In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The Pandering! It Burns!

Oh, fer crap’s sake.

WASHINGTON – President Bush said Friday the national anthem should be sung in English – not Spanish – in a blunt rejection of a new Spanish-language version. He also expressed opposition to a national work stoppage called for Monday to dramatize the importance of immigrants to the U.S. economy.

“I’m not a supporter of boycotts,” Bush said, while restating his support for a comprehensive overhaul of immigration laws.

Bush made his comments at a Rose Garden news conference as a Spanish-language version of “The Star-Spangled Banner,” hit the airways featuring artists such as Wyclef Jean, hip-hop star Pitbull and Puerto Rican singers Carlos Ponce and Olga Tanon.

Called “Nuestro Himno” – “Our Anthem” – the Spanish version rewrites some of the English version. For instance, the second stanza says, “My people keep fighting. It’s time to break the chains.”

“I think people who want to be a citizen of this country ought to learn English and they ought to learn to sing the national anthem in English,” Bush said.

You know, one of the few things I’m willing to give Georgie boy is his refusal to get into demonizing Mexican immigrants, legal and otherwise. Other than the guest-worker proposals, he seems to be more or less on the right side of the immigration issue. But I suppose he has to throw a bone to the Tancredos and the Minutemen of the base every now and again.

Because here’s the thing, George: there are plenty of native-born US citizens who speak Spanish. Including every last person born in Puerto Rico. The US does not have an official language, just a dominant one. And while you like to make pronouncements about who is and who isn’t a Real American, rest assured that Spanish-speaking citizens are every bit as American as your privileged WASPy ass.

I can’t say as I blame him for speaking out against a work stoppage that has the potential to bring the economy to a screeching halt, but the anthem thing is a bit much. Especially when you have clowns like Lamar! Alexander seeking to win the posturing Olympics:

Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said he would introduce a Senate resolution Monday “giving senators an opportunity to remind the country why we sing our national anthem in English.” Noting that America is a nation of immigrants, Alexander said, “We are proud of the countries we have come from, but we are prouder to be Americans.”

And some Americans belong to families that have been speaking Spanish in the territory of the US for longer than the US, as a political entity, has been around.

Oh, but this has nothing to do with brown people, no sir.

In any event, all this hysteria over the Spanish-language anthem overlooks one little thing: it’s not meant to discourage people from becoming Americans:

British music producer Adam Kidron, who came up with the idea of the Spanish anthem, said it was not intended to discourage immigrants from learning English or embracing American culture.

“We instead view `Nuestro Himno’ as a song that affords those immigrants that have not yet learned the English language the opportunity to fully understand the character of ‘The Star-Spangled Banner,’ the American flag and the ideals of freedom that they represent,” Kidron said in a written statement.

Because God forbid they should be able to understand the damn thing.


34 thoughts on The Pandering! It Burns!

  1. “I think people who want to be a citizen of this country ought to learn English and they ought to learn to sing the national anthem in English,” Bush said.

    What a hypocrite.

  2. Someone else on another blog pointed out that there are plenty of gospel or blues-y versions of Star Spangled written to connect with black people, hymnal versions to connect to Christian people, and the whole song is a rip off and a rewrite anyway. I think that this is about a special kind of anti-Hispanic racism that is allowed to flourish in our society, and seems to be getting louder and more pronounced. I think its one of those things, since the immigrants and spanish speakers in this country are actually getting out and opposing laws against them, white people feel free to vocalize a lot of the racism that until now has only been implicit and come up with new racism (reguardless if it is hippocracy or not) that capitolizes on the situation.

  3. My daughter attended a public dual-language immersion kindergarten and every morning the kids recited the Pledge of Allegiance… in English and in Spanish:

    Juro lealtad a la bandera de los Estados Unidos de América y a la república que representa, una nación bajo Dios indivisble, con justicia y libertad para todos.*

    I’m intrigued that a British music producer translated the American anthem, not entirely unlike the French giving us the Statue of Liberty (here, YOU take the downtrodden and the poor).

    *I assume there are various translations around, but as best as I can remember, this is the one the children recited at my daughter’s school.

  4. Oh, fer crap’s sake.

    palabra!

    “We are proud of the countries we have come from, but we are prouder to be Americans.”

    And we’re even prouder-er to be WHITE!

  5. “I think people who want to be a citizen of this country ought to learn English and they ought to learn to sing the national anthem in English,” Bush said.

    Bush is not exactly the person to point fingers at others for failing to master the english language.

  6. I think there are still some places in Central Texas (I’m looking at you, New Braunfels) that may still sing Das Lied der Deutschen (a/k/a Deutschland Uber Alles).

  7. one of the few things I’m willing to give Georgie boy is his refusal to get into demonizing Mexican immigrants

    Uh, he’s saying that if the spanish speaking peoples of america have a version of the anthem that celebrates their culture, then (Presumably becuase they’re so lazy or stupid or something) they’ll not learn english.

    He’s supporting and embracing a racist stereotype, so demonizing mexican immigrants is precisely what he’s doing, even if it is in a rather backhanded manner.

  8. I think Mandy Patinkin did an American medley (including the national anthem) in Yiddish.
    I’m tempted to dig that up and start playing that just in protest of the President’s stupidity…

  9. You ever notice that so many of these English-only assholes can barely speak English themselves?

  10. you know, it’s not as if they’re attempting to change our anthem. G.W. is basically telling them they’re only allowed to sing a song in a certain language. pretty bizarre, if oyu ask me. is this really what he should be concerned about right now? no.

    the united states doesn’t even HAVE an official languge, for christ’s sake.

  11. Uh, he’s saying that if the spanish speaking peoples of america have a version of the anthem that celebrates their culture, then (Presumably becuase they’re so lazy or stupid or something) they’ll not learn english.

    He’s supporting and embracing a racist stereotype, so demonizing mexican immigrants is precisely what he’s doing, even if it is in a rather backhanded manner.

    Well, I probably should have clarified that he didn’t do that until now.

  12. “We are proud of the countries we have come from, but we are prouder to be Americans.”

    In which case, shouldn’t the language in question be Ojibwe or Seminole or Apache or Lakota?

    The phenomenon he’s complaining about is the reason the dominant language of this country is English in the first place.

  13. From that link:
    Purists might quibble with the Spanish phrasing of Estamos comprometidos de trabajar juntos, which could be misinterpreted as saying the two men are matrimonially engaged.

    Bush came out of the closet and no one noticed?

  14. Ironically, now that there’s a version of the Star Spangled Banner in Spanish, Spanish-speaking immigrants and citizens will probably know the lyrics better than English-speaking citizens.

  15. Seriously, having 10 comments ripping into Bush’s speaking skills is not constructive debate.

    Anyway, there are good and bad ideas with the protest movements, I think.

    Good idea: National anthem in Spanish.

    Why?

    It helps to have people understand what the country is: “the land of the free and the home of the brave.”

    Bad idea: Bringing Mexican flags to immigration protests.

    Why?

    It makes people think that you’re anti-American.

    It’s one thing if English were the official language of the country, but it’s not… we don’t have one. Learning English is important; it helps for assimilating people. But learning the country’s values is far MORE important than that.

  16. So, Jim, do you think that all those people waving Irish flags at St. Patrick’s Day parades are anti-American?

    And speaking of what’s not constructive — finger-wagging about the constructiveness of the debate is not likely to win friends and influence people.

  17. JimL:

    Seriously, having 10 comments ripping into Bush’s speaking skills is not constructive debate.

    As compared to what? Kissing his ass?

  18. As compared to what? Kissing his ass?

    You could start with legitimate criticisms of policy preferences, of which there are many.

  19. So, Jim, do you think that all those people waving Irish flags at St. Patrick’s Day parades are anti-American?

    And speaking of what’s not constructive — finger-wagging about the constructiveness of the debate is not likely to win friends and influence people.

    My apologies if I’ve offended anybody, but I’m not trying to win friends and influence people; I know that my powers are quite limited. It bothers me that people avoid legitimate debate in favor of the punchline.

    And no, I don’t believe that waving a Mexican flag at a protest is particularly wrong. I just said that it was probably not a good idea. There are two things:

    1. I’m all for freedom of expression, but you’re not going to get the average American on your side by waving a Mexican flag at a protest.
    2. My interpretation of it is that there’s an element of hostility involved in waving the flag of the country from which you are desperately trying to escape at the country from which you seek opportunity. I could be wrong, but I don’t think that it’s an unfair interpretation, and I don’t think that I’m the only one who has it.

    There’s a difference between displaying the flag during Cinco de Mayo (or St. Patrick’s Day, for that matter) and at a protest. I respect their right to do so, but I don’t think it’s a good idea.

  20. JimL:

    And no, I don’t believe that waving a Mexican flag at a protest is particularly wrong.

    My interpretation of it is that there’s an element of hostility involved in waving the flag of the country from which you are desperately trying to escape at the country from which you seek opportunity.

    Dude, which is it?

    And… “I personally don’t mind it but other people won’t like it” is kinda lame. Now who exactly is offended by the Mexican Flags except the people they are already protesting against so why should they care.

  21. Magis, Jim is doing a classic Concern Troll move. “Well, *I* don’t see it that way, but there are some *other* people who might take it that way. I’m trying to *help* you. But you aren’t discussing what’s important, anyway, and you’re not being civil, either.”

    Though I give him credit for stopping when called on it.

  22. Magis, Jim is doing a classic Concern Troll move. “Well, *I* don’t see it that way, but there are some *other* people who might take it that way. I’m trying to *help* you. But you aren’t discussing what’s important, anyway, and you’re not being civil, either.”

    First off, I love how you have terms for stuff like this. It’s amazing how something as chaotic as the blogging process has become so orderly in its own way.

    I should have clarifed my position better and better represented myself: personally, I DO object to the practice and consider it to be wrong and somewhat offensive and contradictory, but I do not feel that it is the government’s right to censor speech. I don’t think that these viewpoints are contradictory, although you’re welcome to disagree.

    One Catholic priest, an outward supporter of immigrant rights (I don’t know the name off-hand) similarly suggested this to immigrants, that it could alienate people. Now, I don’t know if he was making that up, but I do think he said that deliberately, in order to try to help immigrants gain support from “the average white American.” I read it and his viewpoint made sense to me. I didn’t make up the “concern” aspect; immigration advocates have said the same thing.

    I apologize for my Bush comment; the commenters here were the subject of my response to something that has bothered me for a while: Bush has become somewhat irrelevent to the Left, even if his objectives, once in a while, are relatively similar to theirs. I think the ports deal showed this pretty well. Nora Ephron wrote a pretty good editorial about it, too, if I’m not mistaken, and I think it’s being shown again with immigration.

    I don’t seek to “troll” and I will do my best not to “troll.” That’s all I have. Again, feel free to object, and I will stop commenting here if it would be preferred.

  23. I lived for three years in Puerto Rico when my pops with in the Coast Guard. We sang “This land is your land” but used “From Puerto Rico” instead of “From San Fransico”.

    Guess that’s out too.

  24. Frankly. this whole issue stinks of Prejudice from every angle. It’s ALL about personal context.

    If a bunch of ex-pat Americans took over downtown Paris while waving American Flags we all know that about 80% of America would totally change their tune. Generally speaking, “Liberals” would be talking about American arrogance and jingoism and agreeing that it was an insult to the French while “Conservatives” would forget all about their reaction to the Mexican flags praise the flag-wavers to high heaven and being up the whole “They surrendered to the Germans so who cares what they think” thing.

    The difference in reactions is due almost entirely to different prejudices on the parts of people. Those who are predjuiced to typecast flag-waving Americans as ignorant redneck xenophobes will, of course, think that the presence of thousands of such people in the center of Paris is a provocation and threat. Those who are prejudiced to see them as peaceful patriots will excuse their actions and see the criticism as shrill. In both cases people will tend to typecast the group and forget that these crowds certainly contain a mix of people and motives.

    The exact same thing is going on here. If you are predisposed to see every one as a potential criminal threat you will be turned off by the display of enthnic pride. If you are predisposed to see every one as a deserving refuge fleeing the US dominated economy of their homeland you will tend to think the “threat” is non-existent. Once again, in both cases people ignore the fact that we have a mixed group with mixed motives that cannot be pigeon-holed into a simple narrative.

  25. The stereotype of the “lazy illegal immigrant” does bother me.

    I know lazy. I have been lazy. I have known people too lazy to look for work down the street from where they live. I have NEVER met a “lazy” person who hoofs it for miles to get a job, in a foreign country, earning less than minimum wage.

    I don’t think we should build a wall. I think we should make the border a giant obstacle course, patrolled by rangers with paintball guns, that tests both body and mind – if you make it across without getting tagged you are IN. Just kidding. Call em lazy then.

  26. You missed the insincere apology. “I’m sorry IF my words offended anybody….” Ranks right up there with, “But I was just asking a harmless question about feminism, how do you expect me to LEARN anything, you feminazi bitches?!” for least favorite troll manuevers.

Comments are currently closed.