Seriously. Don’t. I shouldn’t have.
There is no reason to expose yourself to this kind of shit. I’m only writing about it because it has burned such a hole in my brain that I can’t ignore it, and because I think it’s worth pointing out how completely fucking vile these racist misogynist conservative fuckwits are.
(Now, I’m not saying that all conservatives are racist misogynist fuckwits. I’m saying that the racist misogynist conservative fuckwits are racist misogynist conservative fuckwits. Or that racist misogynist conservatives are fuckwits. Whatever. Anyway).
A cautionary note: Includes sexual assault triggers. Big time.
It’s racism at Duke, all right. Racism against white students. Members of the Duke University Lacrosse team may have abused a black party girl, but, without any proof or trial, the Duke Lacrosse team was punished by the university, suspended from further games. So terrified was the administration of being charged with “racism.” The black female wins again. She is truly an ace on the field and in court.
It’s too easy, since the arguments are so classic, and so easy to make. Just take reality and turn it on its head! See, it’s fun:
1. White people are perpetual victims
2. Black people are the real racists
3. Black females always win (and real winners are raped and abused!)
4. Rape “victims” are sluts
5. Sluts can’t be raped
Now, given that Duke University is a private entity, and athletes at almost all universities agree to codes of conduct, it’s not exactly “racism” when they’re punished for breaking those codes. And those codes don’t just say, “Don’t rape.” They include expectations of leadership and decent behavior. And while this guy may think that “abusing a black party girl” ain’t no big thing, most reasonable people think that it is. And even if there were no rape accusations, I suspect that having out-of-control parties, hiring strippers and hurling racial epithets are probably in violation of the athletics code of conduct.
Naturally, the name of the black girl has not been released – appropriate if she is a rape victim, inappropriate if she is engaging in scurrilous race-baiting. The reports say the woman is a divorced, 27-year-old “mother” of two, attending North Carolina Central University. She is not a person of note, and is said to do exotic dancing as a side job to pick up extra cash.
Well, given that you just said that we don’t know if she’s a rape victim, then we probably also don’t know if she is “engaging in scurrilous race-baiting.” And we probably shouldn’t release her name.
Also, what’s with the “mother” in scare-quotes? These are the same people who refer to pregnant, childless women seeking abortions as mothers, despite the fact that they haven’t done any actual mothering. But this woman, apparently, doesn’t qualify because she’s black and poor and takes her clothes off to make ends meet.
The entire Duke Lacrosse team and the university may have been severely maligned on all sides. The alleged incident occurred March 13, but as of Sunday, April 2, no charges have been filed against anyone. One report says 46 of the 47 members of the team were required to submit DNA for testing. (The black member of the team, of course, was exempted, since the accuser says she was attacked by white males.)
Well… yeah, of course he was exempted. The police don’t really like to waste time investigating people who couldn’t have committed the crime. If I see my attacker, and that attacker is clearly of a particular race, don’t we want to focus on suspects of that race?
And if Duke University has suffered because of this incident, then let’s blame the people who caused the incident.
The story, as reported in the papers, indicates either profound social retardation on the part of the black “dancer,” or else irrationality on the part of racist-oriented reporters.
There were two women involved, one apparently white (whose name also remains unrevealed), and the other black. Police got a call from the black woman who claimed she had been yelled at by some guy in the rented quasi-frat house of the Lacrosse team. She and her companion nevertheless went back to the house to “dance,” expecting, they say, four or five college boys to be there. Idiotic mistake No. 1.
Ah yes. She’s stupid, and therefore it was her fault. (Also, what’s with the “dance” in scare-quotes too?).
Then, she says, the two women were suddenly surrounded by 40-some boys, all coughing up racial epithets—presumably at the black woman. (Remember, she’s a 27-year-old-mother. Some of the team members are under twenty-one, else how could any of them have been charged with under-aged drinking?) The women then say they were so upset and frightened that they left the house.
Then, “helplessly,” the two women went back! Idiotic mistake No. 2.
Ok. So she’s stupid and deserves to be raped for it. No matter that some of these men were pretty stupid, and some (I would go as far as to say all, since none of them are willing to tell on their friends) were actively cruel and torturous to another human being.
Some guy on the porch “coaxed” them back, after which time they claim the black woman was abused. So far, there are no witnesses. (So, what happened to the other woman?)
Apparently the second woman wasn’t raped. Perhaps that’s because these men targeted the woman who they perceived as less powerful because of her race.
Two weeks later, the team was suspended from games. The team captains say that the DNA testing will prove that all the members are innocent. This, of course, if true, will mean that it was either an easy set up for the women, or else the fervor of youthful hormones blinded everyone. In the heat of passion, well-ignited before the girls even showed up, there may have been some rough-housing. That should have been a serious tip-off. Of course, a 27-year-old mother of two certainly must have more sense than a drunken 19-year-old, no? However, our nameless victim showed less maturity than a six-year-old.
Is “rough-housing” code for “rape” here? Seriously? As for youthful hormones, well, I’ve got more than a few of those, but I’ve never been so fervently blinded by them that I physically attached someone and engaged in a gang rape.
And a 27-year-old mother should have more sense to what, not get raped?
All the racial issues in this story are moot. This is a tale of stupidity on the part of two women, particularly the black woman.
Act dumb, and you deserve your rape. By the way, I get to define what “dumb” is. And if you weren’t stripping to make money, I’d berate you for being a welfare queen and tell you to get a job and go to school. Of course, I wouldn’t help you pay for your schooling — that’s what your minimum-wage job is for. Can’t be that hard to work 40 hours a week and go to school full time. Then if you did that, I’d tell you that you’re neglecting your kids and you should really be spending more time at home with them.
So, that black woman said, “No,” eh? First, she’s in a profession where she’s expected to do tricks for clients. Second, she’s walking into a house full of young, drunken athletes, who happen to be white. Third, she called the police and complained once; then she went back, but then left. And then she went back again! That’s a peculiar way of saying “No,” it seems to me. These racist black people just want a role model victim, with mistreatment wreaked upon the weakest of the weak: the black woman. All she has to do is cry, “rape by white male!” and she rules the world.
I don’t even know where to start. First, stripping doesn’t require you to do sexual favors for clients. No. Second, walking into a house full of young drunken athletes is consenting to sex? I think a lot of us would be in a spot of trouble if that were the case.
And saying “No” is not a peculiar way to say “no.”
As for black women crying rape and then ruling the world… what? I have to wonder where these kinds of thoughts come from. I suppose the human brain is a powerful organ, but good god that’s quite a stretch. It hurts my head even trying to figure out where he might have gotten that idea.
But she had to have the money, right? She just has to feed those children, pay that tuition, rent, car payment, and books. She’s not on welfare, scholarship, or assistance of any kind? Well, whatever she does receive may not cover her expenses. That’s quite possible.
But, exotic dancing—and then to cry “abuse”? This may be pushing victimhood beyond reason.
Well, yeah, she did have to feed those children, pay that tuition, rent, car payment and books. That’s hardly an example of unfettered greed. Welfare “may not” cover tuition and expenses? How about, welfare benefits barely put food on the table, and thanks to “reform” they cut you off the roles after a few years. So yeah, it’s pretty possible that she did need the money. Christ.
Let’s not forget, though, that strippers can’t be raped, and it’s obscene for exotic dancers to “cry abuse.”
I wonder who else can’t be raped? Prostitutes for sure, and definitely gay men and lesbians, and probably most women of color because we all know that they lie and play the race card in order to further oppress white people. But what about non-virgins? Sorority girls? White women? Anyone who had a sip of alcohol? Vagina-owners in general? I’m guessing that, should they say they were raped, they too would be pushing victimhood beyond reason.
Now I need to go to bed before I scratch out my own eyes.
I found this via some other blog, but now I can’t remember where and I clicked out of it. Sincerest apologies to whoever I just did not credit.
UPDATE: And in case you’re thinking that the author of this article is a random nutjob, David A. Yeagley is an adjunct professor at the University of Oklahoma College of Liberal Studies and a guest speaker for the Young America’s foundation — a pretty mainstream conservative youth organization. This is who “moderate” conservative activists are in bed with. Just something to consider.