In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The Educational “Boy Crisis”

May be vastly over-stated.

A study to be released today looking at long-term trends in test scores and academic success argues that widespread reports of U.S. boys being in crisis are greatly overstated and that young males in school are in many ways doing better than ever.

Using data compiled from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a federally funded accounting of student achievement since 1971, the Washington-based think tank Education Sector found that, over the past three decades, boys’ test scores are mostly up, more boys are going to college and more are getting bachelor’s degrees.


This is certainly good news, and I don’t see why it should be surprising, given that more people in general are going to college and getting bachelor’s degrees.

Although low-income boys, like low-income girls, are lagging behind middle-class students, boys are scoring significant gains in elementary and middle school and are much better prepared for college, the report says. It concludes that much of the pessimism about young males seems to derive from inadequate research, sloppy analysis and discomfort with the fact that although the average boy is doing better, the average girl has gotten ahead of him.

And there’s the sticking point: If girls start to surpass boys, we panic.

The income issue is an important one, though, and one that is not sufficiently dealt with.

“There’s no doubt that some groups of boys — particularly Hispanic and black boys and boys from low-income homes — are in real trouble,” Education Sector senior policy analyst Sara Mead says in the report. “But the predominant issues for them are race and class, not gender.”

Black and Hispanic boys test far below white boys, the report notes. The difference between white and black boys in fourth-grade reading last year was 10 times as great as the improvement for all boys on that test since 1992. Still, the report notes, the performance of black and Hispanic boys is not getting worse. The average fourth-grade reading scores for black boys improved more than those of whites and Hispanics of both sexes.

We need to deal with the race and class issues, and focus on improving education in low-income neighborhoods.

And about those evil feminists who make it their job to hurt men and boys:

The “boy crisis,” the report says, has been used by conservative authors who accuse “misguided feminists” of lavishing resources on female students at the expense of males and by liberal authors who say schools are “forcing all children into a teacher-led pedagogical box that is particularly ill-suited to boys’ interests and learning styles.”

“Yet there is not sufficient evidence — or the right kind of evidence — available to draw firm conclusions,” the report says. “As a result, there is a sort of free market for theories about why boys are underperforming girls in school, with parents, educators, media, and the public choosing to give credence to the explanations that are the best marketed and that most appeal to their pre-existing preferences.”


16 thoughts on The Educational “Boy Crisis”

  1. Go to the Education Sector’s Web site and under “Staff” you will find that most everyone has worked with either Clinton, Gore, NPR, or a “women’s issues” group. I don’t see how this report can NOT be biased. The fact is, far more women than men are in colleges, and that was not addressed adequately. If this keeps up, America wind up like England, with massive numbers of unemployed men with nothing to do but be violent and ciminial. Having had a son in the US public schools, I can tell you firsthand they are not suited to boys’ learning styles. I’m not sure what the goal of feminists here is – but it is not working for boys and to ignore that will just make the numberr of home schoolers rise.

  2. The fact is, far more women than men are in colleges, and that was not addressed adequately. If this keeps up, America wind up like England, with massive numbers of unemployed men with nothing to do but be violent and ciminial.

    This doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. First, more American boys than ever before are going to college –those figures are undisputed. So this idea that massive numbers of unemployed men are hanging around and committing crimes seems a little silly, given that more of them are in school. Further, men have greater job prospects without a college degree than women do. The “men’s work” which doesn’t require a BA tends to be much better-paid than “women’s work.”

    Second, your contention that there are “far more women” in college than men is patently false, unless you have an incredibly loose definition of “far more.” Fifty-seven percent of undergraduates are female.

    What’s actually a huge gender gap? The number of college administrators and professors who are women. Women hold just 20% of positions as college presidents. Women also lag behind in many graduate programs.

    My point was that it doesn’t have to be a fight, and that middle-income girls and boys in high school are generally on par with each other — we should be working harder to improve things in low-income communities, where the decks are stacked against everyone.

  3. “Fifty-seven percent of undergraduates are female.”

    That, to me, is “far more” when looked at in perspective. Not because the number is so lopsided, but because in the past decades, there were more men than women on campuses. It didn’t even out; it went in the other direction. And I wonder what happened. Did guys suddenly become stupid? My feeling is the educational system is the problem.

    Had colleges been mostly females for the past century and the number became 57 percent males, I think this would be cause for concern. Also, the numbers I have seen show more women in graduate programs than men. As for colleges presidents being mostly male, we’re getting off-topic, aren’t we? I was addressing what is happening in the pre-college years. I could also cite a recent article that noted that the highest-earning salespeople are women, but it’s not pertinent.

    Anyway, the problem may be in the culture, not the schools. Schools can only work with what they’re getting.

  4. So the woman goes and gets a college degree, becomes a teacher and starts out at $35,000 a year. The boy does not go to college and enters the coal mines at $55,000 (plus a lot of overtime). Dumb ole boys. There’s a crisis all rightie, it’s just not the one they think it is.

    I realize this is localized and anecdotal but all over the country, technical vocations are being rediscovered after being ignored for a generation. Not only have shortages led to high wages they are often jobs that can’t be outsourced. Women need to start looking at these fields in larger numbers.

  5. This “crisis” for boys as the fault of feminists has been over-hyped in the UK as well.

    The actual problem is a mixture of hostile parental attitudes – passed onto the children – towards schools and education, and a wider cultural problem with the low status of women and this myth about boys falling to bits if a woman dares tell them to sit down and behave. If children were brought up to respect female authority then that would solve a lot of this.

    Besides which, I thought the reason that men were so much more succesful and well paid than women was their ability to focus rather than be all scatter-brained like those airhead girlies ?

    The race thing is not so straightforward either, In the UK children of Chinese, Indian and black-African origin all outperform white-British. Why ? Because they come from cultures that say: respect education, respect your teachers. White pupils that succeed come from the subset of mostly middle-class families that say: respect education, respect your teachers. Anyone seeing a pattern here ?

    Another thing that is usually glossed over, is the fact that schoolchildren have been taught largely by women since before Victorian times. For intelligent and middle class women, becoming a governess or nurse were the expected professions. My very poor, working class grandfathers, like many of their generation, left school at 12-14 years old to work in factories or mines. Their teachers were women. Women who were given respect in the community and by the children. So simply blaming poverty is a pretty poor excuse for bad attitudes as well.

  6. Not because the number is so lopsided, but because in the past decades, there were more men than women on campuses. It didn’t even out; it went in the other direction. And I wonder what happened. Did guys suddenly become stupid? My feeling is the educational system is the problem.

    Dennis, perhaps it hadn’t occurred to you that there were more men than women on campuses before because of deliberate discrimination against women.

    Given that the population of women is slightly higher than that of men, why do you feel the number is “so lopsided”? As it is, the breakdowns by race consistently show that the difference isn’t between white boys and girls, but between black and Hispanic boys and girls. Likewise, there isn’t a discrepency between middle- and upper-class boys and girls, although the discrepency between lower-class boys and girls is greater.

    With no other information than that and crime stats, one might well assume that the US prefers to incarcerate poor men of color, rather than educate them.

  7. Also, the numbers I have seen show more women in graduate programs than men.

    Yes, because in some industries, a woman still requires far more education than a man to get an equal job.

    I look at my (engineering) graduate program. While the undergrad programs are more heavily male, the graduate programs are heavily female. In fact, my graduate program became almost exclusively female during the course of my study. Why were the females there but not the males? Because the females looked around and realized that while males could advance based on “real life” experience, the females need to prove that they’re keeping up with their education. A male with a bachelor’s degree could expect to advance within a single company without ever having to prove a commitment to continuing education, a female with a bachelor’s degree could expect to get kicked around from grunt job to grunt job unless she went out and spent the extra time and money doing the work required to PROVE her commitment to her field.

  8. Yes, because in some industries, a woman still requires far more education than a man to get an equal job.

    Also, graduate programs have a nice straightforward set of requirements. You take the right classes, pass your qualifiying exams, write a thesis that’s approved by your committee, and you have a PhD, the same as anyone else’s. Along the way, you submit your papers to journals and conferences that often have blind reviewing policies, and if the work is good enough, you get published. The working world is a little different. “Well, he may not look as good on paper, but he’s got a strong, direct manner that I really like. Reminds me of the last guy we hired.” Which is not to say that there’s no sexism in academia, but at least up to the graduate degree level, it tends to have a pretty well-defined and transparent system of evaluation.

  9. Let me see, you’re telling me more men than ever are going to college and 57% of the college population is female? This looks like a 5th grade algebra equation to me, but without going through a dull proof, when you see an equation like this most people grasp that “x” stands for how many more women are attending school than used to be.

    In that light, Dennis, you’re complaining that the female college population growth has outstripped the male college population growth. Two factors leap to mind to explaining this: a) a few decades ago the majority of the higher education institutes in America were male only including Yale, Princeton, and Rutgers so women have had to catch up, and b) men have career options without a college degree whereas women pretty much don’t. I know a number of men who opted against college because they could do well for themselves with a blue collar job, they figured that college would take up years of their lives, loads of expense, and maybe not provide that big a return. I’ve only known one woman who opted out of college in order to take up underwater arc welding (I idolized her growing up), I know of no other women who decided to forego college for an immediate entry career other than the SAHM track.

    For the record, I agree that the education system is not all it could be, though by all objective measures we’ve improved rather than regressed relative to ourselves, it’s relative to other nations we’re not keeping up. Meanwhile, for all our collective bellyaching about the schools, they’re taking on a much greater burden than they did prior to the supposed 50s golden age. Before that time children with special needs either stayed home or attended special private schools, for instance. Every special needs child costs the district as much as 10 times the cost of an average child. We expect more parenting of our schools, which costs more money, and more afterschool type programs. We demand gifted and talented programs, which cost more. Our schools have to be wired today. Our populations have grown exponentially, our buildings our aging, the information for science classes continually expands. All the while, we balk at raising taxes to cover these new burdens, in fact we fail to raise either the taxes or the tax share for education sufficiently to keep up with inflation. We’re asking them to do much, much more with much, much less.

    If anyone is falling behind, it’s not due to some vast conspiracy, it’s due to simple economics. I’ve loads of ideas on how to improve the situation to some degree (let’s try some classical education techniques, they’ve worked for generations of men and women and the source materials are public domain), but kvetching about one sex over the other isn’t one of them.

  10. Forgot to mention: kudos to anyone who decides to homeschool, all the same, it’s tough but the evidence suggests that it’s better for your children. I have the same plan. Let’s just not forget about the kids with no options but public school, though, or else homeschooling will become one more aspect of the class gap with a good education definitely only available to middle and upper classes.

  11. are you an idiot, Dennis B? It alarms you most that women now outnumber men in college because until recently, men vastly outnumberd women, and you think this means that less men are going to college? until recently, women hardly went to college at all. women have come to outnumber men in college settings not because less men are going to college but because women are. that’s just simple logic!

  12. Let me see, you’re telling me more men than ever are going to college and 57% of the college population is female? This looks like a 5th grade algebra equation to me, but without going through a dull proof, when you see an equation like this most people grasp that “x” stands for how many more women are attending school than used to be.

    Obviously you failed algebra. Numerically, more men than ever are going to college, but there are also more women than ever going to college. It’s entirely possible for women to outnumber men in the present and still have more men in college than at any time in the past.

  13. Forgot to mention: kudos to anyone who decides to homeschool, all the same, it’s tough but the evidence suggests that it’s better for your children.

    Could you give your evidence on this? From a theoretical point of view I can see arguments in either direction. Most parents, for example, are not really well trained to teach their children, and there might be problems in issues of socialization. On the other side is the greater amount of attention a child would get this way and the opportunities for adapting the curriculum to individual needs. – But the costs are very high, and most are going to be women’s to bear. The costs include the salary the homeschooling teacher loses and any future promotion chances that are lost because of the time taken off. If lots of women did this, then it would become an expected thing that women shouldn’t be promoted etc. because they’ll just take twenty years off in the middle.

    On the specific topic of this post, I like to point out that Iran has sixty percent women in its university student population. Funny how feminism even reached its ugly claws to that fundamentalist country…

Comments are currently closed.