In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Cutting Planned Parenthood and Fixing the World

This is a guest post by Rebecca Nathanson. Rebecca Nathanson is student at NYU majoring in Journalism. She writes for NYU Local and rambles about life, feminism, and idealism on her blog. She enjoys dancing, running, drumming, traveling, leather jackets, and Cheerios. She also wants to be Jack White. Or Patti Smith.

We’re all really busy. In the rush of the days that constitute our hectic lives, it’s easy to gloss over the headlines, to dismiss an issue as irrelevant to whether or not you’ll finish your paper on time, to miss something that actually matters in a very real way. There’s a lot of news being thrown at us from every direction and sometimes it’s just simpler to block it out. Sometimes it all feels distant and entirely disconnected from the reality of our days; other times it’s as connected as anything can ever be.

There are certain rights that I take for granted and I’m only just beginning to realize how wrong that is. In an ideal world, there wouldn’t be anything wrong with taking basic rights for granted because they would be unquestionably guaranteed, but this is nothing close to an ideal world and I’m starting to learn exactly how far from secure many of my rights are. Of course, reading the front page of almost any newspaper will tell you this exact information, but oftentimes that information is presented in such a voiceless, impersonal way that we fail to connect it to ourselves. Perhaps it’s just my twenty-year-old naïvety and innocence, but I’m incapable of not feeling when I read about the problems and injustices of our world.

Somehow, despite the onslaught of depressing news that I am faced with, that naïvety and innocence has survived and left me with the silly notion that I have to try to fix the world. Recently, there’s been a surge of pro-life, anti-common decency legislation, a “War on Women,” and I find those two particular traits of mine beginning to wane as I am faced with the reality of the situation. I know that people have different beliefs and points of view, but I honestly never completely registered how seriously those differences could manifest themselves until I started reading about the ridiculous abortion laws that some states are trying to implement and the proposed bill to eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood.

This isn’t abstract or distant or irrelevant to my life; it’s real and it’s scary and it’s fucking disgusting. The fact that the people running this country think that Planned Parenthood isn’t worthy of their valuable money is horrible and the fact that those people were elected, that the majority of people actually chose to give them power, is absurd. My general rule is that my opinions and politics should always be on the side of choice (unless you’re trying to bring a gun to class), but apparently most people do not abide by that, which would be fine if those same people weren’t trying to take away rights that I believe are necessary and fair and essential to my freedom. My beliefs aren’t effecting anyone else’s life, won’t restrict anyone from doing anything, and won’t force anyone into doing something that they don’t want to do. It would be nice if other people had enough respect for their fellow humans to adhere to the same principle.

The fact that you have access to abortion services does not mean that you have to use them. The fact that there’s a place where you can go to get birth control does not mean that you have to go there. All that it means is that you have the option and, while some people may not want the option, it’s completely unfair and unwarranted to try to take that option away from people who want to make use of it. I don’t particularly care if people feel that there is something inherently wrong with the fact that I want to have sex but have no intention of having a baby, but I care if they get in the way of allowing me that small liberty and I care that they think that their opinions are worth more than mine or that they have the right to tell me what I am and am not allowed to do with my body when apparently even I don’t have that right.

As I said, I took those rights for granted. Silly me for ever believing that I deserve the right to choose whether or not I have a child or have access to birth control. My bad. I guess I’ll just go have sex without any and see what happens. I’ll be sure to keep you posted, seeing as how the GOP seems to care so deeply about the details of my sex life.


17 thoughts on Cutting Planned Parenthood and Fixing the World

  1. Great article!

    I think that defunding Planned Parenthood, and women’s health services in general, have two main purposes.

    First, a lot of Republicans want to take us back to a society in which women were second-class citizens and regarded as little more than babymaking machines who could cook and clean.

    Second, abortion is an emotional “wedge issue” that Republicans use to divide people and distract them from the serious problems facing our country.

    The politicians now pushing to defund Planned Parenthood (as well as destroy unions, Medicare, and Social Security) didn’t tell voters that they were going to do that. If they had, they would not have been elected. There aren’t that many people in the Tea Party.

  2. First, a lot of Republicans want to take us back to a society in which women were second-class citizens and regarded as little more than babymaking machines who could cook and clean.

    They don’t think we’re there already? Srsly, I live in Arizona, and we did not get the memo.

  3. NYU grad student here, just wanna say that NYU Local is a disgusting publication full of some of the most vile, misogynist, bullshit that’s come across my screen in a WHILE.

    NYU Local, as I recall, also wrote a headline a couple weeks ago referring to the budget struggle and GOP attempts to cut federal funding to Planned Parenthood as a struggle about “abortions.” It’s ironic that an NYU Local staff writer is now on Feministe, writing about the same topic. Conflating the REAL nature of the fucking conflict in that way that is not only plain fucking ignorant (none of the federal money going to PP goes for abortions, hyde amendment, blah blah blah), but under-emphasizes and conceals what the right wing is ACTUALLY going after. This is exactly what the neo-cons want you to do. As about a million articles and blog posts by Amanda Marcotte and many, many others, defunding Planned Parenthood is really about blocking access basic reproductive health care, ESPECIALLY ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION, for millions of people (particularly people with anatomy that allows them to become pregnant) all over the country. It’s not a conflict about abortion, its a conflict about contraception and medical care for sexually active people, full stop, with the end goal of bringing women (back?) into a state where they exist in perfect servitude to and dependence on men. It’s about controlling sex, controlling reproduction and controlling women’s labor (reproductive and otherwise) in a way that goes much deeper and is much more profound than the struggle over access to abortion (which, admittedly, implicates these things and is pretty fucking deep and profound). However, as long as the right can SAY its really about abortion, they can hide behind the pope and their yucky fetus pictures (seriously, does ANYTHING surgically removed from your body look pretty?) and their lies about breast cancer, and lull us into believing that their end goal REALLY isn’t the total annihilation of our freedom in every sense of the word. Our complacency will mean their success. SO, fuck you very much for that deceptive headline, NYU Local.

    Also, this article was light on the analysis, heavy on the repeating information that everyone who reads this blog probably already knows, heavy on the navel-gazing, and not very good. Did not add much to the discourse. Go back to NYU Local and come back to us when you have something to say (and I’m not saying this because of your age, just my evaluation of the quality of your writing and the quality of the other publication you write for).

  4. It is shocking just how quickly republicans went from having a majority in the house to pushing anti-choice, anti-birth control, anti-women’s health legislation. Hopefully this strategy will backfire and voters in 2012 will vote them back out of office.

  5. I have a few female friends who agree with taking away these rights. I have a really hard time trying to reason with them, it’s like they think I’m on some crazy feminist rant when I try to explain to them that it has more to do with us and our choices and actions than the political party involved.

    But these days I’m not so sure, it doesn’t seem to matter who we elect, they want to control us on a very personal level, and it scares the hell out of me. I don’t understand the obsession the government has with controlling women.

  6. Wow, SunshineSpike, that was really fucking unnecessary. I put the post up because it’s good, and while these issues have been discussed on Feministe, they’ve been talked about intermittently and not everyone reads the blog every day. You need to stop being a dick.

  7. Rinth de Shadley:
    Second, abortion is an emotional “wedge issue” that Republicans use to divide people and distract them from the serious problems facing our country.

    Good reminder; this is easy to forget. Here in Wisconsin, our Democratic senators fled the state to avoid being forced to pass a budget ending collective bargaining rights for public employees, which is incredibly polarizing… and meanwhile, the Republicans pushed through a bunch of other legislation, without the Democrats there to stop it. Diversion tactics!

  8. Rebecca Nathanson wrote: “My beliefs aren’t effecting anyone else’s life…”

    There lies the crux of the argument. To many of those who oppose funding PP and similar organizations, it’s because abortion does affect other people’s lives: all those at risk of being aborted. And to say that, well, not everyone who goes to PP gets an abortion, yes, that is true. But to those who oppose PP, those not born are as real and fully human as you and I. So it would be similar to PP handing out contraceptives and doing health checks, but every now and then, PP takes the life of a child who walks in there with her mom. Some days it’s a five year old that dies, other days it’s a ten year old. Or imagine that it’s Native American women who are intermittently being killed. Or African American men. Would you still want to support it just because they also provide health checks and other services?

    This is more than just conjecture. Again, to them, those who are unborn are just as alive, just as human as those already born. PP might as well be killing ten year old children; there’s no difference. A life is being taken. And for them to stand by while people are being killed is unconscionable. A similar example would be the death penalty. If people are being killed on death row, and I say nothing even though I believe it is wrong, am I not partially responsible for their deaths?

    I’m not saying that you will agree with me here. I doubt that you’re going to wake up tomorrow and say wow, I’m going to totally change my view on this. I’m sure you’ve already considered this in depth, and my simple message isn’t going to suddenly change that. But the day that you convince them that it’s not really a human life but just tissue or a clump of cells is the day that they convince you that it really is a child. I.e., probably not going to happen. Although I do believe, for the most part, both sides are doing what they feel is right and fair and most kind for all concerned.

    I wish I could tell you I agreed with you. That would make this a much less difficult message to type.

  9. My beliefs aren’t effecting anyone else’s life, won’t restrict anyone from doing anything, and won’t force anyone into doing something that they don’t want to do. It would be nice if other people had enough respect for their fellow humans to adhere to the same principle.

    You just reminded me about my first semester in college. I was in the obligatory University Seminar class that served no purpose than wasting an hour of my time each week. The one I was in was restricted to Honors College and scholarship recipients, and when I chose that one I was naive enough to think that would mean the conversations would be interesting. No, as a matter of fact, I was the only non-straight, non-Christian student in the class.

    One day, out of the blue, one of the ultra-religious girls asked the professor “Is it possible to respect a gay person if you don’t accept that they’re gay? Like, I don’t agree with homosexuality, so is it possible to respect a gay person?”

    Every other student immediately told her that yes, she “should respect” all people, God said so, but that doesn’t mean you have to accept them. Just be nice.

    I blew a fuse. I replied that isn’t fucking respect, but fucking courtesy. Everyone should be granted courtesy as human beings on this planet, but respect is something earned. And people don’t come a la carte, so telling someone “I respect you, EXCEPT FOR THIS” isn’t really respect. It’s really the opposite.

    My point is that for a large amount of people, especially the ones screaming for Planned Parenthood to be defunded, don’t know what respect is.

    SunshineSpike: SO, fuck you very much for that deceptive headline, NYU Local. Also, this article was light on the analysis, heavy on the repeating information that everyone who reads this blog probably already knows, heavy on the navel-gazing, and not very good. Did not add much to the discourse. Go back to NYU Local and come back to us when you have something to say (and I’m not saying this because of your age, just my evaluation of the quality of your writing and the quality of the other publication you write for).

    This brings to mind what is being discussed in the 350+ comment section of the Filling the Gaps post. And how Thomas commented (#94 on that thread) that the commentariat here can be cruel and burn people out and drive people away. How does being that hateful solve anything?

  10. Rebecca – like your passion. You are correct – no reproductive rights translates into a very scary world.

    I am old – I remember. One of my concerns is the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act which can be overturned by a majority in Congress.

    A question: is there any support among young feminists for the Equal Rights Amendment? Or is that just so last century?

    Sunshine Spike: who peed in your Cheerios? If you are looking to promote cohesion, why don’t you post a thoughtful, incisive, analytical piece on your pet peeve? In my opinion, your comment doesn’t meet any of the preceding criteria. If you are looking to promote divisiveness and ill feelings – good job.

    Jill: A tip of the hat to you for this blog. I really enjoy reading a blog without all those blinking ads telling me to buy, buy, buy. I appreciate a forum where you are courageous enough to express your thoughts. We are all the better for it. And you do it for free – Thank You.

  11. Iris: A question: is there any support among young feminists for the Equal Rights Amendment? Or is that just so last century?

    Twenty-four year old checking in with her support. I assume that makes me a young feminist, though my baby cousins assure me that I’m only and decrepit. 😉

  12. Darn it – I wasn’t going to do this – comment more than once that is.
    Anita: Your crux and my crux are not the same crux – I don’t think you have really defined the crux of this matter.
    Either women are autonomous (within the current system of laws) or they are not is the crux of the matter. Your further argument is both specious and insidious. Specious in that you compare Planned Parenthood’s abortion services with death row. If we took your argument to its logical conclusion, all those against the death penalty would be clamoring to shut down prisons so that no one would die on death row. Insidious in that you attempt to use guilt and shame (child, woman, man killed) to stop people from making their own autonomous decisions.
    Abortion is legal. If you would like to see less or none of it, agitating against contraceptives or those who provide them will not get you there.

  13. My beliefs aren’t effecting anyone else’s life, won’t restrict anyone from doing anything, and won’t force anyone into doing something that they don’t want to do. It would be nice if other people had enough respect for their fellow humans to adhere to the same principle.

    This jumped out at me too (though for, I think, different reasons than those who replied before me).

    When you are advocating government action you are impacting someone else’s life, you are restricting what they can do, and you are forcing some of them to do things that they don’t want to. That’s not always a bad thing, but I do think that it is something that should be acknowledged.

    In this article you (rightly, I think) advocate against defunding Planned Parenthood, but if PP is government funded then you are forcing some percentage of the American tax base to fund an organization they find morally odious. In the case of Planned Parenthood you are forcing those people to do good against their will and that’s ok (I’d rather they do good because they want to, but doing good because one has to is a fine second). But when people advocate, for example, against defunding the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen, and who knows where else, they are also forcing taxpayers to support organizations and activities they find morally odious. And in those cases, I think, those people are forcing others to do evil against their will and that’s not ok.

    Anytime the government acts (at least in a large enough country) it will be forcing some people to act in ways they don’t want to and preventing some people from acting in ways that they do want to. Again, this is not always a bad thing (I think there are lots of things it’s good to make people do, and supporting Planed Parenthood is one of those things), but it is a thing and I do think it is important to acknowledge that there is no such thing as government action that isn’t coercive.

  14. Emeryn:
    You are right – let me clarify – by young I mean all those who consider themselves young. Yay ERA

    Mounia A.:
    That’s great. Maybe we’ll see it pass in my lifetime.

Comments are currently closed.