In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Hot GOP Cheerleaders Are Waiting for You

Um. Perhaps she’s just trying to impress Derbs?

Thanks to Ali for the link.


38 thoughts on Hot GOP Cheerleaders Are Waiting for You

  1. Today’s wacky new conservatives get more and more bizarre every day. As I believe I’ve said before somewhere or other, they’re not just shitting the bed, they’re shitting the bed in the insane asylum.

  2. So, I uh… get… what she’s going for and all… Or something. But seriously, chicken sounds from an See n’ Say? Wouldn’t it have been more meaningful if she had flapped her arms and made the clucks herself?

  3. Conservatives are so un-funny it’s sad. Chicken sounds would have been more apropos had she been mocking, oh, CHICKENHAWKS.
    And her jumps are embarassing.

  4. Part of me thinks that she posted this video for two reasons: 1) To get perverted applause from her audience and 2) So when liberals point out that she’s playing into a porno fantasy for her audience, she can scream about how horrible and sexist The Left is.

  5. I don’t suppose it’s saying anything brilliant and insightful to suggest that Malkin is more interested in looking “hawt” than in being taken seriously as a political commentator, no matter what she says to the contrary.

  6. OK – I live under a rock and do NOT know who this is. Anybody want to enlighten the ignorant one (me)?

  7. Tiny, it’s Michelle Malkin. (At least, I think so. My retinas haven’t recovered yet.)

    just, um, wow. pride is clearly a thing of the past.

  8. Wow, that’s depressing. She’s not even good at cheerleading or being sexy, the kind of things that conservative pundits always claim they’re better at.

    The most hilarious thing is that Harry Reid’s actual quote was something like “As long as we follow the President’s path in Iraq, the war is lost. But there is still a chance to change course.”

  9. “Her jumps need serious work.”

    There are times when you just need to spring for professionals rather than trying for a DIY project. Surely there was an experienced cheerleader who’d have thought it was a great idea and who could have used the paycheck?

  10. Having at one point in my life actually entertained the idea of attending Liberty U (I was young and naive), I’m familiar with the dress code and I have to wonder how the cheerleaders get away with those uniforms? Shouldn’t they at least be ankle length or soomething?
    Anyway, back to the post at hand… that was one of the cheesiest things I’ve seen in a very long time. I can’t believe she actually consented to that being released.

  11. Malkin seems to be mixing porn archetypes. What cheerleaders wear Catholic schoolgirl skirts?

    Also, what an annoying voice she has!

  12. I think her “S” was backwards. Not that her ability to form letters with her arms affects the validity of the argument. The argument being that calling someone a loser makes them wrong, I guess.

  13. But isn’t it a legitimate argument that if we are going to get out then let’s do it NOW and not wait 8 – 10 months?

  14. At first I was thinking, “Is that Malkin?” Then I decided it must be some idiot college student with poor video editing skillz.
    Oh, how wrong I was. About her not being Malkin. Or a college student.

  15. I thought is was kinda of funny in a goofy sort of way.

    And since the democrats never seem to deliver on major issues like universal health care, Iraq, ect..— they are in fact losers in my opinion.

    PS Reid voted for the partial birth abortion ban. LOSER.

  16. I watched it the first time around without the sound, then read something about chicken sounds here in the comments…

    That video is hilarious. But its not funny in the “laughing with Malkin” kind of way.

  17. do you think her voice is capable of achieving more than one single pitch, ever? i have never heard anyone who sounded more like one of those text-to-speech readers.

  18. Are parties out of power usually expected to deliver?

    When large majorities of Americans support certain positions, I think that you should be able to win. Also democrats have controlled many states, where they could have delivered on a single payer health system.

    Two predictions: The democrats will be in power in 2008. And they won’t get the troops out of Iraq.

  19. Are parties out of power usually expected to deliver?

    What an asshole.

    do you think her voice is capable of achieving more than one single pitch, ever?

    Well I’ve yet to see evidence that she doesn’t have one of those drawstrings coming out of her back that gets her a-moving and a-squeeking

  20. Two predictions: The democrats will be in power in 2008. And they won’t get the troops out of Iraq.

    We’re going to be in Iraq for decades without some sort of drastic political sea change here in America (or economic collapse, who knows?). Look for information on our military bases and embassy being built/already built there. The embassy alone is projected to cost over $1 billion and is the size of Vatican City.

    The latest non-binding resolution for troop withdrawal within 1 or 2 years sponsored by the Dems contains giant loopholes and only calls for combat troops to come home–depending on the estimates you look at, this is probably around 25-50% of all the troops over there… leaving… what? 70,000 at a minimum?

  21. Yes, Bolo, and don’t forget the “bases” that will undoubtedly be maintained in the “countryside” indefinitely.

  22. This video is the best evidence yet of the old line’s wisdom: If you don’t have a sense of humor, don’t try to be funny.

Comments are currently closed.