In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet


9 thoughts on Proudly Violating Godwin’s Law

  1. I got 9 correct. Interestingly, I always misattributed Hitler’s statements to Coulter, not the other way around. Whatever that might mean.

  2. I only got one wrong. But I have to say, it was more due to the style of language than the actual content of what was being said.

  3. I saw that earlier, and I gave me an excellent solution to the vexing problem: what derogatory nickname shall we bestow upon La Coulter which does not descend into distasteful sexism (e.g. “Mann Coulter,” “that &^%$# c*nt,” etc.) by focusing madly on her genitalia rather than her rabies problem. As I said on eteraz’s website, genitalia are our common woe, and no decent person ever abuses another’s. Anyway, the name I think is appropriate is: Adolf Coulter. Spread it around!

  4. Well, given Ann’s penchant for plagiarism, it’s not surprising that her writing should resemble Hitler’s. She’s probably poaching his stuff.

  5. I got ten right.

    I wouldn’t be surprised atall zuzu.. I wondered how she’d compare to Geobell’s speeches?

  6. I only got seven right. What fooled me in some cases was some rather stilted and I thought old-fashioned language which I attributed to Hitler (thinking that he was writing 60-80 years ago). Admittedly, I don’t read Coulter’s crap much, so I’m not familiar with her “writing style”.

    This isn’t strictly on topic, but…I got a laugh out of a pro-Coulter poster in the comments section of another blog who argued that, among other things, Coulter’s latest screed must be accurate and correct because it’s footnoted. (snicker, chortle)

Comments are currently closed.