouldn’t get jailtime.
    The rest of it though is dead on. I’m sick of hearing about how much of a “slut” or a “skank” she is. There are legitimate reasons to dislike her, why does she need to be persecuted for her imagined sex life.

  48. Roger said:

    I think what he DID care about was a spoiled child who decided that the law just didn’t apply to her.

    I don’t think he really cared about that either. From my reading of the situation, the judge was pissed off that the sheriff’s department made a unilateral decision regarding PH’s sentence based on medical evidence he did not see. Throughout the hearing, the judge pointed out that the evidence which the sheriff’s department used to make the decision to send PH home was at no time (even during the hearing) presented to him so that he could consider it.

  49. # Rin at 11:31 am

    What does it say about our culture that we would rather call her a whore than a snobby, entitled brat when we want to insult her?

    At least some of it is that the automatic comeback to “snobby entitled brat” is “you’re just jealous”. “Slut” is such a shameful word that the “you’re just jealous” response simply doesn’t work so well, and people know that even if they don’t realise that they know that, and that is why they go with “slut” etc.

  50. “Slut” is such a shameful word that the “you’re just jealous” response simply doesn’t work so well, and people know that even if they don’t realise that they know that, and that is why they go with “slut” etc.

    I don’t know. When I was called a slut when I was younger, I’d come back with a, “You’re just jealous — I’M GETTIN’ LAID.”

    I was a shit, though.

  51. All the glee that some people have over Paris Hilton’s fall reminds me of certain cultures that treat human sacrifice victims extraordinarily well for a time before they’re sacrificed, like the Aztecs’ sacrifices to Tezcatlipoca. It’s this ritual that we perform, over and over, with our celebrities, knowing full well and anticipating what will come with at least some of them.

    Yeh, good call. Except for now Mel Gibson’s gonna come along and make a movie about the Aztecs starring Paris, or something.

  52. I agree that she deserves to go to jail, but all of those people out there who gleefully call her “slut” and “whore” seem to overlook the fact that we only have empirical evidence of one sexual relationship with one man. No, i’m not naive and I’m sure there has been more, but still.

    Bottom line – terms like “slut” and “whore” are pejorative terms directed only at women for the purpose of attacking their sexuality. As far as I’m concerned there is no room in civilized society for such a thing.

Comments are currently closed.