The Moonie-owned Washington Times did a recent series on sex-selective abortion in India. Which, handled right, could be a great opportunity to discuss gender issues and the value of girls in a society like India, as well as the economic and societal pressures that lead to the strong preference for boys over girls (not the least of which, especially for poor families, is the dowry system, which still hangs on despite efforts to eradicate it).
But it’s the Moonie Times, so anything like this needs to be assessed carefully. I haven’t read the whole series, but Tracy Clark-Flory feels that the politics (and feminst-bashing) on display outweigh the reporting.
Where could this political bias come from? Right from the top, we come to find out. The reason the story was printed had a lot to do with the fear of horny brown men coming to America in search of brides:
The day before, there was a brief discussion on the foreign desk about a pending series by religion writer Julia Duin on the abortion of girls in India….In the discussion with colleagues on The Washington Times foreign desk, [foreign desk editor David Jones] said: “The reason we are running this story is that [editor-in-chief] Coombs thinks all the aborted girls means that Indian men will be immigrating to the United States to marry our girls.” That is an exact quote, what Jones told his colleagues on the foreign desk.
Coombs has told me and others repeatedly that he favors abortion because he sees it as a way to eliminate black and other minority babies.
And by “our girls,” they most likely mean “white Christian women.” Watch for the Moonie Times to begin (afresh) urging white women to outbreed the brown invaders.